Comments by "Jackie Wu" (@jwu1950) on "Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell" channel.

  1. Slickslash 27  If by evolution you don't mean Darwin's evolution by the process of natural selection, then you are making up your own definition. 
    1
  2. Slickslash 27  I don't know WTF you were mumbling about.  What speciation has anyone been able to demonstrate ?  None, period.  Why mutations have anything to do with Darwin's evolution bull shit ?  It doesn't, period.
    1
  3. Slickslash 27 No, you are wrong.  Nature has no intelligence and is therefore incapable of making any choices.   It has always been the intelligent living organisms that's doing the adapting, and no speciation has ever occurred, only different varieties of the same species.
    1
  4. Slickslash 27  We don't use metaphors in science.  If natural selection is metaphor, it is not science.  And that's exactly what I was saying.  Darwin's evolution bullshit is not a fact nor a single theory but is a collection of theories applied towards a variety of causal questions.  In other words, it is a fairy tale with unsubstantiated metaphors or concept.
    1
  5. Slickslash 27  Every language uses metaphor, not just English.  In fact, all words in any language is a metaphor.  But in science we look for verifiable facts called scientific evidence, not unsubstantiated story telling but logical proofs explaining these observable facts.  None of that exists in Darwin's bullshit evolution. "less beneficial traits get weeded out of the gene pool of a species. " is a part of the design created by God, not some bullshit selection process by some hidden intelligence, and it is not even Divine Intervention as that, although highly probable, doesn't even seemed necessary. So a good metaphor for you is you are an idiot for blindly believing in Darwin.
    1
  6. Slickslash 27 "god is using evolution because evolution before darwin was just used to mean to develop." Bullshit.  God designed living organisms.  Development is a part of the original design.  With your rabbit example, ask yourself who put white colour in rabbits in the first place, or was it already a part of the original design of rabbits ?  Lizards can change colour quickly for camouflaging and that's their design.  Rabbits and lizards can't become invisible because that is not part of their design. There is no problem to use "evolution" as merely to mean change.  But it is not acceptable to use "evolution" as Darwin's bullshit evolution by the process of natural selection.  No one with any kind of intelligence is doing any kind of selection here, not even God the Divine.  Darwin's evolution is at best a misleading, unsubstantiated opinion and at worst a lie and a conspiracy for fraud.   And in any regard, it is not science, period. 
    1
  7. Slickslash 27 First off I'm not being hostile.  I was just calling a spade a spade, and bull shits bullshits.  Second, Darwin's evolution is not development, and development has never been evolution.  If evolution means merely change, or development, then hairdos and ladies' fashion evolve as well as dildos and condoms.   Thirdly, chameleons : a 2008 University of Melbourne study suggests that the chameleon not only uses color change to make himself invisible to enemies, but is even capable of customizing his color palette to the visual capabilities of different predators.  Fourth, saying white rabbits are the result of mutation without any proof is what we called a fairy tale.  Besides, mutation is not evolution.  Per Wiki, "In biology, a mutation is a permanent change of the nucleotide sequence of the genome of an organism, virus, or extrachromosomal DNA or other genetic elements."  No evolution is mentioned, expressed or implied. Since you don't like me calling bull shits bullshits, I just let you figure it out yourself.
    1
  8. Slickslash 27  First, that's just your opinion.  I've never been called that before.  Second, hairdos evolve because they are designs of human intelligence.  The inanimate environment has no such intelligence to cause such development.  Varieties within hairdos are not caused by "natural selection", and neither is varieties within species.  They were all parts of design.  Third, repeat, a 2008 University of Melbourne study suggests that the chameleon not only uses color change to make himself invisible to enemies, but is even capable of customizing his color palette to the visual capabilities of different predators. Forth, I never said such nonsense as "a man that controls the universe through special powers like hes a wizard".  WTF are you smoking that made you so hostile to the truth ? Fifth, Mutations is a science, Darwin's evolution is not, regardless of how you want to define it.
    1
  9. Slickslash 27  1) I am friendly and not hostile. 2)   I repeat :  hairdos evolve because they are designs of human intelligence.  The inanimate environment has no such intelligence to cause such development.  Varieties within hairdos are not caused by "natural selection", and neither is varieties within species.  They were all parts of design.  3)  Chameleon change colour for the purpose of camouflage.  4)  I don't give a shit about the God of Abraham.  God is God, and God is the intelligent designer.  5)  Core or not, teaching or bullshit, mutation is mutation, and it is not evolution, period.  
