Comments by "John Adam" (@johnadam2885) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. Russia's plan is not to take Kharkhov, it is only to create a security belt beyond the border, to prevent attacks on Belgorod..
    2
  2. Frustration that Ukraine is losing.
    2
  3.  @HR_8035_YEA  Russia has a govt. that defends its security. Ukraine has an implanted govt. that fights a proxy war for US interest. How dumb can one be ? Numskull !
    2
  4.  @Tuck213  Nobody invaded Russia. You can threaten Russia without invasion. Russia has eliminated that threat.
    2
  5.  @dankengine5304  'Ukraine was neutral until Russia decided the EU was somehow a crime. ' Don't make up stories. Russia had said it will not allow Ukraine to join NATO as that will bring US naval bases which will shut Russia off from the Black Sea. In the early stages of the war, Putin had said Russia had no objection to Ukraine joining the EU as it is an economic alliance (that might have changed now as the EU has functioned like it is NATO). Ukraine and Europeans are talking about negotiations as they have lost the war, but they want NATO peacekeepers. Trump says 'use European peacekeepers'. Neither is acceptable to Russia. In fact, Russia does not want negotiations. Russia did not seek land, it sought Ukraine to be neutral in terms of NATO (and not the EU). Don't lie. Now the situation for Ukraine is it cannot join NATO AND it has to cede land. After spurning neutrality and trying to get US to set up naval bases in Ukraine to threaten Russia, and after being defeated, it has to cede land. Such punishment and resettling of borders has occurred in the past to Germany and others. If Ukraine had remained neutral, it would have had all including Crimea. Ukraine walked away from a negotiated agreement in 2021 at the behest of BoJo. It attempted a counter offensive in 2023 with NATO tutelage, which failed. In 2024 Russia is taking more. If Ukraine does not accept the current terms, the Russians will take back areas that were historically Russian like Odessa and Kiev. Ukraine will be made landlocked. Land was not what Russia was seeking. But Ukraine's folly and US mischief means it loses land. Get it ?
    2
  6. And Russia will win the long game as you do not have the capacity for the long game. That is clear from the failure of the sanctions and shortage of weapons. As Putin said we are not going to go for negotiations just because you ran out of weapons.
    2
  7.  @nigelgarrett7970  'yours are coping hard...' I am panicking so much I am having difficulty typing. You have difficulty writing English. Not educated enough perhaps ?
    2
  8.  @eliotness4029  Ukraine and Baltics etc. became independent, because Russia showed goodwill. However, if these countries gang up against Russia, and allow the US to threaten Russia, Russia will end their independence. Lithuania tried to misbehave with Russia by blockading Kaliningrad. It was being provocative. A Russian deputy then said that Lithuania's independence needs to be reconsidered. Only then Lithuania climbed down. If these countries have suicidal tendencies, they should accept the consequences : the bear will devour them.
    2
  9. Anders claims that Russia is after geopolitical influence, but does not mention that the US is also after that. NATO expansion was that only. He seems to have the arrogant western conceit that the US sought geopolitical influence in Ukraine to make them a prosperous western nation ! It is typical western conceit. The oligarchs of Ukraine, mostly Jews like Kolomovsky, Zelensky, Zaluzhny, were sucking out Ukraine's wealth with their Jewish brethren embedded in the US. The Russian oligarchs, also Jews were doing the same in Russia till Putin came and stopped it. The US was not interested in making Ukraine prosperous. Let us say Anders is correct that Russia is not after land, but geopolitical influence. How is this new understanding that Anders discloses going to change the outcome, which is defeat for the west ?
    2
  10. There is no risk of a NATO-Russia war. Without the US, NATO is empty. No US President will fight Russia directly - the US knows it will lead to US cities to be incinerated. Russia has the nuclear weapons and superb and proved delivery systems that can arrive at hypersonic speeds. Long ago, Kissinger had said the US will not fight a nuclear war with the Soviet Union to save Germany and Europe. That has not changed. Anders knows the war is lost for the west, he blames it on Trump, and he fearmongers that Trump's line will lead to NATO-Russia war. He hopes with this fear mongering, Trump will change his mind and somehow continue to support Ukraine. When the US will not fight Russia, NATO will not fight Russia despite tall talk by useless people like Rutte, Kajas, Poles, Swedes, Finns etc. With this video, Anders is accepting the inevitable : Russia has prevailed.
