Comments by "John Adam" (@johnadam2885) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

@nigelgarrett7970 Russia is winning because it will dictate the terms of the peace. Ukraine has no say, and the west has come to accept that. Get it ?
1
So the Russians are just provoking to get western media attention and shape the media narrative ? ! Well, the Russians have succeeded because this fool Neilsen is agitated enough to make a video to claim western success lies in being unprovoked !
1
'Can we finally start supporting Ukraine to get there?!' It is too late for Ukraine, and you have nothing in your arsenal to support Ukraine. The war is lost. In 2023, Zelensky was talking about capturing Crimea because 'that is where it started, that is where it will end'. In 2024, he was talking about a victory plan, but lately he is talking about negotiations - but Russia does not want to negotiate with jokers ! Putin had said to the west 'why should we negotiate with you just because you have run out of arms'. The hare-brained Kursk incursion was explained as intending to humiliate Putin; lately they say it is strengthen Ukraine's bargaining position in negotiations. Except, Russia has taken back 50% of what Ukraine took, and it will surely kill off the rest of the Ukrainians, and Russia is not going to negotiate. The collective west cannot fight a long war against Russia and win. Russia will always prevail. Get it ?
1
@nigelgarrett7970 You are not educated enough because if you were, you would have written a refutation of what I wrote about junk western equipment, instead of making personal comments.
1
@nigelgarrett7970 'If we are nit picking then antidote is one word. Educated enough?' You are not educated enough. Nitpicking is one word ! You are a numskull.
1
@nigelgarrett7970 The British were claiming Challengers are invincible. The Americans said the same about Abrams. All because they could fight in Iraq against opposition that did not have the latest. But when the Challengers, Leopards and Abrams came out in Ukraine, Russia destroyed them. The Ukrainian counter offensive failed despite these, cluster bombs, Himars. True or not ? '....just that they are better than the Soviet and Russian ones' That is a conviction born out of conceit. Where is the evidence ? Russia destroyed all types of your equipment. Your equipment is junk, NATO has not fought a war that it has won, nor have the British, French or Americans. The way NATO ran away from Kabul proves you are cowards, and you cannot fight. The Russians have combined arms warfare capability that no one else has. That is tanks, drones, missiles, thermobaric weapons, hypersonic missiles, electronic jamming all working together. They have unused capability in anti-satellite destruction and nuclear weapons, so they hold the nuclear sword above you. And the Russians can fight - you saw in Bakhmut, and how they torched the Ukro Nazis in Mariopol. The collective west cannot match Russia. You may recall the Red Army beat Germany into a pulp. Like that the Russians can beat NATO into a pulp. Britain can be finished with a single hypersonic Sarmat missile. If for a moment you really believed your weapons were better and you thought you could win, you would have sent troops to Ukraine. But you know you will be killed on a scale you did not experience before.
1
@eliotness4029 'but from western point of view ===== annexation of baltic countries was illegal .period.' Where did you get that from ? Those were the spoils of war. The map of Europe was redrawn by Stalin. Churchill/Atlee and Truman could not stop him. Germany was partitioned - who is to say it is legal or illegal ? Germany's eastern territories like Konigsberg became part of the Soviet Union. And Eastern German lands were given to Poland. Again, who are you to decide whether it was legal or illegal. Germany threatened and waged war on Russia, and got beaten into a pulp and the Soviet Union set the terms, naturally. Likewise the US using Ukraine tried encircle and threaten Russia, and hence Russia is beating Ukraine to a pulp, and it cannot expect to have the borders of 1992. Ukraine should have kept the neutrality it promised in its declaration of independence, it reneged unilaterally on that, so its borders will be redrawn. You talk about western eyes like it is the height of morality. Was the invasion of Iraq illegal in western eyes ? Obviously not, as Bush and Blair are roaming around.
