Comments by "Vitaly L" (@vitalyl1327) on "Sky News" channel.

  1. Like, employing half of Moldova population as migrant workers?
    9
  2. In this instance it's for the benefit of all the lung owners. The last time I checked, it meant pretty much everyone, rich and poor alike.
    7
  3. And delaying ULEZ punishes owners of lungs. And it's much harder to replaces lungs than a car.
    6
  4.  @dannyhouse5630  I think your poor command of the English grammar is a far bigger problem than Sadiq leadership. As for housing, direct all your rage at Tories and planning rules, mayors have very little leverage over these issues.
    6
  5. Their whole party is about dramatic gestures instead of any real work, so it makes a perfect sense.
    6
  6. Your brain was clearly caramelised.
    6
  7. There were gammons applauding her speech, apparently. It's hilarious.
    5
  8. Yes! There is a hope for sanity, after all!
    5
  9. Lack of maintenance only aggravated the problem, but still, a lot of buildings are way past their expiration date and nobody botherd to demolish and rebuild them.
    4
  10. Get rekt. The vast majority of Londoners support ULEZ. We want cleaner air.
    4
  11. This is her broken clock moment.
    4
  12. reeks of gammon in this thread
    4
  13.  @littlefish9305 you're not a doctor
    3
  14. ​ @dannyhouse5630 ever heard of public transport? Young people do not need cars. Almost nobody does.
    3
  15. bye bye blue tories, hello red tories...
    3
  16. When both parties try to please the most deplorable subhuman trash of the electorate, there's no hope.
    3
  17.  @bigbasil1908  youtube algorithms make it more likely for the comments with the right spelling of this word to go missing.
    3
  18. ​ @joellemm9229  it means that a gammon campbell learned a new word, and now keep using it everywhere. He failed to learn its meaning though, but it never stops gammons.
    3
  19. Just send there all the gammons from England who dismissed the storm as "just a drizzle". Comment sections in the news are full of them.
    3
  20. Like, including the foreign diplomats and their families? Right now they're all immune, pretty much everywhere in the world. Good luck changing it.
    2
  21. Somebody smuggled a smartphone to a lunatic asylum. Personnel must be notified.
    2
  22. Somehow Trump was ok with Fartage interfering.
    2
  23.  @SEANPOL203  Anyone who does deserve to end up in jail, and if caught in action by members of the public - some good old teaching good manners too (but without crossing the legal boundaries, of course, just some nice humiliation will be sufficient).
    2
  24. He deserve no credit though for being correct. He's correct like a broken clock.
    2
  25. Never was, the class system always existed, even before the Norman invasion.
    2
  26.  @gerardopc1  There should not even exist a procedure for a global update rollout. All updates must be staged. If they had a way to roll out an update to all clients at once, they already failed and must be punished.
    2
  27. ​@jokos1384dog's aren't any better than humans in detecting carbon monoxide.
    2
  28. He certainly provided some comic relief, so I gather people might have voted for him for more laughs.
    2
  29. I voted for him, everyone I know voted for him, and I never met anyone who'd oppose ULEZ, besides an odd Uber driver.
    2
  30. ​ @99_Bananas tories.always have a capacity to surprise. Who expected thick lizz after boris? They can and will do worse and much worse.
    2
  31.  @leemason4203  some will pay, majority will be deterred from driving or forced to buy less polluting cars.
    2
  32. All conservatives are complete AHs, no exveptions.
    1
  33. Found a gammon. Being a gammon is a capital crime. There is nothing more deplorable than gammons.
    1
  34.  @LazerBrain11  how is it related to ULEZ? Get off your daily mail trash and go learn some critical thinking.
    1
  35.  @EGF1000  and it is not clear if they pose any health risk at all. To start with. So your overdramatic babbling about "more polluting than road traffic" was indeed right out of your arse.
    1
  36.  @danowrxv3  well, maybe then it is a good nudge to get rid of this nasty car habit altogether?
    1
  37. not sure about the economy, but the country cleary ran out of competent and honest MPs, maybe not such a bad idea to start importing some.
    1
  38. ULEZ expansion IS popular. Only a vocal minority of the most deranged and deplorable are against it. They can and should be ignored.
    1
  39. Tories are not interested in solving problems though. They are interested in stiering up the gammon trash and in distracting the dim masses from the real problems.
    1
  40. ​​ @almariosaqr6056 division is there, it is biological, there is no way to ignore its existence. Part of the population is deranged inbred gammons, and there will alway be a division between them and humans.
    1
  41. Tough question... Brain worms? Generations of inbreeding? Substance abuse? Foetal alcohol syndrome? All of the above combined?
    1
  42. Bill Gates never spread misinformation, unlike this subhuman filth kennedy
    1
  43. All conservatives are unfit. This new Labour included.
    1
  44. Poor people SHOULD NOT drive. Id they do, it is an abberation that need to be corrected, by investing in the public trasport system. Cars are luxury, and nobody should have private cars when there are viable alternatives.
    1
  45.  @fabiennemitchell2371  I am not talking about, say, white vans that tradesmen drive. Our roads are not choke full with the white vans. They are choke full wirh chelsea tractors. And there is no single reasonable justification for SUVs existence, at all. People who drive because it is a part of their work do so under business vehicles regulations. Personal vehicles are a different story, and they should not exist.
    1
  46. Income tax, capital gains and NI contributions are less than a half of all tax collected, so your assessment is quite flawed.
    1
  47.  @jjefferyworboys8138  almost nobody need to own a car in the modern world, with an exception for farmers, tradesmen (and there are different rules for vans anyway) and taxi drivers (of which we have far too many already).
    1
  48.  @stevec6427  this is why ULEZ is in London, and not in some rural area. Surely, public transport need a lot of investment before punitive measures are implemented, but in London it's already adequate, so it's a right time to introduce punitive measures against car users.
    1
  49.  @dannyhouse5630  that's awful, but totally unrelated to the immediate matter of the unhealthy air inside the city.
    1
  50. @@mr.tea.1748 we're talking about London in the expanded ULEZ zone. I did not need to drive for many years, don't even remember when I had to drive the last time.
    1