    2
  11. Instead of moralising, why don't western countries send troops to Ukraine ? 'I think Western countries have a moral obligation to help Ukraine defend itself. This is a very clear-cut case of one country invading another country.' Did you feel the same moral obligation when the US and UK invaded Iraq, you hyprocritical swine ? Do you feel the same for Palestinians ?
    2
  12. The sort of nonsense Nielsen spouts is of the same variety as Russia shelled the nuclear installaton it owns in Zaphorizia, or that it used a missile to destroy a POW camp housing Azov Nazis. Were those also because they are losing the war and their mental equilibrium is affected ? Nielsen's starting point is his assumption that Russia is losing the war and Ukraine and the west is winning. This is self consoling western propaganda. The fact is Russia has taken 20% of Ukraine, it is strangling Ukraine's economy, it has cut off Ukrainian exports from the Black Sea. Russia is even strangling the western economy, successfully. It is de-industrialising Europe. The strong cards are in Russia's hands. Ukraine has made some advances here and there, but it is not sufficient to roll back Russia. Russia holds the nuclear sword and can use it. If 'crazy Russia' self sabotaged the Nordstream pipeline, then they can go and do the same to the Baltic pipeline, and use the nuclear weapon in Ukraine. Can Nielsen tell us what the west can do if 'crazy Russia' does these two things ? Put more sanctions ? Go to the UN ? Shout about war crimes ? The west feels defeated as Putin has punctured its 'international order', The west does not have the military power or the courage to fight Russia directly, and does not have the economic power it imagined it had. All such analyses based on pyschological conditions of the opponent are indicators of the wishful thinking of the defeated. We heard similar psycho analysis of Putin's state of mind in the first month, the western media said he had a hand tremor, he had cancer, and he did not sit with others as he was distrustful. Yet, the ex tempore speech that Putin gave recently on re-taking the four provinces was brilliant. No western leader can speak with the same knowledge of history and geopolitical understanding as Putin.
    2
  13. The US has no leverage over Russia. Russia has all the cards. It suits them fine if peace talks are dragged out. Unless Ukraine agrees to neutrality and cedes the lost land, there will be no ceasefire.
    2
  14. ​ @joachimfrank4134  The core to the problem is not land, it is neutrality, that is what caused the war. Ukraine was given independence on the understanding it would return the nukes to Russia and it would be neutral. Ukraine reneged on the second, it was incited by the US to fight Russia to join NATO. However, it is defeated and its chief inciter wants to withdraw. The victor sets the terms. Ukraine has to agree to neutrality if whatever remains wants to be independent. Otherwise there are no negotiations, and the war continues and Russia has to settle it by force.
    2
  15. He panders to wishful western thinking : he offers you hope that Russia will be somehow defeated.
    2
  16.  @Ikkeligeglad  He predicted Russian economy will go bust due to sanctions, he predicted Ukraine will recapture Crimea, he thinks Ukraine can keep Kursk. Anders is a first class joker. He is not predicting, he is fostering delusions because he has a preconceived notion that Ukraine is right and angelic.
    2
  17. Nielsen wants to say the Russian pace in summer would be like advancing on foot. They are getting ready to take Chasov Yar. Nielsen is desperately trying to put on a brave face for a lost cause.
    2
  18. The west is defeated, every now and then they make some statement of intent to salvage their pride, there is euphoria for some time, but they find Russia is stronger than the combined west. A paper tiger can fight a real bear only in rhetoric !
    2
  19. Whether Russia is out for land or for political control, neither Ukraine nor west can stop it. You tried to stop it, but you lost the war.
