Comments by "Golag Is watching you" (@golagiswatchingyou2966) on "Is Sudan the next breadbasket?" video.

nazi's actualy did not Believe in IQ's, kinda like your doing. Facts are still facts, you can pretend facts are racist but it just makes you seem immature and anti science.
2
he must be a russian paid bot!
1
is that Sudan? i know they are low on the list, most central african nations are but the lowest?
1
sure... Whatever you makes you sleep at night, mr.scienceisracistman Grow up and stop living in make believe and learn to deal with reality, you might not care about other people's future but I do.
1
@RoyontheHill Vox makes such disgracefully inaccurate and shitty content, I never watch them they don't have any journalistic integrity.
1
yeah not even just countries, just certain groups can cause long term issues like the state of shall not be named in the middle east.
1
I have a question, kinda unrelated to this specific video, I was wonder, say hypothetical that most western nations or just large investment corporations around the world, stopped investing into africa and became more isolationist, less willing to trade and take risks in investments for whatever reason, would that long term be a benefit or a burden on the african economies?
1
@Odignridk but in the current state would that not cause a massive collapse? perhaps later might spark growth but in the short term seems like it would collapse the populaitons, cause wars and other unrest.
1
@Odignridk that sucks, I do think the west sould do more but what can we do? If we interveen in terms of military force the media would call us neo-collonialists, if we do nothing we might get even more refugees which is bound to make civil unrest worse. What can we do? I hope africa can get beter but it seems unlikely, besides a few places that are doing well right now.
1
god hates all of humanity
1
to be honest im not realy buying that narrative, not because it can't happen but because the narrative being spun is so called ''inevitable'' and causes problems for other nations but if they dare do something drastic they are likely to be called imperialist or worse, so I find it very confusing what's the solution if not for massive authoritarian actions to combat climate change? if it is as bad as some say, then draconian actions will be nessisary but honestly it seems like this is just promoted as an excuse for why wealthy nations are somehow to blame so they have to allow more people in their countries and be blamed for the current situation. what's realistically the solution?
1
@af8828 yeah those are authoritarian leaders with socialist ideas that won't work because they don't adress the underlining causes of climate change which is not just wealthy nations not caring in fact western nations do care it's places like in africa, india and China which have huge population growths btw that don't care and who will end up contributing more to climate change then any other nations, so even if you do vote in authoritarian draconian enviromentalists, they must become more authoritarian and even imperialistic to empose on other nations their policies to reduce climate change, it seems like a very logical and inevitable conclusion. Young people today are very arrogant and ignorant on how politics or real long term enviromentalism would have to work, I'm a millenial and I'm deeply ashamed of my generation, gen Z seems far more pragmatic and less idealistic in that regard.
1
@af8828 you just sayd Bernie Sanders who is an open socialist, many of the green parties in Europe are socialists, often we call them water melons because they are green on the outside but red on the inside. I don't understand why you think the western nations are more to blame when India, China polute the environment more then all of the western world combined, Partly that's due to enviromentalist policies in the west and lack of those policies in asia. Idk if you know your history of enviromentalism but the nazi's were enviromentalists and if you want a global effort or want other nations like say Brazil, developing nations like in Africa to stop contributing to climate change you would have to force them to stop having so many kids, block their economic growth and force enviromentalist policies on them, how are you going to do that without use of force and authoritarianism? Idk why you are being so illogical, naive and judgmental for what I see as a logical observation based on historic and objective facts of politics and human nature, seems rather easy to understand. Idk seems like you just hate the western world while pretending to care about the environment. I used to be on the leftwing, even somewhat of a progressive and this lack of objective argumentation and emotional arguing is why I left the leftwing and became more rightwing and nationalistic, I don't want imperialism but how are you going to enforce your ideas without use of force? People are just going to vote for the environment? On a global scale? You realy believe that's realistic?
1
@af8828 you seem to believe most of humanity even the democratic ones are rational as a standard which I no longer believe is true, people act in their own self intrest, their group intrest or an outgroup intrest, what's best for say the enviroment might mean is a bad outcome for you personaly, it might mean that such policies are bad for other outgroup people. an example perhaps though you might disagree with it. here in the netherlands we have an enviromentalist party multiple actualy but il focus on the party Groenlinks for now, one of their spokesmen has sayd that they would abandon treating older people because they aren't worth the investment of time, thus the older demografics have an insentive to not vote for such a party, we have another party called DENK which is a pro migrant, pro islam, pro Turkish almost 5th collum party here that only exists due to waves of migrants, their culture and our culture is diffrent and this is not just culturaly. thus as a result people don't vote for what's best for the enviroment but on issues that effect them the most, therefor your never going to get all the enviromentalist policies even if you do have the right scientific data, it's just not how democracies work.
