Comments by "J Groovy" (@jgroovy1973) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. He keeps losing sponsors.
    1
  2. Average Joe - Trump PUBLICLY asked Russia to help him win in 2016. Then we found out that 1)- His son, son in law, and campaign chairman met with surrogates of the Russian government to trade illegally obtained dirt on Clinton for sanction relief. 2)- 16 Trump associates lied about 140 Russian contacts. 3)- He lied about pursuing a real estate deal in Moscow that required Kremlin approval while he knew Russia was interfering in our election to help him win. Those involved ADMIT to all of the above. It's NOT in dispute. Then, Trump inexplicably started giving Putin everything he wants. Then, Trump was impeached for extorting Ukraine for help with his re-election. Then, he PUBLICLY asked China for re-election help. Then, he said it was okay to take foreign government help to win an election. I repeat, HE SAID IT WAS OKAY. Do you still think that the Russia probe was a hoax?
    1
  3. Average Joe - Fusion GPS is a legal oppo research firm that subcontracted Christopher Steele, who wrote the dossier. Fusion was first hired by REPUBLICANS to research Trump. After the primary, Fusion was hired by a group working on behalf of the DNC, not Clinton. Neither she, nor the DNC colluded with Russia. Fusion GPS clients weren't told how it gathered information. Clinton didn't collude with Russia. Putin admits he wanted to help Trump, and he hated Clinton. Fusion GPS co-founder testified to the REPUBLICAN LED House Intel Committee. He stands by his testimony and wanted it released. Republicans refused to release it. Steele didn't get information from the Russian GOVERNMENT. There was no quid pro quo. However, Don Jr, Kushner, and Manafort met with surrogates of the Russian GOVERNMENT to discuss trading dirt on Clinton for sanction relief. Steele never gave the dossier to the Clinton campaign. He saw possible crimes, and gave it to the FBI. NEITHER THE DOSSIER, NOR THE FISA WARRANT on Carter Page started the Russia probe. It had already begun as a result of George Papadopoulos talking to an Australian intelligence officer.
    1
  4. ajax515 - I am for law and order. That's why I don't support the predident, who is a criminal.
    1
  5. VA BEAR - It's spelled, "there," Einstein. Why is it that you FOX News sheep misspell common words so often? Well, Trump did say he loves the poorly educated. His followers are too dumb to realize that was an insult. Oh, and your reply makes no sense, whatsoever.
    1
  6. ajax515 - Uh, except that I don't.
    1
  7.  @tonewill9407  Are you that simple minded? Yes, I support law and order. No, I don't support doing it Trump's way. Duhhrrr.
    1
  8.  ajax515  Trump isn't choosing these cities based on facts on the ground. He's choosing them based on whether or not the mayor is a Democrat. Has he ASKED any of these city officials what they need? Has he IDENTIFIED what, specifically, they are doing wrong in "Democrat cities" that they are doing right in "Republican cities"? He won't even acknowledge the protesters have a just cause. He calls BLM a "hate symbol." 99.9% of the protesters are NOT vandalizing. He already has masses of fools neglecting to wear masks as a political statement. Are they going to let him equate racial justice with communism and violence?
    1
  9. Why is it that Trump never has to explain his conspiracy theories, but when you explain a real conspiracy involving Russian meddling in our elections, it's a "treasonous coup attempt"?
    1
  10.  @badguy1481  Russians hacked 21 states' voter roll software. They weaponized the DNC emails - with the support of the Trump campaign. They used every major social media platform. They put out false information about how to vote. If the Facebook ads alone changed the minds of just 1% of the people they targeted, it would have swung the election. They funnelled cash to the Trump camp via the NRA. They used tactics they've been refining for decades. Think they'd do it if it didn't work? It wasn't just screwing around with computers. This was a far-reaching, multi-faceted, code-named operation.
    1
  11.  @badguy1481  Yeah, why would the Russians have done what they had an interest in doing, what they're known to do to other countries, and what intelligence - even from other countries - concluded that they did? You think that all-powerful deep state just wasn't powerful enough to stop Trump from getting elected in the first place? Let's see - they supposedly spied on Trump, faked a dossier, and recruited career officials from a dozen or more agencies, but then didn't use that info. during the campaign? They planned to wait until after Trump was elected to make him look bad afterward? Yeah, makes tons of sense.
    1
  12.  @badguy1481  You are so twisted on the facts, you're not even worth correcting. China wants Trump in power. They can manipulate him. They can bribe him. He approved of their concentration camps. He caved on Hong Kong. His trade war is a failure - nothing but an import tax on US companies. When Trump tells you China is helping Biden, don't believe it. Don't believe that absurd lie about Biden somehow taking a BILLION DOLLAR Chinese bribe. Biden wants to ACTUALLY move manufacturing back to the US, not just lie about it like Trump is doing. All you people ever say is, "I know you are, but what am I?" It's pathetic.
