Comments by "John Adam" (@johnadam2885) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @MrBahjatt  'Nielsen is an idealist.....' I do not think so, he has a typical western colonial mindset which believes in innate superiority, the belief that the west sets the rules for others, but can flout any rules when needed. Nielsen is a neocon, the same as Boris Johnson, Blinken, Biden etc... 'He doesn't think NATO expansion should be seen as a threat to Russia.' Whether it is a threat or not is decided by Russian perceptions. He should know that Russia has been the victim of countless invasions, the last one being from Nazi Germany. Soviet casualties were 20 million. Hence, the Russians are paranoid (with good reason) about being attacked. It was highly insensitive of the US to push NATO expansion. Russia does not fear any of the Europeans. They know the Germans, British and the French are yesterday's powers. The British talk big and act Churchillian because of US cover. But the US is the threat. The Russians know NATO is just a cover for the US. The US plan was to have naval and missile bases in Ukraine to shut off Russia from the Black Sea. There is Rand Corp. report which the CIA commissioned on how to contain Russia, and it actively describes methods to stir up anti-Russian sentiments in surrounding countries. 'He doesn't know that it is a threat and may not know the Manroe doctrine.' If he does not know what is Monroe Doctrine, he should not make videos. He knows everything.
    1
  2.  @SVSky  You have view that is self absolving. It was the US that pushed NATO expansion. Merkel and Sarkozy warned against inducting Ukraine, fearing to would lead to war - but Bush twisted their hand. It was the US that financed the 2014 coup in Ukraine that brought neo Nazi, anti Russian nationalists into power. From that day on war was inevitable. You have not bailed out anyone, you created the Ukrainian problem with the 2014 coup - and you are going to walk away. This is after saying you will support Ukraine for however long it takes, after refusing to reply to Putin's request to guarantee Russia's security, and after scuttling the peace agreement reached by Ukraine and Russia in Turkey. The US incited the war, you dragged Europe into it, you blocked the peace agreement in Turkey, and now that you are defeated, you say Ukraine is Europe's problem, we are sick and tired of your wars! Shameless fellow. Europe and Ukraine are at fault no doubt - for consenting to be US vassals. They deserve what they are getting. But don't put on airs of innocence. Get it, scumbag ?
    1
  3. The British below are fondly quoting Churchill as if he was a great savant. Churchill went to see Stalin and prostrated himself to get Soviet support. If Churchill had been around, he would have behaved just like BoJo, Sunak, Starmer. He would have talked big about the need to fight Russia, but would have expected America to do it for him. As it is, America created the crisis in Ukraine by staging the coup in 2014, and now it wants to exit after seeing the mire. But the British want to be more American than the Americans, thinking it is a great Churchillian moment for them to shine and save the free world ! Boris Johnson stated recently that Russia must be defeated as otherwise it ends western hegemony (his exact words). No doubt that is the thinking of the collective west. But the collective west has been defeated in Ukraine, as the US is looking to exit, and EU + UK cannot save Ukraine. Western hegemony is ended for good. There is a new world order, the west can join it. Churchill was the epitome of western hegemony but it is not sustainable.
    1
  4. You will not be able to match Russia in 30 years.
    1
  5. Why don't fools like Nielsen accept Ukraine and the collective west are defeated ? This was evident after the failed Ukrainian counter offensive. The Russians should keep quiet, drive out the Ukrainians from Kursk and advance on Donbass. Nielsen ends with the usual wishful thinking of the defeated. Withholding US weapons to Ukraine will not have effect on Ukraine ? The Europeans can step up ? Really ?
    1
  6. An American should not be discussing ICC and war crimes. The US is not part of ICC, it committed many war crimes in Iraq, Afghanistan, My Lai, and it endorses Israeli war crimes, so just shut up.
    1
  7.  @mobies341  Thank you for correcting that he is Austrian. Why does he speak like an American ? Will Anders have the guts to discuss Israeli war crimes ? I don't think so. Hitler came from his country, so he cannot open his mouth against Israel.