1
'Their entire economy is worth less than that of Italy. Or, about the same as Belgium + Netherlands.' That is a simplistic and immature analysis. It depends what is in the economy of Italy or Belgium + Netherlands. Russia produces oil and gas; metals and alloys (even now Boeing uses the titanium Russia produces); it produces gold; it is the biggest producer of wheat; it has control of the entire nuclear supply chain (the US did not sanction this); it makes hypersonic missiles (even the US cannot make it); it makes submarines, ICBMs, drones, thermobaric weapons; it launches its own satellites, it has its own GPS; it has expertise in cyber and electronic warfare. Can Italy, Belgium + Netherlands, do the above ? Idiot ! 'And yes, they will run out of equipment, its happening already as we can see with their use of motorcycles, Chinese 'golf carts' etc. ' In Bakhmut, British intelligence said Russia had run out of guns and their soldiers were fighting with shovels. In 2022, they said they had run out of chips, and were using washing machine chips. Biden had said in the first month the rouble will be rubble. Did any of that happen ? Idiot ! You have lost the war and you are mired in your delusions. If Russia was not a power, and you thought you could win, you would have sent troops to Ukraine. But a single hypersonic Sarmat missile will wipe out Italy, Belgium, Netherlands in the blink of an eye. And the US will look the other way. So don't fool yourself.
1
@Polygarden It is not even worse for Russia. Russia is bigger than all the countries of Europe combined, and it has many resources. Russia is self sufficient. - besides oil and gas, it controls the nuclear fuel supply chain, it mines gold and diamonds, it is the largest wheat and fertiliser producer, it produces metals like titanium and other alloys (Boeing buys titanium from Russia). Russia launches its own satellites, it has its own GPS, it makes planes, it makes arms, it has set up alternative banking channels. No one in Europe is capable of this. Russia has not outsourced its manufacturing. 'The Netherlands, Belgium and other European powers are managing to produce industrial goods which Russia is depending on.' Russia does not depend on minor countries like Netherlands, Belgium...Can you launch a satellite, have your own GPS, can you make titanium ? The French and the US cannot run their nuclear power plants without Russian input. Netherlands, Belgium are unimportant vassals of the US. You pretend alternative energy is replacing fossil fuels. No one is coming off oil and gas soon. That includes US and Norway.
1
Anders is at last being realistic - this is his first admission that the war is lost for the west ! He cannot go on about Ukrainian victory in Kursk. Anders is right that for Russia it is not a war for land. But he is not right that the war for Russia is for political control. Russia's number one motivation is security : it cannot allow US missile and naval bases in Ukraine. The US ambition was to cut off Russia's access to the Black Sea. Sevastopol in the Crimea is the HQ of the Russian Black Sea fleet, and if Russia had not retaken Crimea, the US 7th Fleet would be sailing from it. He proposes another type of devious western argument that if Ukraine joined the west, it would become prosperous and Russia did not want that. First of all, it is an assumption joining the west would make Ukraine prosperous. Ukraine was in the hands of oligarchs, mostly Jews, who sucked out its wealth - like Ihor Kolomvosky, who financed Zelensky (all Jews). And on the other side, you had Jews like Victoria Nuland, Black Rock, Blinken etc. Earlier Putin said he had no objection to Ukraine joining the EU, as that is an economic alliance, but NATO is a military alliance directed against Russia. Now Russia will not allow Ukraine to join the EU as lately the EU has acted like NATO. Hence, it is s devious argument Anders makes that Russia's aim is to prevent Ukraine joining the west and becoming prosperous - that is a typical western self image of superiority. It is like Bush saying the Muslims did not like America's freedoms, so they struck it; whereas it is related to US support of Israel. Russia wants to be prosperous, it has no objection to Ukraine being prosperous. But the problem is the US wanted to put missile and naval bases to threaten Russia's prosperity. That is is not on. Anyhow, despite Anders belief that the war is to prevent Ukraine from becoming prosperous, he now knows that the Russians will win. Ukraine has to cede what it lost and it cannot be in NATO - that is the starting Russian line now for negotiations. Earlier, Russia only asked Ukraine to be neutral. Now it cannot join NATO and it has to cede land. If it does not agree, Russia is in a position to continue and take more and decapitate Ukraine. And the west cannot stop it. Trump knows the US does not have the money and arms. And the Europeans cannot fight Russia. Ukraine is only a pawn. Boris Johnson stated that if Russia won it will end the rules based international order which was a fig leaf for western hegemony. Since Boris and Anders and their ilk now realise that Russia has won, the most important Russian achievement is they ended western hegemony. The rest of the world salutes the Russians.
1
@otofoto Russia is on the move, it is now started the battle of Chasov Yar. And when the summer comes, there will be more. Zelensky himself said he will have to fall back. He is now offering to negotiate, he has given up Crimea, he wants 2022 borders. Russia did not comment at his stupidity.
1
@DrCrispycross Russia does not have to fly over Ukraine. These days they launch hypersonic missiles from airplanes in Russia. Fire and forget. Technology has advanced, you have been sleeping.
