Comments by "Jackie Wu" (@jwu1950) on "Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell"
channel.
-
2
-
***** You are much smarter than most of the people here. But evolution which you believed in should be revised as to say evolution by the process of God's selection, don't you think ?
Eve and the apple is undoubtedly a metaphor. It is meant to explain what we see is not what is real, and what is real we cannot see. Eve could see the apple, but the apple is only an illusion. The knowledge the devil was telling her about is still an illusion. What is real inside all these molecules, atoms, and subatomic particles are metaphysical and what is metaphysical is not knowable by humans. God is real and God is metaphysical and unknowable by humans. You were correct not to believe in God's plan as prophecies by humans because the Will of God is unknowable to human, even to Jesus. You should therefor reject the idea of sins for the same reason. Believe in God. Believe in Jesus who is the human teacher who didn't undermine, marginalise, and misrepresent God by prophecies but simple taught us to love God with all our hearts, with all our minds, and with all our souls, and to love one another as he loved us. May the love and the peace of Jesus be with you.
2
-
1
-
***** You said, "You don't get to pick and choose what they teach you at school is "truth" or not." I don't pick and choose, I analyse and apply logic and reasoning. It is called critical thinking, in case you have not been taught what that means. Then you said, "the media doesn't teach me or anyone about evolution." They don't, they just stuff the nonsense into your head by lies, propagandas, presumptions, and presuppositions.
I checked all the sites you listed. They talk about mutations, genetics, and fossils. None of that is evolution. Varieties within species are part of design, not speciation. Darwinian evolution by the process of natural selection does not exist in real life, only in fairy tales. Nature does not have any intelligence to enable nature to act, choose, and select, unless by nature we mean God, and by natural we mean God given. Only living organisms can mutate and that is because of the intelligence designed into each and every living organism by the intelligence designer which enables the living organism to survive and reproduce. The inanimate natural environment does not and can not mutate, evolve, or select who and what to be mutated.
1
-
***** You'll be genuinely surprised alright when you start to realise how credulous
you have been to blindly believe in the fairy tale of evolution. You'll also find out everything I said is based on truth and verifiable facts.
Truth number one : Evolution "is neither a fact nor a single theory. It is a collection of theories applied towards a variety of casual questions. It is not a science because there is no theory to be scientifically tested." Per Wiki, "Evolutionary biologist Kirk J. Fitzhugh[39] wrote, "'Evolution' cannot be both a theory and a fact. Theories are concepts stating cause–effect relations...One might argue that it is conceivable to speak of 'evolution' as a fact by way of it being the subject of reference in explanatory hypotheses...In the strictest sense then, 'evolution' cannot be regarded as a fact even in the context of hypotheses since the causal points of reference continue to be organisms, and no amount of confirming instances for those hypotheses will transform them into facts...While evolution is not a fact, it is also not a single theory, but a set of theories applied to a variety of causal questions...An emphasis on associating 'evolution' with 'fact' presents the misguided connotation that science seeks certainty.
Truth number two : They talk about mutations, genetics, and fossils. None of that is evolution. Evolution is not only mutation or genetics. It claimed the origin of life and of species. It claimed life originates by random chance and accidents and minute changes caused by random chance and accidents over a very long period of time amounts to speciation. The problem is random chance and accidents do not exist in real life, only in fairy tales, and time has been observed to reduce order and complexity into chaos and simplicity, never the other way around. In other words, time works against evolution, the more time is involved, the more unlikely is evolution. Evolution is a mathematical impossibility. The law of cause and effect prohibit the existence of random chance and accidents. Everything that exist is caused to exist. We call the first cause God, the creator.
Truth number three : Nature does not have any intelligence to enable nature to act, choose, and select, unless by nature we mean God, and by natural we mean God given. You insisted, "Yes it does, it's called natural selection. And better yet, it proves that something doesn't need intelligence to design things. Mutations happen," So what is nature and what is natural if nature does not mean God and natural does not mean God given ? How is mutation a selection made by the inanimate natural environment when all mutation must be carried out by living organisms by the intelligence designed into each and every living organisation ? To believe in natural selection is akin to believing humans can pop out of rocks naturally. That is a logical fallacy, personal incredulity.
Truth number four : The inanimate natural environment does not and can not mutate, evolve, or select who and what to be mutated. This is a statement of fact. But you said, "You've just committed another logical fallacy, proof by assertion." Are you asserting that the opposite is true, that is, the inanimate natural environment does and can mutate, evolve, or select who and what to be mutated ? Is that your logical fallacy, proof by assertion, or can you substantiate your claim ?
