Comments by "Michael Mappin" (@michaelmappin1830) on "The Jimmy Dore Show" channel.

  1. Ty
    1
  2. And unlike the United states, Russia is dealing with actual terrorists in Ukraine.
    1
  3. Ty
    1
  4. Hello from Canada! Love you guys!
    1
  5. Hear, hear! Thank you. Much love from Canada!
    1
  6. Stupid bull shit? What is bull shit? What's the point of even taking the time to leave a comment if you're not going to explain what you mean? 😀
    1
  7. What does Venezuela have to do with workers only a controlling their own labour and resources? 80% of the economy is in the private sector in Venezuela. That makes them 85% capitalist. 15% is in the state sector. What percentage is controlled by workers? Little to none! So what does Venezuela have to do with Richard Wolff or his argument?
    1
  8. Yeah, I might buy that if wasn't fined forgiving that salute just a few days earlier.
    1
  9. Ty
    1
  10. Ty
    1
  11. Jordan Peterson is not an atheist! He's a self-confessed Christian conservative! I don't know how many times the man has openly said that he's deeply Christian!
    1
  12. And yeah, the guy is an anti-intellectual. I don't know what's worse! He's claiming that ancient civilizations had knowledge of DNA because of the pictures they drew of intertwining snakes! Or his claim that it's impossible to stop smoking without Supernatural intervention! The guy is not only anti-intellectual , he's an idiot! He's a known liar and hypocrite. That's not my opinion, it's a matter of public record.
    1
  13. What do Democrats have to do with Jimmy Dore? And it only takes about 5 minutes worth of fact-checking to verify that Jordan Peterson is both a liar and a hypocrite. Not my opinion, a matter of public record. On top of that the man claims that ancient civilizations had no knowledge of DNA because of the intertwining snake pictures they drew! Have you also claims that it's impossible to stop smoking without Supernatural intervention! And then you lied about Bill c16 eroding freedom of speech in Canada! You see, as a self-confessed Christian conservative, he couldn't stand the idea homosexuals being protected under the law when it came to discrimination and attack from hate groups. Had absolutely nothing to do with freedom of speech. He's a lying scumbag! :-) I'm sorry if I shattered your image of the man.
    1
  14. Ty♡
    1
  15. Ty
    1
  16. Dore 2024! Yes, I know, it’s always premature to discuss the next presidential contest. But I’ll make my pick for 2024 known now: Jimmy Dore. For those who dismiss a comedian running for the highest office, I say, why not? Dick Gregory ran for president in 1968 as a write-in candidate for the Freedom and Peace Party. The comedian and civil rights activist used his run to energize the anti-war movement, draw attention to the needs of the working class and the harassment many people of color still faced following the passage of numerous civil rights bills. Gregory, although he only accumulated close to 50,000 votes, frightened the Nixon administration with his campaign. Personnel in the Nixon White House feared Gregory may become the “black messiah” J. Edgar Hoover long warned about. Shortly after that warning, leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X and Fred Hampton were gunned down. Fearful of his profile and his building of a true rainbow coalition, Gregory was placed on Nixon’s dreaded enemies list. I sincerely believe a Dore presidential campaign could have the same effect. It could empower various social movements and make the oligarchs and their two corporate/puppet parties quake in their boots. Dore could start the race with genuine grassroots support and funding from the people. Dore has expressed both interest and some hesitancy. But if history is any guide, I say he shouldn’t be worried. Run, Jimmy! Scare the oligarchs and empower the people! Dore 2024!
    1
  17. That's how capitalism works
    1
  18. Thank you
    1
  19. Ty
    1
  20. Ty
    1
  21. Dore 2024! Yes, I know, it’s always premature to discuss the next presidential contest. But I’ll make my pick for 2024 known now: Jimmy Dore. For those who dismiss a comedian running for the highest office, I say, why not? Dick Gregory ran for president in 1968 as a write-in candidate for the Freedom and Peace Party. The comedian and civil rights activist used his run to energize the anti-war movement, draw attention to the needs of the working class and the harassment many people of color still faced following the passage of numerous civil rights bills. Gregory, although he only accumulated close to 50,000 votes, frightened the Nixon administration with his campaign. Personnel in the Nixon White House feared Gregory may become the “black messiah” J. Edgar Hoover long warned about. Shortly after that warning, leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X and Fred Hampton were gunned down. Fearful of his profile and his building of a true rainbow coalition, Gregory was placed on Nixon’s dreaded enemies list. I sincerely believe a Dore presidential campaign could have the same effect. It could empower various social movements and make the oligarchs and their two corporate/puppet parties quake in their boots. Dore could start the race with genuine grassroots support and funding from the people. Dore has expressed both interest and some hesitancy. But if history is any guide, I say he shouldn’t be worried. Run, Jimmy! Scare the oligarchs and empower the people! Dore 2024!
