Comments by "FMNIPMJ" (@jhpfdijtuiweruot) on "Nomad Capitalist" channel.

@horsemumbler1 "Also, if it's not a ball, how come the night sky is completely different depending on which hemisphere you're in?" You are assuming we live on a spinning globe split into two hemispheres to prove you live on a globe split into two hemispheres. (Flawed) theory and speculation
1
@horsemumbler1 No. I answered your question. In order to present the stars and hemispheres as proof that we live on a spinning globe, one has to make a lot of assumptions and "trust" that the definition of the stars and hemispheres are what the high priests in lab coats tell us. You are speculating and offering theory. None of this is proof that you live on a spinning globe. It's proof that you can retrofit some ideas into a theoretical model. The collective cyclical progression demonstrate that you don't live on a spinning ball, hurtling through space. I answered this already The burden of proof is on you. The spinning globe does not exist. It's silly and illogical. I know ALL the theory and fairy tales that you are reciting. I too was programmed with it all many, many decades ago. You are proposing that I accept (flawed) theory as fact. I am rejecting your proposal
1
@horsemumbler1 "No, you're the one making that assumption." Illogical "All I did was ask you to explain why and how we see what you do. " And I answered your question "Can we agree that those people will see the same/different things depending on thei location, or is that a fact you dispute?" People see different things in different places at different times, yes. That's quite a flimsy proposal to define the universe we live in though. Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 You are assuming I'm not very good with words and what they mean and trying to belittle me for it. That's called an ad hominem fallacy. Didn't take you long to start attacking my character to try and shut down the discussion, did it? Stop wasting time telling me what you think about me. Do you have any actual proof for your impossible religious cult spinning globe or only flawed, subjective theory and ad hominems?
1
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 Er, I politely responded to your inane rambling and you ran away because you couldn't present anything logical to the discussion. Don't be lying to people that you somehow silenced me. You didn't. I think you're a manipulative narcissist. There, we've both called each other names. Where do we go from here...? Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 Well, pursue me into silence then, tough guy. The guy you are talking to tried to and failed miserably. I'm still here and your commie mob hasn't silenced or censored me one bit. Your mob desperately wants to silence me but hasn't silenced one word of mine. I have not been thrown for a loop. You were and gave up. I am not sharing personal ideas or beliefs only facts. That's why you and others are failing spectacularly to censor me. Because you think I am debating feelings when I am, in fact, sharing facts. You are not trying to convince me of reality. You are trying to get me to concede that theory is reality. I have not run out of words for you or anyone here. You are all the ones who stopped talking. Lol
1
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 "And Merry Christmas 🎄" Are you a Christian or a Satanist? Make your mind up. Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 Silence and tumbleweed. You are telling others that you have cleverly cornered and silenced me when you are the one who talked yourself into a corner and disappeared. Gaslighting and cognitive dissonance. And you still don't live on a spinning ball - that's a fact. And there hasn't been an invisible bat soup flu floating around the sky of this non-existent spinning ball for the last two years - another fact. Why would anyone possibly believe that these ridiculous conspiracy theories are real?! Lmao
1
@horsemumbler1 Can you please stop rambling and provide me with actual proof of your religious cult, impossible spinning ball with water clinging to it? You are making the ludicrous claim. The burden of proof is on you. Stop deflecting. I haven't run away from anything from anyone. I am pro-actively steering the conversation away from the subjective theory and asking that we establish the objective factual reality. Are you interested in doing the same or is this merely an ego contest for you?
1
@horsemumbler1 "A fact is a claim backed by incontrovertible essence. If no evidence nor explanation for a thing can be given, it must be regarded not as fact, but as suspicion. The suspicion may be correct, but it must be demonstrably so to enter into the realm of fact." Agreed. So where is your factual evidence to prove your suspicion that you live on a spinning ball? Lol "I never said anything about thinking you're dealing in feelings. I'm just asking you to present the facts and their evidence as you see them." Yes, as far as I am awre there are no facts that prove the silly spinning ball theory. Do you have any? "You see, if you don't give me evidence for your facts, then the only reason I would have to believe them would be a feeling, and ought we not be men who deal not in feelings, but facts?" Exactly. Unless you can provide me with facts for the spinning ball, the only reason I would have to believe it would be a feeling or blind faith in the $cientific high priests in lab coats. Ought we not be men who deal in facts, not feelings and cartoons and fairy tales...? So, where are your facts to back up your impossible, debunked theory?
