Comments by "People Liberator" (@lvjinbin28) on "Firstpost"
channel.
-
@ElDCru-ow8de Ukraine will not win, Russia will not stop, USA will not kowtow, and China will remain in the background. because China will not allow Putin regime anti-American Russian regime to collapse, so China will be supporting Russia and China is 10 times the GDP of Russia, China does not need to sell weapons to Russia now, nor does it need to provide weapons to Russia for free. China is only buying Russian oil and gas, just filling the Russian market with Chinese goods, This is enough for Russia to maintain its offensive status against NATO.
The United States is very smart and has never leave East Asia for Europe or West Asia. In fact, China and the United States both know what the other side is thinking. China has been waiting for the U.S. ground forces, not only U.S. Air Force to massively enter Ukraine and Israel, once NATO troops enters Ukraine battlefield, China will open its weapons arsenal to the proxy Russia and Belarus then let the war in Ukraine continue for another ten even twenty years, until China will use Ukraine and Russia to bring down the European Union, even weaken both Russia and the United States, or make the division of Europe and the United States.
Similarly, once the U.S. ground forces, not only U.S. Air Force massively enters Syria to attack Iran, China will assist the Muslim world's resistence to weaken American economy and reputation, This is why China brokered an Iran-Saudi rapprochement to isolate Israel, because Israel is father of Americans rather than cannon fodder like Ukraine.
Once the United States got trapped in the Middle East or Eastern Europe proxy war battlefields, China will attack those pro-US containment regime in the first island chain, and the United States simply cannot enter three-front war at the same time. The United States' current strength is unable to rescue Ukraine, Israel, and the Philippines/Taiwan at the same time.
Whether fighting a conventional war or a war of attrition, China's industrial strength and the institutional advantages of socialist centralism are more advantageous than those of the pro-American world.
because China’s industrial output is USA+Japan+Germany+Brazil+Canada. China will definitely trap the US military into the battlefields of Eastern Europe and the Middle East in order to break through the U.S. containment in East Asia,
Just like CCP used the Viet Cong to weaken France and the United States in a 30-year proxy war of attrition during First&Second Indochina War.
Just like CCP used Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and Sino-Vietnamese border conflicts to weaken Soviet-funded Vietnam in 12-year Third Indochina War.
Just like CCP used Afghan mujihideen to weaken Soviet in 10-year Soviet Afghan War in a 10-year war of attrition to bring down the economy of the Soviet Union.
Over the past 30 years, China and Ukraine have had very good relations because Ukraine is pro-Russian, pro-China, and friendly to the United States. However, Zelensky is pro-American and anti-China, Ukrainian politicians have visited Taiwan even during the war, so China will not sympathize with the pro-American anti-Chinese regime. Now Cold War 2.0 has begun, China is facing a comprehensive military containment by the United States in Asia. Chinese politicians also have stopped admonishing/warning the United States. Because the anti-China policies of both parties in the United States will not change, Therefore, China will also be determined to join the new Cold War until the United States gives up containing China, or one party completely collapses and disintegrates.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Musk seems support Russian invaders in Ukraine's Donbass, but Musk seems against USA invader in China's Taiwan, clearly Musk doesn't use same liberal rule or UN charter,
so why Musk plays double standard but opposite to USA government's double standard? USA is against Donbass separatist but pro-Taiwan separatist so Musk acts like traitor,
but the richest man Musk doesn't want American poor man to fight against Russian or Chinese poor man in Donbass or Taiwan, because it's bad for global economy,
why blame him? you got more money than him if global economy collapse? you got more chance than him to escape draft for WWIII?
Musk realized clearly it's USA containing China and Russia in Cold War 2.0, especially American military industrial complex would make huge money from conflicts,
Yes he sold many cars in China, maybe he can't sell cars in Russia, but if global economy collapse then nobody buys his cars, why he can't care about world economy?
we should be thankful that this rich man doesn't get rich by pushing a poor man to kill another poor man, if you want war then show me you joined the army.
2
-
2
-
@SeaKrait571 Bullying the Philippines? If the Philippines supports Taiwanese separatists, occupying Chinese islands as an invader, even joins the American anti-China encirclement, why can't China bully the invader/enemy? Once China loses its all patience and gives up to calm the Philippines, you will see what real bullying is.
