Comments by "King Orange" (@kingorange7739) on "CNN" channel.

  1. No but they do turn their weapons against their own tyrants
    1
  2. Also what do u call the withdraw from Afghanistan and the Soviet collapse? 😂
    1
  3. How so?
    1
  4. Bubba Tao r u a fucking joke? No u fucking idiot. U r not doing the kid a favor by killing it. U are still depriving it of the life it can live. Also not everyone believes in religion u dumb fuck. U think so little of life, then start with ur self before think of depriving anyone else of their life.
    1
  5.  @blooberryproductions904  No I wouldn't. And neither would most pro life members. Obviously in the case of life threatening. The right of life for the mother does not end for the child. Obviously the mother comes first, especially when likely the child would die alongside the mother anyways. However there is a major difference between something being an active threat to your life vs something being inconvenienced for your life. And I find it most humorous that in literally every abortion argument I enter, pro choice members always try to pull the most extreme examples to rationalize their logic, despite it being a severe minority, meaning that even if that isolated circumstance could be acceptable (Which most I still don't), that it would somehow justify the 98% being done for pure lifestyle convenience.
    1
  6.  @blooberryproductions904  It is when your weighing it against the life of a human being. I agree no one should go through that, but by the same token no one should be killed just because they are considered dreadful to someone else. Also no one is forcing anything. That is what is failed to understand. Force requires one to do something that would not already be done. It is a prohibition. A woman is weighed with 5 options rn. Abstinence, Contraception, Motherhood, Adoption, and for rn abortion. Pro life is against the 5th because of it involving the deliberate destruction of another human being. Does not change that those other 4 options exist. Also child support does exist and I will agree requires greater enforcement. So the idea of "getting no help from the husband" would not apply here. Instead pro life wants both the mother and father to be held accountable for the child.
    1
  7.  @blooberryproductions904  ok and as mentioned before there are alternatives. And also as mentioned before this is an extreme case. So I’ll ask would u concede that Abortion for those above 18 if it isn’t a life threatening case should be illegal?
    1
  8.  @blooberryproductions904  can be better but they exist. Also they are far better than abortion ever would be.
    1
  9.  @blooberryproductions904  ok why is that?
    1
  10.  @blooberryproductions904  ok and wouldn’t the solution be to improve those systems rather than using their faults as an excuse to kill the kids instead?
    1
  11.  @blooberryproductions904  ok once again, the solution is to do better not use it as an excuse. Also let’s apply that logic then. If a mother feels it’s in the best interest should she be allowed to kill her newborn?
    1
  12.  @blooberryproductions904  it’s not stupid when u realize that’s the equivalence. Ur adding to my point. Why is it killing newborns is so bad yet killing unborns is seen as a right. Murder isn’t a right
    1
  13.  @blooberryproductions904  unless ur referring to an individual under a major medical risk from the child, then yes. They can do it
    1
  14.  @blooberryproductions904  Also I never said it was right morally. Unless ur a sociopath anyone knows it’s morally wrong. The problem is they see it as a right to be done. And that brings the logical gaps
    1
  15. The bridge was hit to prevent supplies and reinforcements being sent to Ukraine. Russia was using it for military purposes, as such it isn’t a civilian target
    1
  16.  @ramgarhia9945  and?
    1
  17. No abortion is safe. Also, “we can only ban safe theft, we can only ban safe rape.” 🤦‍♂️
    1
  18. Not even close. Also under what crime? Like seriously, what is so hard about both the male and female being responsible?
    1
  19. maddy p. Actually statistically more women are pro life in the United States than men so do us a favor and do research before commenting also it’s not your body that’s being torn apart and suck the vacuum it’s your child’s body and as such that my body my choice argument is invalid so nope
    1
  20. No, Roe V Wade was done to enforce allowing the termination of the unborn on a federal level. Not a thing anymore.
    1
  21. Abortion ain’t a right bud
    1
  22.  @Glumclam  ok and it’s not your body in question. It’s the Child’s
    1
  23.  @bigboy8421  and how would you in any sense consider the murder of a baby to be considered a private matter?