1
@reachforthesky1576 Baldrick used to get a thump on the head from Blackadder. Macron gets the same from Sir Putin.
1
@johan8969 Mariopol was ruined when Russia captured it from the Azov Nazis. They have substantially rebuilt it. They will do the same for Bakmuth and Adivka. They do not need any international conferences on reconstruction, they do it.
1
@otofoto Look man, Zelensky said he is ready to give up Crimea, he wants to negotiate from 2022 position. Why ? Because his counter offensive failed - and his troops got killed off. But Russia is not going to accept 2022 borders, they are advancing. Never mind the pace. Now they have started the battle of Chasov Yar. After that, there will be more. Russia can’t sustain it ? Can Ukraine sustain when it is short of manpower and shells ? Russia has both. Certain western analysts are saying the Ukranian front will collapse eventually. Even the worst western liars are not saying anymore the Russians will collapse. Since the beginning western propaganda said Russians are badly trained and unmotivated. But they have put a stop to Ukraine being in NATO, they killed of the Azov Nazis in the battle of Mariopol, and they are moving forward. You seem to be burning inside as you cannot digest the defeat. No need to take it so personally. Ukraine's plight is like Hitler's in his last days when the Red Army approached Berlin. You need to understand, when the Russians fight for Russia, they fight hard, unlike anyone else.
1
Joker Anders has put a face-saving video saying 'we do not know what Trump will do'. Nothing to worry about ! Let us face the reality. NATO expansion into Ukraine was a US project. The US engineered the coup in 2014 in which Ukro Nazis groups like Azov Batallion and Right Sector were thrust to power, thanks to the machination of that wicked neocon Jew Victoria Nuland (wife of neocon Jew Robert Kagan, an architect of the Iraq war). The Ukraine project has failed, the US does what it always does, just withdraw and hand over the debris to others. Supporting Ukraine for as long as it takes was supporting Ukraine till Biden was in place. The EU is not blameless, it too ganged up with the US against Russia, putting sanctions, thieving Russian assets and sending military equipment to Ukraine. But Russia defeated the collective west. At the end of the day, Russia had the capacity to stay on for as long as it takes to ensure there will be no NATO bases in Ukraine, and the US and the west did not have the capacity. So the blame game has started. Trump says it is a European problem, they should handle it. The Europeans say that the US wanted NATO expansion, it should not be our problem. Ukraine thinks it is the west that is to blame. But it is Europe's problem. Long ago de Gaulle had warned if there is war in Europe, Europe faces the worst consequences because at the end of the day, the Americans do not live in Europe, and the British live on an island. The US and UK will be the inciters of wars, but they don't want the consequences. The Europeans need to come to their senses. At the end of the day, they share the continent with Russia. None of the Europeans individually or collectively can beat Russia. UK, France and Germany were powers - in the past, not now. Russia in contrast is too awesome. No one has the manpower, raw courage and the arsenal Russia has. The Israel project is going to be another defeat for the collective west. Israel is the last outpost of western colonialism, hence the western support. But it is unsustainable. The Ukraine and Israel projects spell the doom of the collective west and western colonialism.
1
@mariaf.6601 Very cold outside in Moscow, very warm inside. How about you ? Do you still have a job ?
1
@mariaf.6601 It is only October. Let me know in December and January. By then you will know you cannot defeat Russia.
1
@mariaf.6601 Russia (decision makers) who defeat Russia most ? You speak like a brainwashed westerner. Russia's decision makers made a decision not to tolerate any more NATO expansion to its Southern borders and to the Black Sea. They have achieved that, the US will not be able to have missile or naval bases in Ukraine. The west tried to retaliate with sanctions by stealing Russia's money. They predicted the rouble will be rubble in a month. But the rouble is strong and euro and pound have depreciated by 20%. Little did your leaders realise that Russia is now financially strong. Energy is more valuable than euros and pounds. You need energy to make money. Further Russia's action to start trade with other countries using alternative currencies has the most far reaching consequences. De-dollarisation is the step needed to weaken America, the country that has done most damage to the planet in the last 70 years. As usual, Russia is a path changer of human destiny. It did it in 1917 with the Bolshevik Revolution, it did it when it enforced unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany. It is doing it again.
1
Russia is not bluffing. It does not believe in strategic ambiguity. If you cross a Russian red line, and that requires use of nuclear weapons according to their doctrine, they will do it. The decision has already been taken.