Chinese netizens regretted their tolerance of Duterte because he changed from a pro-American invader to an anti-American invader. Therefore, China stopped arming Scarborough Shoal and allowed Filipino fishermen to fish in Chinese waters. But when Bongbong coming to power, he completely betrayed Xi Jinping.
Therefore, Chinese netizens have been blaming the CCP for its over-tolerance, defensive and conservative foreign policy. The Chinese hope to immediately expel Filipinos from the South China Sea islands, and take back all the islands and reefs controlled by the Philippines, and even those controlled by Vietnam and Malaysia. But based on geopolitical relations, China should first fully retaliate against the Philippines.
I think you have always had a fantasy, thinking that you can bully China at will at your own reason, if you want to change the order of World War II at will, and then set a new rule to make China kneel to the United States.
When PRC was weak, China attacked US in Korean War, so CCP won't kowtow but take revenge on you guys, because you yourselves are too ignorant.
2
-
UN force in Korean War :USA, S.Korea, Australia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Canada, France, the Philippines, Turkey, Thailand, South Africa, Greece, Belgium, Luxembourg, Colombia and Ethiopia provided varying numbers of fighting troops. In addition, Sweden and Denmark each sent a hospital ship, and India, Norway and Italy sent their own field ambulance teams
why only four in QUAD? you should bring more, let's see who can bully who.
2
-
2
-
Some people seems very happy but if the CCP is determined to retaliate against the Philippines, will India and the United States send troops or navy? How long can they defend the Philippines? once? twice? one decade? two decade? You guys don't know Cold War history or geopolitics?
The West successfully formed an anti-communist The Bamboo Curtain. But what is CCP’s response? deterred? scared? kowtowed? NO, China has escalated its retaliatory measures like Mao Zedong exported anti-Western communist revolution to the world, especially in Southeast Asia. the PRC then intervened in the 3- year Korean War, 25-year Taiwan Strait Crises, 9-year the First Indochina War, 20-year the Vietnam War, and the Sino-Indian Conflicts 1962 1967. the PRC defeated the South Vietnam navy and retook the Paracel Islands in 1974. Why US Navy in Cam Ranh Bay didn't fight or even condemn the tiny PLA navy when South Vietnam should be defended by SEATO (Southeast Asia Treaty Organization 1954–1977)??
The Soviet Union also successfully formed an anti-Chinese encirclement. As a result, the CCP intervened in the Sino-Indian Conflicts 1962 1967, the Sino-Soviet Conflicts 1969, 13-year the Third Indochina War, and 10-year the Soviet-Afghanistan War, and CCP exported so many anti-Soviet proxy wars in Asia and Africa. the PRC defeated the Viet Cong navy and retook Johnson South Reef in 1988. Why the Soviet navy in Cam Ranh Bay didn't fight or even say a word against the weak PLA navy for Viet Cong when Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnam Military Treaty (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics-Socialist Republic of Viet Nam: Treaty of Friendship and Co-Operation 1978–2003).
Everyone Has a Plan Until They Get Punched in the Mouth ----Mike Tyson
Every Power Contained CCP Until They Got Weakened In A War of Attrition. -----CCP
Deng Xiaoping visited ASEAN and US in 1978, after then he fully retaliated against pro-Soviet Le Duan, because he expelled Boat People, occupied Paracel and Cambodia.
The Bongbong is very dangerous now because the United States is busy war in Ukraine and Israel, and CCP is uniting ASEAN to isolate the Philippines now.
2
-
ROC declared the 11-dash line in 1945. the West and the Soviet Union asked the Chinese to take over South China Sea after Japanese withdrew, US navy gave 8 warships to Chinese and helped ROC navy to control Taiping Island, Thitu Island, Triton Island, and Woody Island in 1946. At that time, all Southeast Asian countries were Western colonies, They were not sovereign and independent countries, so when the Western masters gave the South China Sea as a gift to the Chinese, for Chinese sacrifice and contribution in World War II. American Philippines, French Vietnam, British Malaya, British Brunei, Dutch Indonesia, they didn't and can't object Chinese claim in 1945, then 11-dash line will be regarded as the World War II order by the Kuomintang and CCP.
