Comments by "People Liberator" (@lvjinbin28) on "Al Jazeera English"
channel.
-
6
-
6
-
I think people from outside really underestimate how much nationnalistic that Chinese can be, like Harvard survey finds 93% Chinese is supportive to CCP before pandemic,
there was even more Chinese to support CCP when Chinese saw 1 million death in USA, those pro-West liberal Chinese influencer lost support after Trump took power,
so-called white paper revolution like only 50~100 protesters confronted with police in very few cities, 99% Chinese don't even know there's small protest if their phones got no VPN,
even some young Chinese are fed up with endless lockdowns but Chinese people only wants normal life back not regime change, not overthrow CCP or Xi's rule,
even those Chinese liberals went to protest against Xi but they also all knew what happened after Tiananmen protest, so nobody would risk lives to overthrow Chinese government for sure,
maybe Chinese views USA's sanction as bigger threat than CCP, western media keeps repeating it like there's huge revolution coming? like West really cares about Chinese people?
we know it's West really wants such regime-change to happen in China, but its' impossible because CCP got own censored social media platform to prevent propaganda from spreading,
most young Chinese know what Arab Winter means, Chinese people are not naive to welcome Color Revolution to happen in China,
so China won't end up like HK, Soviet, Syria, Libya, Ukraine, CCP would listen to people's voice and open up but CCP would stay in power.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@rickjames18 The 11-dash line in the South China Sea is compensation for the huge casualties of the Chinese in World War II, Therefore, the West and the Soviet Union supported the Republic of China’s control of the South China Sea in 1945. The Kuomintang even took over Taiping Island and Thitu Island in 1946 with escort from US navy. The Philippines should blame why the United States gave the South China Sea to the Chinese in 1945, instead of the American Philippines, British Malaya, and French Vietnam. We are still living in the post-World War II international order today, and China’s control of the South China Sea over Taiwan was regained by driving out the Japanese. If someone wants to change this order, they should win World War Three before inventing an international system based on the winner’s rule order.
The PRC inherited the ROC’s sovereignty over the South China Sea after the civil war in 1949. Today, Taiwan still claims 11-dashl line on ROC constitution, the Philippines stole Taiwan’s Thitu Island in 1971 when the Taiwan Navy was sheltering from the storm, Taiwan gave up taking it back by military because of the pressure from the United States, but Taiwan never gave up to claim its sovereignty on Thitu today. the PLA won and retook Paracel Battle from South Vietnam navy in 1974, but South Vietnam’s big brother, the U.S. Navy, did not even condemn the PRC. the PLA won and retook Johnson South Reef from Vietnam navy in 1988, but the Viet Cong’s big brother, the Soviet Navy, did nothing against CCP.
the PLA Navy was extremely tiny and weak in 1970s or 1980s, but the United States and the Soviet Union did not dare to fight the PLA at that time. The Philippines believes that the United States will go to war with China for the South China Sea, and the United States will definitely win the People's Liberation Army? When the CCP was poorer and backward than Africa, did the United States win the Korean War and the Vietnam War against CCP? Today, the PLA Navy has more warships than the US navy, the second in the world by tonnage. The Philippines would be China’s Vietnam, China’s Cuba, and China’s Ukraine. If Duterte is The pro-China invader to Chinese, then Marcos is the pro-US invader to Chinese, CCP stopped militarizing Scarborough Shoal because Duterte was pro-China, but the Philippines did not regard China's compromise as goodwill, so let's see who can be tougher on sovereignty then.
China definitely treated the invaders too friendly that's why the Philippines dared to join the anti-China encirclement as an American proxy, So the Philippines can keep deceiving the world with lies and brainwashing, remember it's The CCP signed the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in 1982, so China and Taiwan claim the islands and EZZ within the 11-dash line instead of treating the South China Sea as internal waters. it's The United States has not signed the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea until today, where's your morality ground?
