Comments by "Jackie Wu" (@jwu1950) on "TED" channel.

  1. nadjim73 Amen.
    2
  2. Law of evolution ?  WTF was he talking about ?  IDIOT.
    1
  3. aspiknf  Not. Per Wiki, " Evolutionary biologist Kirk J. Fitzhugh[39] wrote, "'Evolution' cannot be both a theory and a fact. Theories are concepts stating cause–effect relations...One might argue that it is conceivable to speak of 'evolution' as a fact by way of it being the subject of reference in explanatory hypotheses...In the strictest sense then, 'evolution' cannot be regarded as a fact even in the context of hypotheses since the causal points of reference continue to be organisms, and no amount of confirming instances for those hypotheses will transform them into facts...While evolution is not a fact, it is also not a single theory, but a set of theories applied to a variety of causal questions...An emphasis on associating 'evolution' with 'fact' presents the misguided connotation that science seeks certainty." Evolution by the process of Natural Selection cannot be a fact because it has never been observed.
    1
  4. aspiknf Not. What part of evolution by the process of natural select can never be a fact because it has never been observed that you don't understand ?  There is zero evidence for evolution.  Evolution is a set of scientific theories applied to a variety of causal questions, in other words a fairy tale.  The logical proof that evolution is a faith and not a science is the fact that there is no Natural Selection unless by Nature we mean God.  There is zero evidence to suggest that Nature has the intelligence that would enable Nature to act, choose, and select. Read up on what the difference is between facts, laws, hypothesis, and theories in science and you won't be making the kind of statements like the ones you had made.
    1
  5. aspiknf  Stephen Hawking is FOS.  He doesn't know science when he started taking about the law of evolution.  There is no such law because there is no such observation.  He has been going from a believer of God to a disbeliever of God.  He doesn't know what he is talking about. He is now removed from the chair which Newton used to sit because his pears have finally figured out he is FOS and has no contribution to science at all. There.  Copied from your first website, "You don't promote a theory to a law by proving it. A theory never becomes a law." Copied from your second website, "Is Evolution a Theory or a Fact? It is both."  Right there it is nonsense.  Facts in science are unexplained observations.  Theory in science explains the cause and effect of facts.  Evolution is neither a fact nor a single scientific theory but a set , or collection, of scientific theories applied to a variety of casual questions.  A collection of scientific theories is not a theory.  It is a collection, or in other words, a story, like a godless fairy tales. Copied from your third website, "Richard Dawkins corrects what he sees as the specious use of the term "theory" and argues that evolution is indeed as close to a ‘fact’ as anything we’ll ever know."  How stupid can this hate mongering idiot get ?  science start with facts, which are unexplained observations, progress into hypothesis outlining the  proposed cause and effect explanation of these observations.  When tested by the scientific method and verified as accurate, hypothesis is accepted as scientific theory which is the highest level of logical proof in scientific terms.  Facts are sometimes referred to as laws because there are overwhelming evidence of these observed facts, for example there is the law of gravity, the law of thermodynamics, etc.  But the fact remains that laws, like facts, are unexplained observations.  For example, Newton discovered the law of gravity but he could not explain gravity which caused the gravitational force.  300 years later today, still no one knows what gravity is.  Einstein tried to explain it with space/time curvature but his theory does not work on a quantum level.  Currently scientists are trying to find gravitons, a subatomic particle that may explain gravity but so far they have come out empty handed.  So no one can tell if objects falling to the ground is pushed to the ground, sucked to the ground, or carried to the ground by some subatomic particles.  No scientific theory will go backwards and become a fact.  Evolution is not a scientific theory because it has never been tested by the scientific method and verified as accurate.  In fact, Darwin's evolution is a fairy tale of a faith in Nature.  Unless by Nature we mean God, Natural Selection does not exist.  There is no scientific experiment that can be designed to test God, or Nature because these are metaphysical concepts and not physical objects.  All scientific theories are in essence metaphysical, but science cannot explain what is metaphysical.  For example, logic and mathematics can be used to prove scientific theories, but no scientific evidence or theory can be used to prove logic and mathematics because they are metaphysical, not physical. Now that I have refuted all three sites you quoted, can you please check things out and use your critical thinking rather than just regurgitating the garbage they stuffed your head with in school and through the media ?