    1
  8. Being anti-Russian does not make one an expert on Russia. If he is an expert, he should have been working to bring peace, instead of inciting Ukraine to a war which it cannot win. He is peddling wishful thinking about Ukraine defeating Russia. Denmark is also another chichua dog that barks a lot.
    1
  9. Russia has defeated the collective west, and Canada is irrelevant. You should shut up, if you provoke Russia, it will agree to US taking over Canada.
    1
  10.  @IusedtohaveausernameIliked  Canada is an irrelevant country, you are in no position to fight Russia, just shut up. America is after you, deal with that before Russia.
    1
  11.  @williamzk9083  So Ukraine is winning if it were not for Trump ? I understand the Ukro Nazis are losing towns in Donbass, and when Pokrovsk falls, there will be a domino effect.
    1
  12.  @AlexKarasev  'The Germans and the Poles are pretty good in that regard also, to be fair, but that's about it' I don't think present day Germans can fight. The Red Army gave them such a thrashing that the German temperament has changed, and they have become a peaceful nation ! Mind you, neo Nazis are awakening in Germany, but fighting Russia does not appeal to them anymore. I don't know why you think the Poles can fight. In the WW 2, they were over run by the Germans, till the Red Army came and liberated Auschwitz. The Poles are barking chichuas. They are rabid xenophobes, with an inferiority complex. They badmouth the Russians, and Germans also (while demanding money from Germany). But I don't think they can fight. When Russia moved some of those Wagner musicians near to the Polish border, the Poles had a shaking fit. The British and Anglo Saxons are Russophobes. They do not have fighting ability, but they have great manipulative skills, and are masters at using proxies. The British ruled India by pitting one group against another, telling the Hindus and Muslims there they were different; they broke the Ottoman empire by inciting the Arabs against the Turks, when they had a lot in common as Muslims; now they and the Americans have pitted the Ukrainians against the Russians, telling the Ukrainians they are Europeans and they have nothing in common with Russians. The Anglo Saxons want to break up Russia like they broke the Ottoman empire, this time using the Ukrainians. Make no mistake of their intentions. The fighting ability of the British in the past has been based on using Indian soldiers (Sikhs, Muslims, Gurkhas etc.) to fight their wars. They cannot do that anymore, so now they try to use the Americans to fight for them. Starmer went to see Biden to incite him to give Ukrainians the licence to fire their missiles into Russia. But the Americans refused as they are like the Brits, they don't want to die. If you look at the American army, it is full of Hispanics who were given citizenship in exchange for being a fighting force for the US. The only one left in NATO who can fight that you missed out are the Turks ! They have the largest army in NATO, and they too are brave fighters. However, the Turks will never fight for the Anglos because they know how the British are. In summary, NATO is a paper tiger, an expensive and cumbersome bureaucracy, run and controlled by the Americans, but the minor vassal states like Norway, Baltics etc. are given the post of Secretary General etc. They praise themselves as the richest and most powerful alliance, but none apart from the Turks can fight, and the Turks won't fight for any NATO cause ! The Ukrainians can fight, NATO would love to have them, but Russia has stopped that.
    1
  13.  @sammiller6631  In a man to man fight, the westerners are cowards. If they have few casualties, they back down. See how NATO ran away from Kabul, with Americans scrambling to get on flights without telling other NATO 'allies'. The rest of NATO also scooted after that. If you had the courage, you should have committed troops from the beginning to Ukraine to fight Russia. But you know the Russians will kill you in the same way as the Ukrainians, and you wanted to save your skin. Those who are afraid to die cannot win wars. Get it ? Stalin said one has to be very brave to be a coward in the Red Army. He sent his sons to the join the Red Army after the Germans invaded and when one of them was captured by the Germans, he refused to negotiate.
    1
  14. So what if there is an alliance between Russia, China, and Iran? Why does it bother you ? You have your alliance that troubles the world and is seen as an axis of evil by others.
    1
  15. Even Russia is advocate of freedom and democracy in Ukraine. But you should have stayed neutral, then Ukraine of 1991 would exist. You became unfree when you sold yourself to the US. The US and its Jews like Victoria Nuland used you to fight a proxy war, and after finding you cannot win, the US will negotiate with Russia and without Ukraine. You will be left with a diminished Ukraine with no NATO membership. So what did you fight for ? Anders was backing your fight, but when that is lost, Anders will disappear and you will be left with a broken Ukraine.
