Comments by "diehardcat" (@diehardcat) on "Asianometry" channel.

Actually China has always been trying to force its way on Vietnam for over two millenniums and say Vietnam copied China.
1
@testla3383 No one said what?
1
China is the snake.
1
@shirleyp8543 When did I say either one of them really communist? You know how to read?
1
@shirleyp8543 That isn't triggered. I'm just annoyed at stupid people trying to be smart like you.
1
@shirleyp8543 Relax! Gosh, Why are you so triggered? Being called 'communist', in fact, isn't an insult at all! It's just like somebody calls the US 'capitalist US'. If he feels the need to ask that question, he's really overreact, or 'triggered'. It's not mocking. He's really triggered! For my case, your 'sharing' annoyed me because it's too stupid. It's the same as saying, 'a cow walks on its four legs'! So it really deserved a response. I only tried to trigger you with my response and sure as h3ll, you're really triggered a f! LOL! Sorry about that!
1
@shirleyp8543 Still triggered? Knock yourself out OK? LMAO!
1
@huaninglyu7372 About books, google this phrase: 'China Contributed Substantially to Vietnam War Victory wilson center' and read the interview of the Chinese historian author and you'll see he's pretty much confirmed my conclusion about Chinese attitude towards Vietnam.
1
@ornchao2561 In this China-Vietnam story, Vietnam definitely IS the good guy. This video clip doesn't concern Vietnam-Cambodia relation so you're way off topic. Nevertheless, YES, Vietnam did take Cambodian land but that had happened only once for the whole 1000 years of history of Vietnam after regaining independence from China. On the other hand, China has never stopped trying to take Vietnam throughout history, if not all at once then bit by bit. And you should remember that the area of land Vietnam took in the last 1000 years is tiny and insignificant compare to what China took in the same period. So if you say Vietnam is bad because of that, China is undeniably much worse. It's very hard for Vietnam to defend herself from China's onslaught if she doesn't have the southern part today because China keeps growing bigger and bigger over that period. On the contrary, China has no excuse to take those lands. It's just pure greed! And be careful what you wish for! In history, when China wasn't even this big, it had expanded up to the central part of Vietnam today. If Vietnam didn't kicked it out over 1000 years ago and stopped the flood, there might be no Cambodia today whatsoever because when China takes, it just doesn't stop in the middle like Vietnam did. And China just hates Vietnam for stopping it so it always likes to back those Cambodian factions who are stupid like you to get back at Vietnam. Therefore, you're just a Chinese tool. And if you gang up with China to take down Vietnam, you're actually trying to destroy the very force that can protect you from the Chinese onslaught! So, don't be stupid!
1
@Anonymous------ Are you really that stupid? Vietnam has many names throughout history so it only makes sense to use the current name because it would be much easier for everybody to understand, right?
1
@ornchao2561 So you say if Vietnam has ever invaded another country in history, It can't say China invades Vietnam when it does? What t f is that?! If so, you can't say Vietnam invaded Champa either because Champa had invaded Vietnam in history too! Vietnam has influence over Laos and Cambodia but she doesn't claim Laos and Cambodia's territories NOW! China still does against Vietnam so why did you say 'To conclude this who is the most backstaber here of course is Vietnam', not China? Stupid?
1
@klytouch7515 What makes you say 'Vietnam helps America defeat China'?! The other way around is true though!
1
@ornchao2561 So you say if you've done something wrong in the past, you can't be called a victim when somebody wrong you today? If so, Cambodia can't be a victim either because it had also invaded Dai Viet (Vietnam), and Champa too in history long before Vietnam took its land in the 1700s, So you should shut up about Cambodia being a victim already! If you say so, Cambodia itself was a little China too! LOL!
1
@ornchao2561 Yes, you just said Vietnam 'are not a victim because Vietnam are little China' in your previous reply. Just take a look you idiot!
1
@ornchao2561 It didn't take the land because it couldn't, not because it didn't wanna take it you idiot! China and the Mongols themselves couldn't take Dai Viet, so what makes you think the Khmer could! LOL! Look at the map of the Khmer empire! It took a lot of land from other peoples, much more than Vietnam ever took from Cambodia.
1
@klytouch7515 I didn't ask for your babbling. I just ask you to give a direct answer to this question: What makes you say 'Vietnam helps America defeat China'?! if you don't even have half a brain to answer a simple question like that, your words are worth as much as crap! LOL!
1
@leogogo7041 The ranking in term of being viewed as an opponent and attitude towards a particular country and its people are two different things. I've been talking about the latter. Do Chinese call the peoples of those countries in your ranking 'monkeys'? Do Chinese leaders call those countries 'little children' in formal meeting with another country's leader? The degree of disdain must be through the roof to make them lose their heads like that. So no, it isn't ridiculous. It's only because you're stv p|d.
1
@leogogo7041 It's different. I have never heard a Viet individual call Chinese dogs or pigs anywhere, but I've been to many places and and see Chinese calling Viets 'monkeys' like a standard reference. They just use the word and everybody knows who they refer to everywhere! That means it is widespread, not just a small part of netizens.
1
@ornchao2561 When did I say I wanna convince you, an |d1ot?! LOL!
