Comments by "rockethead7" (@rockethead7) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
@mikehenkes
YOU SAID: "I do not care what that charge is."
== OBVIOUSLY!!!! If you cared, then you'd know how wrong you are. But, you don't care if you're right or wrong.
YOU SAID: "He was arrested because an elected government body decided they did not want to hear a/multiple citizens grievance with them."
== Yes, that is what it boils down to. Congratulations. You finally got something correct.
YOU SAID: "Period all stop the end."
== Wrong. The arrest is where the process BEGINS, not where it ends. Good grief. This will have its day in court. And, it will likely be followed by lawsuits. This is probably going to go on for at least 2 years. So, spare me the "the end" comment. This is only the beginning.
YOU SAID: "It's foolish to even consider that an elected body can have a scheduled meeting open to the public with a scheduled time and for you to even assert that within that time he could be trespassing."
== Wrong. The officials can trespass someone at any point they see fit. If they do, then the police must abide, and arrest for trespassing.
YOU SAID: "Stop defending the Blue Line."
== Stop slandering the Blue Line.
YOU SAID: "It as it always does will only defend the elites."
== Pffttt. Hilarious!!!! You think those ridiculous clowns in the school board are "elites"?? What's wrong with your brain? They are an incompetent band of buffoons that deserve to be kicked out of their positions for their ridiculous policies. I hope that the man who got arrested sues the board/school and gets at least $200,000 for their hideous actions. And, I hope every other parent joins a class-action lawsuit, and gets at least $40,000 each. And, I hope the school board members are booted out the door, and never serve on any board ever again. But, you're calling them "elites"?? What??!?!?!? Good gods, you are one backward individual. Seriously, you have a lot of loose screws.
YOU SAID: "They will make up and or charge you with BS to do it."
== Wrong. Trespassing is a real charge. If the officials ask you to leave, you must leave. That's what trespassing is. It's not "BS," it's a real thing. And, the cops must abide.
YOU SAID: "They are the elites paid protection service not ours."
== Oh, spare me, you backward clown. If someone was at your house, and you asked the person to leave, and the person refuses, you can call the police, and they will trespass the person and arrest him. They'll protect you in the same way that they'll protect a school board. Like it or not, public building or not, the officials are allowed to trespass people. That's just the reality that you do not understand. The school isn't a sidewalk. You can't be trespassed from walking on a sidewalk. But, a publicly owned building is not all that different than a private home, when it comes to trespassing. The officials of that public building can trespass someone, the same way a private individual can trespass someone.
Look, dummy, the cops are not there to pass judgment. They are not judges and juries. They determine if a trespass is occurring (which it was), and make the arrest. The rest is up to the court system. THAT is where the real battles are done. But, people like you don't seem to understand that. And, frankly, you fail to reason how much stronger the man's legal case is after being arrested. The board is going to go down even HARDER because they had the man arrested. They're going to wish they never stopped that meeting. They're going to wish they never trespassed the man. But, now that they did, those "elites" (sigh, they're as stupid as you are), are really going to go down even harder because they did that. They're certainly not getting elected back into their positions. And, frankly, I doubt they'll even be able to serve the rest of their current terms.
Look, clown, just admit that you have no idea what you're talking about. Is it really that hard? What's so difficult about just being wrong? Why do people like you refuse to see reality?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CC-db4bg
I'm not fan of affirmative action. But, if you can't tell the difference between affirmative action vs. bribery, fraud, money laundering, tax evasion, falsifying credentials, etc., then there's a hole in your head, and you need to see a doctor. At least the affirmative action students actually intend on doing what they are admitted to do. Lori Loughlin's kids were admitted to the university to be members of the crew rowing team, when the plan from the start was never to row a single day on the team. They faked "injuries" and never performed the tasks they were admitted to perform, relying on the knowledge that they can't kick you out for being injured. At least the affirmative action students actually do the stuff they are admitted to do (row crew, play basketball, learn physics, whatever). Lori's kids, nope, the plan was to NEVER do what they were admitted to do. And, they committed a parade of illegal actions in order to do it.
1
-
YOU SAID: "You can't be trespassed from public tax payer funded property with out committing a crime or breaking an ordinance."
== HILARIOUS!!! Go to Area 51 (top secret facility) and try that speech. Demand entry, and refuse to leave. Watch how long it'll be before you're either dragged out or shot. Try that at the White House. Demand entry. It's a public taxpayer funded property, right? Tell them that you have the right to be there. Try walking into a judge's private chamber in a courthouse. How many seconds do you think will go by before you're arrested?
YOU SAID: "A constitutionally protected activity cannot be turned into a crime or used as a reason for disorderly."
