Comments by "Jackie Wu" (@jwu1950) on "Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell" channel.

  1. *****  You don't have to tell me.  I already know natural is natural.  Tell us something we don't already know, like may be natural is something you buy from a grocery store or some shit like that but not "God made" because we know that too already. 
    1
  2. *****  "Jesus fucking Christ" ?  Don't be ridicules.  There is Jesus but there is no Christ. You don't have to wait for my E/IALO to be published, you can read my comments.  And you can read online how gravity may not exist or is a fictitious force.  Per Wiki, "In physics, a gravitational field is a model used to explain the influence that a massive body extends into the space around itself, producing a force on another massive body. Thus, a gravitational field is used to explain gravitational phenomena, and is measured in newtons per kilogram (N/kg)......... In a field model, rather than two particles attracting each other, the particles distort spacetime via their mass, and this distortion is what is perceived and measured as a "force". In such a model one states that matter moves in certain ways in response to the curvature of spacetime,[1] and that there is either no gravitational force,[2] or that gravity is a fictitious force."  
    1
  3. *****  Exactly, we don't know that.  We know evolution does not exist in real life.  And we know every intelligence and designs are designed by the intelligence designer.  And how do we know that ?   Logic.  We apply logic to what we observed and reach a logical conclusion.  What you said is illogical.  So you must be sick.  :)
    1
  4. *****  You don't even know Jesus is not Christ ?  No wonder you still believe in evolution. 
    1
  5. *****  No.  I don't believe shits like that.  Do you ? 
    1
  6. *****  Now you are talking.  Well, they can check their common descent then.  LOL 
    1
  7. *****  No. I believe in science.  I believe in Jesus.  I believe in God.  There are lots I believe in.  How about you ? 
    1
  8. lorenzoleal4  No.  I don't believe in any of those bullshit.  How about you ? 
    1
  9. *****  Evidence, kid.  You don't get the price without evidence.  Evidence talk, bullshit walk. 
    1
  10. ***** Go look in the mirror again. 
    1
  11. *****  No.  A fair deal is you give us one single piece of valid evidence for evolution and I'll give you ten pieces of evidence for God.  That would be on top of the freebies that I already gave you when I asked you to go look in the mirror.  Deal ?
    1
  12. ***** Where is your logic ?  Your parents told you they bought you from the grocery store ?
    1
  13. *****  "Natural selection" can only mean Divine Intervention, which Darwin may believe in but I don't.  I don't think God need to intervene, the original design is already very capable of taking care of itself without Divine Intervention.  You are a variety of the human specie originally designed and created by God.  See ?  You can now teach a 5 year old the truth. 
    1
  14. *****  I did not deny any science.  Evolution is not science.  And no science says anything about speciation or evolution by the process of natural selection, period. I am not a Jew, and I do not follow any religion.  None of my arguments is based on any religion.  They are all based on truth and verifiable facts. The point of my asking for evidence for evolution is so that you folks can learn that there is none.  There are plenty of evidence for mutations and for genetics.  These two science says nothing about speciation or evolution, but they are evidence for intelligence designed in each and every living organisms that enables living organisms to survive, reproduce, adapt, and die as they go through the circle of life.  Intelligence is what Jackie Wu's E/IALO, evolution by the process of intelligent adaptation of living organisms is based on.  The buck stops at intelligence, no God and no Divine Intervention (Natural Selection) is required or assumed in E/IALO.  May the truth enlighten you.
    1
  15. *****  For sure, Natural Selection is Divine Intervention, no intelligence, no living organisms, no designer is required, it is Divinity in action personally. LOL. 
    1
  16. *****  No, thank you.  Thank you for admitting Divine Intervention.  The only problem is no Divine Intervention has ever been observed and is quite unnecessary since the original designs are working just fine by themselves with their built in intelligence to handle all kinds of adaptation, exhibiting all kinds of varieties within each specie.
    1
  17. *****  You can start observing it right now.  Look in the mirror. 
    1
  18. ZombieNinjaTurtle  You nasty woman you !  Is that a picture of you ?  You look kind of cute there.  What made you so nasty, pumpkin ? 
    1
  19. *****  Exactly, Divine Intervention.  Normally that'll just be intelligence design.  But in your case Divine Intervention is probably necessary for someone so stupid. 
    1
  20. ***** " Natural selection, and evolution, are necessary outcomes of genetics."  Bullshit.  Per Wiki, "Genetics is the study of genes, heredity, and genetic variation in living organisms. It is generally considered a field of biology, but it intersects frequently with many of the life sciences and is strongly linked with the study of information systems." Where is evolution being mentioned or even implied.  Information systems are designs.  Genetics support design and not any bullshit evolution. May you get well, and may the truth set you free. P.S.  You said mathematics says about everything.  So you believe 1+1=2 then.  What makes you believe in that bullshit.
