Comments by "James Campion" (@Jimbo2193) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @1337flite  they joined the European theatre after everyone realized the soviets had defeated the Germans and risked taking all of Germany ... and then some.
    2
  2. @jaapvandijk5550  on the contrary.. he has shown incredible restraint and been criticised for it by the extremists in the Kremlin
    2
  3. Total nonsense that Russia's plan was to take control of the whole of Ukraine, the amount of the invasion force is proof of this. Their aim was to scare Ukraine into a peace deal that ensured their nuetrality. They soon found out the west would not allow this and began to prepare for a long war. It's now become apparent that most of the aid will go to replenishing US stocks not to the war effort. To say a war of attrition is in Ukraine's favour is dillusional. Russia has the resources, industry and the man power to continue until a complete compitulation. Their production of "shovels" will continue to grow as required. Obama said not to start a war with Russia in Ukraine for the simple fact that Russia has the ability to esculate than NATO. The fact the Russia believes it is fighting for it's existential survival and not a geopolitical wetdream of NATO/USA to bring down Russia should be enough to convince any sane person that Russia will and has to win this war. USA/NATO haven't the production capacity to match Russia indicated by the wests own predictions on how they will ramp up production. Anders at least has dropped the BS about this war being a stalemate, a big about face. Anders also predicts a hugs Russian offensiv this summer. Rubbish,this requires a huge concentration of men and this war has clearly shown it is not a good idea with the survailance and drone warefare. Why would they when they are steadily taking ground after saturating Ukrainian positions with FABS. If they meet too much resistance they pull back and send another round in. It is painfully clear that Ukraine is slowly collaspsing and won't have an army for Anders' predicted offensiv in the future years. Ukraine has been thrown under a bus by the west.
    2
  4.  @mariaf.6601  you are aware that they were more or less nuetral before the western back coup installed a Russia phobic regime???? Remember that over 3rd of the people didn't accept the installed government. Then Kiev began bombing them. Though you wouldn't be aware of that as you think this conflict started in 2022.
    2
  5.  @mariaf.6601  No I was refering to Victoria Nulands famous phone call naming Poreschenko as the replacement before the coup was completed. 2014 remember boasting the 5m she spent on the opposition. But it you want to deny the eastern Ukraine were happy with the coup then there is no point in discussing further.
    2
  6. he hasn't pointed out diddly....
    2
  7. Anders you know as well as everyone that 97% of the grain was going to Europe & developed countries. Not what they agreed to and Russia was not happy with. If this is a PR disaster for Russia, why is their influence & relations growing in Africa. Seen the Niger coup???? they are waving Russian flags. Do Russia have a Nuland of their own handing out cookies in Niger Anders???
    2
  8.  @mariaf.6601  Whatever. Ukraine coup..good & legit. Libya coup....good & legit. Syrian coup...good & legit. Iranian coup... good & legit. Venezuela coup...good & legit. Niger coup....bad (we have money invested). See the pattern?
    2
  9. Anders honestly you really believe the vomit you've thrown up in this video. "geeky millitary THEORY"??? "POSSIBLE meaning of the attack"! Just spitballing here mate but... Who would benefit from sabotage? : USA. 1. European gas supplies increase from 21% to around 70%. 2. Gas costs $60m per ship, sold in Europe for $270M. Quite a windfall. 3. Collapse of the European economy. Finances and Industries flowing out of Europe to USA. 4. Europe remains totally dependant upon USA for energy, finance and security. 5. creating fear by blaming Russia and voila! increase in military budgets. Not much for theories but have some facts. 1. Both Biden and Nuland both stated the NS2 would never be operational, one way or another. 2. USA/Nato exercises in the Baltic sea in July around Bornholm specializing among other things the use of underwater drones. 3. Several USA ships left had been in the area for days and left the day of the explosions. 4. Unrest in Europe and the increasing pressure for Germany to open NS2. Sabotage put an end to that. 5. USA strengthens the more Europe is decimated. Why it isn't Russia. 1. They have destroyed the greatest leverage they had on Europe to lift sanctions. 2. They could have just turned off the flow instead of destroying the $11B dollars they invested. 3. With all the USA ships in the area leading up to the event and the extensive Danish surveillance around Bornholm, I really don't think the Russians would have attempted anything at the time. Anders, you are a warmongering mouthpiece for the MIC/NATO/western globalist. You've sold our your county and Europe by pushing their agenda in which Danes and Europeans alike are paying a huge price. I'll leave in the famous words of Henry Kissinger. "To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal."
    2
  10. if you haven't noticed the west is becoming increasingly irrelevant .... and by no fault other than our own.
    2
  11. He is seen as a western friendly figure in Russia, which all his speeches and actions indicated in his first years. Then it became painfully clear the west were hell bent on NATO expansion to its borders. There are many madmen in the Kremlin who would dearly take his place.