    1
  20.  @petunized  Anders arguments are feeble, they are born out of sense of defeat. Indeed the west has no negotiating power. Some of them think that Trump will offer Russia the land that Russia has taken, in exchange for Ukraine being in NATO after 20 years. They hope if Russia turns this offer down (which it will), then Trump will throw his weight behind Ukraine and give limitless support.
    1
  21.  @W3c16B  Russian troll - is that the best you could do after defeat ?
    1
  22.  @AkselGAL  'We have more modern MBTs, better trained soldiers, can churn out drones to bloat the sky. Russia has an advantage only with nukes and this cannot be used.' So why has Russia defeated you and Trump is ready to chuck in the towel, and asks Ukraine to give up land, denies it NATO entry, and why can't you provide peacekeepers ?
    1
  23.  @mindbodyinstitute2652  'Plus Europe can take advantage of worldwide manpower and brainpower like US can. Russia is limited due to funding issues.' So why has Russia defeated Europe and the US ? The US wants to abandon Ukraine, Ukraine has been told to cede land, and that it cannot join NATO ? The existence of NATO is in doubt.
    1
  24.  @Cloud-dq1mr  Russia has defeated the collective west because it has a superior arsenal. You cannot even make 150 mm shells. Besides, Russia has hardy courageous soldiers. Yours are cowardly.
    1
  25.  @halilkunge9295  'Russia's "incredible arsenal" is being dismantled in Ukraine.' If so, why is the US asking Ukraine to cede land and accept it cannot be in NATO ?
    1
  26.  @Ko90567  If it was not for Russia's incredible arsenal, NATO would have sent troops to Ukraine. But it knows that the Russians will kill them on a scale it has never faced. Get it, numskull ?
    1
  27.  @mindbodyinstitute2652  'If NATO had to win and committed to doing so Russia stands zero chance'. You are giving theoretical estimates of NATO strengths and claiming superiority over Russia in every which way : population, economic size, technology, combined military assets. However, one has to go by battlefield performance. The fact is Russia has destroyed all vaunted western weapons : HIMARS, Leopards, Challengers, Abrams, Storm Shadows, Patriots. The west does not have 155 mm shells. Russia blunted the NATO led Ukrainian 2023 counter offensive, and has attacked and taken most of Donbass. The Russian soldier is hardy and determined, and they are patriotic. The fact is the US now wants a ceasefire and negotiations. Why not continue if you have superior arms and economy ? The US has said Ukraine must accept it cannot regain 2014 borders let alone 1991; Ukraine cannot be in NATO and the US will not supply peace keeping troops. Europe is in a bind on the peace keeping formula. Russia will not agree to EU troops. Russia has therefore won. NATO (despite its strength on paper) is incapable of winning a war. We saw that in Afghanistan. Against Russia, it has no chance - as the outcome in Ukraine proves.
    1
  28.  @yeetman4953  Putin asked those who thought they could defeat Russia to come to the battlefield and show it. No one in the EU had the guts to take up the challenge. Macron talked a lot about sending his Foreign Legion, but some got killed when he sent an experimental set. Now he has disappeared. The Swedes sent some cyber warfare experts, but they were killed in Poltava with a Kinzhal. They have gone quiet. Britain wanted to send Storm Shadows to strike Russia, but Russia said it would strike Britain or British assets, so Biden did not give permission. The collective west of EU + UK + US is defeated as they cannot change the outcome in Ukraine. Get it ? As for NATO, the world saw what cowards they were when they ran away from Kabul.
    1
  29. Did Russia disclose their plan to this joker Anders ?
    1
  30.  @markmonaghan2309  Then why is Zelensky in a panic and pointing fingers at the west for letting down Ukraine ? You say the new front is closer and easier for Ukraine to resupply - what can Ukraine resupply ? There are videos of Ukrainian soldiers saying they can fire 10 shells a day, and the opponent fires non-stop. See today's video : 'Zelenskyy lashes out at West as Russia bombards Kharkiv | DW News' Defeat is written on the wall, you are in denial. Like the Nazis as the Red Army approached Berlin. It was easier to supply soldiers around Berlin than Stalingrad. Get it ?