    1
  21. *****  Wrong.   "descent with modification" is intelligent adaptation explained by genetics.  There is no bullshit evolution by Natural Selection, meaning Divine Intervention, involved here.
    1
  22. ***** Are we still talking about Darwin's evolution by the process of natural selection here, or are you trying to establish a new meaning for evolution that does not involve speciation but still include some bullshit selection ?   If we are still talking about Darwin's evolution, then I assert that "Natural Selection" is meaningless, imaginary, and void unless it means Divine Intervention.  You can accept this or you can prove my assertion wrong but giving us a valid explanation of WTF is "Natural Selection" which is not mentioned in any physics, chemistry, mutation, genetics, or any so called "evolutionary  theories".  To call physics and chemistry "evolutionary" is outright intellectual dishonesty.
    1
  23. *****  " "On the origin of species by means of natural selection, by Charles Darwin?" is not an evolutionary theory.  It is bullshits imagined by Darwin and has never been substantiated.  It is at best an unsubstantiated concept, not even a hypothesis, and at worst a lie and a conspiracy, with plenty of synthesized story telling in between.  Sorry, you have the burden of proof, baby. I might have by mistake but I always pick it back up after. May the truth set you free from evolution conspiracies.
    1
  24. *****  That's right.  Evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory.  Per Wiki, " Evolutionary biologist Kirk J. Fitzhugh[39] wrote, "'Evolution' cannot be both a theory and a fact. Theories are concepts stating cause–effect relations...One might argue that it is conceivable to speak of 'evolution' as a fact by way of it being the subject of reference in explanatory hypotheses...In the strictest sense then, 'evolution' cannot be regarded as a fact even in the context of hypotheses since the causal points of reference continue to be organisms, and no amount of confirming instances for those hypotheses will transform them into facts...While evolution is not a fact, it is also not a single theory, but a set of theories applied to a variety of causal questions...An emphasis on associating 'evolution' with 'fact' presents the misguided connotation that science seeks certainty."
    1
  25. Brandan09997 MRSA is a bacterium, a living organism, one who possess the intelligence that enables living organisms to survive, reproduce, adapt, and die, thus completing its life cycle.  Antibiotic resistance of MRSA is part of its design. You can define evolution any which way you like, but Darwin's evolution by the process of natural selection is neither a fact nor a single theory.  It is a collection of theories applied towards a variety of causal questions.  In other words, a fairy tale.  It is not science.  It is at best an unsubstantiated concept and at worst a lie and a conspiracy, with plenty of synthesized story telling in between.  No speciation has ever been observed, whether created by God or popped out of other species by some bullshit selection.  Evidence talk, bullshits walk.  No evidence no talk.  Get it ?
    1
  26. Brandan09997  "This complex but it has to do with natural selection, sort of." "Natural Selection" does not exist in real life.  It is a void and meaningless term, unless it means "Divine Intervention". The only proven theory of life and reality is GOD DID IT.  If viruses are life forms, then that's what God did.  If viruses are not life forms, then again that's what God did.  Print this truth in your heart.
    1
  27. Brandan09997  "It does not, it simpily means the strongest reproduce and the weakest organism dies and because genetics are split 50/50 each time an organism has sex that eventually it varries enough to make a noticeable change. " I know that's how the fairy tale story goes.  But who is doing the selecting ?  You need to understand it has always been the intelligent adaptation of living organisms that accounts for all birth, survival, reproduction, and death, the life cycle.  The living organisms have the intelligence designed and created in them.  There is no such intelligence designed and created in inanimate God given environment. I am not religious.  Jesus was not a religious person.  And God is not a religion.  God means different thing to different people at different times.  These are all parts of the One and the same God.  God has infinite parts. May the love and the peace of Jesus be with you.
    1
  28. Brandan09997  I never said evolution is false.  I said evolution is an unsubstantiated concept at best, a lie and a conspiracy at worst, with plenty of synthesized story telling in between.  Darwin was the one who asserted this bullshit, so his followers has the burden of proof.  Show us one single theory of evolution or one single piece of valid evidence for evolution and we are done.  Otherwise, shut up.
    1
  29. Brandan09997  Followers of Darwin's evolution has the burden of proof and they failed.  We dismiss Darwin's evolution for lack of evidence.  We can also prove it is absurd.  In fact Darwin himself confessed that natural selection is absurd to the highest degree.  1)  The law of cause and effect does not permit randomness to exist in real life.  2) Time reduces order and complexity into chaos and simplicity, and there fore time works against evolution.  The more time is involved, the less likely is evolution. 