    1
  22. Ty
    1
  23. Hate speech? What are you talking about? What hate speech? Your comment doesn't make any sense.
    1
  24.  @lincolnworsham1085  , oh, the video didn't start right from the beginning. Very interesting.
    1
  25.  @lincolnworsham1085  , I thought I watched the wrong video. :-)
    1
  26.  @barrel42  , Jimmy Dore, on the other hand, has done a lot of great work. He has exposed a lot of Corporations and evil people, revealing the damage they have done to society and people in general. Jordan Peterson, rather than speak the truth, he actually accepts money to lie on behalf of those individuals at the expense of society and innocent people. He's a truly disgusting human being. That's not my opinion, that's a fact that can be easily substantiated. The things mr. Peterson have done and said are a matter of public record. so the only thing you can really accuse me of is speaking the truth. So why so defensive and angry? I can understand if I revealed the truth about a family member. but why do you have an emotional attachment to someone such as Jordan Peterson? Do you think that behaviour and state of mind is healthy? I would recommend talking to a counsellor if you have the option. If you don't, I would recommend reading a text book called psychology applied to Modern Life. You might find that helpful.
    1
  27.  @barrel42  LMFAO? What the hell is that? or should I even ask? :)
    1
  28.  @davewade30  oh my God! :-) I hope you honestly don't believe that. The only thing Peterson is trying to do it's help himself. Help the cash flow to his bank account. :-) why are people like you so gullible? :-) what makes you so naive? You don't honestly recognize him as a pseudo-intellectual and a fraud? Maybe I can help you. Do you know what the eight basic rules of critical thinking are?
    1
  29.  @davewade30  oh, okay. Let's see if we can move from opinion to assertion. It's very important to be able to differentiate between facts, opinion, and assertions. I'm willing to bet that I can make a very strong case that mr. Peterson is a pseudo-intellectual, a fraud and a liar. Actually I can prove that he's a liar add hypocrite. That's not even in question. That's a matter of public record. But let's deal with the evidence, point-by-point. Shall we? So, did mr. Peterson actually claim that is not possible to quit smoking without Supernatural intervention? Yes or no.
    1
  30.  @davewade30  dude, he deserves to be ridiculed. I'm not just jumping to conclusions. The guy is a known liar and hypocrite. He lied about Bill C 16. When he was corrected regarding Bill 16, he continued to spread lies. He made the claim that no Marxist would debate him. He was then challenged by several well-known Marxist to a debate. He declined. And when it came to places that he was already scheduled to visit for debate oh, he raised his speaking fee in order to avoid having to debate. And then, on top of that, he continued to go around saying that no Marxist would debate him because they're all too scared. He admitted that he had found a way to monetize social justice Warriors! The more he lies, the more people respond to his YouTube videos, making him millions of dollars! I could probably go on for hours stating facts regarding Jordan Peterson. The guy is scum. :-) why do you care so much anyway? You have some kind of emotional attachment to this individual? It's really odd. you would think that I'm criticizing your mother. Anyway, for him to try to crush bills such as c16 just because doesn't believe in Gary marriage or transgenders, that's really despicable! those people are fighting very hard in order to obtain equal rights and protection under the law. These people are dying! They're being discriminated against. And what is Jordan Peterson doing? He's throwing up roadblocks to prevent these people from achieving their goals! the guy is totally vile and disgusting. He makes me sick just to look at him. But for some reason you're not capable of recognizing him for what he is. I don't know why that is. And then you call me close minded? :-) I don't engage in emotional reasoning. there is more than enough Factual evidence to condemn mr. Peterson.