    1
  31.  @seancidy6008  Of course, Russia will do what it has to. But I am intrigued by the false pride and delusions of westerners. They have a sense of entitlement
    1
  32.  @BTinSF  NATO countries will have to back down as Russia has run it out of weapons and NATO is not prepared to be killed. Ukraine should never have been pushed to fight Russia. And Ukrainians should not have been dumb enough to accept western backing as fighting a war with external support depends on goodwill and capability of the donor.
    1
  33.  @BTinSF  Ukraine had the choice to stay neutral and not join any military alliance as per its 1992 declaration of independence. But the US incited a coup in 2014 where the elected govt. was overthrown and a US supporting govt, was put in place. Among the mobs during the coup were Ukro Nazi groups like Right Sector and Azov Batallion. US schemers like the Jew Victoria Nuland and John MaCain were in the crowds distributing sweets after the coup. What were they doing there ? It was the Ukrainian choice to embrace anti-Russianism to gain US favour. So they have no else to blame. Even after 2 months of the war, there were peace negotiations in Turkey in which an agreement was initialed. But Boris Johnson came and talked them out of it, and told them they could win if they continued fighting. The Ukrainians went with that, it was their choice to believe they could win, giving no option for Russia than to dismember Ukraine. To survive, they need 100 Patriot batteries which no one can supply. To roll back Russia from what they have taken is impossible as the the 2023 offensive showed. They do not have the manpower. So the goose is cooked for Ukraine. Due to their own folly in thinking that they can use the west to threaten Russia. Get it ?
    1
  34.  @wwlb4970  Ukraine does not have to invade Russia, it posed a threat to Russia by seeking to invite the US to put missile and naval bases to threaten Russia.
    1
  35.  @wwlb4970  Ukraine was part of Russia. Russians and Ukrainians did not have a very differentiated identity, they were intermarried and Ukranians were leaders of the Soviet Union, like Krushchev, Brezhnev, Chernenko. When given independence, the Ukrainians could not manage, they descended into neo Nazi Russophobic nationalism, encouraged by the US. Once the US infiltrates, that country is destroyed. It is characteristic of Anglo Saxons to seize on differences and instigate conflicts everywhere. War for profit is their culture. They have done that to break up the Ottoman empire (pit Arabs against Turks), in India pit various communities against each other to partition it, just to name a few. They have done the same in Ukraine. Except Russia is a superpower, it will fight and smash anyone that threatens it. That is the bottom line. Get it ? Ukraine is not in a position to fight Russia, with or without western support. The Ukraine of 1992 is not coming back, just get over it, don't waste your money on lost causes. The west is declining, it has enough problems, de-industrialisation, dying populations due to low fertility, anxiety about immigration, the western financial grip on the world is slipping as Russia and China drive de-dollarisation. I would not waste my time fighting lost causes. A new world order had emerged due to Russia and China, and the rest of the world will go with it. The west can fit into that or it fizzle out.
    1
  36. Those 30 countries cannot make weapons and cannot fight as they are afraid to die.
    1
  37. 'Helping Ukraine win this war would be a strategic success for all of Europe' Ukraine has lost the war, the US and Russia will meet to decide Ukraine's future. Like Soviet Union and US decided Europe's boundaries after WW 2. So what are you talking about ? Poland was a gift of Stalin. Had it been for Germany, there would be no Poland. Had you waited for the British, you would still be waiting. What you have today is due to the Soviet Union, you ungrateful wretch.
    1
  38. What is your enthusiasm for Ukraine based on ? The Ukro Nazis took advantage of the Nazi invasion and some collaborated and massacred the Poles. Such Ukrainians were also appointed as concentration camp guards. Whereas the Red Army liberated Auschwitz and Poland. The Poland you have today is a gift of Stalin. If it was left to Germany, there would be no Poland. Considering the above, I say Poles like you are a shameless and ungrateful wretch. Be careful with your provocations against Russia. If you go to far, you too will get Ukrained. We know you cannot fight and nobody will come to your aid.
