Comments by "People Liberator" (@lvjinbin28) on "Firstpost" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. ​ @ravishing-troop5276  fxxk your the mutual defense treaty. When did the CCP really care about the military treaty from the United States and the Soviet Union during the last Cold War? you don't know because you are uneducated about history and geopolitics, CCP humiliated USA expansionist by bombing puppet regime Taiwan's Kinmen for 21 years against Bamboo Curtain, Second Taiwan Strait Crisis 1958-1979, when ROC Taiwan should be defended by Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty 1955-1979. CCP armed N.Vietnam and sent combat engineer troops against USA imperialist and pro-USA Vietnamese collaborationist in Bamboo Curtain, Vietnam War 1955-1975 after massive anti-communist troops landed in Vietnam, when S.Vietnam should be defended by Southeast Asia Treaty Organization treaty. CCP even attacked Soviet revisionist against Soviet's encirclement and caused nuke crisis, Sino-Soviet conflict 1969, Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance 1950-1979 became a piece of waste paper. CCP directly attacked South Vietnam invader and retook territory from 9 dash-line, Battle of Paracel Islands 1974, US navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't condemn extremely tiny PLA navy then even when S.Vietnam still should be defended by SEATO 1954-1977. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics-Socialist Republic of Viet Nam: Treaty of Friendship and Co-Operation signed in 1978-1991. Afghanistan-Union of Soviet Socialist Republics: Treaty of Friendship, Goodneighborliness and Cooperation signed in 1978-1991. CCP launched one-month 'de-Nazification, de-Industrialization, de-Agriculture, De-Infrastructure' military operation, kept attacking pro-Soviet Viet Cong expansionist against Soviet's encirclement, Sino-Vietnamese conflicts 1979–1991, when Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnamese Treaty since 1978. CCP attacked invader Viet cong navy against Soviet's encirclement, Johnson South Reef Skirmish 1988, Soviet red navy in Cam Ranh Base didn't even say one word against relatively weak PLA navy then, when Vietnam should be defended by Soviet-Vietnamese Treaty since 1978. CCP armd pro-China Khmer Rouge guerrilla against Viet Cong occupation and Soviet's encirclement, Third Indochina War 1975-1991, PRC defended Cambodia and Laos independence until Vietnam invader withdrew and giving up 'French Indochina Federation under Vietnam rule' dream. CCP armed mujihideen against Soviet social imperialist's occupation and Soviet's encirclement, Soviet Afghanistan War 1979-1989, when Afghanistan should be defended by Soviet-Afghan Treaty since 1978. China borders 14 countries on land, including North Korea, Russia, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam. Why did the CCP attack South Korea, South Vietnam, India, the Soviet Union, and Vietnam? Why doesn’t CCP attack weak Mongolia, Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, and Laos? Why does the CCP attack regimes that are extremely pro-American and anti-communist, as well as regimes that are extremely pro-Soviet and anti-China? Because as China’s neighbors, they believed in foreign powers and gave up their neutral attitude to join the military encirclement network of the United States and the Soviet Union. Because their people and politicians believed the propaganda, overestimated the United States and the Soviet Union, and underestimated CCP. So they have to pay the price for their ignorance, just like Cuba, Georgia and Ukraine. As a neighbor of a big country, but colluding with another big country to threaten its neighbors, this may not have a deterrent effect, but an effect of inviting war. A piece of paper cannot protect a small country, only smart diplomacy can protect a small country. childish and ignorant diplomacy can turn a small country into a battlefield for a brutal proxy war!
    1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. I'm sorry to tell you that although I sympathize with Ukraine very much, no matter how Ukrainian neo-Nazis persecuted the Russian minority in Donbas, even the United States also loves to invade much more, but the United States never included foreign territory like Latin American territories in its constitution after WWII. I still think that Russia is an invader according to UN charter, especially since Russia is still annexing Ukrainian territory. But geopolitics is very cruel. Why I think Russia will not lose? This is not something Putin can decide, but Xi Jinping behind him! Now China does not provide weapons to Russia because China still hopes to remain neutral in order to win the neutrality of the EU, The Russian army seems to have the upper hand now, so Russia will not fail even if it relies on its own military industry, So as long as Putin is willing to continue fighting, then Xi Jinping will be the nanny feeding Russia's war economy. but If NATO really ends up participating in the war, if Russian army really cannot hold NATO troops anymore, then China will provide free weapons to Russia and even send troops to defend Russia. Just like when North Korea couldn't handle US-led UN force anymore, then China just sent massive troops to defend North Korea. As long as North Vietnam could resist the French and American troops, China will keep sending weapons and food until France and Americans withdrew, So you think the United States can't defeat the Vietnamese? The United States was unable to defeat China and the Soviet Union behind Vietnam in a war of attrition! from China's geopolitical view once Russia loses the war, if Putin steps down and the Russian pro-American party comes to power, Russia will join NATO and contain China from every corner, so Russia is like a huge buffer zone between China and NATO, China won't want to see the U.S.-E.U.-Russian coalition forces will be deployed to Border of Mongolia and Manchuria. So Ukraine’s enemy is not just Russia, but the China-Russia alliance! NATO need to contain both China and Russia, but they are the world’s largest industrial output country + the world’s largest energy country!
