Comments by "rockethead7" (@rockethead7) on "8 News Now — Las Vegas"
channel.
-
@raqui174
YOU SAID: "I think you don’t understand how powerful government could be.."
== And, this is an answer to any question I asked, how??
YOU SAID: "if they want u to disappear they will.."
== Pffttt. Well, Bob Lazar is still around, 40 years after his amazingly ridiculous claims. So, what's your point? He hasn't disappeared.
YOU SAID: "anyone that cane out on his behalf would be targeted he didn’t want to put them in that position"
== But he himself isn't even "targeted" for anything!!! Good gods!!!! And, how does this make any sense to you anyway? I mean, the problems with your "logic" are so numerous, I can't even figure where to begin. But, I'll just ask you this: how would the big bad wolf know he wouldn't contact anybody?? I mean, you believe he went to MIT, and got a Master's in physics there, right? You believe Bob Lazar when he claims that the big bad wolf erased him from MIT, right? OK, now, how would the government know that Bob Lazar wouldn't turn right around and produce records, a diploma, canceled checks, something?? How would they know that he wouldn't contact anybody to vouch for him? And, for that matter, how would the big bad wolf know that there wouldn't be 100 people coming out all ON THEIR OWN!?!?!!? Even if you believe Bob Lazar went to MIT, he was somewhat of an anomaly there, right? He would have been one of the ultra-rare specimens at MIT, who graduated in the bottom third of his high school class, and went to a junior college before going to MIT, right? This is something you don't see every day, because it breaks the mold of MIT, by accepting Bob Lazar over the mountains of people applying ahead of him with far superior credentials, right? So, what is going to happen? NOBODY is going to stand up and say, "yeah, I totally remember Bob Lazar at MIT" (even without Bob Lazar asking for it)?? No?? Any professors who would say, "wait just a minute, Bob Lazar was in my classroom 7 years ago, I remember it clearly!!" No? No classmates that would come forward either?? NOBODY would come forward on Bob Lazar's behalf?? How would the government be able to predict that not only didn't Bob Lazar contact someone to vouch for him, but that none of the thousands of people at MIT would say a word either?? No admissions personnel who would have said, "yes, we accepted Bob Lazar despite that he didn't have the same qualifications as 99.99% of our historical students. It was a tough choice, because he didn't have the credentials to get in, but we talked about it, and we decided that we saw something good in Bob Lazar, so we admitted him." No? How would the super secret government agents know that NOBODY was ever going to say anything?
Good gods, you people are dumb. This is all the same as every other idiot in this thread. You believe what you WANT to believe, and that's all there is to it. And, no matter what mental gymnastics you have to put yourself through to justify believing such ridiculous claims from a convicted felon, you're going to do them.
1
-
1
-
Lisa Jordan
YOU SAID: "people like you make others afraid to speak"
== Pfftt. AFRAID??!?!! How?? By asking questions? Have I threatened you physically? Have I threatened ANYBODY physically? Have I threatened anybody legally? Have I threatened anybody financially? Besides my expression of valid ridicule for the amazing stupidity of people like you, what have I done to make anybody "afraid" of me? I mean, good gods, can you not see how backward you are??!?!? If you are among the Bob Lazar fan group, then you believe Bob Lazar has the big bad wolf out there, deleting years of his life, and a fortune of money, spent on his MIT education, right? But, you're not afraid to go up against that. But, you're afraid of ME?!??!?!!? What's wrong with your brain?
YOU SAID: "the truth."
== You wouldn't know what that means if your life depended on it.
YOU SAID: "Guess what it happening no more. Give me my tin foil crown I will wear it with pride."
== Obviously. This is the amazing thing about you morons, you're actually PROUD to be morons. I'll never understand it.
YOU SAID: "I've seen a bit more than lights and we are too numerous to be silenced"
== And, you've come to YouTube comments with this amazing "proof," eh?? Or, are you another one of the millions of people who have claims of Bigfoot sightings, unicorns, ghosts, aliens, Loch Ness Monster, pterodactyls flying around in modern times, etc., yet can offer no substantial proof of anything??
