Comments by "rockethead7" (@rockethead7) on "Inside Edition" channel.

  1. You're obviously very proud to know nothing.
    2
  2. Yes, and it was quite dishonest of media not to tell you at that point that she was already dead 1.5 years prior. Instead, they staged it so that the first video would come out, then the follow-up a month later, to pretend that the first video caused the death.
    2
  3. Dewdrop, multiple people called, and one of them recorded the incident and gave a copy of the video to the police. It doesn't match her sob story about nobody being around. And, no, the police didn't expose her. They blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. But, once the investigation was closed (she was long dead), they could no longer block FOIA.
    2
  4. Dewdrop, you believe she thought she was alone, why? Because she said so, as she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest, and didn't want to go back to prison again?
    2
  5. Well, that's only if you believe Inside Edition (where facts don't matter). But, pretending you're correct anyway, ok, so, nobody should call the police when they see a crime?
    2
  6. Well, the arrest video wasn't put on the internet until 2.5 years later, long after she died. And, as for her "embarrassment," well, why would you believe her anyway? The witnesses and the video taken of the incident do not agree with her story about nobody being around. To the contrary, the witnesses said it was an intentional act. Frankly, I find the innocent bystanders and police far more credible than the convicted felon trying to whine her way out of her millionth arrest.
    2
  7. Really? Multiple people called. One of them recorded it and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match this story about nobody being around. Why do you believe her anyway? She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison and had an arrest record a mile long, with open warrants. Do you REALLY believe she wasn't going to get arrested? Oh, and the video wasn't posted anywhere until long after she was dead.
    2
  8. Millions for what? For doing their jobs?
    2
  9. Nobody humiliated her. Stop trusting Inside Edition. Good grief.
    2
  10. Wow. Before this incident, she already had quite a history. A mile long arrest record, prison time for stealing cars, numerous failures to appear in court, multiple judgements against her for theft, reported by her landlord as being a, ya know, the things some women do for income when they can't get a straight job any longer, many drug and alcohol issues, etc.... really honorable.
    2
  11. Want to try writing this again after you're sober?
    2
  12. Coworker? Like fellow strippers? Family or friends? Like those people she walked out on more than a decade ago in order to live a life of crime and drugs?
    2
  13. Wow this is what happens when u watch Inside Edition and blindly believe them because no she wasn't humiliated because the arrest video didn't get released to until way after she was dead and none of the news covered anything until the arrest video went public but she died 2 years ago and the arrest video wasn't seen by anybody while she was alive plus she had been arrested a million times before and never killed herself and why would she wait 9 months if she was so embarrassed and who do you think embarrassed her a couple of blogs nobody heard of
    2
  14. How do you bully and ridicule a dead person?
    2
  15. Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  16. It's on the news to get ad revenue. But, fear not, it was never on any news broadcast while she was alive.
    2
  17. And, why would you believe she thought she was alone? Because that's what she claimed as she was attempting to cry her way out of her millionth arrest? Oh, but yeah, sorry, when you see a guy cranking at the playground with kids around, just leave him alone, he's not harming anyone.
    2
  18. Well, given that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, I would hardly think this woman would get embarrassed by being seen. As a matter of fact, the witnesses said it was intentional.
    2
  19. She ruined her life a decade prior when she decided to leave her family and career in favor of a life of crime and drugs. And, sorry, but one of the witnesses recorded the incident and gave a copy of the video to the police. Needless to say, the video doesn't match her version about a quiet act with nobody around. Why do you believe her anyway? With her extensive criminal history, time spent in prison, etc., it's tough to get a straight job. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. I'd eat my hat if she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans.
    2
  20. A ticket for a crime? Can you name any crime that they issue tickets for?
    2
  21. So, you don't advocate people who report crimes when they see them? And, yes, it was in front of kids.
    2
  22. Really? When did they start giving a ticket for a misdemeanor crime? I thought you only got a ticket for an infraction. But, you're clearly the legal expert here, so, please enlighten me?
    2
  23. Yes, an arrest is what happens from an aggravated misdemeanor. And, sorry, but the Freedom of Information Act is what it is. At least nobody saw the arrest video while she was still alive.
    2
  24. Just checking here... you do know that the arrest video wasn't made public until 1.5 years after she was already dead, right? There was very little "public humiliation" involved here. As for the shame you're now inflicting upon the police for finally releasing the arrest video (again, 2.5 years afterward, which was also 1.5 years after she was dead), what exactly do you propose they should have done instead? They kept it private for all of that time, but, they can only block a legal FOIA request for so long. Once the case has been closed long enough, they can no longer block FOIA requests. I'll eat my hat if you even know any of this.
    2
  25. Huh? What did the justice system do wrong?
    2
  26. I agree. And, I'll add, it's even worse that that, because this "news" story (not news) is very cleverly worded to completely alter what really happened here. If they're going to drag a dead woman's name through the mud, they should at least paint a more accurate story.