    1
  16. Trump realises the best way to end the war is for US to negotiate with Russia, and ignore the EU and Ukraine. The EU is irrelevant and Ukraine was only a proxy, they will give up when the arms supply is cut.
    1
  17. Russia has redefined its nuclear strike policy, so that there is no strategic ambiguity. Those who launch missiles inside Russia and those who provide weapons to a proxy to do the same will be struck. Is that a provocation ? Hearing the new notice, Biden did not give permission to his vassal to use Storm Shadows. That was the only sensible course. If Starmer wanted to go ahead on his own, Britain would be left hanging on its own when Russia struck British assets as promised by Putin. NATO is not responding to Russia's 'provocations' only because it knows Russia means business that it will strike NATO assets ! There is no mystery Nielsen. NATO fears Russia's mailed fist.
    1
  18. The change in view of the US came about after Russia defeated the collective west and the US realised spending more money could not reverse the defeat. Hence it did the obvious - bale out, and ask the Europeans to take over.
    1
  19.  @humanieryt  Childish reply. You cannot refute anything I wrote.
    1
  20.  @gamer228r  I am an American living in Afghanistan.
    1
  21.  mksln  Your buddy Zelensky will be migrating to Israel to serve in the IDF with his benefactor Kolomovsky. He knows the war in Ukraine is lost.
    1
  22.  @thomasdracup8403  Hitler was a defeatist also. He had to commit suicide as the Red Army approached. Zelensky will commit suicide or will be airlifted to Israel where he can engage in another war.
    1
  23.  @Anekantavad  'Geopolitically, the Russians have already "lost this one".' How ? Just because you stated so. Russia's achievements go beyond Ukraine, it has neutralised NATO, it has created a new world order, started de-dollarisation and ended western hegemony. Get it ? 'Putin almost certainly regrets ever having ordered his army into Ukraine.' Ukraine regrets fighting a proxy war for the US as it now realises it will be ditched. That is why people are avoiding conscription. Get it ? Numskull.
    1
  24.  @michu6777  That is an effort to claim diminished responsibility. Why was not NATO disbanded when Warsaw Pact was dissolved ? NATO expansion has brought war, caused the demolition of Ukraine, and wrecked European economies, and brought insecurity to Europe. Yet, you tell us we need more NATO to defend us. Numskull !
    1
  25.  @borisgurevich5504  Oh right, you think Ukraine is winning because Zelensky announced a Victory Plan.
    1
  26.  @trytwicelikemice3190  The problem is the Baltics and Poland have become belligerent, and they are living dangerously because they think they have US support. Ukraine also thought the same, and tried to misbehave with Russia, and it got beaten into a pulp. Look at Lithuania. In 2022, it tried to show off by organising a blockade of Russian trains to Kaliningrad, piously stating it was enforcing EU sanctions. Lithuania's independence was based on giving Russian trains to Kaliningrad a land corridor. Two weeks later a Russian politician said it was time to reconsider Lithuania's independence. The media reported Russia can seize the Suwalki corridor and cut off the Baltics. Within a few days, Lithuania climbed down and abandoned the blockade. If it had not, Russia would have seized the Baltics regardless of Article 5 - and the Lithuanians would have found the US would not come to fight for it, and the rest of the Europeans are useless. As for Poland, it acts like America's attack dog. Putin reminded that Poland was a gift of Stalin. If it had been left to Germany, there would be no Poland. The Poles were unable to free themselves from the Germans. If they had waited for the British, they would have been waiting a long time. It was the Red Army that got to Auschwitz and freed the Poles. Stalin could have incorporated Poland into the Soviet Union, but he did not. Stalin gave one of the Red Army's greatest generals, Konstantin Rokossovsky, a Polish officer who became a Marshall of the Soviet Union, to become Poland's defence minister. I would advise the Poles not to be ingrates. So don't put on self-righteous airs about the Baltics, Poland, EU and NATO. You want to bait the bear, then don't cry when the bear mauls you.