    1
  6. aspiknf   I hope I don't have to repeat everything I've said.  You insist, "if you read the later lines of the first site you'd see that evolution is a scientific theory, not a lamen theory."  What part of Evolutionary biologist Kirk J. Fitzhugh's explanation that evolution is neither a fact nor a single scientific theory that you don't understand ?  Evolution is at best a hypothesis because it has never been tested by the scientific method.  But it can't even be a scientific hypothesis because it is based on the faith that Nature is God, otherwise how can anyone assume Nature can act, choose, and select when there is zero evidence that the inanimate natural environment has any such intelligence ? You said, "A scientific theory is a fact that comes from mountains of evidence and correct correlations"  Not !  What part of "Theories are concepts stating cause–effect relations" you don't understand ?  And what part of "laws, like facts, are unexplained observations." you don't understand ? You said, "You mention Newton's law of Gravity and that's a scientific theory as well as a fact, just like Evolution."  What is it that you don't understand ?  In science, facts and laws cannot be scientific theories, and scientific theories cannot go backwards and become facts or laws because facts and laws do not carry any cause and effect explanation.  Facts and laws are unexplained observations.  No one has yet been able to explain Gravity, not Newton, not Einstein, and definitely not Hawking. Thanks for saying I have a beautiful name.  I hope you are a chick in medical school.  I dig so totally.  If you want to know a scientific theory of evolution, I'll give you one.  Instead of Darwin's E/NS, Evolution by the process of Natural Selection, which is a faith in Nature or God,  Jackie Wu's E/IALO, Evolution by the process of Intelligent Adaptation of Living Organisms is a scientific theory which stops at "intelligence in living organism" which can be scientifically tested and God is not assumed. You mentioned there are mountains of evidence for evolution.  But you must realise that these evidence are for "intelligence in living organisms", not "natural selection".  There is zero, repeat zero evidence for "natural selection"  It is after all living organisms that has undergone any evolution.  They do so as a normal course of the intelligence designed in each and every living organism enabling them to act choose, and select by means of conquering, yielding, altering, changing, or otherwise manipulating the animate natural environment as they survive and reproduce.  The inanimate "Nature" never evolve or reproduce, or injected into the living organisms it "selected" to "be evolved" I think I can help you figure out some of your dilemma about God since you are open minded enough to recognise a first cause.  God means different thing to different people at different time, these are all parts of the One and the same God.  God has infinite parts.  God cannot be God if God is not infinite.  Also God cannot be God if God is merely physical.  God can only be metaphysical.  And our physical reality is only a very, very tiny subset of the infinitely larger metaphysical realty where God reigns.  The singularity is still physical, only condensed, so it cannot be God.  It is an effect of God the first cause, just like physical mass or gravitational force is the effect of the metaphysical concept we called gravity.  Gravity itself, like life or God, cannot be observed for these are non physical.
    1
  7. Luigi Deatn stare  You can feel sorry all you want, but you have no evidence or argument to back up your accusation, whether in short explanation or in long.  So you are FOS. 
    1
  8. Dispise Cons  WTF is evolution ?  There is not a single piece of supporting evidence, and there is not a single theory to speak of.  Evolution is a collection of theories applied to a variety of casual question.  It has never been scientifically tested for there is no theory to be tested.  Evolution is an opinion at best.
    1
  9. Dispise Cons  That you believe is a clever excuse to hide your ignorance.
    1
  10. Luca Martinoli  That's because your brain has been stuffed with garbage for years in school and through the media.  Don't believe in everything they tried to piss on your brain in school.  Use critical thinking to question and identify the lies and propagandas and not let yourself be a robot.  Evolution is not science because natural selection does not exist unless by "natural" we mean God. 