    1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. You are really ignorant of history. The China you are talking about is the Republic of China, which is now ROC Taiwan today. Because British India, British Burma, the Russian Empire, the Japanese Empire, and French Vietnam once encroached on the territory of the Qing Empire, but the Qing government was too corrupt and weak to take it back until collapse. Later, the ROC established by Sun Yat-sen inherited all the territorial claims of the Qing Dynasty, but ROC immediately fell into three decades of wars with warlords, Japanese and communists, so Kuomingtang could not regain it until got kicked to Taiwan 1949, so those disputed/lost territory since Qing Empire is still claimed by Taiwan on its ROC constituion. After 1949, the PRC also inherited the territory of the ROC. Because too long time had passed, it was impossible for the CCP to go to war with all surrounding countries to regain its past territories. Therefore, the CCP and Because of the Korean War and the Sino-Soviet split, the CCP was contained by both USA and Soviet allies. At that time, the CCP was not so strong that it could go to war with all surrounding countries, so the PRC made some compromises, PRC made compromises on borderline with Myanmar, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Vietnam, Tajikistan, settled the land border disputes through friendly negotiations, and the land borders were only India and Bhutan controlled by India. The Qing government, the ROC government never recognized the McMahon Line, and India Inheriting the colonial legacy, Nehru's refusal to make any concessions led to the 1962 war and the Sino-Indian hostility to this day. Of course, the ROC Taiwan refused to recognize any agreements between the PRC and other countries, Therefore, today Taiwan has territorial disputes with all surrounding countries on ROC constituion. What remains is the dispute in the South China Sea. Today, Taiwan still claims the 11-dash line, but Beijing changed from the 11-dash line to claiming the 9-dash line in 1957, because the CCP gave Bach Long Vi Island as a gift to North Vietnam to monitor the South Vietnam or American reconnaissance aircraft in 1957, considering that the Viet Cong has become pro-American again today, the CCP must regret its generosity back then.
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19.  @yashvanthreddy5227  when Indians said Indian economy is much smaller than China, because China liberalize market in 1978 but India only liberalize market in 1991, it's 13 years later than China and that's why India is behind, but Indians still boycott Chinese goods even loot Chinese investment, did you see CCP did this to imperialist USA and war criminal Japan? why CCP doesn't just fight back by banning more foreign company especially after USA and India already banned so many Chinese company? even you know you can feel happ to ban your rivial's company, you think Chinese don't know? you don't know the reason, your politicians don't know the reason, that's why India can't catch up with China. The Chinese government subsidized all EV brands, including the American brand Tesla in China market, but Biden will only subsidize American car brand which piss off Korean car company, while Americans and Indians are boycotting Chinese goods and investment, the CCP continues to welcome foreign companies especially American investors to make money in the China market, that's when Sino-US relations were still in the highest midst of a trade war, Shanghai welcomes Tesla is because of the catfish effect that the CCP wants, Chinese local brands got pushed into corner after facing fierce competition from Tesla, they have to improve their competitiveness and innovation or die, hundreds of Chinese car brands and their billions of investment just disappeared because they can't compete. Today, All Americans have no idea, have never seen Chinese brand cars, nobody knows how smart Chinese cars are. because the United States completely refuses Chinese cars to enter the US market. Can other American EV brand compete with Chinese EV brand in the world in the future? Is the United States now more protectionist than CCP? the United States even has rejected Chinese battery companies from setting up battery factories in the United States. Isn't this because American populist politicians are too populist just like Indian politicians? If protectionism could make China rich, then Mao Zedong's China would not be starving, ironically it's Americans taught CCP to open for free trade, market economy.