The PRC inherited the 11-line and claim same in 1949 after Chinese Civil War, but today Beijing only claims the 9-dash line because Mao Zedong gave the Bach Long Vi to Ho Chi Minh in 1957 served as a base to monitor Western reconnaissance aircraft during Vietnam War. Of course Mao Zedong would not have thought that Deng Xiaoping and the pro-Soviet Le Duan would go to war in 1978, nor would he have thought that today's Viet Cong would become more pro-American. I think the CCP must have regretted removing the two-dash line in 1957, just like Putin today regretted that Khrushchev gave Crimea to his best ally Ukraine.
However, because ROC has always been a puppet of the United States, when the Philippines seized Thitu Island from Taiwan navy during 1971 storm, then Taiwan canceled its retaliatory military operations under pressure from the United States. The PRC retook the Paracel Islands from South Vietnam in 1974 and Johnson South Reef from the Viet Cong in 1988. And because the PRC navy was still weak and backward, also the CCP paid more attention to the economy after the Cold War. Therefore, the PRC did not seize the very distant Spratly Islands.
From a Chinese perspective, the presence of the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia in the South China Sea are all invaders and a disruption to the order of World War II. Today's separatist party in Taiwan still occupy Taiping Island and Dongsha Island. Although they have not canceled the 11-dash line in the ROC constitution, they have kept a very low profile in line with US propaganda. If the United States wants to rewrite the order of World War II and force the CCP to abandon the legacy of World War II, the United States must defeat the PRC in the Fourth Indochina War, Cold War 2.0, and World War III.
The international community was willing to let the Chinese take over the South China Sea in 1945. That was because the KMT/CCP eliminated more Japanese than Southeast Asians and resisted since 1931 until 1945, and all Southeast Asian countries and colonial troops surrendered to Japan in 1942. so the Philippines will should win your trophy by sacrificing more blood in WWIII than the Chinese did in WWII, does the Philippines really think you can gain territory by relying on US and propaganda wars? The CCP has never relied on propaganda wars to rise. The CCP was the winner of the Civil War, World War II, the Korean War, the First Indochina War, the Second Indochina War, the Sino-Indian War, the Sino-Soviet War, and the Third Indochina War.
However, due to geopolitical relations in Cold War 2.0, China does not want to push all ASEAN to the United States. Therefore, as a strong power, China has proposed a code of conduct in the South China Sea. No one can occupy new uninhabited islands. All parties should freeze the status quo and develop their economies. However, only the Philippines refuses to join this club. Therefore, China will think that Bongbong is used by the United States to undermine China-ASEAN relation.Therefore, China will only isolate and retaliate against the pro-American proxy/invader, not Duterte but Bongbong regime in the Philippines, CCP will give more benefits to the pro-China invader like Indonesia, neutral like Vietnam and Malaysia, a low-key and too weak Brunei. This is the carrot and the stick of the Chinese. The Vietnamese learned from the three Indochina wars to be pro-French, pro-American and pro-Soviet. The Philippines will also learn this in the future.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@KrishGupta1290 CCP attacked South Vietnam invader against American Bamboo Curtain and retook territory from 9 dash-line, Battle of Paracel Islands 1974 during Second Indochina War, US navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't condemn that extremely tiny PLA navy then, even when S.Vietnam still should be defended by SEATO 1954-1977.
CCP attacked Viet cong navy expansionist against Soviet's encirclement and retook territory from 9-dash line, Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988 during Third Indochina War, Soviet red navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't even say one word against relatively weak PLA navy then, even Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnam Military Treaty 1978-1991.
Did India win 1962 war when both West and Soviet supported Nehru? imperialism is a paper tiger, Modi should know that China is no longer like in 1962, if India wants to contain China again then what if China would also play tougher as revenge? PLA navy warships will definitely be stationed in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives to push back containment from Mod's Foward Policy 2.0.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
there's 153 countries joined BRI, 130 BRI countries leaders, 30 international organization leaders including António Guterres in Beijing now, Putin is meeting so many friendly leaders, it's like Xi hosts a small United Nations in Beijing for Putin, so who isolate who? it will be Global South isolated West.
but why they prefer Chinese debt trap not IMF aid? are those elites stupid than you? Indians are good at talking, so India invented creative propaganda against BRI, then West love and spread it against China, but Xi is a real doer.
well, jealous India, EU and hateful USA know BRI is good that's why they copy and make own, but if you don't really study why Global South choose China, you can never compete with China if based on lies.
when Europe economy shrinks more, they will also join BRI and USA will be only isolated!