Truth number five : Varieties within species are part of design, not speciation. These are the facts, white cats and black cats are both cats, white humans and black humans are both human, big dogs and small dogs are both dogs, etc., etc. No moving the goalpost or special pleading is involved here.
1
-
1
-
***** The evidence against evolution is the fact that evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory. It is therefor not a science for there is no theory to be scientifically tested. A collection of theories applied to a variety of casual questions is a story, a godless fairy tale in the case of evolution. The other evidence against evolution is the fact that the law of cause and effects ensures random chance and accidents do not exist in real life, only in fairy tales. Yet another evidence against evolution is the fact that time has always been observed to reduce order and complexity into chaos and simplicity and never the other way around. The more time is involved logically means the more unlikely is evolution.
The evidence for creation includes : the birds and the bees, the flowers and the trees, the fish in the seas, the far galaxies, the food that we eat, the air that we breathe, everything comprehensible and all that is incomprehensible to you and to me. The logical proof is the law of cause and effects that says everything that exist is caused to exist, and it points to a first cause. We call the first cause God, the creator.
You haven't quoted anybody ? What about all those bull shits you claimed as logical fallacies and all those meaningless results of meaningless experiments ? Why are you asking for sources anyways when you just regard mine as appeal to authority whereas yours are evidence ? That's just bull shit. If you can't rely on facts, logic and reasoning what source can you rely on ?
You have explained what natural selection is ? When ? WTF do you mean by natural if you don't mean God given ? I asked you this question several times already. It only seemed you have no answer or you would have answered it the first time I asked. You are the one who think that by repeating natural selection a few more times it may become true. The bad news is, it doesn't. There is no natural selection unless by nature we mean God and by natural we mean God given.
1
-
***** You asked me for evidence against evolution and evidence for creation and I gave you both in verifiable facts and truthful logical arguments which you ignore because you have no rebuttal.
You quoted logical fallacies without understanding what you quoted is referring to and you applied them at me when you should have applied them at yourself. For example, personal credulity is your blind belief in evolution, not my evidence based belief in God.
" peer-reviewed scientific articles" of what ? Mutation, genetics, and fossils are not evolution. I told you that several times already. Why are you so dense ? You said, "Mutations happen, and those with negative mutations die out, while those with positive or neutral mutations live on. It's an extremely simple concept, and one you're in a state of denial over." I never denied mutations exist. I said evolution does not exist in real life, only in fairy tales.
Stop wasting my valuable time and back up your claims, you lazy ignoramus. Answer my questions : WTF is nature if by nature you don't mean God, and WTF is natural if by natural you don't mean God given ? And WTF mutation is proof of evolution when there is no speciation in mutation ?
1
-
***** There,
The evidence against evolution is the fact that evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory. It is therefor not a science for there is no theory to be scientifically tested. A collection of theories applied to a variety of casual questions is a story, a godless fairy tale in the case of evolution. The other evidence against evolution is the fact that the law of cause and effects ensures random chance and accidents do not exist in real life, only in fairy tales. Yet another evidence against evolution is the fact that time has always been observed to reduce order and complexity into chaos and simplicity and never the other way around. The more time is involved logically means the more unlikely is evolution.
The evidence for creation includes : the birds and the bees, the flowers and the trees, the fish in the seas, the far galaxies, the food that we eat, the air that we breathe, everything comprehensible and all that is incomprehensible to you and to me. The logical proof is the law of cause and effects that says everything that exist is caused to exist, and it points to a first cause. We call the first cause God, the creator.
1
-
1
-
***** Okay, for the third time,
The evidence against evolution is the fact that evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory. It is therefor not a science for there is no theory to be scientifically tested. A collection of theories applied to a variety of casual questions is a story, a godless fairy tale in the case of evolution. The other evidence against evolution is the fact that the law of cause and effects ensures random chance and accidents do not exist in real life, only in fairy tales. Yet another evidence against evolution is the fact that time has always been observed to reduce order and complexity into chaos and simplicity and never the other way around. The more time is involved logically means the more unlikely is evolution.
The evidence for creation includes : the birds and the bees, the flowers and the trees, the fish in the seas, the far galaxies, the food that we eat, the air that we breathe, everything comprehensible and all that is incomprehensible to you and to me. The logical proof is the law of cause and effects that says everything that exist is caused to exist, and it points to a first cause. We call the first cause God, the creator.