    1
  30. Brandan09997 "Who is we anyways? You? " Yes.  And not you. "Please cite your sources from a credible source and try again." Logic is the source.  There is no source more credible than logic. So you admit Darwin's evolution cannot be substantiated and therefore can be dismissed ?  I thought so, that you would eventually come to your senses.
    1
  31. Brandan09997 It is not my problem if you want to disregard the truth.  I am talking to several people right now and they all choose not to disregard the truth.  I told you already that logic is my source and it is the most credible source anyone can cite.  We are believers of God and our beliefs are logically evidence based.  You followers of Darwin blindly believe in a fairy tale without a single piece of evidence and that is illogical and irrational.  Logic and evidence are the credible source, not the evolutionary lies and conspiracies.
    1
  32. Brandan09997  Man !  Talking about being delusional !  Go get your head examined by a professional.  LOL 
    1
  33. Brandan09997  Give your head a shake and see if the marbles are still there. 
    1
  34. *****  Regardless of what antibiotics were invented in the 1900's or the 3000's, living organisms are equipped with the intelligence to resist them as a part of their routine life cycle of born, survive, adapt, mutate, reproduce, and die.  You are wasting time here if you are not willing to learn the truth.  Now go sit out for 5 minutes.
    1
  35. Chris Qiao  No. 
    1
  36. *****  No one gives a shit about how you want to re-define "evolution".  We have been talking about Darwin's bullshit evolution by the process of natural selection which is a fairy tale and totally unsubstantiated. 
    1
  37. *****  God cannot be seen or observed.  Write this truth in your heart. 
    1
  38. *****  Can't help you if you choose to remain blind and keep following the blind. 
    1
  39. Brandan09997  No.  The blind has blind faith in the blind leaders they follow.  Darwin's evolution has zero supporting evidence. 
    1
  40. Brandan09997  That is correct, Darwin is not only blind, he is dead.  Why do you still want to follow him is beyond comprehension.  But who can argue with blind faith ? Flip a coin if you can't tell.  You are the one who needs help. 
    1
  41. *****  I don't understand why you would want to quote evidence for design as in intelligent adaptation of living organisms and call them evidence for evolution.  Think, man.  Don't just follow with blind faith.  Look for logic.  Even Darwin himself confessed that natural selection is absurd to the highest degree. 
    1
  42. *****  Sorry to hear that.  Hope you'll get well soon. 
    1
  43. *****  No one can stop you if you choose not to get well. 
    1
  44. *****  I agree.  It is just absurd. 
    1
  45. *****  What you missed is the absurdity of Darwin's bullshit argument.  The planets orbiting the sun does not seemed absurd at all, the sun orbiting the planets given sufficient time is absurd, not only seemed absurd at first glance.   A more appropriate analogy is water shooting upwards like in a fountain seemed absurd at first glance.  But that does not explain the absurdity of evolution by the process of natural selection because we know fountains are human design and natural springs are God made designs.  Space stations orbiting in space seemed absurd at first glance but not according to the scientists and engineers who designed and caused the space stations to orbit in space. I don't go to church or I won't know what they avoid or not avoid there.  I suppose you know because you never missed attending church.
    1
  46. *****  You have a cold because you are an atheist at heart ?  How ridiculous is that ?
    1
  47. *****  The  Church did not find the idea of planets spinning around the sun absurd.  They found it so logical that it threatened their old beliefs and the power they were having on their subjects.  It is somewhat similar to the conspirators of Darwin's lie finding my scientific theory of E/IALO so logical that it threatens their blind faith and the power they have been holding as hostage in the science community, schools, and politics.  This perpetual lie of Darwinian evolution is like a cancer that has been eating the fresh of our souls. Print this truth in your heart.  It may save your soul.
    1
  48. *****  Misguided, not crazy.  Just have to look at the thousands of US soldiers that returned from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and committed suicide, the number of these death is more than those killed in action, surprised ?  These poor souls and their surviving love ones were not crazy, they were just misguided by those atheistic secular politicians and hate mongers who were bigots trying to torture and murder all Muslims, believers who submit themselves to God. And that is why I am here on YT : to save souls. May the truth open your eyes, and may the love and the peace of Jesus be with you.
    1
  49. Ser Mulqueen  No.  Everything I said is based on truth and verifiable facts. 
    1
  50. Ser Mulqueen   No.  Everything I said is based on truth and verifiable facts. 
    1