    1
  13.  @badguy1481  Nobody has ever taken a billion dollar bribe in the history of the world. You really think that happened, and it wasn't the biggest story of the century? You know nothing.
    1
  14.  @badguy1481  Bill Clinton did not run for president in 1990, Einstein. The NRA gave Trump three times as much as they have ever given a presidential campaign.
    1
  15.  @badguy1481  Absolutely false. Clinton was not in favor of confiscation. Only Beto O'Rourke suggested it, to confiscate ARs, and that was the end of him. Yes, the Russians funnelled money to the Trump campaign undervthe guise of a Russian gun rights advocate group that was connected to the Russian government - a government that doesn't allow any gun rights in Russia.
    1
  16. Cancelled? So, you want a dictatorship.
    1
  17. russell3380 - Where did you hear that, and how do you know what it was in reference to?
    1
  18. Funny thing about using whataboutism in criminal matters. If you point the finger and say "what about THEIR conduct? you are also implicating yourself. For example, Trump saying "What about the documents in Biden's garage?" may get Biden in trouble, but then we get back to Trump and compare the two. If Biden deserves five years in prison, then the only rational conclusion is, by comparison, Trump should get life in prison. The double standard is astounding.
    1
  19. Hey, clueless people in FOX News land, ask yourself this question - How would you feel about it if it was Don Jr. who didn't cheat on, but failed to pay two years of tax bills and had a technical gun charge where the gun was not involved in any incident? You'd be crying "Government weaponization!"
    1
  20. Trump has politicized a virus, and John Bolton said every decision Trump makes comes from a calculation about his re-election.
    1
  21. Yeah, they're coming after you and me for our hush money payments and classified documents handling. Get real.
    1
  22. Are Republicans actually implicitly saying that someone can go commit crimes, then run for President, and they'll shield them from the law while helping them win the White House?? And speaking of ridiculous Republican logical fallacies, are they ostensibly saying that any VP can steal a second term for themselves and their bosses by simply insisting, without proof, that they were cheated? So...there are...no more four-year terms? So, Dan Quayle, HW Bush and Al Gore just... didn't think about that?? Are they asserting that also gives them the right to summon a riot at the Capitol as long as they insist they really believed they were cheated??
    1
  23. M S - No, it isn't. How is it not obvious that Republicans created the "socialist" boogeyman as a fear mongering tactic. Joe Biden defeated Bernie Sanders in the primary, so how socialist could the left be?
    1
  24.  @ppmnox  You said "That's exactly what happened". I said, "No, it isn't". Yes, the Republicans have created a boogeyman, the "socialist threat" is not real. I have made my point very clear. You must be stupid
    1
  25. Dane Hart - Are you saying "wrong" to the original comment?
    1
  26. Trump said the election could be tied up in litigation for years - a strategy he's used all his life. He hasn't suggested any solutions to the "problems" with mail-in voting. It's absurd to want school open now, but say it's too unsafe to vote in November. He asked Russia, China, and Ukraine to help him win, even by investigating Americans. He said taking foreign government help is okay. (It's illegal). He says it's "oppo research" (when HE does it. When opponents do legal oppo research on him, he calls it treason). It's likely Russia will attack the election. Obama prepared for a cyber attack on election day. I'm pretty sure Trump hasn't, and Putin knows it. In 2012, Trump said Obama would start a war with Iran to get re-elected. Apparently, Trump thinks that could work. It wouldn't surprise me if he did that. Turnout favors Democrats. Trump knows that. 50% of voters say they wouldn't vote for him under ANY circumstances. He's never reached across the aisle, and never had a day with over 50% approval. He considers everyone who didn't vote for him an enemy. He HAS to cheat to win, and he's given every reason to think he will.
    1
  27. Fired why? If Joe Biden did and said the same things Trump did, you would not support him. You KNOW that's true, so you are ruled by tribalism. That being the case, your arguments are moot.
    1
  28. John Peterson - FOX News viewers really seem to hate dissenting opinions, and then they call the rest of the media "biased."