1
Your thinking about Biden is muddled. 'a president who is needlessly prolonging the war' He is doing that as he does not want the media and opposition to say he led US to a defeat. 'while denying Ukraine the opportunity for total victory,' There is no opportunity for total victory for Ukraine, there never was. What are you talking about ? If for one moment the US thought there was opportunity for total victory, it would have sent troops. But the US will have to fight Russia, not Iraq. The bear has real WMDs and it will incinerate all US cities. The super quiet Yasen submarines now patrol both US coats 24 h a day, and with hypersonic missiles, there is no reaction time.
1
@johnk6598 Trump pulled put of Afghanistan. At least he recognised it was a waste of US money. He sees Ukraine the same way. Actually, the US sponsored these wars, it must pay compensation to Afghanistan, Ukraine, Iraq, Vietnam, Palestine....
1
What are Danes and your idiot Anders going to do to save Ukraine now that the US will hand over their failed project to you ?
1
@sphinxtheeminx Danes are mentally challenged people who feel proud.
1
'If Russia invades a piece of Finland'. Russia has no intention to invade Finland. But if Finns misbehave and provoke, you too should be Ukrained. You too will find no one can fight Russia and win. Russia can finish you off with a barrage of Oreshniks, and Sweden, Norway and the rest will not come to your aid. Never go for provocations assuming someone's support. Learn from Ukraine. So keep your foolish bravado to yourself and don't provoke Russia. Nobody has forgotten your collusion with the Nazis in the siege of Leningrad. Karelia was taken away by the Soviet Union as punishment. So remember that.
1
I see you cannot cope with defeat and you are indulging in badmouthing Russia.
1
@bluebandites These 'insane losses' are western claims designed to make you feel Russia's achievement is futile. Have you gone and counted Russia's casualties ? Or you just blindly believe what British and US intelligence say ? British intelligence has put out preposterous nonsense like Russians ran out of missiles, they are using chips from washing machines, their infantry ran out of shells and they had to fight with shovels in Bakhmut, their morale is very low etc. If they lie on these, surely they will lie on casualties as well. Look at the reality. The west says Ukraine lost 30,000 and Russia lost 500,000. Russia fires 10x shell as Ukraine - according to Zelensky. Who is likely to have more casualties ? Ukraine does not have manpower to fight at the front, but Russia has. Ukraine is forcibly taking people off the streets and sending them without too much training to the front. Ukrainian forces are now disobeying orders and some have surrendered. Russia's purpose was not to gain land per se; they have plenty of land. Their objectives are security driven. They want to make it clear to the US it cannot have naval bases in Ukraine to threaten Russia (Russia is ready to fight a nuclear war if needed to prevent US bases in Ukraine), to de-Nazify Ukraine (kill off Azov Batallion, Right Sector and other Ukro Nazi groups) and to demilitarise Ukraine (it will not have army and military production again). To achieve these goals, they have to attack Ukraine as Ukraine after the US led coup of 2014 was not voluntarily agreeing to the neutrality it committed itself at the time of independence. Russia then has to enforce neutrality. To do that, it has to occupy Ukraine just like the Red Army had to occupy Germany to evict Hitler and Nazism, and enforced demilitarisation of Germany. In the case of Germany, the Soviets did not annex it. In the case of Ukraine, as some of the areas have Russian population and were built by Russia historically (like Crimea, Donbass, Odessa, Kharkhov and Kiev), these will have to be returned to Russia. Putin has to honour the sacrifices of the Russian soldiers who take these places, so he cannot return them even if Ukraine is de-Nazified and demilitarised. These Russian areas were gifted to Ukraine in 1992, out of goodwill, under the understanding Ukraine will be a neutral state and not part of any military alliance. Ukraine under US incitement reneged on neutrality, it walked away from the peace negotiations and compromise in Turkey, under US and UK tutelage, so it cannot complain if it does not exist anymore. They chose their destiny.
1
@dshaw8356 What is - is defeat of the collective west. What could be - is solace in the face of the current defeat.
1
Ukraine was never going to win, the west should never incited Ukraine to fighting a proxy war for them.
1
From stating that Ukraine is about to win, it has gone back to 'Russia's war economy is unsustainable'. It is the west that is not able to produce 150 mm shells, Patriots, and what not for Ukraine. When Trump comes, that will be the end.
1
@mariaf.6601 Try to dispute what I wrote, and don't use only personal remarks as a counter. That shows a low IQ.
1
Your heroes are Ukro Nazis after they got defeated.