    1
  31.  @davewade30  , that's just the thing. I'm not conflating opinion with facts. For just one example, He is a liar! That is a fact. It is not an opinion. I have caught him lying. :-) so is that a fact or an opinion? LOL did he lie about Bill C 16? Yes he did. That's not my opinion, it's a fact. Did he lie when he said that no Marxist would debate him? Yes he did. For example, There was a university that was paying mr. Peterson to debate Richard Wolff. When mr. Peterson found out who mr. Wolf was, he increased his speaking fee to a level that the university could no longer afford. 2 days later Mr Peterson went on the news making the claim that no Marxist would debate him! this kind of thing has happened numerous times. But yet he keeps repeating over and over how these people refuse to debate him because they're too afraid. You don't have an emotional attachment to mr. Peterson? I don't know. You sure do seem hell-bent on defending him even when your position is untenable.
    1
  32.  @davewade30  , I'm not convinced of it. But your behaviour is very odd. There's a reason for it. Oh, and it's not an assumption. It's called an inference.
    1
  33.  @davewade30  , for example, 1. you completely ignore how many times Jordan Peterson has been caught lying. Even after he was caught lying and challenged on it, he continue to lie! 2. Mr. Peterson has gone out of his way to stop Bill C 16 which would greatly harm and probably lead to the continued deaths of many gay and transgender people. Does mr. Peterson care? Well, he continue to stop the bill even though he was corrected on the nature and limitations of that bill. That is a fact. Not my personal opinion. Why would he do such a thing? What is his motive? 3. Mr. Peterson makes spurious and fallacious claims. He does this constantly! For example, saying that it's not possible to stop smoking without Supernatural intervention. You tried to defend that point, saying people just misunderstand. You're grasping at straws! He outright said that it's not possible. any person with half a clue would have said that Supernatural intervention would greatly improve one's odds of stopping smoking. That would be the natural response. But he didn't say that, did he? No. He said it's not possible! When the interviewer then expressed extreme incredulity, Peterson said, not really. the fact that you would actually try to defend mr. Peterson on this point is absolutely ridiculous! I could probably bring up another 30 or 40 examples of this type of behaviour. but you would just make excuses, as Peterson often does, claiming that people are just simply misunderstanding him. Again, there has to be some motive for you to actually try to defend untenable positions. 4. Jordan Peterson to this very day continues to claim that Marxist will not debate him! but you'll never see him debating mr. Richard Wolff, because Peterson has made so many false claims, stating them as truth , that he now has no choice other than to avoid mr. Wolf. Peterson doesn't understand Marxism. he made numerous claims as to know what marks was talking in various areas. He was dead wrong on most of them! simple things that even a child should have been able to grasp. now these statements are on the internet and Peterson has to run like a child. :-) just like with that idiotic claim as to thinking that ancient civilizations had knowledge of DNA. there's actually another video where he was challenged on that statement. a person went up to him and said he could make such a claim. Peterson at first try to deny it! see, more evidence of the type of lying sack of that he is. when the person pointed out that he actually attended the class where he made the claim, Peterson then backtracked and said that wasn't what he meant. he said it was just a mere suspicion. LOL anyway, I could go on and on and on, probably for hours. the man is a joke. it should be obvious to you. it's not too hard to substantiate. but you're not able to for some reason. I find that interesting. I find it interesting that there's so many people that are taken in by snake oil salesman.
    1
  34.  @davewade30  , what you seem to fail to realize is that it's normal for people to detest individuals that are liars and engage in activities that are harmful and detrimental to vulnerable individuals. However, it is not normal for people such as you to defend these individuals. :-) maybe we should have a conversation about aberrant Behavior what do you think? :-) I have many valid reasons for not liking mr. Peterson. Let me give you another example. Jordan Peterson said that anyone who claims that Soviet Russia wasn't communist should be punched in the face. Punched hard enough to be knocked unconscious! Well that's just something that I happened to point out all the time! Russia wasn't communist! Was there a hierarchy in place? Yes there was. Did classes still exist? Yes they did. Did they still use currency? Yes they did. Did the workers own and control their own labour? No they did not. the guy doesn't even understand communism! considering his qualifications you think he'd at least have a basic understanding of etymology. Lol Anyway, I have valid reasons for disliking the man. why on God's green earth would you ever defend a confirmed liar and hypocrite? :-) are those the kind of people you look up to? Is there something about Jordan Peterson that reminds you of yourself? He's a disgusting and loathsome individual. :-) there must be something that you identify with. stepping up to protect and defend the honour of Jordan Peterson, the known liar and hypocrite. Good job! :-) I'm really hoping to meet Mr Peterson in person one day. :-) I'm going to explain to him how the USSR wasn't communist. I'll see if he attempts to punch me in the face. LOL
    1
  35.  @davewade30  , religious zealot? :-) maybe that's how I sound to you. What makes you think that I believe people are entirely good or entirely bad? Did you not read the list that I provided you? Which rule covered black and white thinking and oversimplifications? I tell you to avoid false dichotomies and now you're telling me that people are not entirely good or bad? Would you like to have a conversation regarding manichaeism? LOL maybe we should discuss both manichean and etymology. :-) I'm starting to understand why you're so impressed with mr. Peterson.