    1
  10. Slickslash 27  1)  Liar, you brought that up by saying "  first off you getting way more hostile than need be this is merely a friendly debate to me. 2)  Hairdos are not inanimate animals which would mean dead animals.  Hairdos are designs by humans, whereas living organisms are designs by God. 3)  No it doesn't.  Chameleons changing colour does not prove evolution it proved that living organisms have the intelligence within them to change and to adapt.  Intelligent adaptation is real, evolution is bullshit. 4)  No matter how desperate it is of you trying to put words in my mouth, I don't give a shit about the Abrahamic God.  I believe in God.  Einstein believed in God.  And neither of us believed in the Abrahamic God. 5)  You said, "mutation is the engine in the car of evolution."    Mutation can metaphorically be an engine, but there is no car called evolution.  Evolution does not exist in real life, only in fairy tales.  Mutation is a science.  Evolution is not, period.  So you are the fuckhead.
    1
  11. Slickslash 27 1)  You brought it up and I won't let you ignore the fact that you were a liar. 2)  You are the one who is referring a deer to a desk, that is, Darwin's evolution to changes and developments as in evolution of hairdos and ladies fashion.  I only pointed out that there is no natural selection involved in these changes or developments.  3)  We were talking about evolution, and my point of bringing up chameleons is to point out changes and developments does not mean evolution as these lizards are capable of changing because they have the intelligence within them to do so, and that's the same with other living organisms.  In other words, no bullshit selection is ever involved. 4)  Einstein and I are neither Christians nor Jewish.  Do your research before writing bullshits, alright. 5)  Get this through you thick scull.  Evolution does not exist in real life, only in fairy tales.  Mutations are not evolution.  The flu viruses are capable of adapting because they have the intelligence within them to do so.  The inanimate environment does not have the intelligence to act, choose, and select which strains of viruses are to survive and which ones are to die. May the truth open your eyes so you can begin to see the light.
    1
  12. Slickslash 27 1)  And I was telling you why you have no reason to accuse me. 2)  Exactly, you were saying evolution means development and agreed that hairdos evolved, and I am pointing out to you that there is no natural selection involved with changing or developing hairdos or changing or developing varieties within species.  The point I was trying to make is clear as day.  You just refused to accept you were wrong and that Darwin's evolution is a fairy tale. 3)  All intelligence are designs, and all designs are designed.   Designs are caused, not spontaneous.  This is the law.  There is zero evidence that supports spontaneous existence or spontaneous design. 4)  Neither one of us, Einstein and I, are religious.  We both believed in God. 5)  Mutation is mutation and it is a science.  WTF is evolution ?  Evolution does not exist in real life, only in fairy tales.  There is not a scientific theory of evolution because evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory.  It is a collection of theories applied towards a variety of causal questions.  In other words, bullshit.
    1
  13. Slickslash 27 1) -- 2)  Per Wiki, " Darwinism is a theory of biological evolution developed by Charles Darwin and others, stating that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individual's ability to compete, survive, and reproduce. Also called Darwinian theory ...."  It was called a theory but it was never substantiated and cannot be regarded as science. 3)  God the creator is metaphysical and what is metaphysical is unknowable to humans.  We believe our physical universe has a beginning according to the big bang hypothesis, but there is no reason for us to believe that the metaphysical universe is not eternal.  We believe God is eternal, and eternity, like, infinity, is not knowable to humans. 4)  Per Wiki, "A religion is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to an order of existence."  Believing in God is a belief, not a religion.  Einstein and I definitely do not follow any religion.  We believe in God, we do not believe in religion. 5)  As a collection of theories, Darwin's evolution is at best an unsubstantiated concept, and at worst a lie and a conspiracy.  The conspiracy began with the support of Hitler because evolution helped to support the idea of ethnic cleaning and the supreme race.  It continues this days as a mean to grab political power and government funding.  Without a single scientific theory of evolution, the conspirators synthesize evolution.  There is actually a modern synthesis of evolutionary theories where the conspirators are calling mutation, genetics, physics, and chemistry evolutionary science.  WTF ?  Can you imagine that ?  Physics and Chemistry are evolutionary science ?  You go and check the definition of mutation, genetics, physics, and chemistry and see if any evolution or natural selection is ever mentioned in these science. Wake up and use your critical thinking.  Do not regurgitate the garbage they fed you in schools and through the media. May the truth set you free.