Doesn't it ever occur to you people that when a convicted felon making claims of seeing stuff in Area 51 after supposedly attending MIT university (without a shred of evidence about any such claims) is some of your strongest evidence... that, in reality, there isn't anything to hang your hat on? I'm sorry that you are so delusional, and I really don't care what you claim you saw. Until there's actual evidence to believe something, I don't believe it. And, you, in my eyes, are nothing more than [yet another] crackpot making insane claims that cannot be backed up with credible evidence. If I'm wrong, and you have credible evidence, what are you doing on YouTube??? Why aren't you presenting any of that evidence via the scientific method?? What are you waiting for??!?!!?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Mr Mac
Well, one of the problems is that we are in a Bob Lazar video. So, to come here and make comments is a bit like going into a home for Down's Syndrome patients and trying to strike up a game of chess. And, look, I don't say that to disparage or insult people who have Down's Syndrome. It's just an analogy, and I'm not creative enough to think of a better one. The point is, every single one of these Bob Lazar believers is really not very bright, and/or they've lost their marbles to the point that they can't think straight. For the dumb ones, well, they're just dumb, and there's not much we can do about it. But, for the ones with some shred of intelligence, well, they've put goggles on, and have decided, in advance, that the rules of their game are to (1) reject all opposition, and (2) accept any claims that align with their delusions. Those really are their only two rules to their game.
As I've said (and thanks for acknowledging), I'm just asking the questions that these Bob Lazar cult followers should be asking. None of his claims are believable in any other walk of life. "Oh, I got a Master's from MIT, spending a fortune and years of my life to do it, but it was taken away from me, oh well, on with my life and the next TV interview." If this was ANY other topic, these very same people would be saying that Bob Lazar is not credible, and would demand evidence. But, nope, instead, the Bob Lazar followers set up an unfalsifiable belief system, such that they really do think it's OK to blindly believe what someone says, as long as they build a scenario where it's OK to not have any evidence whatsoever. It's quite pathetic to think that way. But, the dummies and delusional Bob Lazar followers cannot and will not ever see it. They're blinded by delusion.
1
-
@tedmalley7636
YOU SAID: "If Lazar actually was spilling the beans...he would have been.." disappeared "..."
== Well, I disagree with that. It's one of the few times that I'd actually be on Bob Lazar's "side" (I don't believe a word he says, but, I agree that going public would be the best way to assure your safety). I mean, becoming very public would put such a spotlight on a person in that position, it would then be very public to then kidnap or murder the person. The safest a person can be in such a situation would be in the spotlight. Hence, that's also why I don't think he'd be at any actual risk by naming people who would theoretically know him at MIT. Of course, I don't believe he actually went to MIT. I think he's a lying bag of crap who uses this avenue to boost his ego in an utterly failed life. People in the bottom 1/3rd of their high school class and who go to community Jr. colleges do not get accepted to MIT's Master's programs. And, if they did, they'd be such an anomaly that they'd have a spotlight on them for that reason alone. But, yeah, "going public" is the first thing someone would do if they were actually in the position that Bob Lazar said he's in. Nothing else Bob Lazar makes any sense, but, at least going public made sense.
1
-
1
-
@salamander4668
Let's just pretend for a moment that you're correct, and somehow, magically, the super secret big bad wolf was able to erase his records from MIT. I won't bother re-stating every question I've raised... except this one:
Why wouldn't Bob Lazar sue MIT for his degree back? The man was in the bottom 1/3rd of his high school class, and attended a junior college, right? From there, he was amazingly able to gain admittance to MIT, the #1 science university on the entire planet, that normally only accepts the top 1% of applicants. But, he got in somehow, right? Don't you think he'd really be proud to get in, get a Master's from there, and want to hold on to that?
He paid the astronomical tuition, rent, food, lab fees, etc., right? I'm not going to bother looking up the amounts in the early 1980s equivalent, but, today, that degree program plus the living expenses would be approximately $225,000, right? He spent years of his life attaining the most prestigious Master's in physics degree on the planet, right? But, no, nothing? No attempt to get it back? No lawsuits? No demands? Just, "they erased me, oh well, time for my next TV interview"?? That's how this goes? And, you think that sounds plausible?
Yeah. Sure. They took all of that money, and years of his life. And, he did NOTHING about it?? Do you really find that feasible?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@salamander4668
You crazy people are amazing. You are literally setting up a system in your mind that you will believe ANY claim, with absolutely no reason to believe it. Good grief. Bob Lazar offers absolutely no reason to believe any of his claims. He keeps making these magical cars, never demonstrates them. He says he got a Master's from MIT, and then just gives it up the second that the big bad wolf "erased" it, no fight, no argument, no witnesses, nothing. And, your "logic" is that he does these crazy things so that he won't get shot?? So, tell me, what kind of crazy claims WON'T you believe on that basis? It sounds to me like you'll literally believe anything anybody says.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jayytee8062
Thanks. But, at this point, it's just an exercise in observing the number of people who cannot address any challenges to their position. Almost none of the delusional people in this thread have even attempted to answer the core questions I posed which fly right in the face of any logical behavior on Bob Lazar's part. His cult followers are quite willing to swallow unfalsifiable claims (setting up ridiculous conditions that no evidence is ever going to be needed in order to swallow what he's saying). And, nothing that Bob Lazar does is congruent with what any MIT graduate would ever do. He "gave up" his supposed degree without a fight. Why? Because the big bad wolf was going to come hunt him down, right? Yet, the guy is perfectly willing to keep on spewing more "secrets that can get him killed," yet won't lift a finger to try to get his degree back from MIT? And, it appears he has a bit of a car propulsion system fetish, because he keeps coming up with various types of automotive drivetrains... from jets, to nuclear power, to hydrazine. But, for whatever the reason, he never seems to DEMONSTRATE any of these cars. All we ever see are photos and interviews stating what the cars can do, but never see them actually doing it. Very odd behavior for an MIT physicist.
