Comments by "Jackie Wu" (@jwu1950) on "Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell" channel.

  1. Mauri .tanga You asked, "What do you mean what is real to me?"  It is a simple question, isn't it.  You demanded answers that God is REAL so you must know WTF you mean by REAL. You, said, "The logical proof of computer simulation theory is life itself,"  Wrong, life is an evidence, not a proof. You said, "do you have proof that cause and effect doesn't not aply to god?"  No. I do not.  God is metaphysical.  What is metaphysical is unknowable to humans.  We can't know, we can only believe or not believe based on logic applied against our observation of the EFFECTS of God, not of the entity God. You asked, "Oh and can you actually disprove evolution? "  Yes I can.  But you have the burden of proof because you asserted evolution, I didn't.  I am not just saying evolution is a fairy tale, I explained why it is a fairy tale : it is neither a fact nor a single theory but a collection of theories applied towards a variety of causal questions, in other words, a story, a godless fairy tale. 
    1
  2. Mauri .tanga  Life is evidence, yes.  But evidence for what ?  Evidence  is not proof.  Proof only exists in logic and mathematics.  I did not just say God is metaphysical.  I proved it with the law of cause and effect.  Everything that exist is caused to exist.  We call the first cause God.  Cause exist before effects.  God exist before anything physical was caused to exist, therefor God is not physical but metaphysical.  God does need a creator because God is believed to be eternal. I can disprove evolution, yes.  But you have the burden of proof.  Show us a single piece of evidence for evolution, or even just show us a single theory of evolution that can be scientifically tested so as to as least try to satisfy the burden of proof. What is wrong with evolution is that there is no evidence whatsoever to indicate any natural selection, abiogenesis, or speciation.  150 years since Darwin and there is still not a single piece of evidence, something is wrong.  Evolution does not exist in real life, that's why.
    1
  3. *****  If you put 0 effort or thought into your comments, then you're wasting my time.  The logical fallacy you used is incoherence.
    1
  4. Francosteiner  Yeah, finches, I forgot.  Finches is another good example of varieties within species caused by design.  How clever ? 
    1
  5. *****  An incoherent person don't know what a logical fallacy is, thinking that no logic is logic.  That is you.  You also used circular reasoning at time when you were not as incoherent as at other times.  No, I can't allow you to move on, sorry. 
    1
  6. *****  What did I tell you ? An incoherent mind cannot distinguish logic, so logical fallacies are not recognisable to such minds.  X explains Y, Y explains Z, therefore Z explain X is not debunking circular reasoning.  It is confirming it, bonehead. If you can figure out the logic, just get on with the issue.  Where did you see mutations and genetics is evolution ? Per Wiki, "In biology, a mutation is a permanent change of the nucleotide sequence of the genome of an organism, virus, or extrachromosomal DNA or other genetic elements." "Genetics is the study of genes, heredity, and genetic variation in living organisms. It is generally considered a field of biology, but it intersects frequently with many of the life sciences and is strongly linked with the study of information systems." Where is evolution in these definitions, bonehead ?
    1
  7. *****   Where is evolution in these definitions, bonehead ?
    1
  8. *****  Our physical universe has a beginning, that's the big bang hypothesis.  There is a first cause, that's the law of cause and effect.  We call the first cause God, that's a fact but you can call the first cause by any other name you like, no one can stop you.  We choose to believe in God the same way we choose to believe in gravity, life, and time, by applying our logic towards our observation of the EFFECTS of these entities and not of these entities themselves because these entities are metaphysical and what is metaphysical is unknowable to humans, only believable. Evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory.  Since there is not a single theory to be tested, evolution cannot be science.  I did not invent this.  I'll quote you the evolutionary biologist who pointed this out.  Per Wiki, "Evolutionary biologist Kirk J. Fitzhugh[39] wrote, "'Evolution' cannot be both a theory and a fact. Theories are concepts stating cause–effect relations...One might argue that it is conceivable to speak of 'evolution' as a fact by way of it being the subject of reference in explanatory hypotheses...In the strictest sense then, 'evolution' cannot be regarded as a fact even in the context of hypotheses since the causal points of reference continue to be organisms, and no amount of confirming instances for those hypotheses will transform them into facts...While evolution is not a fact, it is also not a single theory, but a set of theories applied to a variety of causal questions...An emphasis on associating 'evolution' with 'fact' presents the misguided connotation that science seeks certainty." Learn much today ?  You are welcome.