    2
  12. there wouldn't have been a war but for the Americans.
    2
  13. USA have no say in the peace matter. Russia will decide when there is peace and that is when all their securities issues are in place. Like it or not that is what the situation on the battle field dictates. And when the next NATO Hawke starts to warning about Poland being next, rest assured Russia has no longer any interest in us in the west. They are looking east and into the arms of China and Brics. We Europe and NATO are becoming increasing obsolete, those of the likes of Anders either won't admit it or are plain ignorant.
    2
  14. In a war of attrition everyone.... I mean everyone agrees Russia has the resources and man power to outlast and win this conflict. How in gods name can Anders bring this up as a Russian weakness when Ukraines army is in tatters. The advances on the eastern fronts are accelerating day to day. Yep Anders Russia is in deep sh!t 😉 Incidentally Anders tried to convince you all Russia blew up their own pipeline.... clown show but entertaining.
    2
  15. This is by far the most delusional analysis to date by Anders. He is right on one ... and only one point. "peace is not an option" for Ukraine. This whole tragedy could have been avoided in March last year but it wasn't Russia fault but Ukraine with their hand forced by NATO/USA to continue fighting. The peace agreement now released, brokered by Israel/Turkey was signed by Ukraine which would have allowed Ukraine to maintain all their territories (except Crimea), by agreeing to neutral status, limited military, Russian culture/language permitted and a security guarantee by USA, England, Germany, France and Russia. Ukraine SIGNED the deal and then again reneged on it before the ink dried. Part of the deal was for Russia to pull back from Kiev which they did (in a not so elegant way). Like the Minsk accord that was never seriously considered by Berlin/France and the west Putin has come to realize that the west / Ukraine cannot be trusted in any agreement and have long ago decided to decimate Ukraine. Anders is a mouthpiece for the western NATO/MIC and nothing else. Never seen combat nor never will but is happy to cheer lead the massacre of Ukrainians in a USA/ NATO war using Ukraine as a battering ram to weaken Russia. Finally Putin is going no where I personally hope, as the replacement could be one of those calling out for all out war on Ukraine.
    2
  16. Again a fine piece of unbacked, unsubstantiated Russia bashing conspiracies. 2 simple questions. Why are more and more western leaders now calling for a ceasefire? And why is the average age of the UK army now at 43y.o ? And to call it a stalemate is beyond comprehension.
    1
  17.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  serious?
    1
  18.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  millitary industrial complex... war is a racket.... endless wars..... create an enemy and sell it tp the masses. Easy with a complient media.
    1
  19. ​ @pablodiviso7909 for not mentioning the "cluster ammunitions" targeted at Belgorod center killing over 20 people Anders or the Donetsk city square New years night knowing full well it was loaded with people celebrating. To claim (3 times) that Russia attack schools and playgrounds!!! Yep those evil Russians.(sarc). Though 2 civilian targets were hit 1. a university attended by Stephan Bandera (I'm sure you've heard of him) and honured by the institution. 2. was a museum devoted to Roman Shukhevych, (Nazi) another revered and honored forefather of the Ukrainian west population.
    1
  20. 2 questions, 1. Since when did attacking power grids become a war crime? 2. Why wasn't NATO/US brought before a Haig tribunal for Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya... not to mention Serbia on European soil? Your comments on this exposes your bias and anti-Russian agenda unfortunately retracts from your otherwise interesting analysis.
    1
  21.  @nobodyherepal3292  whatever... US by their own admission went after and took down the Iraqi power grid. You obviously haven't seen images of Bagdad or Afghanistan. Finally Beograd lost there main TV station, Chinese embassy and the power just to name a few civilian entities during the 72 day bombing campaign. Sun shining in your world?
    1
  22. What a tool
    1
  23.  @YouKnowItMang  I only go into this channel to see how much anti Russian spin he can put on a story. He even flatly refuses to retract his view that Russia blew up the NS2. But people love him as he follows the narrative
    1
  24. Dead right, they started the whole Ukraine crisis in 2014 with Nulands' colour revolution and coup. Now they are pulling out as the war is lost.
    1
  25. During the last week I saw. 1. a tactical retreat by Russians who foresaw the offensive choosing to save lives. According to both sides the costs to the Ukrainian army were massive. 2. More ground taken in the Donekst being the Russians main and most difficult offensive. 3. Kherson offensive has stopped and the main bridgehead on the eastern side of the river has just been isolated due to the bombing of a huge dam and the pontoon bridges being washed away. Expect the thousands of Ukrainian troops stranded to be on the end of a massacre. I find it incredibly amusing how you Anders manage to continuously put a positive spin on this war. Ukraine (and Europe) are going to enjoy a winter without water, power or communications. Something Russia could have done at the start but now I feel the gloves are coming off. To me you are nothing but a cog in the western's propaganda machine which would put the Russian one to shame.