== Well, it can. But, that's what the courts are for. The school board was way out of line for their policies, for not listening to their constituents, and for ending the meeting early. But, again, that's what courts are for. You sue them. That's how this works. But, if you refuse to leave when asked, yes, you're trespassing.
YOU SAID: "These deputies are not enforcing a law"
== Yes, trespassing IS a law.
YOU SAID: "they are feeling enforcers working in the interest of the school board. They are tyrant oath breakers who swore to uphold our rights hold them accountable."
== Wrong. They are enforcing the law correctly. And, why are you crying about it? The case against the board just got stronger because the guy was arrested. The cops didn't do anything wrong. They were obligated to trespass people when the board says so. But, the board... they should be thrown out of office. And, I hope the parents sue the school board into oblivion. Sorry that you don't understand the law, but, until you do, keep your ridiculous cop-hatred to yourself. The cops don't have a voice on the politics. They don't get involved with free speech violations. They don't exercise their own personal opinions during an arrest, nor would you want them to do so. If an official of the school demands that someone is trespassing, the cops must do the arrest. The cops are not judge and jury. That's why we have courts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
What the board did about every topic was ridiculous, outlandish, and I hope they all get thrown out of office. But, the cops do not get to make that call. If the school officials trespass someone, the cops must trespass that person. It's really that simple. The cops are not judge and jury. They make the arrest, and leave the rest up to the courts. Imagine that the cops took a personal stand about someone who refused to leave your home, for example. Would you want the cops to say, "sorry, we're not taking the guy off of your property because we don't agree with your politics, so we're letting him stay"? Oh, and before you say something like "public property, he has a right to stay," nope, sorry, that's wrong. There's a difference between public property like a sidewalk, vs. a building that happens to be owned by the public. The officials CAN trespass people from the building.
1
-
1
-
Hilarious!!!! So, that's how you think this works?? Amazing. Absolutely amazing. It's clear that you don't know the difference between public property (like a sidewalk), vs. a building owned by the public. I mean, I could explain it. But, maybe it's just easier for you to find out for yourself. Why don't you march over to the White House and demand entry, claiming that you have a right, as a taxpayer, to be inside a publicly owned building? See how that works out for you. Or, go march into a judge's chamber in a courthouse, and refuse to leave, under the premise that it's a taxpayer office, therefore you think you have the right to be there. See how that goes. Or, go walk into City Hall, and try to get into a mayor's office, and refuse to leave, because it's a public building. I'll bet you could even hold your breath for the time it would take to be locked up in the city jail.
No civil rights were violated here, dummy. The issue here is that the school board asked the police to trespass the person from the building, the man refused to leave, so he was trespassing. The police had to arrest him. That's it. End of story.
Now, I hope the man who was arrested will sue the school/board, and win tons of money. And I hope the board gets kicked out of office, and will never serve on another school board again in their lives. But, if a proper authority of the school asks the cops to trespass a person, then the cops MUST trespass the person. It's not a civil rights issue. Good grief.
People like you are ridiculous. The cops did their jobs correctly, and you want them fired for it? How about blaming the school board instead of blaming the cops? That's where the real blame is here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jaems_Scott
No, what makes me correct is the law. I mean, not only is there a mountain of case law that goes against what you said... not only did you wander all over the spectrum of ignorance, talking about civil rights, then shifting aimlessly to other concepts (wrongly)... not only are you completely illiterate, and don't know how to spell or punctuate... but, why do you suppose that this story hasn't even been reported like you're saying? Neither the right wing media, left wing media, or anything in between, are making the claims you're making. None of them. Nobody. The only people parading around, touting this stuff you're touting, are the completely ignorant. Sorry to say, there are too many of you ignorant YouTube warriors, who have NO CLUE what they're talking about on any level. You're all imbeciles, and quite proud to be imbeciles. It's very sad.
1
-
@Jaems_Scott
And, now you're back to civil rights again. What does that have to do with whether or not the person was trespassing when officials asked him to leave, and he refused? Good grief. What a total mess you are.
Look, just go back to school. Go learn something. You can barely write a sentence that doesn't have a million grammar/spelling/punctuation mistakes. That might not sound important to you, but, it's representative of why you don't know anything. If you can't write well, you can't read well. If you can't read well, you have very low reading comprehension. And, if you have low reading comprehension, you will fail to understand a lot of things (case in point). Start there. Go back to school. Take some reading and writing classes. Then, in a few years, maybe then, if you dive into the law, you might understand it better.
I didn't claim that media were any sources of virtue. The fact that you think that... is a product of your low reading comprehension skills. My point was that NO media outlets are reporting this story like your interpretation. I used that angle because you refused to absorb the other (more relevant) angles. I thought maybe there'd be a chance that you'd understand it better if I chose that angle instead.
But, your mind is too far gone. You need about 6-8 years of reading and writing skills before you can absorb what you need to absorb to understand these concepts. Come back here when you get those skills.