    1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22.  @Jenny723  You are really ignorant of history. The China you are talking about is the Republic of China, which is now ROC Taiwan today. Because British India, British Burma, the Russian Empire, the Japanese Empire, and French Vietnam once encroached on the territory of the Qing Empire, but the Qing government was too corrupt and weak to take it back until collapse. Later, the ROC established by Sun Yat-sen inherited all the territorial claims of the Qing Dynasty, but ROC immediately fell into three decades of wars with warlords, Japanese and communists, so Kuomingtang could not regain it until got kicked to Taiwan 1949, so those disputed/lost territory since Qing Empire is still claimed by Taiwan on its ROC constituion. After 1949, the PRC also inherited the territory of the ROC. Because too long time had passed, it was impossible for the CCP to go to war with all surrounding countries to regain its past territories. Therefore, the CCP and Because of the Korean War and the Sino-Soviet split, the CCP was contained by both USA and Soviet allies. At that time, the CCP was not so strong that it could go to war with all surrounding countries, so the PRC made some compromises, PRC made compromises on borderline with Myanmar, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Vietnam, Tajikistan, settled the land border disputes through friendly negotiations, and the land borders were only India and Bhutan controlled by India. The Qing government, the ROC government never recognized the McMahon Line, and India Inheriting the colonial legacy, Nehru's refusal to make any concessions led to the 1962 war and the Sino-Indian hostility to this day. Of course, the ROC Taiwan refused to recognize any agreements between the PRC and other countries, Therefore, today Taiwan has territorial disputes with all surrounding countries on ROC constituion. What remains is the dispute in the South China Sea. Today, Taiwan still claims the 11-dash line, but Beijing changed from the 11-dash line to claiming the 9-dash line in 1957, because the CCP gave Bach Long Vi Island as a gift to North Vietnam to monitor the South Vietnam or American reconnaissance aircraft in 1957, considering that the Viet Cong has become pro-American again today, the CCP must regret its generosity back then.
    1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. I finally realized why Gordon Chang is still on American TV show after 20 years 'China Collapsing' propaganda, just look at enormous clickbaits of every video on this or other channel, then you know people extremely enjoy such biased, exaggerated fakenews not reality and facts, it became big FORTUNE for both Gordon and media, remember what's last enormous 'China Collapsing' story? Evergrande, not long time ago right? but there is new propaganda products come out everyday on your table, such so-called Free Media doesn't guarantee your independent thinking, even worse and ironic they pretended like 'free, objective, honest' media to brainwash people in Free World, because they know you subconsciously want China to fail, you think you don't need to increase your competitiveness to defeat your opponent? Whether the elephant will attack you, it depends not on what you wish, but it depends how strong you are, or how elephant's mood today, many people have never been to China, can't speak a word of Chinese, but they have a sense of superiority and pretend that they are China Expert, Have you ever seen a Chinese who does not understand English and has never been to the USA but claiming to be an USA Expert? some countries are too busy with wishing China to fail, rather than busy with improving themselves..all of sudden it's US economy collapsed before CCP in 2008 wallstreet crisis, most ironically, it's China bailed out world economy especially USA, Australia, Canada through 2008–09 Chinese economic stimulus plan, suddenly US politicians waked up and realized China won't collapse naturally, then they made bigger and bigger CHINA THREAT propaganda, like enormous Xinjiang Genocide story.. so it means they admitted previous 'CHINA COLLAPSING' story proves FAKE, right? then who really covered up China's rise by faking up news to calm down US politicians? Why is China's strategy of 'hide his ambitions and disguise its claws' successful? Because there are hundreds of millions of people like Gordon Chang in USA, such media and Gordon don't feel ashamed of their dishonest report last 20 years? people don't feel ashamed to keep Gordon on TV show? that's why Chinese netizens joked Gordon should be awarded a medal for his patriotism(to China not USA) for his inside job, because it's Gordon not CCP mouthpiece newspaper, successfully brainwashed all American elites and people, help China to avoid being contained by the USA in 2001, if USA could foresee China's possible potential 20 years ago, then Trump's Trade War will be much much easier to win in 2021, would those Free media and most anti-China activist Gordon be responsible for cover up CCP's rise? nope, he is still on TV but selling his new ‘CHINA THREAT’ propaganda product, Gordon can always lead Bad China propaganda, but now the trend is 'CHINA THREAT' not 'CHINA COLLAPSE', this channel should follow Gordon's new trend. it's new narrative to make huge money!
    1
  50. 1