    1
  14. ***** Slickslash 27 Everything I said is based on truth and verifiable facts.  They are not arguments for the sake of argument. 
    1
  15. Slickslash 27  Here and there.  They are all based on truth and verifiable facts.  For example, I said Darwin's evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory and therefore it cannot be science.  I got that from reading Fitzhugh, a evolutionary biologists. 
    1
  16. Slickslash 27 Kirk Fitzhugh. 
    1
  17. stoneman472  God is real.  Evolution does not exist.  One cannot be replaced with the other. 
    1
  18. stoneman472  God is metaphysical and is therefore unknowable to humans.  We humans can only choose to believe or not to believe in God based on logic applied towards our observation of the EFFECTS of god but not of God for God is unobservable to humans.  In the same way we believe in other metaphysical entities like gravity, life, and time.  There is overwhelming evidence and logical proofs for God and there is zero contrary evidence.  To not believe in God is irrational and illogical.  To believe that there is no God is outright delusional. Metaphysics is the foundation of science.   All scientific theories are in essence metaphysical.  Metaphysics explain science.  Science cannot explain or prove what is metaphysical.  What is metaphysical is unknowable to humans. You have zero evidence for Darwin's evolution by the process of natural selection.  We have plenty of scientific evidence for mutation and genetics, but mutation and genetic are not evolution.  They are parts of the design built in each and every living organism.  There is no need to debate.  Give us one single valid evidence for evolution and I will forever shut up. May the truth open your eyes so you may begin to see.
    1
  19. stoneman472  No.  You are the one who is shooting shit out of your ears. 1)  I said there is overwhelming evidence and logical proofs for God.  Can you not read ? 2)  So did you look at the observable EFFECTS of God or evidence for God ?  If you haven't, look in the mirror and ask yourself where did you and this mirror come from. 3)  Did I not tell you there is zero evidence for evolution ?  You believed there is a mountain of evidence for evolution but you cannot even show us one valid piece of  these so called evidence.  That's the irony. 4)  The proper answer to your question is yes, we can observe and measure the EFFECTS of God the same way we can observe and measure the EFFECTS of gravity.  Objects and falling objects respectively. 5)  Look at yourself in the mirror and ask who created this motherfucker and this mirror. 6)  Science is a branch of philosophy and the foundation of science is metaphysics.  Science without metaphysics is hollow and meaningless materialism. 7)  No.  Mutation is a part of the design built into each and every living organism.  Nothing is evolutionary because Darwin's evolution by the process of natural select does not exist in real life.  It is just a fairy tale. 8)  Artificial selection involve human intelligence.  The inanimate God given natural environment is not designed with the intelligence to act, choose, or select.  Natural Select is meaningless and absurd unless it means Divine Intervention.  Even then there is zero evidence of speciation by Divine Intervention other than the original species designed and created by God the creator.  Varieties within species are not speciation.  Wolf and dogs are of the same specie. Also, time works against the evolution bullshit.  Time has always been observed to reduce order and complexity into chaos and simplicity and never the other way around.  The more time is involved the less likely is evolution.
    1
  20. ano ny  That's right.   That also has nothing to do with evolution.    There is zero evidence for Darwin's evolution by the process of natural selection.