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Tejas Mishra Tibet was never sovereign state because Qing Empire or ROC never accepted Tibet independence.
evidence? today Taiwan still claims Tibet and South Tibet in its ROC Constitution, even UK and India never set embassy in Tibet, but India imagined and blamed PRC unification war as invasion, it's like Russia blamed Ukraine to invade Donbass.
Forward Policy is about annex South Tibet then whole Tibet that even British India didn't even annex whole Tibet, India is more aggressive than British India.
Qing Empire, ROC, PRC never accepted McMahon line, it's Tibet separatist agreed with British India, not Chinese central government.
it's like Donbass separatist drew a borderline with Russia but never accepted by Ukraine.
PRC wanted to make compromise with India in McMahon line, but Nehru thought India is more powerful, CCP can't do anything but to accept Nehru's LAC after Chinese great famine.
Mao didn't understand why socialist Nehru so tough with Chinese brother, it's Indian domestic propaganda made PRC as weak, Nehru even warned to defeat PLA and annex more Tibet, so Mao attacked India when Nehru was preparing.
Indian military was weak and easily lost the war, because Nehru looked down Mao even Mao just defeat United Nations in Korean War, so where's Nehru's baseless confidence comes from?
it's same like today Modi still looks down China and plays tough, crossed LAC then got killed as invaders, even Modi admitted Chinese didn't enter Indian territory on LAC side of India.
well, Neville Maxwell's book got banned by india because he revealed truth that it's India betrayed China and tried to force PRC to accept McMahon line.
you can keeps brainwashing yourself and pretend good Colonist, but at least India should fight better.
2
-
2
-
2
-
well, Russian GDP is only 10% of China so Russia can't really help economy of Central Asia, Russia and Central Asian countries are even natural resource rivals in China or Europe market, when Russia military looks not strong as people expected then Central Asia would not be so obedient to big brother, especially Kazakstan also got 19 million Russian minorty like 16% of its population, Kazakstan is worried and turning anti-Russia pro-USA because there's risk that Russia may support their separatism like did in Crimea and Donbass too, Kazakstan need outsider's help to balance and weaken Russia's influence and control, it's either West or China.
China and Central Asia are complementary to each other, China got largest industrial output but only lacks natural resource, that's both Russia and Central Asia should compete to win Chinese market, so if China and Central Asian can cooperate then it's a win-win for both, the problem is can Russia let Central Asia go?
Russia today face serious pressure from Western backyard side in Ukraine, so Russia can't accept South backyard in fire again, if Russia has no ability to keep Central Asia as pro-Russia then Russia need to accept a less worse choice, today Russia only has two option: let West or China to fill that void in Central Asia, surely Russia would rather to give her back to China, because China and Russia shared longest border, if China wants to backstab Russia then China can just attack Russia on Sino-Russian border, Russia can't lose China to back up Russia economically, militarily and strategically under Western sanction and encirclement, let Chinese Belt&Road to link Xinjiang and Moscow through Central Asia, better China than USA.
China, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan recently signed a railway deal, acutally China planned about this deal for 20 years, why it delayed so long time? it's just because Russia let it go, China knew Russia's concern so China never really challenged Russian influence in Central Asia in last 20 years, China didn't really push it to happen and force Russia to accept Chinese influence in Central Asia, but China to let it to happen naturally and keep Russia interests there too.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Chinese government subsidized all EV brands, including the American brand Tesla in China market, but Biden will only subsidize American car brand which piss off Korean car company, while Americans and Indians are boycotting Chinese goods and investment, the CCP continues to welcome foreign companies especially American investors to make money in the China market, that's when Sino-US relations were still in the highest midst of a trade war, Shanghai welcomes Tesla is because of the catfish effect that the CCP wants, Chinese local brands got pushed into corner after facing fierce competition from Tesla, they have to improve their competitiveness and innovation or die, hundreds of Chinese car brands and their billions of investment just disappeared because they can't compete.
Today, All Americans have no idea, have never seen Chinese brand cars, nobody knows how smart Chinese cars are. because the United States completely refuses Chinese cars to enter the US market. Can other American EV brand compete with Chinese EV brand in the world in the future? Is the United States now more protectionist than CCP? the United States even has rejected Chinese battery companies from setting up battery factories in the United States. Isn't this because American populist politicians are too populist just like Indian politicians? If protectionism could make China rich, then Mao Zedong's China would not be starving, ironically it's Americans taught CCP to open for free trade, market economy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2