The source is simple logic and reasoning if you have any.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** Done that by the law of cause and effects. Everything that exist is caused to exist. The law does not allow random chance and accidents to exist and therefor evolution cannot exist. There can not be evidence for something that does not exist. Mutation and genetics exist and you can find a lot of evidence for those. These evidence also logically prove the intelligence designed into each and every living organism that enables the living organisms to live, reproduce, mutate, and act, choose, select, or otherwise manipulate their natural environment which has been designed to be inanimate, impotent ,and unintelligent, okay ? By example, the capsule carrying Armstrong landed on the moon by design and by cause, not by random chance or by accident, we explore and live for extended period of time in space and in ocean deeps which are not our natural habitat because we have the intelligence to do so, not natural selection but artificial selection as in animal bleeding where Darwin got his original idea, but Darwin was mistaken, nature has no intelligence unless by nature he meant God, and I think he did originally but he later changed his mind when Hitler supported his idea and he became rich and famous for validating Hitler's and white supremacists' agenda of ethnic cleansing. May the truth be with you.
1
-
***** That's correct, random chance and accidents do not exist in real life, only in fairy tales. If you roll one standard dice and get a 7 or 8, then I'll have to admit I am wrong. But you can't, never, regardless of how many times you roll. It is because the dice was designed to have only six sides labelled 1,2,3,4,5, and 6. You can roll any of those six sides depending on how it is rolled, the number that come up is a result of cause and design. If you want to roll 7 or 8, you would have to change the design. If you put 7 on every side you'll roll 7 every time. There is no randomness. This is the law, understand ?
You said, " evolution isn't just random chance. Natural selection removes most of the "chance" and "randomness". WTF is evolution and WTF is natural selection ? Evolution is not a single theory or a fact. It is an opinion and it does not exist in real life. Natural selection does not exist either unless by nature you mean God, and by natural you mean God's design and creation. Do not confuse mutation and genetics with evolution, they are different ideas. Mutation and genetics do exist and there are plenty of evidence for them. These evidence showed that mutation and genetics are caused by the intelligence designed into each and every living organism that enables the living organisms to live, reproduce, mutate, act, choose, select, and otherwise manipulate their natural environment which is designed to be inanimate and impotent. There is zero "chance" and "randomness" in mutation, genetics, or anywhere in real life, This is the law, understand ?
You asked, "So it's intelligent design that a baby is born with extra toes or blind?" Yes, without a doubt. It is very stupid of you to ask such a stupid question. It is even more stupid of you to then say, "What a great design and a loving God you have there." Most people would say that is not a good design and not loving of God. But it is irrelevant. God just "is". Human interpretation of good and evil, bad or good, loving or hateful, etc. are only human measurements, they don't define or determine God. Yin Yang in Chinese philosophy describe the complimentary, inter-related, and inter-dependence of Yin and Yang in everything, from God to the negative and positive charges in electromagnetism. Both Yin and Yang are necessary parts of the whole. There is no Yin without Yang, no good without evil, no bad without good, no loving without hateful. Can you have life without death and vice versa ? Of course not. That would be a stupid question if I actually ask you that, wouldn't it ?
You said, " Based on what we know of mutations they are completely random and are due to genetics, not some God designing anything." You need to understand you don't know shit if you don't even know random chance and accidents do not exist in real life.
You asked, "What about that space ship that blew up, killing all the astronauts on board on live television, due to a random faulty wire or something like that. Was that just God giving humanity the finger?" It is again very stupid of you to ask such a stupid question. Of course that space ship blowing up was designed and caused to blow up. The faulty wiring was a faulty design by human engineers, nothing random about it.
It happened as designed and as caused, nothing to do with who is giving who the finger which could be one of the causes if that actually happened, but it did not happen, nobody is giving anyone the finger. That was only your imaginative opinion. I am not saying that is not possible. Muslims spies could have done it deliberately to mean giving USA the finger, but that's just groundless speculation.
You said, "Saying that God is behind everything is just bullshit you're making up, and I can claim any God or supernatural being is doing the same thing." That's correct, you can. If you are referring to God the creator, the first cause, it is not bullshit I made up. I have proven it with evidence and logic. I told you already no one can stop you calling the first cause by any other name like Zeus, FSM, invisible unicorn, etc., it's your choice if you don't like to call the first cause God, as long as you mean the first cause with the label of you preferred.