But, yeah, the cult followers will just swallow anything he says, with no evidence offered whatsoever.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@larrywatson9400
Here you go, I will copy and paste the reply about element 115 from earlier in this thread. Sorry that you don't know anything. Maybe you should work on that.
Here's my reply to the other guy about this same 115 nonsense.
*
You have NO UNDERSTANDING of this topic. None whatsoever.
When they say they "discover" new elements, that's a bit of a misnomer. The new elements aren't "discovered," they're MADE. And, they've been making new elements since the 1930s with element number 43. Basically, they stick some large elements into an atom smasher or cyclotron, and try to fuse two elements together, or to simply add protons. Most of the time, it's not successful. But, every once in a while, they successfully manufacture a new element. Now, keep in mind, these new elements don't last. They fall apart almost the instant they're made. But, in those scientific circles, it's a bit of an accolade to make a new element. And, they're always trying to make bigger and bigger ones. They have been doing this since the 1940s.
So, if Lazar predicted element number 115, it's not all that special or surprising. All he had to do was to look at the periodic table of elements, and predict a bigger number than had already been made. And, from there, it's just a matter of time. Again, they had been manufacturing these elements since the 1930s, bigger, and bigger, and bigger. It's not very unique or special to predict 115, any more than it's special if you predict 120 today (yet undiscovered, or not yet made).
Yet, you know none of this. And, you're quoting "Ununpentium 115"?? Have you bothered to look at the periodic table of elements and find out that 115 is NOT named Ununpentium?? Your own article that you're quoting from was WRONG. It wasn't the first time 115 was manufactured. It had been manufactured a decade earlier.
Anyway, once again, you're just another clueless Bob Lazar fan who doesn't bother to fact-check anything. You don't know what you're talking about. It sounds impressive to you that Bob Lazar named a new element. But, any idiot who ever attended Physics 101 in any university on the planet would know that those big elements aren't found in nature, they're MADE. And, in science, they are constantly trying to make new elements. During Bob Lazar's time, the biggest elements ever made were in the 100s. So, all Bob Lazar needed to do was name something bigger (like 115), and eventually it would be made. Today, you can name something in the 120s, and eventually it will be made, and you too can claim to have alien knowledge, and the idiots with no clue how elements work will worship YOU, just like you're worshiping Bob Lazar.
This whole thread is an idiot parade. It really is. Not a single one of you clowns understands this stuff. You are dazzled by a liar who makes these stupid claims, because these stupid claims align with your predetermined conclusions.
1
-
@zenmeister451
YOU SAID: "They pass all such assertions/possibilities off as being illusionary, delusionary, optical phenomena, aberrations of perception, hoaxes/lies, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera."
== Yup, because that's been proven throughout history. People hallucinate. People don't always know what they see. People have depth perception problems. People often associate shapes they see with stuff they imagine, creating memories of things that didn't happen in reality as their memories say. And, decade after decade after decade, these things go by, and none of the claims have ever held up to any actual level of scientific scrutiny. There are UFOs, of course, but, to claim that they are of alien origin has never been supported by any evidence that is credible. The latest wave of released videos by the Pentagon were a joke also. One was nothing more than a bird looking like it was traveling super-fast due to parallax (the bird wasn't going fast, the plane was, and the camera was rotating with the plane). And, the other was just a routine object that shows up on FLIR to look different than in real life. Nothing spectacular there. Yet, people like you jump for joy. Sorry, but if you ACTUALLY expect others to believe your crackpot notions, you need better evidence. Again, nobody, and I mean NOBODY, can tell the difference between your astounding claims, vs. those who claim to have seen unicorns, ghosts, Bigfoot, living pterodactyls, all varieties of gods manifesting themselves on Earth, you name it. You can replace everything you just said with the word "Bigfoot" instead of "alien UFOs" and it would be the exact same thing. "They pass all such assertions of Bigfoot as illusionary, delusionary...." Um, yeah, exactly. Until someone actually produces a Bigfoot, that's the logical conclusion. And, the crazed Bigfoot chasers out there are just as convinced about their Bigfoot as you are about your aliens. There literally is no difference between you and the Bigfoot chasers. You have the equal amount of evidence, supported by the equal amount of scientific validity (zero). And, I could introduce you enthusiastic Bigfoot believers who sound EXACTLY like you.