    1
  27.  @HomeFromFarAway  What is the point I missed in the video. The claim Anders makes is that Russia is after geopolitical influence, and it is not so much after land. That may be correct, but that was obvious. He makes out that very few people in the west understand this and he talks like he is a singularly wise man. What he does not say is that the US was also after geopolitical control of Ukraine, so much that it funded a coup in 2014, led by Ukro Nazi groups like Right Sector and Azov Batallion, which overthrew the elected government. The neocon Jewess Victoria Nuland and John McCain were in the crowd celebrating he overthrow. What are US government officials doing in a Ukrainian Nazi led movement ? Why is the US seeking geopolitical control so far from home ? If you watched the video and I missed something, you can correct me. You will not be able to answer the above.
    1
  28.  @dankengine5304  Annexing land was not the primary aim. It happened as a corollary to Ukraine not accepting to go back to neutrality and choosing to fight. If you threaten Russia, and you fight and lose, the borders will be re-arranged. Just like Germany lost its eastern lands like Prussia, and Stalin rearranged Germany and Europe's map, Ukraine will lose its eastern lands and Russia will rearrange its geometry. If Ukraine had accepted to retain its neutrality, it would have all including Crimea. Instead, it chose to bring in the US which was seeking naval bases in Ukraine to cut off Russia. Ukraine fought, it lost, and the US is washing its hands off.
    1
  29.  @dankengine5304  Ukraine of 1991 will not exist. That everyone understands including the Ukrainians. Ukraine will be partitioned, Russian areas will go back to Russia including Kiev and Odessa, and the remainder will be rendered into a wasteland; or Russia will take all of it, if Ukraine does not sign up for neutrality. There will be no NATO bases in Ukraine, a position the west now understands. Get it ?
    1
  30. Has Russia declared a summer offensive ? They are not like the Ukrainians, broadcasting their plans. This joker Nielsen had been telling us in 2023 that Ukraine will capture Crimea in their offensive. Now he is grudgingly admitting the Russians are advancing.
    1
  31. 'I am thoroughly sick of the pathetic, self-limiting approach of the west' The self limitation is because unlike Iraq, the west knows the bear has real WMDs that will incinerate all US and European cities. It is dangerous and naive to think otherwise. Get it ? The west is pathetic because of its false pride which led it to spurn negotiations. Did you feel sick about that ? Or you are only feeling sick because you Russia made you impotent ?
    1
  32.  @Epaminondas371  Just cut out the selective concern for Ukraine, hypocrite. Both Ukraine and Gaza wars were created by western back door operations.
    1
  33. Glorious Ukraine will be part of Russia. Ukraine proved it was not capable of self governance.
    1
  34. Victory for the Ukraine is not possible, and the leaders know it. Biden's strategy for Ukraine is to try to prevent it collapsing before elections. If Biden wins, he will delegate Ukraine management to the Europeans, who are useless. He will focus on his next war against China. If Trump wins, that is curtains for Ukraine, he will not even pretend otherwise, and he may also withdraw from NATO. Hence, don't indulge in wishful thinking, the Ukraine war was lost in 2023. Ukraine cannot retrieve Crimea and the four oblasts, and if it persists, it will lose more.
    1
  35. The talk about Russia's use of tactical nuclear weapons came after the French said they will send troops, and the British said Ukrainians will hit Russia with their missiles. The British and French ambassadors were called and told in no uncertain terms that British and French targets inside and outside their countries will be hit and Russia was ready for a nuclear strike if necessary. If red lines are crossed that require Russia to use its nuclear doctrine, it will use it. Russia does not bluff. Soon enough, Cameron pulled down his tweet about hitting Russia with British missile and the British media stopped talking about hitting the Kerch bridge (now they say it is not used for military supplies !). And the French made amends and sent an envoy to attend Putin's inauguration, along with 7 EU countries ! Russia is winning in Ukraine without nuclear weapons, but it dangles it judiciously when needed on western heads. Russia is always one step ahead, and always resolute. The west is completely at sea. It is burning with rage, but is completely impotent. Russia is mightier than the collective west and the rest of the world can see it. The west needs an off-ramp but there is none.