You said, "It doesn't need intelligence to design". That is incorrect. Design is intelligence, period. For example, computers and space stations are products of human design and human intelligence, living organisms and solar systems are the design and intelligence of the intelligent designer, and we call the intelligent designer God.
The evolution conspiracy endorsed by Hitler and white supremacists are still currently active. Militant atheists like Dawkins, Krauss, Harris, and the late Hitchens are some of the conspirators. They use evolution to promote hate, violence, racism, and bigotry. That's why there are still so many blind believers of evolution even though it is painfully obvious it is a lie and a fairy tale.
1
-
***** I am speechless. You are so stupid it's no even funny. Chance, probabilities, and logic are ways to explain, they are not causes and they don't cause mutation, genetics, the rolling of dice, or anything at all.
There is zero evidence for evolution. You have not presented one single evidence for evolution because there is none to be found. Keep saying that evolution is well established does not make it become true. Even though I don't have the burden of proof, I have proved evolution does not exist in real life. You cannot prove something by evidence, especially something that does not exist. You prove it by logic and reasoning explaining the cause of the evidence. Mutation and genetics are evidence for design because they can be logically explained to have been caused by design. They are not evidence for evolution although evolution is highly dependent on them to function because they cannot be logically explained to have been caused by evolution.
You asked, "Just what do you think evolution is?" I told you that already. Evolution is a collection of theories applied towards a varieties of causal questions. In other words evolution is a story, a godless fairy tale. Evolution is highly dependent on mutations and genetics to function but it is not the cause of mutation and genetics, and mutations and genetics can logically be explained to have been caused by design, they are by virtual of this fact evidence for design rather than for evolution.
Referring to my statement ""These evidence showed that mutation and genetics are caused by the intelligence designed into each and every living organism", you asked rather impolitely, "What fucking evidence? Please provide at least one link." All the links and all the evidence you have provided, sir, and don't be so rude next time, it makes your behavior look like that of a 6 year old. They are all based on observation of organisms. When the causal point of reference is organisms, no amount of confirmations can transform them into facts because each organism is different and unique.
You asked, "So again, the fact that an animal is born with a negative mutation which will threaten its survival is intelligent design? How the fuck is that intelligent?" It is very stupid of you to ask such a stupid question. Intelligence is intelligent. It doesn't have to function the way you like it to. Stupid intelligence are still intelligent, only in a stupid way, just like the way you asked these stupid questions. Your said, "You've listed no evidence that proves that mutations aren't completely random,..." Yes I have, the law of cause and effects does not allow random chance and accidents to exist in real life. I must teach you this, evidence is not proof. Proofs only exist in logic and mathematics.
You asked, "So if God does something horrible or stupid, then he's exempt from any criticism because he's beyond human morals and logic?" I don't believe you can be so stupid. God does horrible and stupid things all day long. God is not beyond human morals and logic. You can criticise God all day long but that does not change God a single bid. God just "is". Some people are like you, they hurt their kids by criticising them all day long as if by doing so they would make themselves right. They wouldn't, they wouldn't change their kid either. Like you, they are just fooling themselves.
If one day you fall on the steps and broke your spine, there is no doubt that is a result of design and of cause. Every event is caused. Accidents do not exist in real life. This is the law of cause and effect. I do not and I can not make up laws. Fertilisation also must obey the law of cause and effect and not the fantasy of randomness. You were born out of design and cause, not out of nothing by random chance and accident.
You said, "....it was designed to safely transport people into space." That was the intention, yes, but that was not the final design, was it ? That space ship blew up because of human design and other causes, faulty unintentional human design as reported by subsequent investigations. It was not an act of God like a volcanic eruption, and not an act of randomness like you fantasied.
Re. your example of a random number generator, it depends on the perimeter you set for the calculation. If the perimeter is set at fifty million. 7 coming out three times in a roll is an indication someone is tinkering with the design of the machine. The lottery commission would definite withhold giving out prices pending further investigation if the same winning number come out twice in a roll, never mind three times, for it is almost a certainty that can't happen other than by design. They would investigate the design and the functioning of the machine like you would check the dice if a 7 come out of a roll. Design sets the perimeter of what is possible in probability calculations. Don't believe me? Ask your math teacher. While you do that ask your math teacher also why Jackie Wu says 1+1=2 is invalid in physical terms, okay ? May be he or she can teach you how to fuck and think.