YOU SAID: "There's no way to contend with those sorts because they have - a priori - discounted your experience/knowledge from the git-go. So you can't win fer losin' as the saying goes."
== Yup.
YOU SAID: "The problem with rh7 is that he uses a very limited amount of overly simplified 'evidence' to support his claim"
== WHAT CLAIM!?!?!?!?!? You're the crackpot making claims. I'm asking questions. And, the main topic here is about Bob Lazar's credibility. It's a joke. His credibility is zero. What's the most concrete evidence presented in this thread? He says they were using element 115?? Ridiculous. I can say I saw someone using element 121, and in about 10-15 years, when they smash a couple more protons into a nucleus, people like your friends here in this thread will worship me like they worship Bob Lazar. I realize you posted something (which I didn't read in full) about "defending" me about Bob Lazar's credibility. I don't know what you said, and I don't care, because I don't need your defense. But, apparently, from the couple lines I did read, you already know Bob Lazar's credibility is poor. So, I'm really not sure what claims you're talking about. But, perhaps that's my fault, because I stopped reading anything from you long ago (with the exception of this recent post). But, ya know, I just don't care. You can chase aliens until the day you die (I know that's exactly what you're going to do anyway). Make a fool of yourself aaaaallllllllllllll you want. It makes no difference to me. But, yeah, sorry, I'm not joining your band of crackpots on a quest to chase loose sightings from mostly drug addicts and idiots, who jump to support conmen who lie about their academic history. I'm not explaining this again. Produce CREDIBLE EVIDENCE, or your claims are worth nothing.
1
-
@larrywatson9400
YOU SAID: "Your absolute ignorance on Element 15 astounded me. You are so narrow-minded you can’t imagine something existing beyond what earth’s resources have provided."
== First of all, element 15 is phosphorus, and yes, occurs naturally. But, sorry that isn't what was brought up in this thread. The insane Bob Lazar worshipers were all impressed that Bob Lazar said there was an element 115, not element 15. This is undoubtedly a product of your inability to understand and digest basic concepts. And, no, element 115 doesn't occur naturally. There has never been a single atom of element 115 ever found. And, the ones that were made, didn't last more than a short instant before falling apart again. The half life is less than a single second.
YOU SAID: "Simple, stupid and unimaginative. Grow up and stop being such an ass."
== Let me get this straight... YOU are talking about the wrong element, and you're basing your opinions on element 15 instead of 115, and **I** am the stupid one??? Sorry, but you're dead wrong. As I said in this thread, once you get into the big elements, those are NOT found in nature. And, there's been a worldwide competition among physicists to manufacture larger and larger elements. Bob Lazar's prediction of element 115 a decade or two before it was manufactured is no more impressive than if anybody predicts element 121 today, and just waits a decade or two for it to be manufactured. I mean, good gods, even just reading the Wiki article about element 115 tells you that it's synthetic (man made). I don't even usually recommend using Wiki as a source, because it's too often wrong. But, in your case, anything is better than the level of stupidity you're expressing here.
As I said, and you apparently ignored, the first time an element was manufactured was in the 1930s, when element 43 was manufactured using a cyclotron. From the 1940s and forward, there has been an ongoing race in physics to create elements, bigger and bigger. When you get up into the 60s through the mid 90s, some of the elements are found both in nature, and/or can be man-made. But, once you get to element 95 or above, none of that is ever found naturally, and is always man-made. Element 115 is NOT found in nature. So, you can sit there aaaaaalllllllllll you want and make an idiot of yourself, if that's what you want to do. But, if you think "Earth's resources provided" (your own words) element 115, you're sadly mistaken. But, hey, what are you worried about ME for?!?!?! If you are correct, I'm sure there's a Nobel Prize waiting for you!!!! Just go demonstrate that you're correct, and it will rewrite every physics book on Earth!!! You're an overnight millionaire!!!! The Nobel Prize comes with approximately $1 million already. But, that's peanuts next to your 7 or 8 figure book deals, and the $70,000 per week that you'll be earning on the university lecture circuits. So, hey, be my guest. You have far bigger targets in life than worrying about ME. A Nobel Prize awaits you, the moment you prove me wrong!!! Why are you bothering with YouTube?!!?!?!!?! GO!!!! Go get your Nobel Prize for your understanding of heavy elements that nobody else on Earth understands!!!!
1
-
1
-
1