    1
  9. *****  No.  Mutations and genetics are evidence of intelligent design and neither of them explained evolution.  Speciation by means of evolution by the process of natural selection does not exist in real life and is not explained by mutation or genetics.   You may call this logical fallacy of yours absurdity. You can start asking me nicely and I may just give you two pieces of evidence for God as freebies since it looks like you can never earn any.  I'm afraid you may not even know what to make of them, for that's grade 2 stuff.
    1
  10. *****  Only living organisms can mutate and pass on their genes because each and every living organism is designed and created by the creator, the intelligent designer, with intelligence to enable survival, reproduction and mutation.  Rocks don't have these intelligence and therefore rocks can't reproduce or mutate.  Still, mutations and genetics does not explain or prove speciation without which the fairy tale of evolution collapses.
    1
  11. chrisshorenumber1  Go tell that to the evolutionists.  They are just as confused as you.  DNA engineering is an evidence for intelligent design.
    1
  12. *****  There is DNA engineering which is human intelligence working with information contained in DNA.  There is God engineered DNA in each and every living organisms which is not human made.  That is intelligent design.  Human intelligence is also evidence of intelligent design. 
    1
  13. *****  per Wiki, " Causality is the relationship between causes and effects.[1][2] It is considered to be fundamental to all natural science, especially physics." Learn something today ?  My pleasure. There is no need to argue.  EVIDENCE.  Put up one single piece of evidence for evolution or even one single testable theory of evolution and we are done.  Otherwise bullshits walk.
    1
  14. *****  Varieties within species is a part of design, not some kind of speciation.  No new specie has ever been observed whether created by God or by some bullshit selection process.  This is a fact. 
    1
  15. *****  Back to abiogenesis again ?  EVIDENCE.  Where is the evidence of abiogenesis ? 
    1
  16. chrisshorenumber1  So abiogenesis is proven according to you.  Are we all supposed to believe you are going to manufacture humans now, or should we continue to have sex ? 
    1
  17. ***** You don't have to mention it.  You don't know which is which anyways.  You even think mutation means speciation. 
    1
  18. chrisshorenumber1  What evidence ?  There is zero evidence for abiogenesis or for speciation.  Evolution simply does not exist in real life. 
    1
  19. chrisshorenumber1  That is absurdity to the highest degree because time will reduce order and complexity into chaos and simplicity and has never been observed to do the opposite.  Time works against this bullshit selection and baloney evolution.  Get it ? 
    1
  20. chrisshorenumber1   What do you mean time does that?   EVIDENCE please.
    1
  21. chrisshorenumber1 Asserting that time can produce life is just an assertion.  It is not an evidence.  Besides, time works against any process of building simplicity into complexity or chaos into order.  All we can observe is metals rust, bodies decompose, buildings collapse, in time. The more time is taken into account, the less likely is evolution. 
    1
  22. *****  You and your siblings are not different species, bonehead. 
    1
  23. *****  Yeah it can, if natural selection exist.  The problem is evolution and natural selection do not exist in real life. 
    1
  24. *****  All of the above. 
    1
  25. *****  Natural selection does not exist in real life unless by natural we mean God designed.  Death is a part of design and so is heredity.  Heredity is designed and caused.  Random chance and accidents do not exist in real life, only in superstition and fairy tales like evolution.  Everything that exist is caused to exist. As for speciation, varieties within species is not speciation, it is parts of design.  No new specie has ever been observed whether it is created by God or popped out of another specie. As for evolution.  You can define evolution in any silly way you want.  It makes no difference.  You and your siblings are not different species but varieties within the same specie.  You mother can have sex with whatever animal she like to have sex with, but no human offspring is possible unless the father is also human.  You can try this at home if you don't believe me.
