Comments by "Quint Rankid" (@quintrankid8045) on "The Japan Reporter"
channel.
-
54
-
17
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Fascinating. I read as many of the comments as I could and now I can't get that time back.
It wasn't a war crime. At least not at the time. If it had been the people who bombed cities like Warsaw, Rotterdam, and London would have been prosecuted.
Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were considered to be military targets.
A full blown invasion probably would have resulted in millions of more deaths of Japanese. And a lot more Allied deaths as well.
A demonstration, dropping the bomb in a place where it wouldn't have killed anyone, would very likely not have resulted in surrender because dropping the bomb on an actual city did not result in surrender.
The bombs weren't dropped on Germany because Germany surrendered before the bombs were ready, whereas Japan was ready to fight to the bitter end.
Japan attacked the United States. An embargo is not a good excuse for initiating hostilities.
But still, it's completely reasonable not to like the bomb or its use. I don't. But I think the question is, what was a realistic alternative at the time? I mean one that would have been politically acceptable in the US at the time and resulted in the defeat of Japan, which is after all the usual purpose of war. Or at least I'm pretty sure thats what Clausewitz and Sun Tzu would agree on.
Japan and the US have a treaty which allow the US to station troops in Japan. Japan is still a sovereign nation. The treaty can be dissolved by either nation and it will be when it no longer serves the interests of both nations. It seems that both nations want closer ties.
Did I miss anything?
While many of the comments have asked you to comment on various criminal actions of Japanese during the war, I think these are well known. Instead I would like you to comment on the various Japanese projects to develop atomic bombs, none of which, thankfully came to fruition. Wikipedia has an article titled, "Japanese nuclear weapons program" which covers these. I'd appreciate you covering the legal, ethical and political aspects of these projects and why the US was able to build the bomb and Japan failed. Do you consider the Japanese who worked on these projects to be war criminals working in support of an illegal war of aggression?
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1