    1
  29. In 2000, when the Court gave the Presidency to George Bush when it came down to a state where Bush's brother was governor, did Dems go nuts? Did they refuse to accept the results and start a smear campaign against Bush as "an excuse for a lost election"? When the Republicans obstructed Obama's SCOTUS pick with a bullshit excuse about a year away being too close to an election, did Dems go nuts? When Trump let a far-right group, the pick Neil Gorsuch for what should have been Garland's seat, and refused to consult with Dems beforehand, as is traditional, did Dems go nuts? No. Now, another far-right group has made a list, from which Trump picked the guy most likely to protect him from the Russia probe, and a guy who could very well help overturn Roe V. Wade, (which only 29% of the public supports). They withheld 100,000 documents needed to properly vet this man, finally releasing 42,000 of them 15 hours before the confirmation hearing. Now, Dems are showing their anger. Dems don't do that until they are pushed and pushed. It's about time.
    1
  30. Then there's Georgia, 1/6, and the documents. All while FOX News is about to have to pay $1.6 billion to Dominion for lying for the crooked clown.
    1
  31. How on earth is that treason?
    1
  32. Trump PUBLICLY asked Russia to help him win in 2016. Then we found out that 1)- His son, son in law, and campaign chairman met with surrogates of the Russian government to trade illegally obtained dirt on Clinton for sanction relief. 2)- 16 Trump associates lied about 140 Russian contacts. 3)- He lied about pursuing a real estate deal in Moscow that required Kremlin approval while he knew Russia was interfering in our election to help him win. Those involved ADMIT to all of the above. It's NOT in dispute. Then, Trump inexplicably started giving Putin everything he wants. Then, Trump was impeached for extorting Ukraine for help with his re-election. Then, he PUBLICLY asked China for re-election help. Then, he said it was okay to take foreign government help to win an election. I repeat, HE SAID IT WAS OKAY. Do you still think that the Russia probe was a hoax?
    1
  33. In 2000, when the Court gave the Presidency to George Bush when it came down to a state where Bush's brother was governor, did Dems go nuts? Did they refuse to accept the results and start a smear campaign against Bush as "an excuse for a lost election"? When the Republicans obstructed Obama's SCOTUS pick with a bullshit excuse about a year away being too close to an election, did Dems go nuts? When Trump let a far-right group, the pick Neil Gorsuch for what should have been Garland's seat, and refused to consult with Dems beforehand, as is traditional, did Dems go nuts? No. Now, another far-right group has made a list, from which Trump picked the guy most likely to protect him from the Russia probe, and a guy who could very well help overturn Roe V. Wade, (which only 29% of the public supports). They withheld 100,000 documents needed to properly vet this man, finally releasing 42,000 of them 15 hours before the confirmation hearing. Now, Dems are showing their anger. Dems don't do that until they are pushed and pushed. It's about time.
    1
  34. If you start with the premise that the entire mainstream media, the Democrats, and the "deep state" are all in cahoots to control everything, you also have to accept everything that would go along with that premise. It defies common sense. - You would have to believe that, despite all of their power, this "deep state" either allowed or couldn't stop the Republicans from having the power that they do. The deep state couldn't stop Trump from becoming president? The deep state allowed Republicans to control the Senate, the White House, and gain and have a Conservative majority on the Supreme Court? They also had the House for Trump's first two years. They literary controlled everything. - You would have to believe that the media outlets ALL get together and coordinate their message, even though they COMPETE with each other and live to expose facts. The "liberal" media and the deep state allow FOX News to exist? Really? - You would have to believe the president when he says almost everyone else is lying about him on an almost daily basis, even though he is a PROVEN habitual liar. Really? REALLY??
    1
  35. Hey, MAGA World, pretend it was Biden who, while leaving office, took 15 boxes of documents from the National Archives while insisting the election was stolen, refusing to ACCEPT THE RULINGS OF 61 JUDGES, refusing a peaceful transfer of power, and inviting an armed mob to STORM THE US CAPITOL. "Let's have trial by combat!" said Trump's lawyer, to the mob on 1/6. Pretend Biden also took those documents while under multiple investigations. Would you be okay with that? If Barack Obama did that? Bill Clinton? Would you DEFEND that? And speaking of your devil, what about Hillary's emails?? Trumpers have this blind eye for the massive, intentional mishandling of classified information by the Trump Administration. You can't have it both ways. If you think she should be locked up, so should he and for longer. You thought Hillary was reckless with information ten years ago. SHE WAS INVESTIGATED. She admitted doing it. It's over. And Hunter Biden is also being investigated, so what more do you want? It seems you people never try to understand the process of things. This is about Donald Trump. If ANY other actual US President did what he did, do you seriously think there wouldn't be an investigation? That one wouldn't be absolutely called for? What If it were Jimmy Carter or Ronald Reagan? All of those things Trump did and said as President that "we just hate him" for - If Biden did or said them..? What about Obama? If Hillary had become President? All you have are whataboutisms and accusations about the "deep state". WHO are you talking about? You're saying the only way to explain it is this shadowy, evil left-wing network of political crooks who have invaded every agency including the military, the CIA, the FBI, and the National Archives. All this "election stealing" on every level from Biden to the Chinese to regular Dem voters...any ACTUAL SUSPECTS? Other than your President harassing and defaming three female generations of volunteer poll workers in Georgia. I hope they sue Trump for every dime. Anyone who cries about the "deep state" doesn't understand the basics of separation of powers or even the fundamentals of how the US government works. How many more REPUBLICAN TRUMP WORLD INSIDERS have to all paint the same picture of him before you get it? They're ALL lying? They're all "out to get him" and "just don't like him"? They all wanted to put themselves through hell? Think. Until you can say you would defend any other President acting this way, any arguments you make to defend Trump are simply tribal, mindlessly biased, in bad faith, and therefore moot.