1
@horsemumbler1 "You too. No luck needed with people like him: Just give them a real chance to actually explain their ideas and watch them scurry to change the subject. Notice that he's already doing that. He'll probably say something ridiculous like it's not worth his time to explain anything to anyone who doesn't already believe what he has to say, or something equally silly. Or maybe he'll actually prove me wrong. Wouldn't that be interesting?" Stop bitching and posturing like a couple of teenage schoolgirls in the playground and present the facts. Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 "I never once claimed the Earth is a spinning ball, nor do I care to make nor defend such a claim." Great! We are in agreement then. Discussion ended. Merry Christmas, mate! (I haven't made ANY claim anywhere about how the World is shaped so there is no expectation for me to defend or explain something that I haven't claimed). Enjoy your holiday (safe in the knowledge that you aren't a meaningless speck of dust on a spinning ball, hurlting through an infinite vaccuum of darkness)
1
@horsemumbler1 No, the original claim was in the original post that we live on a planet (or spinning ball). I pointed out that this was a theory and not a fact. Nobody can provide any factual evidence to back up the original claim that was made and you are instead trying to deflect and reverse the burden of proof back onto me. You stand corrected, sir
1
@horsemumbler1 I haven't run away anywhere. You have now spent hours talking and bitching about me and avoided presenting any factual evidence to back up the silly claim that we live on a spinning "planet". Stop deflecting and start presenting facts. Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 I'm not denying anything. The parameters for the claims and discussion are clearly set out. I am taking us back to the original claim not running away from anything. I am not a "kiddo". Stop with the pathetic ad hominem fallacies already... I haven't made any claims. The original comment claimed we live on a "planet". I have asked (for days now) if there was any factual evidence to back up this claim. And you are now trying to flip the burden of proof back onto me. But that's not how it works (kiddo). There are no facts for me to give you. We don't live on a spinning planet. If we did, I could provide you with PLENTY of facts. But there are none. Only theories
1
@horsemumbler1 Why are you calling me "kid"? I am a retired man. Lol. STOP the childish ad hominems to try and get your point across. Do you have any facts for the spinning planet or not? If you don't have any then the matter is settled
1
@horsemumbler1 I am a man of facts because I am asking to establish the facts of the matter over subjective theory. If there are no facts to prove that Santa Claus exists then you are a man of facts for accepting that no facts exist to evidence silly, subjective theories. It's a very simple and easy to understand concept. It's not a "feeling" of mine. What facts exist that prove we live on a spinning ball? That's what we are trying to establish. Our respective feelings and beliefs are irrelevant to the factual reality
1
@horsemumbler1 "We don't live on a spinning planet." That's a claim, and you just made it again. That a fact." Maybe, maybe not. But the original claim was that we live on a (spinning) planet. That is the claim that we are trying to prove. If somebody claims that Santa exists and I say we don't, the burden of proof is on the person making the crazy claim not on me. What are you struggling with about this very simple concept? Lol
1
@horsemumbler1 "How about you tell me what you think a planet is and/or isn't, eh? If you can't explain why you think we're not on one, can you at least do that much?" No, how about we stick to the original debate and you provide me with factual evidence for the claim that was made instead of trying to divert the discussion onto my personal beliefs and thoughts (that I have never shared)
1
@horsemumbler1 All the best. Enjoy your Christmas. Thank you for confirming that there is no factual evidence to prove the insane and bonkers conspiracy theory that we live on a spinning globe planet, hurtling through an infinite vaccuum of darkness.
1
@vladimirofsvalbard9477 Yeah... probably best not to be handing out medical advice to others if you think there is an invisible bat soup flu floating around the sky... of a spinning planet... that you need to get a jibjab for... even though it won't kill you. Lmao Dr Vladimir, prescriber of fairy tales
1
You don’t seriously believe in that nonsense do you? Lol
1