1
@ornchao2561 Vietnam's history started 1000 years before being annexed by Han. Vietnam regained independence in 939 CE, not 15th century, you id. iot! Why are you trying to teach Vietnam's history to me?! It has no relevant to the topic here. You're just wandering all over the place. I'll summarize your points here. Read and get over with already: 1. You said Vietnam isn't a victim because Vietnam took Cambodian land right? If so, Cambodia can't also be a victim because it had attacked Vietnam even before that trying to annex Vietnam but failed. Cambodia was still the one who drew the first blood so it's STILL wrong here. It just lost at the end so stop talking as if it's a poor innocent victim. 2. You're talking as if China's protecting Cambodia from Vietnam. Totally wrong! China has never given a cr. .ap about Cambodia. It didn't even care about 300,000 Chinese murdered by Pol Pot, or 20,000 Chinese died at its border with Vietnam, so what makes you think it would give a f about Cambodia?! LOL! China attacked Vietnam because it was butthurt from being rejected. Because it's a sore loser! That's all. If Cambodia was situated right next to China like North Vietnam, it would have been disappeared. The opposite is true, Vietnam has been protecting the Chinese onslaught down the Indochina peninsula since 1000 CE. In fact, Vietnam has saved Cambodia from a China's backed regime! You wouldn't have a chance to sit here and b |tch about Vietnam if she didn't cross the border to save you from China's tools! Right?
1
@leogogo7041 Vietnam has won even before China fired the first shot! Deng Xiaoping essentially ordered his troops to blow up, destroy, take things near the border and run back as fast as they could like bandits to avoid deaths but still managed to get 20,000 killed! LOL! Do you know that's THE record of invading troops killed in three weeks in Vietnam?!
1
@leogogo7041 Who call you Chanks '$|c k m@n of Asia'?! Isn't it the 'modest' Japanese? LOL! What a tool!
1
@leogogo7041 Did you just say mass murderers and mass r2apists are 'modest' people?! LOL! China's forgot about Nanjing?
1
@leogogo7041 You got slapped so hard you're hallucinating now?! LMAO?! Poor Chank! LOL!
1
@chowwh308 You're having it backwards. You're the one who refused to accept the reality that China is insatiably greedy, petty, and full of itself here. LOL!
1
@ornchao2561 You said, <<Khmer rouge were in 2 sides one with China one with Vietnam. They also slaughter both Chinese Vietnamese and Cham.>> But Vietnam deposed it when it started murdering Chinese and everybody else while China continued to support it! Why did China support a regime that mass murder Chinese?! You see? China is so fkn' evil so if I'm anti China, I'm anti evil! It's a good thing! You, on the other hand, like to kiss the evil's @ss, so yu are the subhuman here!
1
@ornchao2561 Stop saying Viets has Han origin you |d1ot! They have different roots and their DNAs are different.
1
@leaderindia2192 You're spewing such a big load of horse$h|t!. Give me the source that say when and where Vietnam invaded Guangxi. Vietnam has details records of the Khmer Rouge's incursions into Viet territories, If Vietnam did it, China must have records but it doesn't! China's backstabbing of Vietnam in 1979 was an aggression from the very beginning. That's why it doesn't like talk about it like other wars!
1
@leaderindia2192 'Hanoi's gate opened' 'eating breakfast'! LOL! You Chanks are so hilarious! Chinese troops could only advance around 25 km into Vietnam territories but already suffered heavy casualties. 25km deep is nowhere near Hanoi! In only three weeks China suffered 25,000 dead. That's the record of invading troops die in three weeks in Vietnam. Even the petty dwarf Deng Xiaoping knew China would suffer heavy casualties so that's why he ordered his troops to run home fast to avoid death but at the end he couldn't avoid that! LOL!
1
@ornchao2561 The Khmer Rouge was only recognized by the US, China and a few other US' dogs like Singapore and Thailand, not the whole UN. That's why it was replaced by a coalition in 1981. Yes, everybody knew about what happened inside Cambodia after Vietnam liberated it. It's only because the US and China ganged up trying to isolate Vietnam to satisfy their petty grudges!
1
@ornchao2561 NO, eventually Hunsen, a Vietnam friendly leader, still run Cambodia. That's not what the US and China wanted. The US just leads a part of the UN, not everybody. Getting advice and love a person are two different things. And love and don't love have nothing to do with the fact that Yew was a US running dog!
1
@ornchao2561 'Invade' is what China did at its border with Vietnam. Nobody in Vietnam had wanted Chinese troops to set foot on Viet soil. China turned a good situation into a bad one! On the other hand, Cambodians came across the border asking for help. Viet troops was welcome in Cambodia by the people. Cambodian troops fought alongside Vietnam against the Khmer Rouge. Vietnam turned hell back to life. That's definitely liberation! Why are you so $t up|d?!
1
@leaderindia2192 No, China deaths was around 25000 according to neutral sources. Nobody can believe a word coming out of China's mouth because China is a compulsive liar! No neighbor likes or believes China! That says a lot! LOL! China says its attack against Vietnam in 1979 was 'defensive'. A BIG lie. Nobody else says so except China. China itself doesn't have any evidence to back it up! China says it has never been an aggressor state throughout its long history! A BIG shameless f kg lie! LOL! China says it owns the WHOLE SCS since ancient time. Another thievish shameless BIG lie! China is the one who can't admit failure. Its attack against Vietnam only brought a lot of deaths upon itself. An extremely stupid move. It couldn't scare Vietnam to pull out of Cambodia! Those 25,000 deaths were for NOTHING! LMAO! Those stupid soldiers just died for Deng Xiaoping stupid mistake!
1
@ornchao2561 What gold on what dead body? You're so f kg hilarious! LOL! No I 've never said 'Cambodia betrayed Vietnam to China 2 day ago' you \d!ot!
1
@言行一致 English
1
@Auzzzie82 China broke up many many times during that 5000 years, do you know about that?!
1
If it wasn't for the US and USSR, China would still be r@.ped by the Japanese now so don't Chinese leaders forget that! LOL! No USSR and US, NO China!
1