Comments by "James Campion" (@Jimbo2193) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13.  @andrzejbarcelonafrlk6416  "Well, you could say Crimea was part of the Russian empire, but it wasn't Russia, like many countries that regained independence." Crimea was part of Russia and was handed over to Ukraine in 1957 by Khruschnev a Ukrainian! My point being that the people are predominantly Russian and voted unamiously to rejoin Russian Fed. *********************************** "(unless you agree president Putin is another Peter the Great to retake parts of the late empire (what about Alaska ?)) Would you equally say Russia is part of Mongolia, because it was part of the empire created by Ginghis Han ?" that is just nonsense, thought this was a serious exchange. *********************************** Do you know any source to confirm the hmmm... idea of "no move of NATO eastwards"? here is one which is a tad pro western. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/12/russias-belief-in-nato-betrayal-and-why-it-matters-today "A new book, Not One Inch: America, Russia, and the Making of the Cold War Stalemate, by the prize-winning historian Mary Elise Sarotte, charts all the private discussions within the western alliance and with Russia over enlargement and reveals Russia as powerless to slow the ratchet effect of the opening of Nato’s door. The author concludes the charge of betrayal is technically untrue, but has a psychological truth." "At one level it narrowly focuses both on verbal commitments made by the US secretary of state James Baker under President George HW Bush and the terms of a treaty signed on 12 September 1990 setting out how Nato troops could operate in the territory of the former East Germany. Putin claims that Baker, in a discussion on 9 February 1990 with the Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, made the promise that Nato would not expand to the east if Russia accepted Germany’s unification. The following day Chancellor Helmut Kohl, ambiguous about Germany remaining in Nato after unification, also told Gorbachev “naturally Nato could not expand its territory to the current territory of the GDR”. The promise was repeated in a speech by the Nato secretary general on 17 May, a promise cited by Putin in his Munich speech. In his memoirs, Gorbachev described these assurances as the moment that cleared the way for compromise on Germany. *********************************** Why would B. Yeltsin then say and sign Russia has nothing against of the access of Poland in 1999? Because he was a drunk and sold out to the west and Russian was in no position to demonstrate, they were a basket case through the 90's. That's why NATO had a free run to rain missiles on Serbia for 90 days. *********************************** Also, if you go off topic , o you know how many Ukrainians "worship" S. Bandera (and why?) ? percentage know but many of those in Politics and the armed forces. They don't try to hide it.
    1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25.  @UserErr0r3578  No coup? Yanukovych signed an agreement to hold early elections and pull his security forces back. This was backed by Russia, French, USA and I think Germany. The day after the Azov and other extreme right wing groups stormed the parliament and yes he fled. The west reneged on the deal and recognized the newly installed regime. You know the one Nuland had already picked out with Poreschenko as leader. Now if 100,000 protestors and overthrow an elected president, I'd call that a coup. As for your election the Russian oriented eastern Ukraine would not recognize nor participate with demonstrations and armed resistance in the east. You do recall the 20 odd pro Russians demonstrators in Odessa slaughtered in the trade union building(burnt or shot) by the Azov thugs???? On camera. Russia would never have signed the Budapest pact if Ukraine had intentions of joining NATO and they didn't until after the coup when the new pro western government removed it from their constitution. Russia are a little paranoid about Ukraine and with good reason. They were invaded via Ukraine from Europe a couple of times the last one costing 26million. Think you'd appreciate that. Now fact is Russia are taking back the pro Russian areas, funny how there is no resistance in Crimea or the Donbass. The west started this mess with our exceptional arrogance and Ukraine is paying for it. Now the west is abandoning them and we in Europe will have to deal with this mess, not to mention our economy is in free fall. Russia's army is stronger than ever and far from isolated which was our plan. Time to move on and destroy Georgia now. Watch this space for Anders to put his pro NATO spin on that.
    1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. When you say things aren't going well for the Russians with the relatively few gains I think you need to consider a couple of things Anders. 1. Russia is up against virtually a NATO army, trained and equiped over the last 8 years.(as they new this war was coming :-)) 2. Bakhmut and adveeka the most fortied cities in arguably the history of european warfare. 3. Both of these essential cities to Donekst/Lughansk defence are technically surrounded and being saturated by Russian artillery (6:1 outgunned) 4. The fact that Russians haven't stormed anyware is testimony to what Col. McGregor and Scott Ritter claim that Russia with their artillery superiority are fighter a war of attrition. Bombing the bejesus out of the Ukraines then move slowly forward when safer to do so. It is ludicrous and beyond comprehension to imply the Ukrainians have the luxury of carrying out a war of attrition infering more Russians are dying than Ukrainians. With the slow movement of the front line and artillery superiority of 6:1 there can be only one outcome. The kviv indendent was gloating over 16,000+ Russian soldiers have died since the start of the war, we know most of the Ukrainian army which started with around 450K and 200K reservists have all but perished(over 100K KIA). 3 rounds of mobilization i Ukraine so far and they have resorted to kidnapping of men in cities around the country. Now with the Russia capacity to manufacture more artillery shells than the west can supply Ukraines I'd say time is on the Russians's side, fighting a more and more depleted Ukrainian military who are spending more shells a day that the west can supply in a month. So I think the Russians would be pretty happy with the way things are going. To say Russia has spent all it available resources on a winter offensive is simply wrong. The majority of the mobilized forces haven't entered Ukraine as yet. Not sure where you get your information from. Utter rubbish to claim Putin orders his generals for an all out offensive during winter to sure up political support, it hasn't started yet. The ground never froze enough for the 250K mobilized soldiers to begin and now the rain season will also cause a delay. I do enjoy the rosey picture you paint for the Ukraines, no doubt they'll soon be in Moscow. Looking forward to your next video.
    1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1