The Philippines feels more secure that it has signed a military alliance treaty with the United States, Could it be that Cuba has more Soviet missiles, and the United States will be deterred, afraid, and kneel to Cuba? nope, the United States was not deterred, but instead tried to nuke Cuba even the Soviet Union. Don’t forget that the Viet Cong signed a military alliance treaty with the Soviet Union in 1978. As a result, the CCP has been attacking and harassing the Viet Cong from 1979 until Vietnam became pro-China in 1991. Ten thousand U.S. troops landed in the South Korea and South Vietnam, but they did not deter the CCP even invited CCP to join Korean War and Vietnam War.
After defeating the United States' bamboo curtain and the Soviet Union's anti-China encirclement network, the United States and Russia has no longer encircling China in last 30 years. Although there were frictions, but all can be resolved through diplomatic negotiations. Therefore, China has not get involved in any wars in last 30 years, but the neighbors around China, Even Australia, which earns the most surplus from China, but ships its warships to the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. Lithuania, a tiny country far away from China, but dares to support Taiwan separatist. Even Ukraine, which is in the midst of war, sends its congressmen to visit Taiwan, not China sent officials to visit Donbass. well, why nobody dares to send warships to the Caribbean Sea? why no one dares to support the independence of Hawaii, of course it is because China is too peaceful but the United States is too warlike, so why China should respect the sovereignty of these anti-China countries? the world has forgotten the history even looked down peaceful PLA, so they joined the American new Bamboo Curtain again. It seems that you have forgotten how cruel, bloodthirsty and warlike the CCP was militarily rising in 1949-1991, you will miss the CCP that has been peaceful for last 30 years.
I just want to see if the U.S. can defend the Philippines for 30 years like it defended South Vietnam. Whether the U.S. can use cannon fodder the Philippines to slow down China's peaceful rise, or China can use the Philippines as breakthrough to weaken containment and oppression from the anti-China regimes.We will defeat you invaders and imperialist, no matter that you are a small country like the Philippines, Vietnam, or a superpower like the United States and the Soviet Union.
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
Polin Ni Murrigan even China locked first, longest, strictest China still tested more than USA+India, because China has done around 200 million testing.
so how could Trump said USA is NO.1 for testing and should slow testing, and I don't see much Western media questioning it??
Let's see China testing history:
Wuhan tested 1.6 million people during 2 monthes lockdown, but there was found 6 asymptomatic cases after opening, then Wuhan tested whole 11 million population in 10 days.
every Chinese province got locked down for 3 weeks even there's just hundreds of cases, then every province tested all potential cases even let test all students before send them to school.
there's dozens of new cases in Beijing found from imported salmon fish seafood market, then Beijing tested half population 11 million got whole district locked down again,
there's 2 cases found in Ruili tiny town,Yunnan province by stowaway, then China tested 200,000 whole population,
there's 6 cases found in Qingdao then China tested whole 9 million population in 5 days,
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
well, Russian GDP is only 10% of China so Russia can't really help economy of Central Asia, Russia and Central Asian countries are even natural resource rivals in China or Europe market, when Russia military looks not strong as people expected then Central Asia would not be so obedient to big brother, especially Kazakstan also got 19 million Russian minorty like 16% of its population, Kazakstan is worried and turning anti-Russia pro-USA because there's risk that Russia may support their separatism like did in Crimea and Donbass too, Kazakstan need outsider's help to balance and weaken Russia's influence and control, it's either West or China.
China and Central Asia are complementary to each other, China got largest industrial output but only lacks natural resource, that's both Russia and Central Asia should compete to win Chinese market, so if China and Central Asian can cooperate then it's a win-win for both, the problem is can Russia let Central Asia go?
Russia today face serious pressure from Western backyard side in Ukraine, so Russia can't accept South backyard in fire again, if Russia has no ability to keep Central Asia as pro-Russia then Russia need to accept a less worse choice, today Russia only has two option: let West or China to fill that void in Central Asia, surely Russia would rather to give her back to China, because China and Russia shared longest border, if China wants to backstab Russia then China can just attack Russia on Sino-Russian border, Russia can't lose China to back up Russia economically, militarily and strategically under Western sanction and encirclement, let Chinese Belt&Road to link Xinjiang and Moscow through Central Asia, better China than USA.
China, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan recently signed a railway deal, acutally China planned about this deal for 20 years, why it delayed so long time? it's just because Russia let it go, China knew Russia's concern so China never really challenged Russian influence in Central Asia in last 20 years, China didn't really push it to happen and force Russia to accept Chinese influence in Central Asia, but China to let it to happen naturally and keep Russia interests there too.
4
-
4
-
@UC94Ok4_AwKesYPpNZesaPAQ ironically, British HK was very authoritarian, HK people couldn't vote and protest, HK governor was a tough leader so political system was really stable, that's why HK economy could rise up, remember that 4 Asian Dragons like Singapore South Korea HK Taiwan economy all rose up without a tiny western democracy, today Singapore is least democracy among 4 Asian Dragons, Chinese HK gave people to vote but got trapped in political chaos so HK economy got kidnapped by real estate giants and couldn't make industrial upgrade plan, don't forget Macau is also SAR and pro-Beijing, Macau GDP per capita is NO.1~3 after handover, Macau politics got controlled by Beijing deeply.
4
-
1.population is No.1 reason, Spain can win Netherlands, UK can win Spain, US can win UK, once big country can catch up with same generation technology, who got more people, who got more potential organized labors, skilled talents, and consumption market for own goods, once China can catch up with USA then Chinese productivity will be same like USA, but production and consumption scale will be at least 4 times bigger. China has biggest smart educated and hardworking laborforce, even now China got double engineering graduates more than USA when China GDP per capita is only 1/6 of USA, Chinese Taiwanese HongKongers Singaporeans Koreans Japanese, all Confucius society has same IQ level score even China is still a developing country, if China can spend same budget on education like Japan in future 10 years, you think USA can contain 10 Japans even Japan is aging?
2.Chinese culture is secularism, materialism, realism, ancient Chinese mythology kills God, shoot Sun, bury seas, move mountains if those things don't benefit humans, it's people to control own destiny, when India, Middle East, Latin America pray and wish for afterlife, Chinese is busy with making religion decorations, status, gifts for you, lazy people just can't win economic competition.
3.Chinese politics became 100% independent after PLA beat USA in 1953 and Soviet in 1969, no superpower can dictate China politics anymore if USA Soviet military can't, Japan didn't fight back USA's trade war tech war even once in 1980s because Japan is military colony for USA, EU fought back USA's trade war sometimes but divided Europe is still Internet, media, intelligence, military satellite states for USA, EU didn't put EU first but USA put USA first, so their potential has ceiling, is oppressed, limited. American propaganda can't do regime-change in China, CIA can't buy elites to influence Chinese public opinion, there will be no color revolution in China like happened to Soviet Yugoslavia Syria Libya Ukraine, China is not naive to collapse.
4.CCP liberated Chinese from feudalism in brutal civil war, but India can't carry on land reform under fake democracy controlled by landlords, that's why China can build 70% bullet train of the world just in one decade but it will never happen in other countries especially India, even West wanted to help India industrialization, but India would contain herself and improve much much much slower than China did, India has chosen a peaceful revolution to get independence from British, but those landlords who loyal to colonist, today same family still controls India democracy in every region, that's the cost they are paying now.
5.China got contained, sanctioned, blocked by both capitalism world and socialism world in last Cold War when China was poorer and more backwards than India Africa, then China broke through containment against USA and Soviet in Korea Vietnam, Tibet, Machuria, Xinjiang, Taiwan, Afghanistan, but China survived and rose up, it shows Chinese people and CCP had strong resistance and resilience ability, so China would break through USA containment in Korea Vietnam Taiwan Japan India in Cold War 2.0, when today China industrial output is bigger than USA+Japan+Germany combined, 140+ Belt Road countries would support China or at least don't sanction, it will be easier to survive.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4