    1
  11. Luca Martinoli Evolution is hilarious.  The hypocrisy lies with the fact that evolution denies God and accepts the meaningless term of "natural".  Natural selection does not exist unless by "natural" we mean God.  There is zero evidence and zero reason to believe nature has any intelligence to enable nature to act, choose, or select.  Evolution is a godless fairy tales, period.  I mean, man, use your brain if you have any left !
    1
  12. Luigi Deatn stare  Not only did you fail to provide any logical explanation for your case, you want others to follow you to be ignorant because you are scared my analysis is correct and you were the only  one who has been fooled by evolution.   Don't be scared, a lot of people are like you, but many have learned to be wiser after reading my analysis.  It's not too late to turn around and start believing in God.
    1
  13. Luigi Deatn stare  What is "nature" ? How did "nature" come into existence ? 
    1
  14. Luca Martinoli DELUSIONAL per Wiki, "A delusion is a belief held with strong conviction despite superior evidence to the contrary." The evidence and the logical proof for God is overwhelming and there is zero contrary evidence.  Therefore to disbelieve in the existence of God is delusional. Our best teachers in science and philosophy, Socrates, Aristotle, Newton, and Einstein are all believers of God.  Why ?  Because they are logical and rational and not delusional like you.  Do our kids a favour, stop teaching the same garbage you learned from school and start encouraging your students to think.
    1
  15. Luigi Deatn stare  So you have no answer as to what "nature" is.  I thought so.  I'll teach you, "nature" is the effects of God.  God is the creator, the first cause.  God also mean different thing to different people at different time, these are all parts of the One and the same God.  God has infinite parts.  God is eternal.  What we believe is "nature" started with the big bang when what we believe is our physical universe was caused to exist.
    1
  16. Luigi Deatn stare  Learned something today ? Now read the Gospels and learn the teachings of Jesus.
    1
  17. Luigi Deatn stare  Stubborn aren't you ?  That's how ignorant people remained ignorant their entire life.  
    1
  18. Luigi Deatn stare  What is "truth" ?  I hope you have an answer this time. 
    1
  19. Luigi Deatn stare  So again you don't have any answer.  WTF are you doing calling people stupid then ? 
    1
  20. Luigi Deatn stare Zachariah Elliott  aspiknf  So you folks think it is stupid to question what is the "truth" ?  No wonder people believe ignorant is bliss.
    1
  21. aspiknf What evidence are you talking about ?  Evolution is not a fact.  Facts are observations.  When was evolution ever observed ?  You were not wrong.  You just believed in evolution as if it is a science when evolution is not a single theory and therefor there is no theory that can be scientifically tested.  It is blind faith, not wrong. Fairy tales are not wrong.  They are not true.
    1
  22. Luca Martinoli  You should have your faith in God, not mankind and not Darwin.  There are evidence of mutation and there are evidence of genetics.  But mutation and genetics are not evolution and there is no selection, natural or artificial, in mutation and genetics.  These are facts, observations, which evolution is not.  I am not trolling.  Everything I said is based on truth and verifiable facts.
    1
  23. Luca Martinoli  Exactly, this is designed, not evolved.  Some birds are designed with long claws and some with short.  Besides, varieties within species is not speciation. There is zero evidence evolution explains origin of life or origin of species.  Evolution is not a single theory but a collection of theories applied towards a variety of causal questions.  In other words evolution is a fairy tale.  To believe in evolution is to have blind faith.  Believe in God.  There are overwhelming evidence and logical proofs for God and there is zero contrary evidence.
    1
  24. Luca Martinoli  Hard evidence for God is all around us : the birds and the bees, the flowers and the trees, the fish in the seas, the far galaxies, the food that we eat, the air that we breathe, everything comprehensible and all that is incomprehensible to you and to me.  Mutation does not simply appears.  Rocks don't suddenly appear to have mutated.  Mutation only occur with living organisms because each and every living organism has intelligence designed into it to enable it to survive and to reproduce.  What is needed for mutation to occur was already in the living organism, the inanimate natural environment did not add or inject anything into the living organism which undergone mutation.  Mutation is part of the design, just as survival and reproduction are parts of the design. Darwin's evolution by the process of natural selection did tried to claim the origin of life but was refuted as nonsense.  The original of species should also be refuted for lack of evidence and lack of logic.  Evolution is entirely based on random chance and accidents, claiming minute changes over long period of time amount to speciation.  There is zero evidence that random chance and accidents exist in real life.  The law of cause and effect prohibits the existence of random chance and accidents.  Everything that exist is caused to exist.  This is the law.  Time has been observed to reduce complexity and order into simplicity and chaos and never the other way around.  Time therefor works against evolution.  The more time is involved, the more unlikely is evolution.  Evolution is a mathematical impossibility.