1
Peace will be on Russian terms. Ukraine walked out of the Istanbul talks due to BoJo, that was their choice. Now is payback time. BoJo and Biden are gone, the wind has changed.
1
The Europeans are content vassals. Indeed, they are particularly proud they are partners of America. The Japanese and Koreans are also content vassals. Merkel and Sarkozy opposed NATO expansion to Ukraine fearing war will come, but Bush twisted their arms. The Europeans are unwilling to say who blow up Nordstream. Servile nations have to pay the consequences.
1
'to commit to long term investments in the Ukrainian defence industry; Rheinmetall promised to build a tank factory. It is not going to happen. The capitalist never invests money if he feels he will not get a return. The moment a factory is completed or even before, Russia will strike it with a Kinzhal. How can you be so dumb ?
1
@LowenKM Ukraine was also obliged to maintain neutrality. Further, Ukraine conspired with US and UK to have NATO bases in Ukraine to threaten Russia - which is a contravention of the spirit of the Memorandum. Therefore Ukraine will not exist. Get it ?
1
@kosta2177 West dares not end restrictions - because Putin has said he is ready to fight a war with NATO, and that will be nuclear. He has said British assets will be struck if Storm Shadows are used in Russia, therefore Biden did not give permission to Starmer to lift restrictions on Ukraine. Biden knows US cities will be incinerated, but perhaps you have not understood.
1
@marquisdemoo1792 'Any peace plan presented by Russia demanding Ukraine not join NATO is disingenuous and should be ignored.' Russia is not presenting any peace plan. The Ukrainians walked out of the agreement initialled in Turkey at the behest of BoJo. Hence, Russia realises peace plans with NATO do not work. So what are you talking about ? The Soviet Union did not offer a peace plan to the Germans, and Russia will not offer any more peace plans to the Ukro Nazis. Ukraine has no option to join NATO. Biden declined to give permission in the Vilnius NATO summit. Zelensky is again asking for admission to NATO be end of the year, saying otherwise Ukraine will be defeated. Biden will not agree. The US will not agree because it will mean fighting Russia, and that means US cities being incinerated. Get it ?
1
@criticalcharge8172 And despite your staggering claims, Russia has taken 4 oblasts, Ukraine was unable o get them back, and Russia is advancing. Russia has killed off much of the professional Ukrainian army, and the west is unable to even supply 150 mm shells in quantity, let alone Patriots. Russia is not only demilitarising Ukraine - but also NATO ! Even western media says Russia is producing more shells than the combined west. Get it ? You need to have a reality check.
1
@criticalcharge8172 Putin said it is cheaper to fight now to stop US bases in Ukraine than if Ukraine got into NATO. Then Russia would have to fight a nuclear war. By fighting now, Russia has checkmated all US plans for NATO bases in Ukraine. Get it ? 'All conflicts after WW2 pales in comparison to the losses Russia has endured in these 2 years of warfare against a country who has no operational navy, no air superiority, and no manufacturing capabilities for shells and vehicles.' You are slyly trying to belittle Russia because it has losses from a country who has no operational navy, no air superiority, and no manufacturing capabilities for shells and vehicles. But Russia is in effect fighting NATO , as NATO is supplying all these things to the country that does not have them. Russia has thereby proved it is stronger than entire NATO. Then what is your point ?
1
'Millions of Americans support Ukraine. ' But you are defeated. Trump knows that.
1
Congratulations to Russia for defeating the collective west, and creating a multi polar world. Only Russia could have done this. Putin is a steely leader like Stalin. The Ukrainians should have known not to flirt with Nazi style nationalism. No one can fight Russia and win. The Ukrainians are better off surrendering unconditionally to Russia. They will get better terms from Russia, than from the US, and the useless Europeans. Russia has also undermined NATO.
1
Never mind what Russia's budget is, more important is what they make with it. Europe will never be able to catch up with Russia's arsenal of hypersonic missiles, flame throwers and what not. The best for Europe is establishing good diplomatic ties. NATO expansion was driven by the US, but the Europeans were comfortable sailing in the US boat thinking they too were part of US hegemony. The Europeans were eager to bad mouth Russia and join in threatening Russia, forgetting it was living off Russian energy. Now the US changed course, and it showed the Europeans were only vassals. Russia has beaten the collective west and Europe needs to swallow its false pride and get to terms with that. When the US is following the 'if you cannot beat them, join them' philosophy against Russia, the Europeans should do the same. If the Europeans try to confront Russia militarily, they will get their heads kicked in.
1