    1
  36. The US escalated when it expanded NATO after promising Russia NATO would not expand one inch to the east. Get it ? Finally, Russia punched you in the face and you pretend you are innocent. Get it ?
    1
  37.  @dpelpal  On the one hand Russia cannot beat Ukraine. But on the other hand, Russia has plan to take the whole of Europe. Your type has contradictory narratives. The first argument is a cover up as you cannot accept you are defeated. The second is to use fear to mobilise. At no stage will you ask what you are doing to make enemies all around the world. Russia has ended the US controlled world order. Get it ?
    1
  38.  @petermelville5524  Numskull, Russia destroyed an advanced arms factory in Ukraine (built during the Soviet era), with a single Hazel. It came in at 11 Mach according to Ukraine and no Patriot, Thad etc. can stop it. Putin even gave a 1 hour notice to the US because he knew nothing could stop it.
    1
  39. No amount of funding for Ukraine after defeat can reverse defeat. So what are you talking about ? There is no country in Europe including the leading ones (UK, France and Germany) that can fight Russia. You do not have the arsenal, and the manpower with patriotism and courage like the Russians, to fight a war. And you cannot rely on the US. Living with good relations with Russia is the best for Europe.
    1
  40.  @vanCaldenborgh  You are a duplicitous liar. There was no agreement but this is what James Baker said (NATO would not expand one inch to the east). With deliberate NATO expansion, the Americans did not keep their word, they lost goodwill with Russia. If Warsaw Pact was dissolved, then NATO should have been dissolved. 'Now we see how wise it was of the Baltics and other sovereign countries to join NATO.' America promised Ukraine for support as long as it takes to win. America is getting read to abandon Ukraine; Trump openly advocates cutting aid to Ukraine, Harris will get a new team who will tell her to off load responsibility for Ukraine to Europe. The Americans will stab Ukraine in the back, as it stabbed Russia. As for the Baltics, if Trump abandons NATO, they will find themselves abandoned and in trouble for their provocative stance against Russia. Small and insignificant nations are better off being quiet and diplomatic, instead of being proxies for big boys. In fact, all the European nations and UK are insignificant. Get it ?
    1
  41.  @JABN97  Get real man. Ukraine's sovereignty was conditional on return of nukes and neutrality. Without those two understandings, they would never had got independence. Russia would not have given independence if Ukraine said it was planning to gang up with the US against Russia. Sovereignty does not give you the right to invite a far off superpower, to threaten a neighbouring superpower. Get it ? Ukraine backstabbed Russia by ganging up with US, and therefore it will not exist. Ukraine cannot get back what it lost, the US will walk away from Ukraine as it has done in past conflicts it created, and the Europeans are useless and cannot restore Ukraine. That is real life. Suck it up !
    1
  42.  @birgitlucci9419  NATO is the US and it is driven solely by the US’s military interests. There are New York Times articles from 1997 and 1998, which says Lockheed and US arms companies lobbied with US politicians to expand NATO for increasing their export orders. These articles are still available. Look at the situation as a result. Are the European countries more secure after NATO expansion than before ? Europe has 9 million refugees and all major cities are now targets of Russia’s nuclear sword. No European country singly or collectively can fight mighty Russia. And the US will abandon Europe if it faced nuclear extinction. Long ago Kissinger said the US would not fight a nuclear war with the USSR to save Germany and Europe. That position has not changed, you are dumb if you do not understand this. ‘Also Ukraine gave back their nuclear weapons against security guaranties offered by Russia, the US and the UK. Russia broke that in 2014 and again in 2022.’ Ukraine did not give back nuclear weapons against security guaranties offered by Russia. It had to give the nuclear weapons back and agree to neutrality – as CONDITIONS for independence. Get it ? So don’t pretend Ukraine was charitable. The understanding was Ukraine will be neutral and not join any anti-Russian military alliance. If that understanding was not there, why would Russia give independence ? After independence, in 2014, the US instigated a coup that brought Ukro Nazis to power, who wanted to gang up with the US against Russia. Ukraine reneged on its commitments to Russia on neutrality which allowed its independence. The US wanted missile and naval bases to shut out Russia from the Black Sea. Russia has ended any possibility of missile and naval bases for the US. The US now knows there is no possibility. And Ukraine’s sovereignty is terminated, and there is nothing you can do about it.