    1
  25. aspiknf Thank you for agreeing with me the lies of evolution.  With evolution out of the way, how would you explain the origin of our physical universe and of life on earth ?  The fact that we exist and everything in our physical universe including living organisms exist is undeniable, and the law of cause and effect logically explains that everything that exist is caused to exist and therefore there is a first cause.  We call the first cause God.  If you say with certainty that God does not exist, you are irrational, illogical, and delusional, in view of the overwhelming evidence and logical proofs for God and the absence of any contrary evidence.
    1
  26. Luca Martinoli  That is your speculation, your unsubstantiated opinion.  Evolution is Darwin's speculation and unsubstantiated opinion.  What is apparent to you is not necessary the truth.  That is why I asked before what is the truth.  I suppose it is apparent to you that 1+1=2 is valid physical.  The truth is 1+1=2 is invalid physically.  Do you understand why ?
    1
  27. AWZ SmartPhone  Sorry, I do not believe in anything "Holy", and I do not believe in any prophecies.  The reason is I believe no one know the Will of God, not even Jesus, Logic tells me God cannot be God if God needs some human to do God's bidding, and to prophecies is to undermine, marginalize, and misrepresent God.  Jesus never prophecies, he claimed he is the way, the truth, and the life, and he warned us of false prophets.  Muhammad, I believe, is a politician like Moses.  Politicians don't speak the truth, they tell stories to push their political agendas.
    1
  28. AWZ SmartPhone Looks like I have to repeat myself to you : 1)  Jesus never prophecies, he claimed he is the way, the truth, and the life, and he warned us of false prophets.  Jesus is not a prophet.  Since you showed disrespect of Jesus by calling him a prophet, I have no choice but to point out the facts that Moses, Ibrahim, David, Noah, and Mohammad are all false prophets.  Like Hitler and George Bush, these are politicians, period. 2)  Logic tells me God cannot be God if God needs some human to do God's bidding, and to prophecies is to undermine, marginalize, and misrepresent God.  No one knows the Will of God, not even Jesus.  Anyone who self proclaimed to be a massager for God is a liar.  This is logic. 3)  I do not believe in anything "Holy".  It is meaningless to say, "Anything said by God is holy, anyone sent by God is holy. ........ books (Torah, Bible, and Qur'an) are holy", because these books are not the word of God but of humans.  God communicates with us everyday day, every moment, every instances, every event, and through everything, not by words alone. You said, "Turning a deaf ear to the logical claims of a true religion is not less than accepting a nonsense Darwinism theory.  All religions are "true religion", but not the truth; and Darwinism is just a fairy tale.  Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life.  Jesus is a man, not a religion, not  God, not the only Son of God, not Christ, not the Messiah, and not a prophet.  Jesus never claimed what he is not.  Jesus was a man who died 2000 years ago, crucified by his own people for not believing in him, but his spirit is alive today in his teachings which is available in every corner of the world to anyone who is interested in love, peace, and everlasting life.  You said, "You should have a very strong reason to reject logic and/or truth."  I have no reason to reject logic and/or truth, and I have no intention whatsoever to reject logic and/or truth.  Not like some people, I also have no intention to invent, or to follow false logic and/or untruth. You said, ".... it's sad to see you deprived of knowing the truth about our creation, God and prophets."  No one knows the truth, the truth about our creation, or God because these are not knowable to humans.  We humans can only choose to believe or not to believe based on evidence and logical proofs.  As for prophets, I believe they are all false because I believe no one knows the Will of God, not even Jesus. You said, "I can pray to the true God/Allah for your guidance."  Thanks but no thanks, I can talk to God myself, and I do, all the time.  When I pray, I pray the way Jesus taught us how to pray, the Lord's Prayer : Our Father in heaven,hallowed be your name.Your kingdom come,your will be done,on earth, as it is in heaven.Give us this day our daily bread,and forgive us our debts,as we also have forgiven our debtors.And lead us not into temptation,but deliver us from evil. You mentioned, "...../reason of human creation", and you'd said, ".... it doesn't make logic the creator of the entire universe created humans (super intelligent creatures compared to other living things) uselessly without any purpose".  I believe no one knows the reason of human creation because logic tells me that God, or the Will of God, is unknowable to humans.  We humans don't know what is useless or not useless to God, and why, but some people like to make things up and pretend that they do somehow know. I believe in God, I believe in Jesus, and I follow the teachings of Jesus to live an everlasting life of love and of peace.  May the love and the peace of Jesus be with you.
