Comments by "" (@shamrock141) on "Real Engineering" channel.

  1. What he says is completely true
    6
  2. Can't wait to see all the devastated Russians in the comments complaining about biased views on the war
    5
  3. The government must be rich beyond imagination if it's able to sponsor every engineer and construction worker in the country without anyone every knowing where that money came from and how it mussing 😅
    4
  4. If you think it's a subliminal clip to sell you on 5G, but still don't want 5G then it's obvious it's not
    4
  5. Just how is it "ovious"
    4
  6. Yup, NATO expansion doesn't involve forceful subjugation
    3
  7. Would you rather have a surgeon or someone who's "done his own research" operate on you
    3
  8.  @MrSteve8511  "if it isn't for stealth" that's like saying if it wasn't for the F-16s Jet Engine it would be a shit plane, stupid thing to say. They've already spoken for themselves throughout many war games, notably where 1 F-22 beat 4 F-15 Eagles singlehandedly
    3
  9. Actually there are torpedoes more than capable of sinking an aircraft carrier, and quora isn't a good source since anybody can write whatever they want on it
    2
  10. We've done both of those things
    2
  11. So as not to contaminate the rover
    2
  12. Non renewable energy consumption is at 84% with renewable at 16%. That means for every $1 invested in non renewables $1.40 is invested in renewables. Not such a stark difference
    2
  13.  @michaelswanson7881  are you out of your mind? Plants thrived for millenia with the small amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere, now we've cut out trillions of plants and skyrocketed CO2 emissions, this is not a good thing
    2
  14.  @michaelswanson7881  I have done my research, that's why I'm calling you out on your bullshit
    2
  15. The aviation industry uses imperial today because the industry globalised in a time when the two biggest contributors to the industry, the British and Americans, used imperial. Imperial wasn't chosen over metric it was chosen because that was the convention. It's the same reason we only use English in the industry, because that was the convention laid out. However if you watch any modern air crash investigation programme today you'll see that when talking about altitude both feet and meters are used, in distance both miles and kilometres are used etc.
    2
  16.  @jaredj631  I feel that's largely regional, everyone where I live answers in centimetres and those kinds of measurements are used when calculating your BMI among other things but yes I see your point it's probably easier to visualise
    2
  17. Genius look at the date stamp
    2
  18.  @Akram_El-Masry  uh huh remind me, is it day 520 we're on now?
    2
  19.  @Akram_El-Masry  uh huh they're sure taking their time, what with only having secured a little eastern sliver of Ukraine. When is Russia supposed to win exactly
    2
  20. "Scientific studies" I.e nutjobs on facebook
    1
  21. Isn't this exactly what SE just said
    1
  22. Yeah because it's so minuscule compared to the byproducts of coal and natural gas that it's negligible
    1
  23. You don't have to agree with either
    1
  24. What's the difference?
    1
  25.  @washuotaku  thanks
    1
  26. Cause they're both Irish
    1
  27.  @francocarrieri1988  climate change is real and a clear catalyst. The Earth takes thousands of years to noticeably change, what would have taken the Earth millenia has only taken a few decades. This is not natural
    1
  28.  @francocarrieri1988  whatever your evidence is must be fraudulent because I can't even access it since it's been flagged as an unsecured website. Your idea that this level of warming will be followed by a period of cooling is profoundly wrong. There is no evidence whatsoever that suggests that. Additionally Greenland was originally called "Gruntland" by the Vikings which translates to "ground-land" and was modified in translation when English settles and travellers came about
    1
  29.  @francocarrieri1988  well I can't without getting an unsecured website warning
    1
  30. All the conspiracy theorists in the comments section and what's funny is they all have a story about a "miracle" that showed them the "truth" that happened to a "close friend"
    1
  31. Oh lord
    1
  32.  @iandavidvillaloboswong5180  that's not NATO expansion
    1
  33. The biggest contributor to climate change are the agricultural and energy industries and it's not even close. As for the worker rights of the airline industry that is something that most industries are in constant struggle with, but aviation is not among the industries with the lowest job satisfaction
    1
  34. Ironically California is among one of the best states to live in in the US
    1
  35. Why do you let it bother you, just don't watch it
    1
  36. They were all in the fleet during the game
    1
  37. And? Do you seriously think Denmark or Ireland has the capital for a nuclear plant
    1
  38. No. Bapuji's theories and innovations for flight were far different than the Wright brothers. Where the Wright brothers used motors to generate lift Bapuji attempted to use mercury in a sort of cylindrical tube. These are vastly different ideas
    1
  39.  @karbhatia501  they didn't use the same structures
    1
  40.  @karbhatia501  I have and there's no evidence, it's mainly a point of indian nationalism. There isn't sufficient evidence to support such a claim. No photographs, contradictory testimonies, a fundamentally different idea of flight etc.
    1
  41.  @karbhatia501  that sounds racist but by all means post your evidence
    1
  42.  @karbhatia501  1."that we Indians superior to them" yes that does sound racist 2. You still haven't provided any evidence to support your claim
    1
  43. Give the guy a break
    1
  44. You need evidence to make nonsensical claims
    1
  45. All of your practical examples (tv, screen size) use both imperial and metric to advertise to the widest possible market and aviation uses metric because the aviation market was globalised at a time when the biggest commercial aviation countries, the US and UK, used imperial measurements and since the US only grew in aviation influence the global avitaiton industry had to follow that metric because that was the convention laid out. Watch any air crash investigation programme now and they'll specify altitude in both feet and metres, distance in both miles and kilometres and so on
    1
  46. Those are by far the stupidest criticisms of a power source ever
    1
  47. Well this jet was meant for interceptions and dog fighting but if it's too unstable then the pilots won't be able to control it in the most critical moments, combat. Conversely the B-2 is meant to be a stealth bomber with a crew instead of one pilot and is supposed to maintain stable flight so its manageable for computers to control it
    1
  48. Is that really the best criticism you can come up with?
    1
  49. Hydrogen will need to prove itself before it becomes a seriously contested solution
    1
  50. What problem are you referring to? This is about excess carbon emissions
    1