Comments by "D4RD1V" (@d4rd1v79) on "Hindustan Times"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Mangobite9689 Classic, WHaT aBOUt AMeRaIcA? Focus instead on Russia.
Preventing and acting during the act are two different subjects.
When an attack has already occurred, it is indeed often easier to manage a situation where special forces can intervene on the ground, as in the case of the Moscow terrorist attack, compared to an attack involving hijacked airplanes, like the 9/11 attacks.
When an attack occurs on the ground, special forces, police, or military can react more directly and intervene to neutralize the threat. On the other hand, when it comes to hijacked airplanes, there are limited options for immediate response. The planes move quickly and can be difficult to stop before they reach their targets.
Then we can also ignore that FSB offices are nearby.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@JudgeBread. While it is true that the specifics of NATO's role and level of direct involvement in the conflict remain subjects of debate, it is essential to differentiate between the actions of NATO and the agreements reached in the Minsk accords.
Firstly, while NATO's actions and policies may have influenced the situation in Eastern Europe, including its support for Ukraine, they are distinct from the agreements reached between Ukraine, separatist groups, and other parties in the Minsk process. The Minsk agreements primarily focus on finding a peaceful resolution to the conflict in eastern Ukraine, addressing issues such as ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons, and political dialogue.
Secondly, regarding the characterization of the actors in the conflict, it is important to recognize the complexity of the situation. While some may prefer the term "rebels" over "separatists," it is crucial to understand the motivations and objectives of the groups involved. While certain factions may seek greater autonomy or economic freedom within Ukraine, their actions, including the establishment of self-proclaimed entities like the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, can be interpreted as separatist in nature.
Furthermore, while advocating for political and economic freedom within Ukraine is a legitimate goal, the means by which certain groups pursue these objectives, including armed conflict and the violation of Ukraine's territorial integrity, raise ethical and legal concerns. Additionally, the determination to fight for these goals does not necessarily justify the means employed, especially when they result in human suffering and loss of life.
2
-
@JudgeBread. While it is true that the specifics of NATO's role and level of direct involvement in the conflict remain subjects of debate, it is essential to differentiate between the actions of NATO and the agreements reached in the Minsk accords.
Firstly, while NATO's actions and policies may have influenced the situation in Eastern Europe, including its support for Ukraine, they are distinct from the agreements reached between Ukraine, separatist groups, and other parties in the Minsk process. The Minsk agreements primarily focus on finding a peaceful resolution to the conflict in eastern Ukraine, addressing issues such as ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons, and political dialogue.
Secondly, regarding the characterization of the actors in the conflict, it is important to recognize the complexity of the situation. While some may prefer the term "rebels" over "separatists," it is crucial to understand the motivations and objectives of the groups involved. While certain factions may seek greater autonomy or economic freedom within Ukraine, their actions, including the establishment of self-proclaimed entities like the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, can be interpreted as separatist in nature.
Furthermore, while advocating for political and economic freedom within Ukraine is a legitimate goal, the means by which certain groups pursue these objectives, including armed conflict and the violation of Ukraine's territorial integrity, raise ethical and legal concerns. Additionally, the determination to fight for these goals does not necessarily justify the means employed, especially when they result in human suffering and loss of life.
2
-
@JudgeBread. While it is true that the specifics of NATO's role and level of direct involvement in the conflict remain subjects of debate, it is essential to differentiate between the actions of NATO and the agreements reached in the Minsk accords.
Firstly, while NATO's actions and policies may have influenced the situation in Eastern Europe, including its support for Ukraine, they are distinct from the agreements reached between Ukraine, separatist groups, and other parties in the Minsk process. The Minsk agreements primarily focus on finding a peaceful resolution to the conflict in eastern Ukraine, addressing issues such as ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons, and political dialogue.
Secondly, regarding the characterization of the actors in the conflict, it is important to recognize the complexity of the situation. While some may prefer the term "rebels" over "separatists," it is crucial to understand the motivations and objectives of the groups involved. While certain factions may seek greater autonomy or economic freedom within Ukraine, their actions, including the establishment of self-proclaimed entities like the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, can be interpreted as separatist in nature.
Furthermore, while advocating for political and economic freedom within Ukraine is a legitimate goal, the means by which certain groups pursue these objectives, including armed conflict and the violation of Ukraine's territorial integrity, raise ethical and legal concerns. Additionally, the determination to fight for these goals does not necessarily justify the means employed, especially when they result in human suffering and loss of life.
2
-
@JudgeBread. While it is true that the specifics of NATO's role and level of direct involvement in the conflict remain subjects of debate, it is essential to differentiate between the actions of NATO and the agreements reached in the Minsk accords.
Firstly, while NATO's actions and policies may have influenced the situation in Eastern Europe, including its support for Ukraine, they are distinct from the agreements reached between Ukraine, separatist groups, and other parties in the Minsk process. The Minsk agreements primarily focus on finding a peaceful resolution to the conflict in eastern Ukraine, addressing issues such as ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons, and political dialogue.
Secondly, regarding the characterization of the actors in the conflict, it is important to recognize the complexity of the situation. While some may prefer the term "rebels" over "separatists," it is crucial to understand the motivations and objectives of the groups involved. While certain factions may seek greater autonomy or economic freedom within Ukraine, their actions, including the establishment of self-proclaimed entities like the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, can be interpreted as separatist in nature.
Furthermore, while advocating for political and economic freedom within Ukraine is a legitimate goal, the means by which certain groups pursue these objectives, including armed conflict and the violation of Ukraine's territorial integrity, raise ethical and legal concerns. Additionally, the determination to fight for these goals does not necessarily justify the means employed, especially when they result in human suffering and loss of life.
2
-
2
-
@JudgeBread. While it remains a topic of debate regarding the specifics of NATO's role and the extent of its direct involvement in the conflict, it is crucial to distinguish between NATO's actions and the agreements outlined in the Minsk accords.
Firstly, NATO's actions and policies, which may have influenced the situation in Eastern Europe, including its support for Ukraine, are separate from the agreements established between Ukraine, separatist groups, and other involved parties in the Minsk process. The primary focus of the Minsk agreements is to facilitate a peaceful resolution to the conflict in eastern Ukraine, addressing key issues such as ceasefire implementation, withdrawal of heavy weapons, and fostering political dialogue.
Secondly, when considering the characterization of the actors involved in the conflict, it is important to acknowledge the complexity of the situation. While some may argue for the term "rebels" over "separatists," understanding the motivations and goals of the various groups is crucial. While certain factions may aspire to achieve greater autonomy or economic independence within Ukraine, their actions, such as the establishment of self-proclaimed entities like the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, can be interpreted as separatist in nature.
Moreover, while advocating for political and economic freedoms within Ukraine is a valid objective, the methods utilized by certain groups to pursue these goals, such as engaging in armed conflict and infringing upon Ukraine's territorial integrity, raise ethical and legal concerns. Additionally, the determination to achieve these objectives does not justify the means employed, particularly when they result in human suffering and loss of life.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2