1
@af8828 the green parties are authoritarian by nature, their policies limit economic freedom, in places like Germany they have already banned things like diesel cars in cities, promote anti natalist views and have caused due to their policies to ship industries oversea which they don't have to deal with enviromental concerns like China, progressives at least most that I see aren't aware of long term cause and effect, they focus on wedge issues like LBT(so on) issues and defending backward ideaology like radical islam, criminal gangs because they don't want to be ''racist'' they claim to be enviromentalists while shipping our industry away, not having children and welcoming of outsiders that changes our culture and subverts our democracy, I do care about enviromental concerns which is why im so dissapointed in them. the only thing I''ve seen them support that makes sense to me is maturnity leave for woman so they can raise their children, which does support population growth and therefor western values.
1
@af8828 nationalism historically has been the foundation of every civilized nation in the world, every civilization in human history had a identity, in the past this was based on religion and tribalism, nationalism abolished those primative concepts or absorbed them into their national identity, which allowed some sense of unity and stability, no it's not perfect nothing is but if you don't have a baseline, if you have no history, you have no future and can't defend your own intrests because you will become victim to those that do. in fact organisations like the EU are suppose to create a sense of pan-nationalism, to bind all the national states together, they want to be like the USA which is a superpower because of it's national unity. nationalism is civilization, pan-nationalism is the attempt at greater civilization. in order for something to be, means other things can't be it, otherwise it would cease to exist.
1
@af8828 sorry for long text but I felt like it's important to understand these complex issues
1
@af8828 your lack of an education on colonial history and your anti white racists views, combined with your childish, immature additude towards real problems is exactly why I left the leftwing. I think it's a shame how so many of you are so convinced of some supposed evils of the past that you would force your lack of mature additude on younger generations, they won't be greatfull or tolorant of such views. In fact gen Z is becoming the most conservative generation in decades and nationalist parties are rising all over Europe, even in EU parlement. I'm not a ism or whatever childish name calling you want to commit yourself to, to avoid asking real, mature questions about globalism, enviromentalism and nationalism. I love my country, I love my and all the people's of Europe who have suffered under the boot of authoritarian globalism and state enforced mass migration, standing up for your people, promoting the values of your nation, exposing those who wish to do harm to your Ideals while they censor you, bully you, intimidate you, hurt or even try to kill you is the meaning of bravery. I'm a man and you are a child in my view, the world would be a lot beter if you outgrew this childish, self loating and racist additude you have, the rest of the world already has. I pitty you, have a nice day.
1
@af8828 btw your response was exactly what I had expected, your repeating a childish narrative that many of us have outgrown, it's rather tiring to try and educate you and teach you something new when all you have to do to protect your fragile ego is calling someone an ism, throw insults and pretend you understand how the world works. It's a real Shame, I could have actualy talked to someone with big ideas instead of wasting my time with another usefull idiot.
1
do muslims only care about themselves? seems to be a lot of self centered and narcisitic behavior in their groups.
1
@darkzi1431 just for your nation? For all nations? Or for all muslims?
1
@darkzi1431 yeah inshalla means if god wills it which is an islamic/arab phrase, so im questioning your intentions because why would you need god to make a nation strong? In fact having a more seculare government is how you become stronger.
1
@darkzi1431 im a realist, often times reality is annoying for fundamentalists muslims.
1
@darkzi1431 if only the rest of the islamic world stopped going to western nations, then perhaps we might get allong beter.
1
@darkzi1431 we don't even controle our own borders, the USA does most of that crap, the west does not benefit, except perhaps a few big corporations that everyone hates. Also coming to the west is not a solution long term, so people will have to go back or be forced back, with or without stable governments in the middle-east. Would we be beter off if we did more? What if we actualy started to wage morr aggresive wars? Or actualy attacked a nation that supported radical islam like saudi-arabia, would that be beter?
1
@darkzi1431 islam is hatred, they hate love and they love war, which is why the USA loves them so much, keeps arming them and defending their most radical people. Im anti barbarism, can't realy be anti barbarism if you love islam. You sound learn to have some more compassion, you lack empathy and are full of venom and hatred for others.
1
@darkzi1431 please don't let your heart be filled with hypocracy and hatred, islam hates life, animals, peace and prosperity and will only drive you to maddness. I understand you are afraid because anyone who leaves the islamic faith is killed, including their family which is why honor killing exists. I don't expect you to change your hatefull and wicked ways but just because you hate me does not mean I have to pay for your hatred or lack of compassion. Unlike your evil religion, I forgive you for your ignorance and show mercy, I Just wished you would do the same.
1
@darkzi1431 don't blame the west for being free, don't seek to cause more suffering like you already have, some muslims understand islam and that gives me hope but sadly you are not one of them.
1
@dru4670 my main weakness is I have too much empathy, I always reason which is why im often censored and insulted by people who hate the truth, I always listen to people who I disagree with, that's how you prevent being stuck in an echochamber. There is a Imam in new sealand, they call him the Imam of peace, why? Because he dares to talk about the violence, inhumanity and threat from islam, he gets death threats from "peacefull muslims" every day, he gives me hope, not those who actualy defend islam and call those who speak the truth hypocrites, it's easy to call someone names, it's hard to actualy confront the truth.
1