1
-
1
-
Good grief. What ARE you talking about? The cops have one decision to make. Is there cause to arrest, or not? If the man is being trespassed by the school board, and the man refuses to leave, the cops have no real choice in the matter. It's trespassing, they must arrest. And, that's why we have courts. Cops are not courts. Cops are not the judge and jury. Cops are not supposed to decide guilt or innocence. They decide if there is cause for arrest, and that's all. From there, the man can sue the living daylights out of the school/board, and I hope he does, and I hope the entire parent population that attended that meeting gets a bunch of huge checks for the ridiculous actions of the school board. But, for you to shift blame to the cops, for doing EXACTLY what they're supposed to do, is shameful.
1
-
YOU SAID: "Looks like we will start to see alot of privately owned airlines and shipping and trucking companies pop up around the states with their headquarters based outside of the states."
== What are you talking about? Are you under the impression that people are willing to connect through a different country to just fly across a couple of states? Or, are you unaware that foreign held airlines are not allowed to fly those kinds of domestic routes? I mean, basically, if you want to fly Qantas (for example) between Chicago and New York, you basically have to fly through Sydney, Australia to do it. Foreign held airlines can fly in and out of cities in the USA, but, not in between cities in the USA. You knew that before you posted your message, right?
YOU SAID: "Biden and his party of democrats and liberals are destroying this country! It needs to be stopped."
== Pffttt. As opposed to what? Republicans? Hey, whenever you want to wakie wakie and realize that all of the political parties are a nightmare in one way or another, you'll be better off for it.
YOU SAID: "I forsee"
== You can't even spell it. What could you possibly "forsee" (your spelling)?
YOU SAID: "another civil war in our near future if Biden and Nancy don't get out of office."
== Pffttt. Spare me. Every time there's a political power transfer from one party to another, there's a group of nutbags on the internet who scream about a civil war. Get real.
YOU SAID: "And not a war based on race rather a war based on political views."
== Fine. Go post that in a video about political views. Getting vaccinated (or not) has nothing to do with political views. It's a bunch of people who understand the science, and a bunch of people who don't.
YOU SAID: "Conservatives vs Liberals. Republicans vs Democrats. Hope I'm wrong"
== Don't forget "uneducated vs. educated." Good grief.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Pffttt. And, if it was your home, and you asked the cops to remove someone who refused to leave, do you want the cops to say, "sorry, we don't agree with your politics, therefore we're not going to arrest the guy, you'll have to deal with it yourself"?? (And, before you come back with something about "public property," sorry, that's not how it works.)
1
-
1
-
YOU SAID: "ok fine your right"
== My right what? Or, was that your barely literate attempt to say "you're"?
YOU SAID: "anytime A government official doesn’t like what you say all they have to do is use their thugs with guns to trespass you"
== You don't get to call police "thugs" just because you don't agree with the laws. Dummy, the police are there to enforce the laws. And, yes, if a government official trespasses you, and you refuse to leave, the police MUST trespass you. What would you have them do instead? The police are not judge and jury. The police do not inflict their own personal politics into whether or not you get arrested. I already gave you the example (which you ignored) of the police coming to your own house to trespass someone because you called them. Would you like it if they said, "nope, we're not removing this person from your property, because we don't agree with your politics"?? Is that how you want it to go? Look, dummy, there's a reason we have a court system. The police only decide whether a trespass occurred, and then make the arrest. That's all they do. From there, it's in the court's hands, and rightfully so. We do not WANT cops to make personal decisions about politics. Oh, but wait, YOU do. You want cops to make personal political decisions if it aligns with your politics, but, if the cops ever made a personal decision that doesn't align with your politics, you'd be the first to say, "hey, cops, keep your politics out of it, and just follow the law."
YOU SAID: "simple yay for the first amendment."
== Dummy, the cops don't get involved with that. That's what the courts are for. But, apparently, you can't get this through your skull. The man was NOT ARRESTED FOR SPEAKING. He was arrested for TRESPASSING. How many times does it take before that sinks in?
1
-
1
-
So, to explain, there's a difference between a public space like a sidewalk or something, vs. a building owned by the public. And, well, you might not think about at first. But, if you stop and think this through, you'll realize that most public buildings ARE very restricted, and they have the right to ask you to leave, and trespass you if you don't. Airports. The mayor's office. The private chambers of a judge at a courthouse. The ladies' room at a public park. Area 51, a top secret facility. I mean, even the school itself is off-limits during the day when kids are there, unless you get permission to be inside. So, yes, the board has the right to trespass the people at the meeting, if they refuse to leave. I hope the board gets sued, and all get kicked out of their positions. But, whether you like it or not, yes, the board can trespass people for not leaving when asked.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1