Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "EU Made Simple" channel.

  1. Well, we could impose a super majority higher than 55%. Or make it so that 55% isn't enough and you need at least half of Europe or at least 12 countries
    9
  2. Draghi is probably the best politician Europe has, but it's risky to use him for political seats like those in Commission,perhaps it is better to keep him as a wild card for emergencies
    8
  3. There are few others. Italy economy and military power is important too and without it EU doesn't exist. Poland is also important military and increasingly economically. Spain is perhaps among the most important nations for economy and so are Denmark, Sweden, Finland Everyone is important
    7
  4. If an Federation is formed there will be laws and counterweights for all. But you are either in or out
    6
  5. To me it seems you want the advantages without the advantages. If you think the super majority will be made so Sweden and other Norther state can do as they please, dream on. As for immigration, it's time for ALL of the Union to decide. Meaning no country will be left alone and that if there one policy ALL of the Union will follow it. Harder measure and strict regulations? Very well, it does for all 27 countries
    6
  6. Italy economy and military power is important too and without it EU doesn't exist. Poland is also important military and increasingly economically. Spain is perhaps among the most important nations for economy and so are Denmark, Sweden, Finland Everyone is important
    5
  7.  @bjornSE  Many others contributed much more than you and have to deal with immigration issues and your nation vetoing solutions. We need a Federation, a just one but a Federation. You will either be in or be out. And that's it
    5
  8. One culture? One language? China is anything but. And USA aren't that united either. Learning more than one language is enriching. And yes, EU can definitely stand on par with China, India and USA
    5
  9. No, it's a political union
    5
  10.  @elfigos1631  Without the "whatever it takes" all European states would have gone broke, first Greece, then France and Germany ( their banks had lots of Greek bonds), then Italy
    4
  11.  @bjornSE  Like? Except Germany and France, which is anyway debatable, which have benefited more? Yeah, as I said a COMMON immigration policy that goes at border OF THE UNION, not one single state. But Mediterranean countries cannot be left alone with this burden, otherwise why should they help with Sweden and Finland problems? We need a Federation and if you want to stay out of it stay out but if you decide you are in there is no room to complain
    4
  12.  @vasilispatsalidis5683  What?
    4
  13.  @vasilispatsalidis5683  He is not, currently at least 🤦‍♂️
    4
  14. You are making brexiters mistakes. Fact is, when brexited happened the regions who were mostly vocals saw their funds REDUCED. Meaning EU wasn't the problem
    4
  15. "He believes EU is only an economic union" that's being eurosceptic
    4
  16. ​@DanaProca-x6i No, a hero
    4
  17. ​@deadeye4520 😂😂😂😂 Scotland,NI and Wales will soon leave uk
    3
  18. EU is already democratic but a Federation would be even more
    3
  19. Good
    3
  20. @elfigos1631  He SAVED Europe.
    3
  21.  @nenasiek  Who told you to you could rejoin? If you do that, believe me, I and others will lobby for all nations to vote against you JOINING, because as for uk, there won't be a re- anything.
    3
  22.  @bjornSE  "We don't want a common immigration policy because it would mean unlimited immigration" not if you stop immigrants at the border of the Union because that's the UNION policy. If you mean between countries part of the Union, well yes, but it's part of the deal Good, don't be a part of it then. But Drumpft doesn't say "I don't want New York to be part of USA because of common immigration policy", he propose harsher immigration policy at FEDERAL level (granted, I don't agree with him on most of the issues he talk about, I hear who says immigration as it is, it's a problem)
    3
  23.  @Wind_Falcon  It will have a bigger voice through the Federation. Do you know how Federations work?
    3
  24. EU has not destroyed anything. Don't talk about things you know nothing about
    3
  25. You forget most of those countries do well because they are in the union. Paraguay bs Brazil: which country have the better economy? Nicaragua and Mexico?
    3
  26.  @didixtar2863  They would because their voice will be heard in the WORLD better than single nations. They would because they are protected and they may want to still have that protection, something that won't happen if EU collapse. Yeah, there are some issue. Dor example those small states might have to stop laundering money and getting money from other big countries, for example, Southern countries, because they are fiscal havens and issue questionable financial practices. Yes, France and Germany will need to curb excessive nationalism and work in the interest of all. But I think it's doable. Otherwise the economic union will break and those countries may find themselves in a worse economic situation
    3
  27.  @robharris8844U  EU is an EUROPEAN political union, NATO is a MILITARY ALLIANCE. You don't know the difference
    3
  28. Yes
    3
  29. ​@TheRezro That's a way tho challenge them. And EU is a superpower if it act as one
    3
  30.  @eyvindr.  Hopefully your wage can support them. Good luck, you will need it to care proper care of them (independently from wages)
    3
  31.  @rinmartell2678  They are not
    3
  32. @WilhelmEley-s3y  I think you misunderstood something: Greeks banks did, then German tried to make other European states pay for it
    2
  33. ​@anitaklein2630 How is forming a Federation an invasion? Germany and France and Italy etc..will lose some of their sovereignty too, but it won't be given up o other states but pooled together
    2
  34. @yazangh9075  AHAHAH Wikipedia😆😆😆😆 French Médiocrité is the only big thing France can have Italy is among the European nation with the best militaries in Europe, probably behind uk and Russia Reality cares not for your delicate croissant feeling 😉
    2
  35. We have heard this for decades. EU is still here
    2
  36. ​​@frank-ko6de You are wrong. In fact the ones who oppose the most are states like Slovakia and Hungary And yes, EU was always political
    2
  37. ​@paullarne We did lost like the 6th or 7th power, a leech who stopped profession and thought too much of itself. It's no big deal, though
    2
  38.  @AthrunWilshire  Which ones? The only countries talking leaving are Scotland, Wales and NI and they want to leave uk to join EU
    2
  39.  @rosshilton  True, it will be a federation by then. England may be allowed to join, though Scots, Welsh and Irish may not be too much happy about that
    2
  40. 🇮🇹🇪🇺🤝🇦🇱 Wanna see you in EU soon
    2
  41. ​ @АннаСтепаненко-ч9щ Invading neighbours? Moldova, Georgia, Ukraine....
    2
  42. I think most of Europeans do already
    2
  43.  @DukeOfTheYard  "Identifies primarily" nobody does that not even at national level, region or city come first usually. They do however feel European. The Next Generation show perfectly the mutual assistance of Europeans countries
    2
  44. ​ @gigikontra7023 Each European should speak more than one languages. And the European army would work more like NATO than America's army
    2
  45. ​@hid3x810 😂😂😂😂 uk thought the same, look how it ended. Don't whine about blocked funds then. If you stay, you follow the rules. Or you leave
    2
  46. N.4 at best
    2
  47. We should become a Federation then accept new members Perhaps Ukraine should be the only exception
    2
  48. EU was never just a trade agreement, always political and aiming for a Federation since it started in 1957
    2
  49. ​ @DanDan-du9mo It doesn't look that way at all. EU is rearming and is better together than alone. We saw in 1939 what countries can do alone: nix, nada, niente etc..
    2
  50. No it wouldn't. Why would it be?
    2