    1
  29. AWZ SmartPhone "Bravo man. You're speaking logic and truth ...."  that's how you started your comment with your first address to me.  Now, "Reading piles of illogical statements made by you,..." is how you would start your comment addressed to me ?  Everything I said is based on truth and verifiable fact.  You have not been able to name one thing I said that is illogical, never mind a pile.  You just wanted me to agree with your prophet and your religion which I replied politely and said, "Sorry, I do not believe in anything "Holy", and I do not believe in any prophecies", and gave my reasons.  You disregarded my reasons for not agreeing with you and started to disrespectfully called Jesus a prophet after I specifically told you that Jesus never prophecies because to prophecies is to undermine, marginalize, and misrepresent God.  I explained to you how logically God is unknowable to humans, but you keep pressing the lies and untruth you believed in on me, without considering you can believe whatever you want to believe but you have no right to say those who disagree with you are illogical without giving any evidence or explanation. You said, "You think you've found the ultimate solution to your problems."  I never made such a statement and in fact I never said I had any problem.  May be you have problems, but not me. You said, " So good luck and enjoy."  I don't believe in luck.  May be you do.  It is illogical and irrational to believe in luck.  The God given law of cause and effect does not permit random chance, luck, and accidents to exist.  Everything that exist is caused to exist.  We call the first cause God, not Luck.  Only superstitious idol worshippers believe in luck. You said, "You believe in not to believe in anything."  That's another lie of yours.  I never said such a thing.  I said I believe in God, and I believe in Jesus.  I don't believe in prophecies, prophets, "Holy" scripture, or any misrepresentation of God and the Will of God. You are a very ungrateful person.  After I wished you the love and the peace of Jesus a couple of times, you repay me with insult, "Your belief in Jesus is a drama as you don't respect his teachings and don't exactly know his message."  You have given zero proof of that, and so you are just being pretentious, obnoxious, and condescending.  You pretend you alone know "exactly" the message of Jesus, and your knowledge is above that of anyone who does not agree with you.  Who do you think you are ?  The authority for God ? You asked, "If Jesus was not a messenger than what that compels you to believe in him at least?"  As with any of my beliefs, logic and reason.  I told you that already last time : the spirit of Jesus is alive today in his teachings.  What about you ?  What compels you to believe in prophecies and to believe in Muhammad being the last prophet sent by God ? May the love and the peace of Jesus be with you.
    1
  30. AWZ SmartPhone  " all humans can communicate with God through logic and reasoning"  I told you that already.  Why are you asking me over and over again ?
    1
  31. AWZ SmartPhone  I breathe and I said thank you God, and I breathe again and again.  Every human does that except a lot of them took it for granted and neglected to give thanks to God.
    1
  32. AWZ SmartPhone  I am a believer of Jesus.  Believers of Jesus have no want.  We are overflowing with grace from God.  Do you really think someone like Bill Gates needs to build up his credit ?  Well, we believers of Jesus are richer than Bill Gates.  We are living an everlasting life of love and of peace. May the love and the peace of Jesus be with you.
