Comments by "D4RD1V" (@d4rd1v79) on "Hindustan Times"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
USA warns about possible ISIS-K attacks
RU-claims to be superpower, to have best intelligence, army, etc
RU - putin ignores warning, says bad amerika wants us to be afraid, there are no dangers
RU - has Moscow rigged with cameras and arrests civilians for any protest
also RU - fully armed terrorists arrive at mass gathering, kill everyone on sight, set fire, leave in 30-40 mins without ANYONE interrupting them except poor unarmed security of building, who are killed
ISIS - we did it, we hate christians.
RU - IT wAs UkRoNaziJeWBanDeraAnglOsAXsaTanisTs
ISIS - yes, it was us, here are pics
RU - AMERIKA IZ BAD. why did not they prevent attack on us?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@loumcast While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences.
Firstly, the circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation.
Secondly, the question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted.
Furthermore, while the US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability.
In conclusion, while the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
2
-
@loumcast While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences.
Circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation.
The question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted.
The US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability.
While the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
2
-
@loumcast While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences.
Firstly, the circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation.
Secondly, the question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted.
Furthermore, while the US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability.
In conclusion, while the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
2
-
@loumcast While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences.
Firstly, the circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation.
Secondly, the question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted.
Furthermore, while the US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability.
In conclusion, while the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
2
-
@loumcast While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences.
Firstly, the circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation.
Secondly, the question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted.
Furthermore, while the US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability.
In conclusion, while the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
2
-
@loumcast While it is true that the unilateral decision by the US and its allies to recognize Kosovo's independence was met with resistance and led to a lack of recognition by half of the world, drawing parallels between Kosovo and Crimea oversimplifies the situation and ignores crucial differences.
Firstly, the circumstances surrounding Kosovo's declaration of independence and Crimea's annexation by Russia are fundamentally different. Kosovo's independence was the result of a long-standing conflict, international intervention, and a process facilitated by the United Nations. In contrast, Crimea's annexation by Russia was widely condemned as a violation of international law, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, following a controversial referendum conducted under military occupation.
Secondly, the question of sovereignty and territorial integrity is a complex issue governed by international law and diplomatic norms. While the desires of the people in a territory are undoubtedly important, they must be expressed through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, with respect for the sovereignty of the affected state. The legitimacy of Crimea's referendum has been widely questioned due to the lack of international oversight, the presence of Russian military forces, and the rapidity with which it was conducted.
Furthermore, while the US and its allies may express their opinions and exert diplomatic pressure, the ultimate resolution of territorial disputes must involve dialogue, negotiation, and respect for international law. Unilateral actions that undermine sovereignty and territorial integrity only serve to escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve lasting peace and stability.
In conclusion, while the desires of the people in Crimea and other disputed territories are important, their aspirations must be pursued through legitimate and internationally recognized processes, in accordance with the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and respect for international law. Drawing simplistic parallels between different situations overlooks the complexities and nuances of each case and risks perpetuating instability and conflict.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1