We don't know God has a cause or not because God is believed to be eternal and metaphysical, and eternity and what is metaphysical is unknowable to humans. My logic is not faulty and there is no special pleading. I have never said we know God has no cause. I said we believe God is eternal but there is no way we can prove if this belief is accurate. It is like saying we humans believe galaxies billions of light years away from earth still exist but there is no way to prove if this belief is accurate or not, not because galaxies are metaphysical for they are believed to be physical, but because billions of light years feel like an eternity to us, given our limited ability.
Just the opposite, evidence like hind leg bones still being in whales proves that there was intelligence involved. Ask yourself this : without intelligence designed into whales what enables them to grow hind legs in the first place even if evolution had taken place. We can observe tree roots breaking concrete but we have never observed concretes causing trees to grow legs and walk away. That's because trees are not designed to grow legs regardless of how eager you are to have concretes lend a few legs to trees so you can validate your fantasy.
I have not repeated myself, you have. The last comment was the first time I called evolution a conspiracy. You are the one who is heavily brainwashed and not putting in an effort. Many people on YT have praised me for my originality and my clear minded free thinking accuracy. You would too if you were not so deeply indoctrinated by those lies and propagandas they fed you with in schools.
The truth will set you free. May the truth be with you. These are no my original of course, but the brilliance of bringing it up here is another example of my un-indoctrinated free-mindedness.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Mauri .tanga I know it is difficult you to read all my previous comments, so I'll repeat it for you. The overwhelming evidence for God includes : the birds and the bees, the flowers and the trees, the fish in the seas, the far galaxies, the food that we eat, the air that we breathe, everything comprehensible and all that is incomprehensible to you and to me. One of the logical proofs for God is the law of cause and effects which points to a first cause. We call the first cause God the creator.
God has been called by many different names because God means different thing to different people at different times, these are all parts of the One and the same God. God has infinite parts. The more accurate description of God I think include ; the One that cannot be named, the Alpha and the Omega, the Pantheistic God of Spinoza, the creator, the first cause, the intelligent designer, and the law giver
Make no mistake, Jesus is not God. Jesus is a man who died 2000 years ago crucified by his own people who did not believe in him. But the spirit of Jesus is alive today in his teachings which has been preserved and is available everywhere in the world to those who are interested in everlasting life.
May the love and the peace of Jesus be with you.
1
-
Mauri .tanga I gave you the evidence and I gave you the logical proof. Why are you still asking where is the evidence for God ?
You asked, "From where did the creator come?" The answer is God is eternal. Eternity, like infinity is unknowable to humans.
You said, "If the answer is "he always existed" then we have a situation," No one can say God always existed. God is metaphysical. What is metaphysical is unknowable to humans. No one knows God, where God comes from, or what is the Will of God. Any one who says he or she knows is a liar and a hypocrite. We humans can only choose to believe or not believe in God based on logic applied towards our observations, the evidence. Since the evidence and the logical proofs for God is overwhelming and there is zero contrary evidence, to believe that there is no God is irrational, illogical, and delusional.
May the truth be with you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** You are not allowed to graduate to the second point if you can't pass the first. So far you've failed. You cheated by quote mining. I said, " Evolution does not explain mutation and genetics, Neither do mutation and genetics explain evolution." You quoted, ""Evolution does not explain mutation and genetics" Normally that offense is sufficient reason for expulsion. However, being such a nice guy, I'll allow you another chance.
So give me a single valid evidence with logical proof for evolution. Common decent does not mean evolution. Apple computers and any generic computers have common decent but they are all designed by human using human intelligence created by God the creator, the intelligent designer, not by any baloney selection.
Genetic engineering is the proof that DNA is a design and it can be redesigned by human intelligence. Explaining the function of a part does not change the origin of the part. Compare DNA to the engine of an automobile and viruses to an electrical screwdriver. saying viruses played a major role in the origin of DNA is like saying electric screw drivers played a major role in the origin of the automobile engine, they are all designs, viruses, DNA, electric screwdrivers, and automobile engines, no mention of God is needed for such a simple understanding.
No worries, you'll get a chance to get all your fallacies pointed out and corrected if you put in sufficient effort. But you must correct the first one before you are allowed to move on to the second.
To answer your questions, I am millions of years old I suppose, I live on earth, and the education I have is the kind that is logical, rational, and evidence based, not like the bull shit lies, propagandas, and blind faith education you apparently have. These are all based on truth and verifiable facts as usual. How about you ?
1
-
Mauri .tanga
1. Genetic codes, that serve to prove design, not evolution. Radio codes were designed, not evolved.
2. Fossil records prove some species die out over time, not new species having been created by God or popped out of rocks like you believed. Fossil studies are irrelevant and a waste of time.