    1
  26. *****  You misspelled evolution.    The problem is that evolution does not exist in real life.
    1
  27. chrisshorenumber1  What does ? Abiogenesis, natural selection, speciation, and evolution do not exist in real life, only in fairy tales.  GOD DID IT is the theory that has been around in every culture, everywhere, and everytime throughout human history, never been successfully countered. Sure, ID is not science.  But it is a testable theory, only not scientifically tested.
    1
  28. chrisshorenumber1   MRSA is a good example of design.  Each and every living organism is designed and created to be unique.  No two individuals is exactly the same, not even among identical twins. God means different thing to different people at different times, these are all parts of the One and the same God.  God has infinite parts,  polytheistic religious parts. Science is not wrong.  You are.  ID cannot be tested by the scientific method because the concept God is involved, and God is a non falsifiable fact.  You can test ID by looking in a mirror and use the logic designed in you to describe what you see there.
    1
  29. *****   You said, " It’s funny, to see you object to “evolution” and “natural selection” solely on the basis of semantics, I’ve never seen that before."  The reason is giants are not made everyday. :)  I don't reject "natural".   Natural means God made, period. I reject "selection", for God did not design intelligence into the inanimate God made (natural) environment that enables it to act, choose, or select.  It is always living organisms that mutates because each and every living organism is designed with intelligence to enable them to survive, reproduce, mutate, and die by acting, choosing, selecting, and otherwise manipulating its inanimate natural (God given) environment.  Plants and animals living in space is a good example of that. Accidents do not exit in real life.  You said, " “Accident” simply means something one did not expect", and " “random” simply means something we cannot predict.  The creator is obviously not that someone.  Everything that exist is caused to exist.  This is the law. No speciation has ever been observed whether created by God or popped out of another species by some bullshit selection process.  Varieties with the same specie is not speciation.  One specie cannot mate with another specie or mutate to become another specie.  Speciation is a fantasy. You can call God by any other name you like.  But to call God evolution is to say evolution accounts for the solar system as well as life on earth.  Well, go ahead, no one can stop you. I never said ID is scientifically testable.  It is not because the concept of God is involved and God is a non falsifiable fact.  ID is testable and we test our ID all the time.  Look in the mirror and use the logic designed in you to figure out what you see there.  That's ID. Clones are good examples of variety within the same specie.  Cloned sheep are still sheep.  Clones are not identical.  Clones have souls. You said, "The scientific method can be used to detect anything which has any influence what so ever over anything in the universe."  No.  Scientific method cannot tell us what is gravity, life, or time, yet we all know these metaphysical entities exist.
    1
  30. *****  You misspelled evolution.   It's too bad that EVOLUTION is a fantasy that doesn't exist in the real world.
    1
  31. chrisshorenumber1  All living organisms are designed and created by the creator we called God, with  intelligence that enables them to act, choose, select mutate, or otherwise manipulate their inanimate natural (God made) environment which is also designed but was not designed with such intelligence as in living organisms.  You did not see MRSA developed from inanimate material.  What you saw was design in action. 
    1
  32. chrisshorenumber1  Do bacteria have DNA ?  DNA is the storage of intelligence.  What we see is not real.  What is real we do not see.  That's a different topic.  Suffice to say intelligence is the metaphysical entities stored in DNA, or DNA is in essence intelligence.
    1
  33. chrisshorenumber1 1+1=2 is also simple as that.  But 1+1=2 is valid only as a metaphysical concept.  It is invalid in physical terms.  The 2 molecule pairs that you think you saw is not real.  What is real in these molecules you can't see because it is metaphysical, not physical.  We describe them as essence, not as units as in numbers.
    1
  34. MarcoManiac  Sure.  We can detect subatomic particles too.  But what's in them we do not know , and we humans may never know What is metaphysical.  No doubt atoms are real, so are apples, they are real illusions. 
