Comments by "John Adam" (@johnadam2885) on "Anders Puck Nielsen"
channel.
-
113
-
27
-
22
-
16
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@jesan733 You are indulging in a vague plea that America does not incite wars. But somehow you are always embroiled in all wars on the planet - Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Ukraine/Russia.
Then you argue America has no financial and social problems arising from sponsoring conflicts the world over. Alright then, carry on !
'People conflate budget deficit and printing dollars. It's not the same thing, and the problems are vastly overblown. '
You forced the Saudis and others to sell oil only in dollars; and when the Iraqis and Libyans tried to sell in Euros, like Saddam and Gaddafi, you invaded and did regime change. Why ? You should have let them sell oil in whatever currency they wanted.
As a result of the wars you engaged in, the rest of the world wants alternatives to the dollar. Russia and China are leading this effort. We see trade emerging slowly in national currencies, the Chinese and Saudis are selling off US treasuries and buying gold. As more and more countries settle bills without using dollars, you will weaken. You are putting on a brave face. But you will see the US will lash out and engage in more reckless wars to preserve the dollar.
The lasting and most impactful blow that Russia has delivered the US is de-dollarisation. It has kicked off the movement, and others have joined the bandwagon. Considering the fact that the US went to war to stop Saddam and Gaddafi selling oil in other currencies, it is sure the US is very concerned - but it cannot go to war against big boys like Russia and China who have the capacity to incinerate US cities. If it were not for that, you would have done what you did to Iraq and Libya.
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Amusing to hear this joker Nielsen asking 'Why did experts fail to predict Russia's invasion of Ukraine?'. He claims he got it right.
The reason is western experts did not heed Putin's warning on NATO expansion, and thought that Putin was bluffing. In any case, the west was supreme, Ukraine with NATO weapons and training would defeat Russia, sanctions would make the rouble rubble, the whole world would rally round the west, and there will be an uprising in Moscow.
The surprising thing is why Nielsen is posing such a question now. His previous videos were euphoric on how Ukrainians had nailed Russia in Kursk.
To raise such a question now is an admission the war is lost for the west, and the soul searching and blame game have started. The EU will say the US abandoned Ukraine; Trump will say it is Europe's problem and the war was due to Biden; the British will say the US and EU did not have the Churchillian resolve of the British. They hate to accept the reality : Russia is more powerful than the collective west, and NATO is a paper tiger.
Now Nielsen knows the west has lost. Russia is going to finish off Donbass and move forward to the Dnieper, and then it will chase out the Ukrainians from Kursk. The US will not give the irresponsible British permission to strike Russia with missiles, as Russia has promised it will attack Britain and the US does not want to fight a nuclear war to save anyone else.
Instead of asking ''Why did experts fail to predict Russia's invasion of Ukraine?', the question is why did your experts not listen to Russia and accept that NATO expansion was a threat to Russia, and Russia would take action ?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Anders is a joker. He says that Ukraine is doing very well in Kursk. But is it relevant ? Ukraine cannot advance in Kursk, it is pinned down, its rear in Sumy is attacked, and its soldiers and equipment in Kursk are being hunted down.
Anders goes out of his way to say the situation in Prokvorsk is not critical and the Russians have not won the war even if they take it ! All options covered.
The numskull is trying to hold back a fart and put on a brave face ! He says it is going to take a long time to take Provorsk (like Bakhmut). No, that is not correct. Ukraine has just 5 brigades in Provorsk. Provorsk is a key logistical transport hub on which supply lines for the Ukrainians depend all along the eastern front. When that falls, the effect is big.
Then he says even if Provorsk falls, so what, there will be a new front line ! That front line may not have time to form. There are no massive fortifications built further west.
Another of his feeble lines is 'Look it took Russia 6 months to advance 10 km, so it will take years for Russia to take a city'. It does not work like that. Initially, the defending side has the manpower and equipment, and the attacking side's penetration will be slow. But when the defending side's manpower and equipment is reduced to a low level, the resistance will crumble at one point - and the floodgates open. Novohrodvika was taken in 3 days intact and that was a key supply centre. Several other small towns were taken intact because there was little resistance. When some Ukrainian military officials say the Donbass frontline is crumbling, why is Anders so eager to lie on behalf of Ukrainians ?
Ukraine's last days will be like Nazi Germany's against the Red Army. There were many Nazi supporters who believed Germany could turn the tide, it had miracle weapons etc.
2
-
Note that Russia is not asking for peace talks. The instigator of the conflict, the US, wants to be the peacemaker now ! The US instigated the coup in Ukraine in 2014 which brought Nazi style Ukrainian nationalists to power, who sought NATO entry. The project failed, and the US wants to leave.
Whether there is peace or not after the peace talks is irrelevant. The fact is the US wants to give up on Ukraine. Peace talks will be on Russian terms. Ukraine has to be neutral, there will be no NATO bases in Ukraine AND Ukraine has to surrender Donbass. No European forces will be allowed in Ukraine as peacekeepers. Those are the entry terms for Russia.
If the US does not agree, Russia will continue and take by force the remaining part of Donbass, and advance to the Dnieper, and also go for Odessa. No one can stop it.
Time is on Russia's side. US support is going, the Europeans cannot step in and if they continue their suicidal polices, the current European leaders are going to swept away by 'nationalist' or Nazi governments that do not want to support the war. Russia just killed a Danish F16 instructor. No western govt. will be able to send forces to Ukraine as the Russians will kill them and there will be uproar in the western public.
Peace talks taking several years suits Russia. Russia is adept at the long chess game. Due to Trump, NATO weakens, tariffs mean the trans Atlantic alliance is over, and neo Nazi governments want Dexit and Frexit, so end of the EU. The west is falling apart.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2