3. Genetic commonalities, that serve to prove design also. General Motor cars and Ford cars have plenty of design commonalities too.
They were both designed, not evolved through some kind of baloney selection.
4. Common traits in embryos, common trait in adults, these serve to prove design. Genetic engineering can alter these designs by using human intelligence to redesign the DNA. Human intelligence is also evidence of intelligent design.
5. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is proof that intelligence has been designed into bacteria to enable them to live, reproduce, and mutate. Antibiotics are proof that intelligence has been designed into humans to enable them to act, choose, select, and otherwise manipulate their natural (God made) environment. The natural environment
has not been designed with any intelligence to act, choose, select, or manipulate living organisms like human unless God choose to intervene.
There, four of the five are all based on scientific facts and studies and they all support design. Fossils are irrelevant and they are not scientific evidence. May the truth be with you and guide you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Mauri .tanga You said, "The evidence of thousands upon thousands of scientific research suggest that evolution is real , thats why i believe in it." Let me repeat what I told you before, there is zero evidence for evolution. There are plenty of scientific research on mutations and genetics, but mutations and genetics is not evolution. Mutation and genetics serve as proofs for intelligent design and we called the intelligent designer God. God is real, evolution is not. I explained to you four of five of these evidence you quoted how they serve to prove design, and one, fossil records, that is irrelevant of anything.
Read the above paragraph at least once everyday so you can appreciate what I have given you in return, truth and wisdom in return for lies and propagandas.
It is good that you realise human intelligent is proof that god is real. You should also realise all living organisms are proof for intelligent design and God the intelligent designer. It is intelligence designed into each and every living organism that enables living organism to live, reproduce, mutate, act, choose, select, and otherwise manipulate their natural (god made) environment which is not designed with any intelligence for it to act, choose, select, or otherwise manipulate living organisms. Case in point, humans, monkeys, and plants have lived in space and in ocean deep which is not their natural habitat.
You asked, "okay , So when did god create humans?" Okay, so you tell me when did God created humans. I don't know. The popular expression is "God knows". What God knows is unknowable by humans because God is metaphysical and what is metaphysical is unknowable to humans. For example, no one knows what is gravity, life, or time because these are metaphysical. We humans cannot know what is metaphysical. We can choose to believe or not believe based on logic applied towards our observations, the evidence, of the effects of these entities, not the entities themselves. We believe in gravity because we can observe falling objects. We believe in life because we can observe plants and animals are alive. We believe in time because we can observe the ticking of our clocks. We believe in God because we can observe all that we can observe and we applied the logic in the law of cause and effects to prove to ourselves everything that exist is caused to exist and therefor there must be a first cause. We call the first cause God. We can observe intelligence in human and all living organisms and we call the intelligent designer God. We can observe natural laws like the law of gravity, the law of thermodynamics, etc. and we call the law giver God. All these metaphysical entities are real, in fact more real than the physical object that we can observe and detect with our senses. What we can see is not real, they are illusions. What is real we cannot see, they are metaphysical.
1
-
Mauri .tanga Exactly, I did say "God is metaphysical", and you would have been correct to say science cannot be applied to prove God because what is metaphysical is unknowable to humans, like I told you.
I don't know how many times I have to tell you why there is zero research that prove evolution is real before the logic can get through your head. Evolution is not a single theory, therefore there is no theory of evolution that can be tested by the scientific method, and that is why no scientific testing has ever been conducted to prove evolution. The thousands of research everyday all over the world prove mutations and genetics, and mutations and genetics are not evolution, they are designed.
You said, "However there is not one ! piece of evidence that supports your theory". What theory of mine are you referring to ? The theory that says, GOD DID IT I suppose. Well, everything comprehensible and all those incomprehensible to you and to me supports the theory of GOD DID IT. I told you that already and explained why to you also. Go back and read what I wrote, and start learning rather than ranting.
There is no theory of gravity either. There is the law of gravity by Newton. A law is not a theory. Laws are observable facts that has not or cannot be explained. If there is any explanation for the law of gravity that would be called the theory of gravity, but there is none. Einstein attempted to explain gravity with the general theory of relativity but Einstein failed because his theory does not work in the quantum level. Some scientists are currently trying to find gravitons which are hypothetical subatomic particles that might explain gravity, but none has been found so far. So as science stood today there is no theory of gravity and no one knows when objects fall to the floor whether they were pushed to the floor, sucked to the floor, or carried gently to the floor by gravitons.
