Comments by "foil hat" (@foilhat1138) on "The Sun"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
You can read what Arakhamia said about negotiations yourself if you want.
“First of all, in order to agree to this point, you have to change the constitution. Our aspiration towards NATO is written in the constitution. Also, there is no trust in the Russians that they will do this. This would only be possible if there were security guarantees. We couldn’t sign something, go away, everybody there would breathe a sigh of relief, and then they would come more prepared, because in fact, when they invaded, they were unprepared for such resistance. We could only work on this when we were 100% sure that this would never happen again. However, there is no such belief."
So you are incorrect about everything. Good job.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@TheDrAstrov That was in 2019 after Russia invaded in 2014 genius. Did you read my post? or are you just deliberately obtuse? I said prior to 2014, obviously after Russia invades its going to change the landscape. Here's the tenants of the Budapest memorandum because you seem confused, why don't you tell me which one Ukraine broke.
Respect the signatory's independence and sovereignty in the existing borders (in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act).
Refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of the signatories to the memorandum, and undertake that none of their weapons will ever be used against these countries, except in cases of self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
Refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine, the Republic of Belarus and Kazakhstan of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind.
Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to the signatory if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used".
Not to use nuclear weapons against any non - nuclear-weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a state in association or alliance with a nuclear weapon state.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheDrAstrov I like how you didn't respond directly to me in hopes I wouldn't be able to respond to your lies. Here's what the Ukraine act of independence says, please tell me what Ukraine violated.
- Ukraine shall be declared an independent democratic state on August 24, 1991.
- Upon declaration of its independence, only its Constitution, laws, orders of the Government, and other legislative acts of the republic are valid on the territory of Ukraine.
- A republican referendum shall be organized on December 1, 1991 to confirm the act of declaration of independence.
-In view of the mortal danger surrounding Ukraine in connection with the state coup in the USSR on August 19, 1991,
-Continuing the thousand-year tradition of state development in Ukraine,
-Proceeding from the right of a nation to self-determination in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and other international legal documents, and
-Implementing the Declaration of State Sovereignty of Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic solemnly declares.
-The territory of Ukraine is indivisible and inviolable.
-From this day forward, the Constitution and laws of Ukraine only are valid on the territory of Ukraine.
-This act comes into force upon its approval.
Stop spreading lies.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheDrAstrov I just dont understand why you would lie about something so easy to google.
On March 10, 2014 the de facto Prime Minister of Crimea, Sergey Aksyonov, made an unofficial verbal invitation to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) to monitor the plebiscite.[ However, later in the day, an OSCE spokeswoman said that Crimea did not have the authority to invite the organization into the region as it is not a fully-fledged state and, therefore, incapable of requesting services provided exclusively to OSCE members. OSCE personnel already in Crimea were asked to leave by the pro-Russian authorities. On March 11, the OSCE chair, Switzerland's Foreign Minister Didier Burkhalter, declared the referendum as unconstitutional and therefore the OSCE would not send observers. OSCE military observers attempted to enter the region four times but were turned away, sometimes after warning shots were fired, which was another reason given for not dispatching referendum observers.
OSCE also published a report about their observations which "produced significant evidence of equipment consistent with the presence of Russian Federation military personnel in the vicinity of the various roadblocks encountered"
2
-
2
-
2
-
2