Comments by "People Liberator" (@lvjinbin28) on "Al Jazeera English"
channel.
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The real exploitative trap of IMF and World Bank is that they require the recipient country to implement neoliberal economic policy in order to receive so-called SAL (Structural Adjustment Loans). Developing countries have to privatize state owned enterprise, lower trade barrier, reduce public spending, remove state subsidies on key sectors. All those neoliberal policies will wipe out the developing countries' remaining weak industrial sector and make them a dumping ground for expensive foreign goods, like Latin America just can't get out from middle income trap for decades after they got helped by IMF several times, Banana Republic in Latin America can't even feed locals even they sold millions of tons bananas to USA for decades, such multinational corporations behind IMF and World Bank can come in and make huge revenues by exploiting local labors and natural resource and paid almost nothing, US capitals even can control major stock share of very good company in Latin America, Asia and Indochina after IMF 'helped' them after financial crisis, that's why those patriotic economic offcials of developing countries would prefer Chinese loans, do you think elites in poor countries they don't see Western propaganda? Actually many African elites graduated from Western universities so they are educated people, Yes they saw but still choose Chinese loan just because IMF loan is much much worse condition, at least you get something real and touchable roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, power stations, factories and Chinese market from working with China, but if you only work with USA then you can only get so-called untouchable 'democracy and human rights', and remains as corrupt and starving country just like last decades.
IMF and World Bank are complicit with big capitalists and corporations. They don't care about the industrial and manufacturing progress in developing countries. In fact, they prefer developing countries not to become industrialized countries because they don't want another 1.4 billion industrialized Africa, USA barely built infrastructures in Latin America, Africa even USA herself because only normal people will use public roads, public bridges, power stations, public hospitals, why should those First World like 1% elites in Wallstreet build roads for people in Third World or poor communities? It will waste too much time and money for them, as long as they can control media then they can easily put one pro-USA democratic regime or pro-USA ring-wing dictator by regime change, Those Wallstreet elites don't even build infrastructure for American voters anymore for decades then what you expect they can build for other races? if not for competing with China's infrastructure, do you really think Biden really has motive to pass infrastrucuture bill? if Americans finally got new infrastructures, if American company finally build roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, power stations in Africa to win your heart, they should thank China for that pushing those exploitative politicians to do that, because if China never came to Africa, people will never see those top rich would care the poor and build basic human rights for you.
3
-
3
-
3
-
Is Guam not far from Los Angeles? USA obtained Guam through the Spanish-American War, Greece as the winner, controlled 95% of the islands in the Aegean Sea after Balkan War, World War I, and World War II, while Turkey as the loser, can only control 5% of the islands and zero EEZ in the Aegean Sea, does it look like China’s 11-dash line situation?
ROC's 11dash line claim got support from the West and Soviet when all Southeast Asia were Western colonies in 1945, because Chinese suffered most casualties from Japan, also kept resistance and elimiated more Japanese than ASEAN combined until Japan surrender, so West and Soviet let ROC navy to take over after Japan retreated from South China Sea, it's like a trophy to biggest Asian contributor China, this is world order decided by winners to divide the spoils after war, even USA lent 4 warships to ROC navy in 1946, Chinese landed on Taiping Island, Thitu Island etc, today Taiwan still claims 11-dash line from 1945 to now but keeps silent, then PRC inherited same claim from ROC after 1949, anyways all countries live under the Yalta system, the World War II order.
China signed the UNCLOS but USA has not. Therefore, China only claims the islands in the 9-dash line instead of treating the South China Sea as internal waters. That tribunal is not under the United Nations, so West can only win the media war, but Chinese obtained the South China Sea with blood, then USA can feel regretted today but anyone must use more blood get South China Sea and rewrite new word order, it's not enough to win media war.
3
-
3
-
@Phanngochanh73 Soviet signed military alliance treaty with Vietnam communist and Afghan communist in 1978.
pro-Soviet anti-Chinese Le Duan genocided Boat People, overthrew pro-CCP Khmer Rouge, occupied Laos, Cambodia, Vietanmese wanted to unify whole French Indochina, even annexed Chinese territories on border and islands in South China Sea in 1977-1978, because Vietcong thought CCP was weak, and Soviet can deter CCP or protect Vietcong.
then CCP joined Third Indochina War(Sino-Vietnamese War 1979, Sino-Vietnamese Conflicts 1979-1991, Cambodian-Vietnamese War 1978-1989),
Deng xiaoping also armed Afghan mujihideen agaisnt Soviet in Soviet-Afghan War 1979-1989
Soviet left from Afghanistan, visited Deng xiaoping for normalization in Beijing 1989.
then Vietnam left from Laos and Cambodia, visited Li Peng for mercy in Chengdu 1990.