A FACT is not a theory. What you described there is the observable fact or the observable effects of gravity, not gravity itself. Gravity is metaphysical. It cannot be observed. We can only believe in gravity based on our logic applied towards these observable effects of gravity. It is the same way we believe in God, by applying our logic towards the observable effects of God. BTW, mass and forces are metaphysical too. They cannot be observed, only their effects can be observed.
The observable FACT that the genome/dna/ changes over a period of time is explained by design or the theory of GOD DID IT, not by evolution. There is no theory of evolution and evolution does not exist in real life, only in fairy tales. The engines of automobiles and the computer chips change over time too because they are designed, not because of evolution by some baloney selection.
The effects of gravity is a FACT, an observable fact. But gravity is not a fact. It is an unobervable metaphysical entity, a concept, a form, an idea, or an essence. Metaphysical entities like gravity, life, time, mass, force, God, etc. are real because they caused observable effects. Evolution on the other hand is not a FACT. No evolution can be observed and there is no observable effect of evolution. There are observable effects caused by intelligent design, like mutations and genetics, and that is why intelligent design is real.
1
-
Mauri .tanga God is proven whether you believe in God or not. Not scientifically proven though, mind you, because God, like gravity, life, time, etc. are metaphysical and cannot be proven by the scientific method. What is metaphysical is unknowable by humans. That is a verifiable fact.
There is no theory of gravity and there is no theory of evolution. The law of gravity which is the observable facts regarding the effects of gravity is as you described it. What you need to learn is laws and facts are unexplained. A theory is an explanation, a fact is not an explanation. Gravity and evolution, in fact anything , cannot be both a fact and a theory. Gravity is a fact. Evolution is neither a fact nor a theory. Per Wiki, "Evolutionary biologist Kirk J. Fitzhugh[39] wrote, "'Evolution' cannot be both a theory and a fact. Theories are concepts stating cause–effect relations...One might argue that it is conceivable to speak of 'evolution' as a fact by way of it being the subject of reference in explanatory hypotheses...In the strictest sense then, 'evolution' cannot be regarded as a fact even in the context of hypotheses since the causal points of reference continue to be organisms, and no amount of confirming instances for those hypotheses will transform them into facts...While evolution is not a fact, it is also not a single theory, but a set of theories applied to a variety of causal questions...An emphasis on associating 'evolution' with 'fact' presents the misguided connotation that science seeks certainty."
You asked, ""The observable FACT that the genome/dna/ changes over a period of time is explained by design or the theory of GOD DID IT," WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE ?" These observable facts are the evidence. Intelligence in living organism is logically required to carry out these changes, and intelligence logically required an intelligent designer. We call the intelligent designer God. This is how the theory of GOD DID IT explains these observable facts, these evidence.
You asked, ""The engines of automobiles and the computer chips change over time too because they are designed"
So thats your evidence for god?" No. that is proof of human intelligent design. Human intelligence is evidence for intelligent design. We call the intelligent designer God.
1
-
***** You said, "Genetics and mutation explain evolution because they are key parts of it." What kind of logic is that. Engine and wings are key parts of aeroplanes means engine and wings explain what is an aeroplane ? What about all the connecting parts of the aeroplane which is non existent in the case of evolution. This is another fallacy of yours. I shouldn't even allow you to move on to the next fallacy until you corrected this one. But being such a nice guy I'll allow you one more.
You said, "Long term evolution makes new species that branch off from others, which means that common descent means evolution." This is a typical logical fallacy called circular reasoning. That is x explain y and therefor y explains x. Case in point, x (evolution) explains y (common decent), therefor y (common decent) explains x (evolution). Much worse than this, evolution does not even exist in real life, only in fairy tales. It is design that explains species, and species are evidence for design, not explanations of design. Common decent is evidence for design, not explanation of design.
Now you must put some effort in if you like to be allowed to move on to the third point.