    1
  21. stoneman472  You are the imbecile and the stupid brick. 1)  I told you already.  Evidence for God are the observable EFFECTs of God.  Logic is the proof.   I have told you about you which you can observe in the mirror, the mirror which is invented by humans using material created by God, objects which include all physical objects.  How much longer a list do you need from me ?  I'll tell you what.  Look around and everything you see is evidence for God because they are all EFFECTS created by God the first cause. 2)  "Natural processes" ?  WTF is that ?  What is natural if not God given, God designed, and God created.  Mirrors are human designs using God given intelligence to assemble God created materials. 3)  I have told you not to list evidence for mutations and genetics and called them evidence for evolution because mutations and genetics are not evolution.  They are parts of design and they do not involve speciation.  Varieties within species are part of the process of intelligent adaptation of living organisms, not involving some bullshit selection or Divine Intervention.  So why are you still quoting me irrelevant studies ? 4)  Read 1) and 2) above, and stop bitching. 5)  Read 1) and 2) above, and stop swearing. Your bitching and swearing only make you more of an imbecile and a stupid brick. 6)  Per Wiki, "Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy concerned with the foundations, methods, and implications of science. The central questions of this study concern what qualifies as science, the reliability of scientific theories, and the ultimate purpose of science. This discipline overlaps with metaphysics, ontology, and epistemology, for example, when it explores the relationship between science and truth."  Science itself is hollow and meaningless materialism without its philosophy.  The highest science degree is a PhD. 7)  Google mutations and genetics and see if they mentioned Darwin's evolution.  They don't.   Google Kirk Fitzhugh, an evolutionary biologist, and read his explanation why evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory.  Evolution is a collection of theories applied towards a variety of causal questions.  In other words, evolution is at best an unsubstantiated opinion, and at worst a lie and a conspiracy, with plenty of synthesized story telling in between. 8)  Space and ocean deeps are not natural habitats for humans, plants and other animals either.  But humans use their God given intelligence to explore and conquer these frontiers because we humans, like any other living organisms have been designed with the intelligence to be born, to survive, to adapt, to reproduce, and to die.  Each and every living organism is designed with the ability to act, choose, select, and otherwise manipulate their inanimate natural environment as a part of the process of their adaptation, survival, and reproduction.  No bullshit selection or Divine Intervention is required. May the truth open your eyes so you may begin to see.  Remember this : GOD DID IT.
    1
  22. Slickslash 27  Natural selection does not mean anything, period.  There is nothing natural that is not God designed, God given, and God created.  If natural selection is to mean Divine Intervention, there is still no evidence of any evolution by the process of Divine Intervention.  Evolution simply does not exist in real life.  It is a fairy tale. Christians believe in Christ.  I believe in Jesus.  Jesus is not Christ.  Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life.  Everything I said is based on truth and verifiable facts.  I don't lie. May the truth open your eyes so you may begin to see.
    1
  23. stoneman472  What makes you think your Viking gods are not real, imbecile ?   Why you have to wait for shit stain ?  Just wipe some of your shit on your face and don't wash it off for a few days, you stupid piece of brick !
    1
  24. stoneman472 " What makes you think your Viking gods are not real, imbecile ?   Why you have to wait for shit stain ?  Just wipe some of your shit on your face and don't wash it off for a few days, you stupid piece of brick !" Those are my words.  Write those words in your heart.  It may save your life one day.
    1
  25. ano ny God, a).  Final answer.  God was the original creator of bbc, bbbc, and bbbbbbc without a doubt.  No Divine Intervention or any bullshit selection is involved or is necessary for this kind of intelligent adaption process.  It was as originally designed.
    1
  26. Slickslash 27 See ? Even the imbecile stoneman472 disagree with you ? Learn the truth from me.  You don't know how fortunate you are to come across such wisdom. 
    1
  27. stoneman472  God can't be disproven because God is real and proven.  There is overwhelming evidence and logical proofs for God and there is zero contrary evidence.  To not believe in God is therefore irrational and illogical.  To believe that there is no God is outright delusional.  So, do you believe in God or are you irrational, illogical, and perhaps delusional, shit stain?  Can you whistle ?  Your singing is lousy.
    1
  28. Slickslash 27  Look in the mirror and ask yourself who created this person and this mirror.
    1
  29. stoneman472  WTF are you rambling about.  The best contributors to science in the history of mankind are believers in God.  For example, there is Socrates and Plato, Aristotle, Newton, and Einstein.  Only Newton was religious.  Socrates and Plato, Aristotle, and Einstein are not religious.  And I am not religious.  We believe in God based on overwhelming evidence and logical proofs for God and there is zero contrary evidence.  You are irrational and illogical to not believe in God, and you are delusional if you believe that there is no God.  So, do you believe in God or are you irrational, illogical, and perhaps even delusional ?  Tell us which one do you choose. 