    1
  33. AWZ SmartPhone  "our duty ..."  WTF is that ? I believe in God.  I believe in Jesus.  I do not believe in Christ.  Jesus is not Christ.  God is metaphysical and is unknowable to humans.  All that talk about what God is, and referring God as a HIM is blasphemy.  May the truth open your eyes so you may begin to see.
    1
  34. AWZ SmartPhone  Jesus was a man who died 2000 years ago, crucified by his own Jewish people who did not believe in him.  Jesus is not Christ the Messiah, not God, not the only Son of God, not a politician, not a messenger, and not a prophet.  You can say Jesus is a spirit alive in his teachings, like the spirits of Socrates, Buddha, and Confucius are alive in their teachings.  Jesus claimed he is the way, the truth, and the life.  He never claimed what he is not.  Jesus warned us of false prophets because to prophecies is to undermine, marginalise, and misrepresent God.  All prophets are fake because no one knows the Will of God, not even Jesus.  It is blasphemy to speak of prophecies. 
    1
  35. AWZ SmartPhone  It is a wise choice for you to stop your blasphemy. May the truth open your eyes so you may start to see. 
    1
  36. AWZ SmartPhone  Tell your fellow Muslims to blasphemy no more.  Muhammad, like Abraham, Noah, and Moses before him is a fake because they prophecies, undermining, marginalising, and misrepresenting God.  That is the truth. Believe in Jesus and start living an everlasting life of love and of peace, not a temporary life of fear, ignorance, and vengeance you fellows are used to under the power of lies and conspiracies. God bless.
    1
  37. AWZ SmartPhone  Very good.  May the love and the peace of Jesus be with you. 
    1
  38. Denislav Kanev Go sit out at the corner for 5 minutes.
    1
  39. Denislav Kanev  No talking when you are sitting out. 
    1
  40. Dawkins is FOS, an idiot, a hate monger, and a white supremacist.  The evidence and the logical proofs for God is overwhelming and there is zero contrary evidence.  Atheists are irrational, illogical, and delusional.
    1
  41. Desdenova262  Certainly.  God means different thing to different people at different time, these are all parts of the One and the same God.  God has infinite parts. Evidence for God : the birds and the bees, the flowers and the trees, the fish in the seas, the far galaxies, the food that we eat, the air that we breathe, everything comprehensible and all that is incomprehensible to you and me. Logical proof for God : the law of cause and effect points to a first cause we called God. Evidence that God means different thing to different people : Greek gods, Jewish God, Hindu gods, atheists' gods, ... are all different parts of the One and the same God.  Logical proof : God cannot be God if God is not infinite and therefore has infinite parts. Evidence that God means different thing to a person at different time : your God when you were 8, 18, and now are probably all different, true ? Logical proof : God cannot be God if God is knowable as a concrete object.
    1
  42. Desdenova262  People kill people since the beginning of history.  No one knows the Will of God, not even Jesus. Evolution does not explain the origin of life.  And evolution is just a godless fairy tales.  It is neither a fact nor a single scientific theory. Your asked, " First cause could be any number of things couldn't it?"  It could.  We don't know. We just know the first cause exist.  God is not knowable like infinity is not knowable.  We can only know bits and pieces of a small number of parts of God, and of infinity. You asked, "If god is infinite why can't the universe be so?"  Why not ?  There is probably infinite number of infinite universes in the infinite God.  But we don't get to know it, at least not yet. I haven't mentioned ID.  But if you want to talk about it, we can.  Each and every living organism has intelligence designed into it to enables it to survive and to reproduce.  That is a fact.  The logical proof that the intelligence in living organisms is designed is the fact that all matters of intelligence we can observe are designed, like computers and space stations are designed by human with human  intelligence. You said, "a god that is way more complicated must have been designed"  That's a possibility.  But we don't know because we don't get to examine our intelligent designer. You said, "Evolution solves this compounded problem."  The truth is evolution solves nothing and explains nothing.  It is just a faith based on Natural Selection.  Unless by Nature we mean God, Nature has no intelligence to enable Nature to act, choose, and select. You said, "things start out simple and over time become more complex."  The truth is time works against Darwin, not for him.  All our observations confirmed things change from order and complexity into chaos and simplicity over time, and not the other way round.  Further more, chance and necessity does not exist, the law of cause and effect dictates that everything is caused and there can be no accident.  The space capsule carrying Armstrong landed on the moon by design, not by chance,  It could not have landed on the moon, mars or Jupiter by accident.