    1
  39. And still NATO had to but 155 mm shells from Pakistan, where factories are working 24 h to fulfil NATO's orders.
    1
  40.  @DaveP-uv1ml  'the US bought those shells NATO didn’t buy anything.' The Czech PM on behalf of NATO and EU undertook to procure 155 mm artillery shells. The requirement was well beyond the capacity of US + EU. The British govt. was buying shells from Pakistan. Pakistani factories are working round the clock to supply shells - and still it is not enough. The US does not have enough Patriots and interceptor missiles. All in all, you do not have the arsenal to fight Russia. That is why you are asking for ceasefire and negotiations. As Sir Putin told Tucker Carlson, 'we are not going to negotiate just because you have run out of weapons'. These are the reasons for your defeat. Learn from it : no one can fight Russia and win.
    1
  41.  @AsgeirrSpjuth  'ukraine has already defeated russia.' Then why is Trump asking for a ceasefire and negotiations, you numskull ? Why is Ukraine asking for a security guarantee ?
    1
  42.  @zi0  She did not feel the same about those wars Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and Lebanon, and the illegal bombings of a "Sovereign" country. She imagines she has shared values with Ukrainians because they are white.
    1
  43. It seems to be a vain attempt to keep up the morale of Ukraine's handlers. The reality is there is no Kherson offensive and Russia is after Nikolaev.
    1
  44. 'I sure wish We had been a lot more "proactive" when it came to arming Ukraine from the start!' You should have negotiated on Russia's security concern instead of arming Ukraine and losing. Numskull !
    1
  45.  @intractablemaskvpmGy  If you don't care what Russia wants, then cope with the war, and the refugees and the defeat Russia is inflicting on NATO. NATO has been exposed as a paper tiger that does not have the courage to send troops and fight.
    1
  46.  @Princip666  Can you read up about the Azov Batallion and Right Sector, two Ukro Nazis groups in govt. and the army, which took part in the coup of 2014 ? Andrei Biletsky, the founder of Azov, said he wanted to save the white race from Jews and untermenschen. The US branded the Azov Batallion as terrorist, but in 2023, it shamelessly lifted the ban to allow arms to be supplied to the Azov Batallion. The Russians hammered the Azov Batallion in Mariopol, killed many and took them prisoner. They are identifiable by their Nazi tattoos. During the WW 2, Ukro Nazis were active in western Ukraine supporting the German Nazis. Their leader was Stefan Bandera. There was a SS division of Ukrainians. The Germans often chose Ukrainians to be concentration camp guards in Poland. After defeat of Nazi Germany, Bandera escaped to West Germany and was given asylum in Munich. The US shamelessly recruited this Nazi Bandera to work against the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union eliminated Bandera in 1958. After the US sponsored coup in Ukraine in 2014, roads have been named after Bandera in Ukraine, and statues have been erected of this wannabe Ukrainian Hitler. There is nothing imaginary, it shows you are ready to support Nazis to gain advantage against Russia. Shameless scum.
    1
  47. "So we are supposed to give up our national territory, vow never to join NATO no matter what russia does to us, AND also give Donald Trump our rare Earth metals?" Yes, because you are defeated. You don't have to vow never to join NATO because you will not get unanimous support - the US will not agree, let alone Hungary, Slovakia, Turkey. You have to give Donald Trump our rare Earth metals to pay for the money the US expended.
    1
  48.  @AG-mz7vm  So you think Ukraine is in a glorious position. Even dumb Anders is changing his tune.
    1
  49. Canada will be Ukrained if you don't shut up. And Europe will be as useless as it was with Ukraine.
    1
  50.  @maritaschweizer1117  Putin's main goal was no US missile and naval bases in Ukraine. That is achieved. US knows it will have to fight a nuclear war for bases in Ukraine, it is not going to do that. The US is getting ready to drop Ukraine = Putin has won. Get it ?
    1