Comments by "MrEkzotic" (@MrEkzotic) on "The Civil Rights Lawyer" channel.

  1.  @danielboone8435  I didn't say it happens a lot, but it has happened. The most recent one I can think of is Dezi Rios.
    2
  2.  @billsmith5166  If a cop breaks into your home illegally and points a gun at you, you would have the absolute right to defend yourself. The only thing they matters is if you reasonably believe your life was in danger. I don't give up my natural instinct of the preservation of my life simply because a would be murderer is wearing a badge. Police have no more right to self defense than a private citizen.
    2
  3.  @billsmith5166  If a police officer is acting within the scope of his official duty, then absolutely I would not be able to justify the use of self defense. I'm not talking about those types of situations.
    2
  4. I read an article which said that this isn't the first time he has gotten into trouble with his emotional outbursts. I forgot where I read it.
    2
  5. One barb of the taser would have no effect. Both barbs would have to strike.
    2
  6. ​ @falseprophet1024  You can also make a lot of money fighting the system, plus it gives you a clear conscience so you can better enjoy the fruits of your labor.
    2
  7. Just because he's the son of a bad cop means nothing without more evidence. That's just speculation.
    2
  8. Lol. Wow. That cop is in trouble.
    2
  9. I don't know if even want to watch this. I don't think I can continue to be informed of these incidents without doing something about it.
    2
  10. ​ @dinmorerenabe No it wasn't. It was detestable.
    2
  11. Why don't people ever fight back? It's so depressing watching people allow the government gestapo to do these things.
    2
  12. If the camera is immediately activated upon unholstering his firearm, it seems the suspect's car would be seen, at the very least, pulling away from the scene.
    2
  13. I think I am going to go and block the lenses of all those speed cameras with duct tape. I'm glad the cops set the precedent that we can do that.
    2
  14.  @fredcarpenter1027  But the cops overreacted.
    2
  15. He should be fired.
    2
  16.  @MyNameJerf  There will be settlement offers. They obviously did something wrong...whether they admit it or not is irrelevant.
    2
  17.  @deusvult8251  Legally, yes, but 22 is usually not developmentally an adult.
    2
  18. They should have chosen me.... I'd vote guilty all day long.
    2
  19. Most 24 year olds are too mentally and emotionally undeveloped to be police.
    2
  20.  @GenX-Grampa  That's awesome. I'm glad you found the right one early. 👍
    2
  21.  @Brandon-tz2wh  That's not the reason for qualified immunity. In fact, I'm pretty sure only US law enforcement has qualified immunity. While I wouldn't say QI should be abolished, it should be modified. I think it's a bit ridiculous to claim that "ignorance is the law is no excuse" applies to citizens, but not to police.
    2
  22.  @thecivilrightslawyer  Crack ID.
    2
  23.  @Ann-kg1zd  The guy isn't an elder. Lol. You all must be like 19 and 20 years old.
    2
  24. No, he's educated, educated in BS.
    2
  25. Qualified immunity must be abolished. Other immunities need to be greatly narrowed.
    2
  26. I have no idea why the courts upheld warrantless tag inquiries. It should be wholly unconstitutional. Sure, the tag number itself is public information, but the information attached to it is not.
    2
  27. LOL. Yeah, I'd like to see them try to force me to delete video.
    2
  28. That's a lawsuit.
    2
  29. This is why I will NEVER get married. The screaming emotional outpouring from wives everytime there is a crisis is just unbearable to me.
    2
  30. ​ @jasonshults368  Agreed. In this case, he could have used deadly force against this lunatic cop and it would have been completely justified.
    2
  31. Even though I'm a strong critic of police, this officer was polite and professional. And this judge slandered him and tried to damage his life and reputation, he needs to sue the living s*** out of that thug judge.
    1
  32. ​ @michaelwynne4346 I knew him personally for nine years, he has his his flaws like everyone else. He's had failures and learned from them. And he's better than any of the alternatives.
    1
  33. ​ @matszz  Stalin was responsible for the intentional starvation, mass execution, and deportation of millions of his own citizens. He ruled through fear, absolute censorship, and secret police, and dissent meant death
    1
  34. ​ @michaelwynne4346  Hyperbolic rhetoric that is anecdotal and ignores key context.
    1
  35. Trust me, those clowns aren't seal team 6.
    1
  36. Put a database of records online and let the public have access.
    1
  37. Wait, what? He was convicted of having flashing lamps? OMG. Flashing your headlamps is NOT what that statute is for. How stupid are there people? I would appeal it and then sue the the crap out of that cop.
    1
  38. Disgusting, abhorrent, an abomination to decency.
    1
  39. Well, if they asked him to leave, he should leave. I don't agree with Walmart telling him to leave, but it is a private business and they have that right.
    1
  40. ​ @empressjessica5020  They would not scream DEI if he was promoted based on his skill and experience.
    1
  41. ​ @kennybachman35 That's not the reason.
    1
  42. @EmpressOfExile206  Who cares? Why are you so offended? Do you have black fragility?
    1
  43. @EmpressOfExile206  Wah
    1
  44. @sawyer7287  I think it's obvious to which officer he's referring.
    1
  45. @decemberholiday3488  Why?
    1
  46.  @FelixUmbra  The defense would request dismissal of any frivolous lawsuits. No civil attorney will take a case that they don't have a reasonable chance of winning. Abolishing/modifying QI will incentive police to better understand what they can and cannot do, and this may actually result in fewer lawsuits. It may also help to help heal the division between law enforcement and the public. There should probably be some protection for exceptional situations, but they would be very narrowly tailored.
    1
  47. They are mean because they know they are cowards without a badge and gun.
    1
  48. If that was my Dad, that cop would have suffered a fatal gunshot. Pointing a gun at someone with that kind of anger and emotional instability, whether a cop or not, would cause any reasonable person to fear for their life... self defense would have been justified.
    1
  49. No, they are not justified.
    1
  50.  @ChowdahHead  Mostly agree, but it depends on the situation.
    1