    1
  35. MarcoManiac  I said, "No doubt atoms are real, so are apples, they are real illusions."  I never said atoms are not real.  My point is, what we see is just illusions of the metaphysical reality.  We can't see gravity, life, time, or God because they are metaphysical, not physical.  The physical effects of these metaphysical entities are just effects like an illusion.  Falling objects are the effects of gravity but is not gravity.  Flying birds are the effect of life but is not life.  Ticking clocks are the effects of time but is not time.  Our physical universe and life on earth are the effects of God but is not God.  We don't know what is gravity, life, time, or God.  We can only choose to believe or not believe in these metaphysical entities based on our logic applied towards our observation of the effects of these metaphysical entities. 
    1
  36. *****  Please do not lie.  I never said, " DNA is metaphysical ".  I said the intelligence stored in the DNA is metaphysical.
    1
  37. *****  You misspelled evolution again. " Nuh uh. It's too bad EVOLUTION doesn't exist in real life." 
    1
  38. *****  You spelled evolution wrong again.  It should be "No, EVOLUTION doesn't exist in real life."  See ?  That's the correct spelling.
    1
  39. chrisshorenumber1  Mathematics is metaphysical, not physical, and 1+1=2 is mathematics.  Okay my child ? 
    1
  40. MarcoManiac  No disagreement there.  I don't give a shit about any religion, and I have not talked about religion here.  It was only God and logic I talked about. 
    1
  41. *****  Nonsense ! 
    1
  42. *****  Look in the mirror and tell us what you see. 
    1
  43. *****  Exactly.  You are learning.  You can say thank you now for my lessons. 
    1
  44. *****  Not evolved, designed.  And you are on the right track : as scientifically illustrated, our entire existence is nothing more than a complex physical process of our mind, and that's the way we were designed by the metaphysical intelligent designer we called God. Per Webster, "Metaphysics, : of, relating to, or based on metaphysics : of or relating to things that are thought to exist but that cannot be seen."  We cannot know metaphysical entities.  We can only choose to believe or not to believe in metaphysical entities like God, gravity, and time based on our logic applied towards our observations of the effects of these metaphysical entities and not of the entities themselves.  The birds and the galaxies are the observations or evidence that allowed us to believe in God, the falling object in gravity, the ticking of the clock in time. May the truth set you free.
    1
  45. *****  You know why you thought so ?  You are stupid, that's why. 
    1
  46. *****  All right.  The reason you are so stupid is because you are deeply indoctrinated by Darwinism and its evolution bull shit. 
    1
  47. ***** Evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory.  Read Fitzhugh. 
    1
  48. *****  Dream on.  I won't be teaming up with you.  Evolution does not exist in real life, period.  In real life, it has always been designs.  Mutation, genetics, gene pools, intelligent adaptation of living organisms, varieties in species are all parts of the original intelligent design, no intervention has ever been observed and no intervention is necessary.  No one knows what gravity is but gravity is definitely not physical.  Per Wiki, "Gravity (or gravitation) is a natural phenomenon by which all things attract one another including stars, planets, galaxies and even light and sub-atomic particles.", "Newton's law of universal gravitation states that any two bodies in the universe attract each other with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them."  a force is a metaphysical entity.  Gravitational force does not even exist or is a fictitious force under Einstein's theories of relativity. Physics is not physical either.  In fact all scientific theories are in essence metaphysical.  Don't believe me ?  Look it up. You don't need me to show you evidence of design.  Just look in the mirror.  You'll find it.
    1
  49. *****  Biology is not evolution.  Evolutionary biology is not Darwin's evolution by the process of natural selection.  The only scientific theory of evolution is Jackie Wu's E/IALO. 
    1
  50. *****  Not.  Per Wiki, " Evolutionary biology is a subfield of biology concerned with the study of the evolutionary processes that produced the diversity of life on Earth. Someone who studies evolutionary biology is known as an evolutionary biologist. Evolutionary biologists study the descent of species, and the origin of new species." No one can study Darwin's E/NS because "natural" can only mean God made and "natural selection" can only mean Divine intervention.  Science do not study God or what is Divine.  Evolutionary biology will one day study Jackie Wu's scientific theory of E/IALO.  But they'll have to wait for it to be published.  In the mean time they study mutations and genetics which says nothing about speciation and evolution.
    1