    1
  24.  @bigboy8421  it’s has plenty to do with the child. Murder of a child is not a private matter just as domestic abuse or Chile abuse isn’t either
    1
  25.  @bigboy8421  and you are relying on a logical fallacy. Your right to life does not equal the right to be provided for by a third party source
    1
  26. K-V have u not watched a single pro life session?
    1
  27. Lunar Robot part of it but also due to logical gaps.
    1
  28. Lunar Robot well to answer this let me first ask u why u think abortion should be legal and why the unborn child should not be legally protected from the mother.
    1
  29. Lunar Robot OK what’s first look at your foster care argument while I will agree that there are plenty of problems with it one evil does not justify a greater evil being committed. Instead the energy should be focused on actually fixing those problems instead of just using them as an excuse to kill unborn babies.
    1
  30. Lunar Robot whether or not it has rights is determined by the law selves saying that it doesn’t have rights is dumb we know it doesn’t have rights right now the question is why it shouldn’t have rights.
    1
  31. Lunar Robot also you’re incorrect on the last matter but it’s not forcing a mother to do anything yes when you get pregnant you end up becoming a mother that’s pretty much simple logic. But here’s the thing a choice has to be made before you get pregnant and 99% of cases that choice is the mother having sex because she loved the spouse or the guy very very much. So she made the choice that led to her pregnancy and as such now has a child that has become her responsibility until that responsibility can be passed on someone else. This is why I have a mother refuse to care for her child after birth she would be arrested for at best negligence. Just saying.
    1
  32. The hell u mean?
    1
  33. Abortion ain’t a right
    1
  34. Not even slightly. If Russia wants an open fight against the US and NATO, have them invade an actual NATO nation and wait to see how long it would take before Moscow has a US flag
    1
  35. Nope because a miscarriage is not the fault of anyone. At least if it’s accidental. So no one would be blamed for that.
    1
  36. The Bible isn’t relevant to this point. I don’t want contraceptions banned, neither do most pro lifers. Preventing the existence of a life is not the same as taking a life.
    1
  37. No they really don’t. Do not believe everything CNN tells you bud
    1
  38. And the court over turning it has nothing to do with the majority principle. That is Congress job. If it violates or is not stated in the constitution, the court will not pass it to enforce. It does not matter if 99% agreed with it. If people wanted it as law, then a new amendment would have to be done with that. However that is never going to happen.
    1
  39. You don't get to kill someone for being unwanted.
    1
  40. Ok and here is a very basic rebuttal. At what point should a “Clump of Cell” be regarded as a human being with a right to live.
    1
  41.  @denniswakabayashi9000  Right so let’s get this straight. You take someone who is biologically at a same level of development and as around the same age, and you determine that one is a human being for being born and the other isn’t? Ok so here’s a simple question, is the birth canal some magical gateway of humanity?
    1
  42.  @denniswakabayashi9000  it really isn’t moot. You are drawing a rather arbitrary line that from a biological pov has no sense. 2. Legality doesn’t equal morality. We have seen many times in history that things that were morally abhorrent were legal for a long time. Slavery comes to mind. Or maybe even the Holocaust considering the Nazis committed that because the Jews weren’t persons to them. No matter which way you slice it, basing the validity of a life on “personhood” is completely arbitrary. 3. I find it rather funny that you would deny the humanity of someone who biologically is far more developed. So by your logic, an 8 month who is born a month early is more human than a 9 month who is going to be born in 2 days. As mentioned before there is no sense behind that and you don’t have to be a religious zealot to clearly see the gaps in that logic.
    1
  43. Not even close
    1
  44. Elliot Delmar which is why rapists need capital punishment. Not getting a baby killed.
    1
  45. Utha I’m not a republican. I don’t deny some Republican hypocrisy but the democrats are just as bad if not worse. No I’m on the side of justice. Death comes to those that do wrong and ruin the lives of people. Not babies. If Democrats want to call people like me hypocrites because we support the death penalty and oppose abortion then literally they confessed to their own hypocrisy by having the opposite values.
    1
  46. Nice attempt at false equivalence. Maybe you need to take a break from CNN
    1
  47.  @Kuroitakai  the father would technically be held responsible for it
    1
  48.  @Kuroitakai  also what statistics hold the rape. You realize that myth has been debunked many times.
    1
  49.  @YouknowIliveforever  such as?
    1
  50.  @doctorprotein2807  how so?
    1