    1
  26.  @mariaf.6601  sure, that bridge head was stranded and is now destroyed. No brainer. This idiot came on Danish TV and pointed the finger at Russia for bombing it's own infrastructure. The guy is a shameless clown and a paid tool.
    1
  27.  @zacklewis342  a la Ukraine today I guess
    1
  28.  @sammiller6631  I can list them...
    1
  29.  @dabubba4603  That is simply factually incorrect. A PR stunt that's cost them 30K of their best men and the collaspe of the Doneskt front. Hastens the end of the war though.
    1
  30.  @k.e.7582  agree, victory for Russia will only come when NATO pull its head in and stop with unnecessary expansion and provocations. That will not happen... too much money at stake.
    1
  31. to compare Hitler to Putin is just absurd. He tried for 8 years after the USA led coup to arrange a security arrangement within Europe but the west blindly refused even up to 2 months before his invasions. Not to mention the initialed Istanbul peace agreement torn up by Zelenski at the behest of the west. The fact is that US thought they could break Russia, overthrow Putin and tear it apart for access to its huge resources. Russia do not want more land, they want security. Simply put no NATO in Ukraine.
    1
  32.  @evgeniya7853  you are correct... they should just sit back and take.it. Hope your children are ready for frontline action.
    1
  33.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  Definition of Nazies? seriously? 😄 start with 2 words. Bandera and Azov battallion. All over the media for decades but have arrempted to whitewash it since.
    1
  34.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  several western experter whose careeer and livelyhood does not require spinning the official narrative. One being col. Doug MacGregor....previous assistant sec of state and long milliard careeer. Rejected by US congress for defence sec. Because he wasn't hawkish eniugh.
    1
  35.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  MacGregor has been on the money with about everything. Couple of things. The Kharkov offensive was a success however Russia had already withdrawn the forces and a few residual defence units remained. You don't roll over a hundred KM in a few days against any form of resistance. However it was still at a cost to the Ukrainians. This debunks the narrative that Anders and co. run with that Russia don't value the lives of their soldiers. They simply didn't have the manpower to defend it. If you'd listen to McGregor Russia went in with 90K, that is not an invasion force. Kherson was again a withdrawal which by Ukrainians own admission were decimated during their offensive. Russia could not sustain the forces on that side of the river. Again they considered the lives of their soldiers above the political blowback by withdrawing. Now to the present where Russia aren't pulling back but are prepared, the Ukrainian offensive is just going "swimmingly" (sarc) don't you think. In the first couple of weeks they lost 20% of the supplied NATO Equipment, however western analysists claim they only lost 10% more in the last 3-4 weeks! That's 30% and they have very little to show for it. They haven't even made it to the first Russian defence lines. Russia are on the offensive in Karkiv and making progress. MacGregor predicted this and said all along Russia was betting on negotiations by threatening full blown invasion. If they intended to invade and occupy they would have went in with more than 20% of their forces. Now they realize there is no point in negotiations so have geared up for a massive counter offensive. Ukraine has just envoked national conscription because they are running out of men. The west can't supply the artillery or weapons. Very sad but this Ukrainian offensive was their last hurrah. They are finished and the West's plan to destroy Russia economically, millitarily and polically has absolutely fallen flat. And Ukraine used as a battering ram has payed the ultimate price.
    1
  36.  @Frederiknshansen  hate factual replies that shred my arguments.🤣
    1
  37.  @Destroyer120296  Exactly Russia put a stop to that. West never had any real intention of letting them in. As stated by several US congressmen, they will fight to the last Ukrainian to destroy Russia. The whole disaster is a neo con wet dream.
    1
  38. ​ @robertscott961  maybe not but was agreed and based on the fact Ukraine's constitution explicitly ensured neutrality, no NATO membership. After the overthrow of the elected government the pro western regime then removed that paragraph from the constitution. Russia has said since 2007 it will never allow Ukraine to become a NATO member. So the grounds the Budapest pact make no sense to Russia. Can kinda understand Russia's obsession with Ukraine having been invaded several times from Europe, last one costing 26 million. No security for Europe without security for Russia.
    1
  39.  @thekinginyellow1744  It was agreed and based on the fact Ukraine's constitution explicitly ensured neutrality, no NATO membership. After the overthrow of the elected government the pro western regime then removed that paragraph from the constitution. Russia has said since 2007 it will never allow Ukraine to become a NATO member. So the grounds the Budapest pact make no sense to Russia. Can kinda understand Russia's obsession with Ukraine having been invaded several times from Europe, last one costing 26 million. No security for Europe without security for Russia.