    1
  30. Slickslash 27  I gave you the evidence and logical proofs for God already, but I'll repeat them for you : the birds and the bees, the stars and galaxies, you and me are some of the overwhelming evidence or observable EFFECTS of God.  The logical proof is the law of cause and effects that states that everything that exists is caused to exist.  We call the first cause God the creator. God means different thing to different people at different time, these are all parts of the One and the same God.  God has infinite parts. Now it is your turn to answer my question : do you believe in God or are you irrational, illogical, and perhaps even delusional ?  
    1
  31. Slickslash 27 .  1) That's correct.  God caused the big bang to bang. 2)  I never claimed God is someone.  God is the first cause and God is metaphysical, not a physical person or a physical substance. 3)  No lose-lose.  You win if you choose to believe in God. 4)  We don't know if God was bored or not when God decided to create our physical universe because God is unknowable to humans.  Evolution does not exist in real life. 5)  You can consider whatever you want.  I rely on logic and verifiable facts.
    1
  32. Slickslash 27 stoneman472  That's right.  God caused our physical universe to come into existence and then rapidly expanded. Re. mutation.  Per Wiki, "In biology, a mutation is a permanent change of the nucleotide sequence of the genome of an organism, virus, or extrachromosomal DNA or other genetic elements."  Where is evolution even mentioned in mutation ?  Wake up to the truth, evolution does not exist in real life.
    1
  33. stoneman472 Slickslash 27   A part of the process,  the gear in the bike, is not a process nor a bike.  Evolution , the bike, does not exist in real life.  There is zero evidence, zero observation, that it exist.  Evolution is nothing more than a some fossils, a few dried bones, and a godless fairy tale.
    1
  34. Slickslash 27  You lied again.  I never said there is no fossils.  I said, "  Evolution is nothing more than a some fossils, a few dried bones, and a godless fairy tale."  Fossils demonstrate that some species died out in the pass, but they are not evidence for speciation.  No speciation has ever been observed either by Divine Intervention or some bullshit Darwinian selection. You lied again when you said, "evolution guided by gods hand which is something you've argued for stating that the mutations these creatures go through are all part of his intelligent design."  First off mutation is not evolution.  Secondly I said that mutations and genetics are parts of the design of living organisms, not some kind of Divine Intervention or some bullshit Darwinian selection.  None of that is necessary or ever been observed.  Every mutation and genetic capabilities were already built in the living organism by the original design created by God. You may want to visualize evolution.  But evolution does not exist in real life, only in fairy tales Darwin wanted you fools to visualize.
    1
  35. stoneman472  I have provided solid evidence for every claim I've made. 1)  Intelligent adaptation of living organisms : DNA 2)  Evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory :Kirk Fitzhugh's explanation.  3)  GOD DID IT : Everything that exists and the law of cause and effect that says everything that exists is caused to exist.  God, the first cause, did it.
    1
  36. stoneman472 Read my latest reply to Slickslash 27  Everything that I said is based on truth and verifiable facts.   Scientists and experts have been working on mutations and genetics, some for their whole life.  But no one has ever worked on evolution because evolution is not science.  It does not exist in real life.  It is at best an unsubstantiated opinion and at worst a lie and a conspiracy to gain political power and government funding.
    1
  37. stoneman472 Slickslash 27    Scientists and experts have been working on mutations and genetics, some for their whole life.  But no one has ever worked on evolution because evolution is not science.  It does not exist in real life.  It is at best an unsubstantiated opinion and at worst a lie and a conspiracy to gain political power and government funding. Fitzhugh is an evolutionary biologist, a PhD and the curator of the natural history museum.  He is not only an expert of evolution but is some sort of authoritative figure.  Besides his explanation is scientific,  Evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory.  Therefore evolution cannot be science.  It cannot be scientifically tested.  That is why no one can provide us with a scientific theory of evolution.  If you guys want to have a scientific theory of evolution, use Jackie Wu's scientific theory E/IALO, Evolution by the process of Intelligent Adaptation of Living Organisms, where evolution only means changes in genetics, no adaptation and no Divine Intervention expressed or implied.  The buck stops at intelligence which can be scientifically tested.  Unlike Darwin's bullshit evolution by the process of natural selection, God or Divine Intervention is not a part of this scientific theory.