    2
  27. No, shame on the woman for performing in front of an audience on a public beach including children.
    2
  28. She was a convicted felon with a prison history and a million other arrests. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" (yeah, that kind). If she wasn't making "public beach" content for her fans, I'll eat my hat. Multiple witnesses called about the incident, and one of them recorded it and gave a copy of the video to the police. Stop blaming victims for the crimes of others. Good grief.
    2
  29. I'm sure they wish the same upon you for judging something you know absolutely nothing about.
    2
  30. I agree (except I wouldn't know what the "jail" part would be for). But, just checking here: you do know that the timeline was this, right? July 1, 2021 = this arrest. March, 2022 = suicide. November 24, 2023 = public release of the arrest video. December, 2023 = viral.
    2
  31. Wrong. The shame belongs to Inside Edition, for intentionally painting a false picture of what happened here, by clever wording, out of context quoting, and asking questions without providing the answers. The police did well here. They got calls from multiple people. One woman used her cell phone to record the incident, and showed it to the police. They described the video in their police report as a very loud and public display in front of multiple people, including children. Arresting her was the correct action. Furthermore, the police managed to keep the arrest video private for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after her suicide. Eventually, it was probably made public due to a legal FOIA request, which the cops cannot refuse, once the case is closed long enough. I'm sorry you fall for videos that try to make you think that the release of the arrest video had anything to do with her suicide, but, sorry, it didn't. She was already dead for 1.5 years before anybody in the public ever saw this video. So, stop blaming police, and start blaming Inside Edition for false reporting.
    2
  32. Wouldn't matter in this case. One of the "audience" recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, it didn't match her story about a discreet act with nobody around.
    2
  33. When you see a guy cranking at a playground, better not say anything, because it might lead to something bad, right? I mean, not that I even agree that the woman in the video lost her life over this arrest... none of her other million arrests resulted in that... why this one? And, why wait a year? It makes no sense. But, on your premise alone, it makes even less sense. Never report a crime, because the criminal might do harm to him/herself??
    2
  34. I hope you feel guilty for blaming the victims about a topic you know nothing about.
    2
  35.  @PanhandleFrank  Technically, she might be talking about the one and only site that did cover the story when she was alive: Smoking Gun. They posted her photo. But, yeah, 99% of the people in the comments don't understand the timeline at all.
    2
  36. Well, she hadn't seen her children in how long? Like 10 or 15 years, right? And, yes, she had a mile long legal/arrest/prison history.
    2
  37. I feel bad for her also. But, I don't know what you mean by "this is not right." What's not right?
    2
  38. The cops responded to multiple calls, and dispatched for it. One of the "audience" had taken video of the incident and showed it to the police. They describe the video in the arrest report as a very loud and public display in view of multiple people including children. One of the witnesses reported that this woman had wandered up and down the beach, looking for a place to do this, and chose a spot in front of a family with children. They can also look up her mile long arrest and prison record for various offenses, thefts, drugs and alcohol, prison time for stealing cars, failures to appear in court, etc. Between all of that, and the witnesses, do you really believe the cops weren't going to arrest her? They should have done something else, in your mind? Furthermore, the cops never released the arrest video for 2.5 years. That's 1.5 years after her suicide. So, the police didn't expose her to anybody. Nobody saw the police video while she was alive. And, after the case was closed that long, they can no longer block legal Freedom of Information Act requests. So, I'll ask again, how and why do you think the police should have done this differently?
    2
  39. I don't lack sympathy for her. I just don't understand why so many people just blindly swallow whatever Inside Edition feeds them.
    2
  40. Huh? That's a mighty huge accusation. Got any evidence?
    2
  41. They DID handle it differently. They arrested her, but, she never served any time or suffered any conviction for it. And, they managed to NOT release the video to the public until 2.5 years later (or 1.5 years after she committed suicide). What EXACTLY do you think they should have done differently?
    2
  42. Oh? When did they start giving tickets for aggravated misdemeanors? You're the legal expert here, not me, so please elaborate?
    2
  43. Um, ok. What did these cops do that violated their training?
    2
  44. Huh? It was an aggravated misdemeanor. What else were they supposed to do?
    2
  45. She abandoned her career and family (including a husband, a 6 month old son, and another son) more than a decade ago to live a life of crime and drugs. Her landlord said she was a "dancer" at the gentlemen's club. And, neighbors said she did "extras" for cash in her apartment. So, I think she had as many loving boyfriends as money could buy.
    2
  46. Yeah, but "innocent soccer mom gets arrested by evil police and can't stand the shame" goes viral. The real story doesn't.
    2
  47. Freedom of Information Act. I agree, yes, the video shouldn't have been made public. I just don't know how anybody can really prevent it, what with the legal FOIA request process. And, sorry, but they DID keep the video private for 2.5 years. She was dead for 1.5 years before anybody ever saw the arrest video. But, eventually, you just can't block FOIA requests if the case has been closed too long.
    2
  48. Welcome to Inside Edition.
    2
  49. Hilarious!! The video taken by one of the "audience" disagrees with you. Oh, but you keep on pretending to know things you don't, ok?
    2
  50. Yes, of course. But, stop believing everything you see on trash TV like Inside Edition.
    2