    1
  40.  @thekinginyellow1744  For a start all my knowledge comes from Americans and a few Europeans who are far more independent than our friend Anders. Prof. Jeffrey Sachs who has also advised Russia during their transition in the 1990's. Prof. Mearsheimer, Col. Douglas MacGregor, Col. Larry Wilkinson, Richard Wolf... no Russians there mate. No there is nothing in the Ukrainian constitution about neutrality, Poreschenko removed it in 2022. "Russia and (the rest of) Europe were both perfectly secure until Russia annexed Crimea" Correction. Russia and (the rest of) Europe were both perfectly secure until Victoria Nulands 5 billion coup in 2014. Here have a cookie! "but the audience for this channel is, in the main, of above average intelligence" yet you all think 1. the war was totally unprovoked. 2. There are no ethnic Russians or Russian speaking in eastern Ukraine. 3. the Ukrainians are winning 4. Russians blew up their own pipeline. 5. Russian economy crashed years ago. 6. Russians are suffering massive loses compared to Ukraine. Even though 70% of casualties in this type of war is from artillery and missiles which according to western experts Russia have between 7 & 14 to 1 advantage. Do the math sunshine. All this BS according to Anders. Enjoy your bliss.
    1
  41. ​@philipeduardovich7834 it's been a US doctrine since the early 1990's, Ukraine was the jewel in the NATO expansion crown. Europe was against it but Bush pushed it through in a NATO declaration in 2004. Europe especially Merkel knew it would lead to war. First coup failed in 2004, again in 2008 then 100,000 demonstrators were allowed to overthrow a government voted in by a country of 42million in 2016. From the time Poreschenko come to power (handpicked by Nuland) Kiev started to attack the Donbass when they refused to recognize the US puppet government. A neutral Ukraine was an ideal buffer but we just had to push for NATO expansion.
    1
  42. If Ukraine can ... and if they...then if... then this is possible. A lot of ifs. When Russian are on the offensive it doesn't make sense, when Ukraine make ground its fantastic. With respect to the Kherson bridge is not working at reduced capacity as the railway line on which Russia move their logistics is functioning normal. Yes Anders Ukraine has the strongest army in Ukraine but could you at least point out that Putin was restricted to use about 20% of its potential forces. Russia are outnumbered 5:1 on the battle field. You don't mention the 300k on the way. The pointless attacks on Ukrainian cities as you put it took out 80% of their air defences (according to Col. Doug Macgregor) which is why the day after Zelensky is appealing to the west for air defence systems. They took out the SBU headquarters, German consulate, I believe the EU office took a hit, electricity, water and railway transporting western arms. I don't see that as pointless. 200+ missiles at cities and 19 dead(some secret police) I don't think you could call that indiscriminate attacks. Donekst city has lost more in a day from Ukraine shelling. Your bias in you appraisal and judgement resonates throughout your videos something one would expect to come from either Russian or Ukrainian media. Your job is to muster support among general public to keep this war going knowing full well Ukraine can not win this. Looking forward to your videos come November when the 300k Russians are on a major offensive costing untold innocent Ukrainians lives because you and the mafia you represent are cheering from a safe distance behind the lines.
    1
  43. Russia bolstered one area and stopped their progress and that was to the nuclear power plant. Now Ukraine can't hold their defense lines deep inside Ukraine, how the hell are they going to hold this area inside Russia. Russia is in no rush to remove them for obvious reasons.
    1
  44. ​ @gior987  NATO bombed the bejesus out of Serbia because Kosovo were being attacked by Serbians , we thought it best that instead of leaving the country they'd be granted independence. Now I have no idea why Ukraine would want 5 million Russians in their country. Let them go.
    1
  45. That is so incorrect its mind boggling ​@tuehojbjerg969
    1
  46.  @spymaster07  ethnic Russians. Ever ask yourself who was fighting Kiev the 8 years prior to Russia's intervention???? Ever ask yourself why there is no uprising behind the lines in the occupied Donbass????? No of course not it doesn't fit your delusional take on things.
    1
  47.  @atlantic169  but we allowed Kosovo to succeed along ethnic lines. Ok thats right the "rules based order" rules will only benefit Western/NATO agendas. Silly me.
    1
  48. If you want the USA/NATO propaganda go no further than the western MSM
    1
  49. according to a US mercenary fighter there, the life expectancy for a UAF soldier in Bakhmut is 4 hours! He called it a meat grinder. So Anders' comments on attrition is utter nonsense. Gives an indication of how little Zelenski values his soldiers lives, rather than facing the embarrassment of losing a city.
    1
  50.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  not on the frontline, but as a medic yes. A british officer recently stated that the Sverige age is over 40 and they need to get hold of more young. They have a hug problem.
    1