1
-
1
-
Mauri .tanga Why would I want to disprove your claim. If you seriously claimed that and not just use it as a hypothetical case for an argument, then it is true to you as you must have believed in this giant unicorn that is metaphysical and created "GOD" and gave life to the world based on your logic applied towards evidence. You might have vividly seen or even talked to or held hands with this unicorn, I don't know, I have not observed any evidence myself and therefor I can't form any logical reason to believe in it. Besides I have contrary evidence and logical proofs that God is metaphysical and eternal and it is God who created our physical universe. I suspect your giant unicorn was also created by God but if it is metaphysical like gravity, life, time, energy, force, mass, etc. there is no way I can verify my suspicion because what is metaphysical is unknowable to humans, only believable. Or you might have mistakenly referred the god of Abraham as God and called the real God by the label of a giant unicorn. You know which answer I gave is accurate, I don't., God means different thing to different people at different times, these are all parts of the One and the same God. God has infinite parts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** The first grade here is how to correct two of your fallacies :
1) You said, "Genetics and mutation explain evolution because they are key parts of it." What kind of logic is that. Engine and wings are key parts of aeroplanes means engine and wings explain what is an aeroplane ? What about all the connecting parts of the aeroplane which is non existent in the case of evolution. This is another fallacy of yours. I shouldn't even allow you to move on to the next fallacy until you corrected this one. But being such a nice guy I'll allow you one more.
2) You said, "Long term evolution makes new species that branch off from others, which means that common descent means evolution." This is a typical logical fallacy called circular reasoning. That is x explain y and therefor y explains x. Case in point, x (evolution) explains y (common decent), therefor y (common decent) explains x (evolution). Much worse than this, evolution does not even exist in real life, only in fairy tales. It is design that explains species, and species are evidence for design, not explanations of design. Common decent is evidence for design, not explanation of design.
You must learn and correct these first grade fallacies before you can move on, get it ?
1
-
***** The fallacy is in your assertion, "Genetics and mutation explain evolution because they are key parts of it."
Now it is a double fallacy because you said, " Mutations explain evolution because mutations are a key part in the natural selection process. " Natural selection is an absurd concept and it does not exist in real life, unless by nature you mean God and by natural you mean God made or God designed. Even Darwin himself conceded that natural selection is absurd.
Now is triple fallacy when you said, "Genetics explains evolution because otherwise we would have no idea why our DNA is so similar to chimps and other organisms." DNA are designs just like computers are designed. Apple computers and any other generic computers share a high number of similar chips, these are all evidence for human intelligent design. If you don't like aeroplanes, we can use automobiles, photocopiers, or dildos, anything will do really, as long as it is designed like any living organism is designed.
Evolution is not natural selection. Evolution describe a mathematically impossible process of speciation with zero supporting evidence. Natural selection describes survival of the fittest which is a designed process with no selection involved. Poorly manufactured computers will break down first but not because of some baloney selection process. Even Darwin admitted that natural selection is absurd when it comes to complex organs. It would be like claiming sometimes the sun orbits the planets.
This is what you said, "Long term evolution makes new species that branch off from others, which means that common descent means evolution." This is not circular reasoning ? Ask anyone and you'll be told that's circular reasoning. even if you want to add mutation and genetics in the middle and make all four meaning the same process. This was what you said, "Evolution is natural selection".
You failed once again. No. you are not allowed to graduate from grade one until you learn how to correct the first two fallacies of yours, not "dealt with it" the way you did. That is, if you want to amount to anything when you grow up.
1
-
1
-
Mauri .tanga Exactly, I said, " I suspect your giant unicorn was also created by God but if it is metaphysical like gravity, life, time, energy, force, mass, etc. there is no way I can verify my suspicion because what is metaphysical is unknowable to humans, only believable. Or you might have mistakenly referred the god of Abraham as God and called the real God by the label of a giant unicorn. You know which answer I gave is accurate, I don't." You are now confirming my second suspicion is accurate. Good for you. Just like I said, " God means different thing to different people at different times, these are all parts of the One and the same God. God has infinite parts.
You said, "the evidence in Wedensedayism and The giant unicorn are life itself and you can never disprove those theories." The truth is I have no intention whatsoever to disprove your theories. I just don't see any reason to believe in any theory or any bull shit like evolution based on zero evidence or logical proof for them.
I never said your theories or evolution and natural selection are wrong. I said there is no evidence or logical proof to give anybody any reason to believe in them. I believe in the metaphysical God and the theory of GOD DID IT based on the overwhelming evidence and logical proofs for god and the absence of any contrary evidence. It would be irrational, illogical, and delusional for me to believe that there is no God. BTW life is also metaphysical. And it is true that life gives out the effects that living humans can fantasise about Wednesdayism, giant unicorns, and the evolution and natural selection craps.
If that's the logic of your theories then it is the logical fallacy of argument from ignorance. You are basing your argument on "we don't know". I am basing my argument on we "know" the metaphysical God is "unknowable to human" because we have proved that God is metaphysical and what is metaphysical is not knowable to humans.
May the truth be with you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1