    1
  38. Slickslash 27  I'll correct your quote, "  Since all cells in our body contain DNA, there are lots of places for mutations to occur; however, all mutations matter not for evolution. ...... because evolution does not exist in real life." delicious and golden delicious are still apples, viruses are still viruses.  No speciation there.  What part of "mutations resulting in varieties within species are parts of the original design" you don't understand ? Even if bird flu wipe out the entire human population, there is still no speciation and no bullshit Darwinian evolution.
    1
  39. stoneman472  That quote you cited is not a lie.  It is simply presumptuous based on a faulty presumption that evolution actually exist.  That is why I corrected it.  Evolution does not exist in real life.  Varieties within species is not speciation.  They are parts of the design.  Red delicious and golden delicious are still apples.
    1
  40. stoneman472  I said I was correcting the quote before I corrected it.  Correction, not misrepresentation.  The original quote was based on faulty presumptions.  The corrected one is based on truth and verifiable facts as usual in all I ever said.   Logic is the authority.  Darwin's evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory.  It is a godless fairy tale.  Mutation, on the other hand, is a science, and mutation has nothing to do with evolution.
    1
  41. stoneman472  So are you a pathological liar or are you having Narcissistic Personality Disorder ?  See, you lied and I pointed that the lie for everyone to see.  I, on the other hand only speak the truth and everything I said is based on truth and verifiable facts.  Slickslash 27 is starting to see the truth and that's why he is not responding to you any longer, I guess.
    1
  42. stoneman472  I think you read too many fairy tales and fictions.  Read the Gospel for a change and learn the truth.  May the love and the peace of Jesus be with you, kid. 
    1
  43. stoneman472  Evolution is superstition.  Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life.  May the truth open you eyes and lead you away from superstition. 
    1
  44. stoneman472  God is metaphysical.  What is metaphysical is unknowable to humans, and is independent of time and space.  To say God, gravity, life, and time are small is being irrational, illogical, and delusional.  That would be you.  Go get your head examined by a professional. 
    1
  45. stoneman472  Evolutionists are religious people believing in Darwinism with blind faith and they are self-righteous like all religious people.  Jesus, Einstein and I are believers of God and we don't follow any religion.   Jesus taught us love, not righteousness.  The love of Jesus is unconditional, not out of fear or righteousness.  Love out of righteousness is not love.  It is bigotry.  Write these words in your heart and stop being a bigot.
    1
  46. stoneman472  Who said anything about saviors ?  I am not a Christian.  Christians believe in Christ.  They do not necessarily believe in Jesus.  I believe in Jesus, the way, the truth, and the life.  And Jesus is not Christ. Let me say this one more time for you seemed to be not getting it.  Jesus taught us love, not righteousness.  The love of Jesus is unconditional, not out of fear or righteousness.  Love out of righteousness is not love.  It is bigotry.  Learn the truth and stop being a bigot. all right ?  
    1
  47. stoneman472   "Righteous man" ?  LMAO ! Per Wiki, "Self-righteousness (also called sanctimoniousness, sententiousness, and holier-than-thou attitudes[1]) is a feeling or display of (usually smug) moral superiority[2] derived from a sense that one's beliefs, actions, or affiliations are of greater virtue than those of the average person. Self-righteous individuals are often intolerant of the opinions and behaviors of others." What you displayed here are the words of a self-righteous bigot (per Wiki, a bigot is a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.) Let me say this one more time for you seemed to be not getting it.  Jesus taught us love, not righteousness.  The love of Jesus is unconditional, not out of fear or righteousness.  Love out of righteousness is not love.  It is bigotry.  Learn the truth and stop being a bigot. all right ? "....all Gods has conditions: He demands obedience. ....." WTF are you talking about ?  God is metaphysical and what is metaphysical is unknowable to humans.  Jesus was a human.  Jesus is not God or the only Son of God.  Go argue with the Christians you hated so much but don't argue with me.  I am not a Christian.  I believe in Jesus.  I do not believe in Christ or the Abrahamic God. "The only true salvation for mankind is Humanism."  WTF is salvation ?  WTF is Humanism ?  You are mumbling nonsense there. " To not due it out of fear, but because it is right."  You call that English ? LOL !  and WTF is "right" ? May the truth open your eyes so you may see with the light.