    1
  36.  @davewade30  , oh, and another thing. Religion and Faith have no place when it comes to science or politics. Never mix the two. Religion is for weak-minded people such as Jordan Peterson. Save your faith for when you give the keys of your car to your children. :-) LOL
    1
  37.  @davewade30  , I'll address your other points when I get home. :-) but for now I'll just point out that it doesn't matter how much free time Jordan Peterson has handed out. None of the things you mentioned make up for the things he's done. You're just making poor justifications for inexcusable Behavior. Why, I do not know. Rachel Maddow? Well she obviously cares more about money than the harm she is causing. I think she was getting paid something like a million dollars per episode! Something like that. But look at how many people believe the BS Jordan spews. so I'm not surprised that people believe the Russians are going shut down power plants causing people to freeze to death. Or that they manipulated the election to get Donald Trump in power. Americans are the most propagandize people on earth. Check out Noam chomsky's manufacturing consent. it's no wonder the United States is number one when it comes to mental disorders. LOL
    1
  38.  @davewade30  , and socialism didn't murder people. LOL that's like blaming Jesus Christ for the church burning people at the stake. Socialism is just the idea that workers should own and control their own Labour and resources. It's a bottom-up, non-hierarchical system. Would it lead to Communism? Probably. Because if you have an environment where wealth actually stays with the wealth producers, then what need is there for a state? Capitalism is dependant upon the state because it has to protect and defend capital. That's one of the reasons the USA has over a thousand major military bases around the world and over 2,000 minor military bases. God knows how many lily pads.
    1
  39.  @davewade30  , make sure you watch part 2. It's only 5 minutes long. Link is in the low bar of the first video.
    1
  40. Ty
    1
  41. You actually believe that silly propaganda about China? Oh my God.
    1
  42.  @salohcinuno1192  , has nothing to do with belief. Communities cooperatively owning their resources and factories is a good thing. That makes them independent from government and capitalist corporations when it comes to jobs and consumer goods. Would you rather own your own tools or would you rather someone else owned the tools you need to survive with? Imagine someone else owning your tools then charging you a usage fee every time you use them. That's capitalism. Socialism and communism is freedom.
    1
  43. Thank you
    1
  44. Dore 2024! Yes, I know, it’s always premature to discuss the next presidential contest. But I’ll make my pick for 2024 known now: Jimmy Dore. For those who dismiss a comedian running for the highest office, I say, why not? Dick Gregory ran for president in 1968 as a write-in candidate for the Freedom and Peace Party. The comedian and civil rights activist used his run to energize the anti-war movement, draw attention to the needs of the working class and the harassment many people of color still faced following the passage of numerous civil rights bills. Gregory, although he only accumulated close to 50,000 votes, frightened the Nixon administration with his campaign. Personnel in the Nixon White House feared Gregory may become the “black messiah” J. Edgar Hoover long warned about. Shortly after that warning, leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X and Fred Hampton were gunned down. Fearful of his profile and his building of a true rainbow coalition, Gregory was placed on Nixon’s dreaded enemies list. I sincerely believe a Dore presidential campaign could have the same effect. It could empower various social movements and make the oligarchs and their two corporate/puppet parties quake in their boots. Dore could start the race with genuine grassroots support and funding from the people. Dore has expressed both interest and some hesitancy. But if history is any guide, I say he shouldn’t be worried. Run, Jimmy! Scare the oligarchs and empower the people! Dore 2024!
    1
  45. What are you talkin about?
    1
  46. Yeah, socially owned workplaces where the workers actually own and control their own labour and resources, that results in dictatorships and lots of people being killed. 😆
    1
  47. Ty
    1
  48. Who said anything about equality of outcome? People don't all get paid the same at worker cooperatives. Why would you ever make such an assumption?
    1
  49. Ty
    1
  50. thank you very much for posting those links.
    1