    1
  43.  @angusmatheson8906  'Baker had no authority, it was off the record...' You mean you want something for nothing. Listen son, with Russia either you play straight, or you don't play at all. If you agree to pay 10 roubles, they will not ask for more, or settle for less. If you indulge in your customary mischief and try to cheat afterwards, they will punch you in the face. Get it ? 'russias actions prove that NATO membership is pretty crucial to prevent Pooty from playing soldier' So has Ukraine got NATO membership after Russia's action ? Biden said in the Vilnius NATO summit in 2023 Ukraine cannot join NATO and there is no road map. Lately, Blinken made statements that Ukraine will join NATO after the war - it is face saving statement to hide defeat. After the war, there will be no more Ukraine to join NATO. If Ukraine had not announced after the US sponsored coup of 2014 it wanted to join NATO, Ukraine would have had the borders of 1991, including Crimea. The day it announced it wanted to join NATO, Putin took back Crimea. And Ukraine lost 4 more oblasts, and is in the process of losing more. Then what evidence is your statement of NATO membership being advantageous, based on ? You are a numskull.
    1
  44. ' I saw him as a great leader in fact, the leader of the free world. ' Really ? You deluded yourself and you still cannot accept reality that the collective west is defeated.
    1
  45.  @williamzk9083  The rejection of western hegemony disguised as the 'rules based international order' by the rest of the world burns deeply in your western soul. Russia, China, India, Brazil, Iran and Muslim countries reject it and that is causing burning. Here is the proof. In 2022, Boris Johnson said 'we must not let Putin win, as it would end the rules based international order' according to which the west sets the rules, and flouts them when convenient (as in Iraq). In 2024, Boris Johnson said that victory for Putin means end of western hegemony (that is the term he used). He was pleading with Trump not to allow a Russian victory. Clearly, from Boris Johnson 's words, 'rules based international order' means western hegemony. He knows what is at stake. You need to get real : Russia has created a new world order with BRICS, it has triggered de-dollarisation, and weakened NATO with a superior arsenal which the west cannot match. The west's main asset was its control of the financial system, and that is undergoing change too, and Russia and China are going to drive it. Ex Soviet states are irrelevant in the global importance of what Russia has done.
    1
  46.  @MrAntonBaton  'Ukraine will become a puppet state without a foreign army on its soil' Ukraine was already puppet state of the US after the 2014 coup, even without the US getting bases. Ukraine could not even go ahead with the peace process it agreed in Istanbul, because the US and UK over ruled. Ukraine is clearly unfit for self rule. If you had been neutral, you would have been free and still had Crimea. But you blew it, thinking you could threaten Russia using the US.
    1
  47. @SnorriTheLlama The rest of the world has seen western duplicity in Afghanistan, Iraq invasion, support of Israel etc. That is why the rest support Russia as it breaks western hegemony for good. They can see the US was expanding NATO and threatening Russia.
    1
  48.  @MrAntonBaton  Ukraine could have remained neutral and could have retained all including Crimea. Instead the US came and interfered in Ukraine with a coup, and tried to get bases, Russia put a stop to that, and now the US wants to withdraw and forget about Ukraine. Net result : Ukraine will not exist. Get it ?
    1
  49.  @MasterBot98  Crimea would also have been Ukrainian if the Ukrainians had not gone along with the coup the US foisted on it. Foresight is better than hindsight. Ukrainians were short on foresight.
    1
  50. 'One is left wondering what Ukrainians could have achieved if they wouldn't have to fight with one hand tied from the first days of the war.' No point wondering, because the west knows Russia will use nukes on Ukraine and if needed on the west. The Russians are not going to allow US bases in Ukraine, and they are ready for nuclear war if needed. Get it ? Now the US understands it also even if you are too dimwitted to understand.
    1