    1
  43. Sean Baron  Logic. 
    1
  44. Ben Dover  I am not a Christian, so you are the genuinely crazy person, not me.   What have atheists proved that is scientific and not based on blind faith ?  Nothing ?  I bet you can't give me one single piece of evidence that there is no God or that God is not required for our existence. You are pathetic, not me.
    1
  45. Ben Dover   You mean you can't answer my simple question, "What have atheists proved that is scientific and not based on blind faith ?" You said, "can you give me one piece of evidence to prove that santa and the tooth fairy don't exist"  No, I can't.  Obviously Santa and tooth fairy exist and they are real fictional characters.  If you don't believe Santa and tooth fairy exist as real fictional characters, you would no doubt be considered irrational, illogical, and delusional.
    1
  46. Ben Dover  You said, " atheism is the pursuit of all things rational and logical"  Do you have any dictionary definition of that ?  Sounded like you have again regurgitated some more garbage they fed you with in school and through the media, along with evolution and science.  For your education, atheism is a doctrine, a baseless blind faith of disbelieving in the existence of god, any god.  This is defined by Webster, "Definition of ATHEISM 1 archaic :  ungodliness, wickedness 2 a :  a disbelief in the existence of deity b :  the doctrine that there is no deity " You are more stupid than I thought you were.  May God have mercy on you.
    1
  47. Ben Dover  There is no box big enough for God.  God by definition is boundless, the One that cannot be named, the Alpha and the Omega.  Science on the other hand is boxed in to our physical reality.  Metaphysics is the foundation of science.  All scientific theories are in essence metaphysical.  Metaphysics explain science, the box, but science cannot explain the metaphysical, what makes the box. 
    1
  48. Ben Dover  Metaphysics is not a theory.  It is a fact.  All scientific theories are based on metaphysical facts and are in essence metaphysical. The evidence for God is all around us.  Why did you say there is no evidence for God ?  I didn't mean to ask you to disprove God for I know that's not possible.  I asked if you have any evidence to support your belief that there is no God. 
    1
  49. Ben Dover Yes, metaphysics is a philosophy, and so is science.  Do you believe in gravity ? 
    1
  50. Ben Dover  So you believe gravity exist.  Do you know that today, that is 300+ years after Newton discovered the law of gravity, no one knows what gravity is ?  We can observe the effects of gravity just like we can observe the effect of God.  But we cannot observe gravity itself just like we cannot observe God.  We don't know what is gravity but we believe in gravity because we can observe and measure the effects of gravity.  Similarly we don't know what is God but we believe in God because we can observe and measure the effects of God.  So if you believe in gravity you should have no problem believing in God. Metaphysics is not science.  It is the foundation of science.  All scientific theories are in essence metaphysical.  I told you that already.  I'll quote a source and I'll give you an example so you may understand it easier.  Per Wiki, "Much recent work has been devoted to analyzing the role of metaphysics in scientific theorizing. Alexandre Koyré led this movement, declaring in his book Metaphysics and Measurement, "It is not by following experiment, but by outstripping experiment, that the scientific mind makes progress."[33] Imre Lakatos maintained that all scientific theories have a metaphysical "hard core" essential for the generation of hypotheses and theoretical assumptions.[34] Thus, according to Lakatos, "scientific changes are connected with vast cataclysmic metaphysical revolutions." For example E=MCC, mass, equal, speed of light, square, are all metaphysical concepts, none of these is physical matter, none of these can be observed. Only their effects can be observed.  They are things thought to exist but cannot be seen.  Definition of metaphysical, per Webster, metaphysical           adjective meta·phys·i·cal \-ˈfi-zi-kəl\ : of, relating to, or based on metaphysics : of or relating to things that are thought to exist but that cannot be seen.
    1