    1
  36. There are only two possible reasons the Obama Administration would have spied on the Trump campaign. 1)- To prevent his election, or 2)- To smear him in case he got elected. You can eliminate the first one. No information gathered by US intelligence was used during the campaign. The ONLY possibility would have been to smear Trump in case he won. That WOULDN'T HAVE MADE SENSE. Why would Clinton, with a 94% chance of winning, bother to prepare for that 6% chance? For a 6% chance, would Obama, FBI, and CIA officials in non-political agencies - most of whom were Republicans - risk their careers and their freedom? Would they engage in a MASSIVE conspiracy involving dozens of people across multiple agencies, right under the noses of Republicans among them, just to make Trump look bad? If the FBI was so desperate to ensure a Clinton victory, why did Comey re-open her email case and HURT her chances? Why DIDN'T he announce that there was a probe into Trump's possible ties to Russia? IT MAKES NO SENSE. The FBI was trying to safeguard the election from Russian attack. In the process, they uncovered many Trump campaign ties to the Russian government, WHICH THEY LIED ABOUT.
    1
  37. Never told the truth? Name ONE LIE.
    1
  38. Daniel Gross - What? Am I disrespecting the most disrespectful person on the planet? Get real. Ask the McCains how respectful he is.
    1
  39. Nobody is saying he doesn't have the right to defend himself. Look at HOW he defends himself!
    1
  40. And if Biden did what Trump did, you'd feel the same, right? Right?? We both know the answer to that.
    1
  41. He had no experience and he lied about his credentials.
    1
  42. Then there's Georgia, 1/6, and the documents. All while FOX News is about to have to pay $1.6 billion to Dominion for lying for the crooked clown.
    1
  43. RevJ - Yeah, maybe he should pledge his loyalty to Trump and to Cult 45.
    1
  44. A Russian who helped Don Jr set up the Trump Tower meeting wrote in an email that it was about Russian "GOVERNMENT support for your father". Why would he write that, knowing US intel might see it? Blackmail. When Don Jr went along with it, the Russians then knew what we didn't. When Trump lied about having deals with Russia during the campaign, the Russians knew he was lying about the Trump Tower Moscow project. That could be used as blackmail. Acting AG, Sally Yates, tried to explain to Trump that Michael Flynn's intercepted conversations with the Russian ambassador about sanctions could be used as blackmail. Trump did not understand that. He didn't fire Flynn immediately. He resisted. He later fired Yates. James Comey tried to explain to Trump that a rumored "pee tape", IF it existed, could be used as blackmail. Trump did not understand that. He took offense to it. Then, he fired Comey. Now, we find out Trump has been hiding transcripts of his meetings with Putin - even from his own administration. No, he doesn't have to release those transcripts to the public. Yes, he has to KEEP A RECORD. There are good reasons why new Presidents release their tax returns and divest their businesses. Now, we have a President we know has had dealings with Russia, but we don't know much more than that. But the Russias know. You Trump followers need to wise up.
    1
  45. I guarantee you Trump's internal polling has him way behind Biden.
    1
  46. You think that's the dichotomy? Really? YOU are so brainwashed.
    1
  47. There are exactly zero communists and two Democratic Socialists in Congress. We send representatives to Washington to debate policy ideas, bill by bill. Bernie Sanders LOST the primary to a centrist. How, exactly, is this "Marxist takeover" supposed to work? The US, just like almost EVERY country, is somewhat socialist. Learn something before you spout that fear-mongering crap.
    1
  48. Dave - You really need to study history.
    1
  49. Yeah, gee, we've never had a liberal president before.
    1
  50. Scott Pruitt, Tom Price, Ryan Zinke, Rob Porter, the SIXTEEN senior Trump campaign officials who lied about a total of 87 Russian contacts, including his campaign chairman, senior advisor, and personal attorney...According to the Washington Post, Obama lied 148 times in 8 years. Trump is at over 7500 in less than 2 years.
    1