    1
  48. stoneman472  Per Wiki, " Humanism is a philosophical and ethical stance that emphasizes the value and agency of human beings, individually and collectively, and generally prefers critical thinking and evidence (rationalism, empiricism) over established doctrine or faith (fideism)." So WTF that has to do with ""The only true salvation for mankind', and where is your critical thinking and evidence ?  You bigots like to talk about humanism and evolution as if these are gospel truth but in reality these are meaningless opinions unsubstantiated by any valid evidence.  The US talked about humanism and then tortured and murdered 1.5 million innocent and defenseless men, women, and children civilian Muslims in Iraq.  Clearly their humanism and yours are subjective and self-righteous, a mask worn by bigots. Jesus is the light, the light that overcome the darkness of mankind.  May the love and the peace of Jesus be with you.
    1
  49. stoneman472  I have always used evidence and logic to substantiate my claims and I demand nothing less from you.  There is no doubt whatsoever that belief systems caused the death of millions of innocent people.  In the US alone, the belief that abortions are consistent with their so called humanism bullshit led to millions of unborn human lives being murdered each year.  Everything I said is based on truth and verifiable facts.  These are verifiable facts, not philosophical stipulations. Don't change the subject.  Neither Nazism or Jesus has anything to do with humanism.  It is humanism which is the subject of our debate, and my question to you was "So WTF that (humanism) has to do with ""The only true salvation for mankind', and where is your critical thinking and evidence ?"  And I explained to you "Clearly their (U.S.) humanism and yours are subjective and self-righteous, a mask worn by bigots. It is obvious you wish I leave rather than consistently embarrassing you by pointing out your ignorance and bigotry here.  That is typical of self-righteous and obnoxious people like you.  When facing defeat, you people reach for some kind of exaggerated dignification and exaltation.  You don't seem to realise how ridiculous you sounded. Your humanism is keeping you blind.  May the truth open your eyes so you may begin to see.
    1
  50. stoneman472  You are a liar.  I never said evolution is false.  I said evolution is neither a fact nor a single theory, that it is a fairy tale, and that it does not exist in real life.  I quoted Dr. Kirk Fitzhugh's explanation as support for my assertion.  You said, "Jesus and Einstein were both indeed Jewish."  They were born of Jewish parents but that does not mean they believed in or follow the religion of Judaism.  See how stupid and ridiculous you are ? You are a liar again when you said, "But "believe" in Jesus as the son of God...."  I never said such a thing.  Just the opposite, I said Jesus is not the only Son of God as the Christians claimed he was. You lied again when you said, "You then for some reason claimed that "righteousness was bad""  I never said righteousness is bad.  I said you were self-righteous when you claim to be a "righteous man".  Do you even understand what it means by being self-righteous ?  It means you believe, act, and said you are right when you are not or you don't even know what is "right".  I asked you WTF do you mean by "right" and you couldn't answer my question. Liar, I never defined Humanism.  I quoted the definition by Wiki, and I asked you, "So WTF that has to do with ""The only true salvation for mankind', and where is your critical thinking and evidence ?"   To which you still could not find an answer. You lied again when you said that I "proceeded to blame Humanism for all the deaths of Iraqi citizens...."  I did not blame humanism.  I blame what the U.S. believed was humanism.  And I pointed out what the U.S. humanism and yours are : "Clearly their (U.S.) humanism and yours are subjective and self-righteous, a mask worn by bigots." You lied again when you said, "Now you blame Atheist Humanists as the cause for abortion in America."  I never made such an accusation or blame.  I cited the millions of aborted babies as an example of how belief systems can cause millions of death, which was the fact that you denied.  I said, " In the U.S. alone, the belief that abortions are consistent with their so called humanism bullshit led to millions of unborn human lives being murdered each year." Why were you quoting statistics about religious people committing murder by abortion ?  It is belief systems and humanism bullshit that I cited as cause for the murder of millions, not religions or atheism.  Besides you are confused,  Christians believe in Christ, not in the man Jesus. "everything we have said this far is easily referenced by scrolling up."  Exactly.  Everything I said is based on truth and verifiable facts and every lie of yours that I pointed out can be easily verified by scrolling up. I don't know how you can find your own lies amusing and expect me to show that they are true when they are not.  All three items you listed are your lies and your made up stories. I am getting tired babysitting kids like you.  Grow up, and stop lying, alright ?  May the truth set you free.
    1