3
-
3
-
3
-
Russia gave up communism, embraced multiparties, universal suffrage, private ownership, gave Easter Europe independence, even tried so hard to join NATO, then did NATO stop supporting Georgia and Ukraine against Russia? the root reason is not the bill, not even HK independence, remember South Korea and Japan are democratic and independent, but only anti-China leader can finish one term, Russia China India even EU is just too big to US hegenomy, that's the core reason, so HK is next Ukraine and it never ends until China collapsed.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Cyan_Nightingale 1. Mao Zedong began to export the communist revolution in the 1950s and supported the Indochina Communist Party and all communists in Indochina, including the Vietnamese communist Party, the Cambodian Communist Party, and the Lao Communist Party.
2. As the leader of the Communist Party of Indochina, Ho Chi Minh transferred Chinese weapons and money to the Khmer Rouge. So if you say Mao Zedong supported Pol Pot, so did Ho Chi Minh, because they were in same team.
3. After the split between China and the Soviet Union, the split between China and Vietnam, and the split between Cambodia and Vietnam, those who supported Pol Pot were Deng Xiaoping, Carter, Reagan, and especially Kissinger, he really supported Pol Pot more than Deng Xiaoping, Because Deng Xiaoping was pro-American, Le Duan was pro-Soviet, and Pol Pot was anti-Vietnam.
4. In the end, China, the United States, and ASEAN worked together to support the anti-Vietnamese guerrillas composed of Sihanouk, Son Sann, and Pol Pot until the Vietnamese occupying forces withdrew from Cambodia and Laos.
5. From a moral standpoint, the Viet Cong liberated the Cambodian people from the tyranny of the Khmer Rouge, but soon the Cambodian people began to hate the Viet Cong occupying forces because the Vietnamese plundered Cambodians’ food and other supplies as war supplies .
6. The Cambodians have always known that the Vietnamese have always wanted to unify the French Indochina Federation, so if the Vietnamese withdraw their troops after defeating the Khmer Rouge, the Vietnamese can call themselves liberators, just like the Mao Zedong withdrew all PLA troops after the Korean War and the Vietnam War, but Le Duan did not withdraw its troops and still established a puppet regime, This is territorial annexation that Cambodians fear most.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The real exploitative trap of IMF and World Bank is that they require the recipient country to implement neoliberal economic policy in order to receive so-called SAL (Structural Adjustment Loans). Developing countries have to privatize state owned enterprise, lower trade barrier, reduce public spending, remove state subsidies on key sectors. All those neoliberal policies will wipe out the developing countries' remaining weak industrial sector and make them a dumping ground for expensive foreign goods, like Latin America just can't get out from middle income trap for decades after they got helped by IMF several times, Banana Republic in Latin America can't even feed locals even they sold millions of tons bananas to USA for decades, such multinational corporations behind IMF and World Bank can come in and make huge revenues by exploiting local labors and natural resource and paid almost nothing, US capitals even can control major stock share of very good company in Latin America, Asia and Indochina after IMF 'helped' them after financial crisis, that's why those patriotic economic offcials of developing countries would prefer Chinese loans, do you think elites in poor countries they don't see Western propaganda? Actually many African elites graduated from Western universities so they are educated people, Yes they saw but still choose Chinese loan just because IMF loan is much much worse condition, at least you get something real and touchable roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, power stations, factories and Chinese market by selling goods to China, but if you only work with USA then you can only get so-called untouchable 'democracy and human rights', and remain as corrupt and poor country.
IMF and World Bank are complicit with big capitalists and corporations. They don't care about the industrial and manufacturing progress in developing countries. In fact, they prefer developing countries not to become industrialized countries because they don't want another 1.4 billion industrialized Africa, USA barely built infrastructures in Latin America, Africa even USA herself because only normal people will use public roads, public bridges, power stations, public hospitals, why should those First World like 1% elites in Wallstreet build roads for people in Third World or poor communities? It will waste too much time and money for them, as long as they can control media then they can easily put one pro-USA democratic regime or pro-USA ring-wing dictator by regime change, Those Wallstreet elites don't even build infrastructure for American voters anymore for decades then what you expect they can build for other races? if not for competing with China's infrastructure, do you really think Biden really has motive to pass infrastrucuture bill? if Americans finally got new infrastructures, if American company finally build roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, power stations in Africa to win your heart, they should thank China for that pushing those exploitative politicians to do that, because if China never came to Africa, people will never see those top rich would care the poor and build basic human rights for you.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
You have forgotten the three things the Chinese have, freedom, independence and sovereignty.
CCP attacked Americans in 1950 during Korean War, CCP attacked Soviets in 1969 during Sino-Soviet Split,
CCP got contained, encircled, sanctioned by both West and Soviet during 1960-1980, Is it worth it? Freedom is not free.
so PRC today has the most independent, complete and largest industrial system, also independent media, finance, diplomacy, politics, and ideology,
East Germany was a communist colony of the Soviet Union, and now whole Germany is a liberal satellite state of the United States.
If you enjoy the protection from NATO, you can only lose your freedom.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2