Comments by "oneoflokis" (@oneoflokis) on "Richard J Murphy" channel.

  1.  @GeoffV-k1h  💯
    1
  2. Possibly!
    1
  3. @stevehiggins1263  I see. I have not heard of such occurrences, so am unable to judge the validity.
    1
  4. F*** neoliberals!
    1
  5. @adenwellsmith6908  Did they though?
    1
  6. Good for you! Glad you won! 👍
    1
  7. ​ @Tensquaremetreworkshop They should: they were building societies!
    1
  8.  @Tensquaremetreworkshop  Yeah.😏
    1
  9. Hmm: Why only 299 likes on this video, when it has 7k views!! (And we can no longer see how many muppets disliked it.) Come on, someone: give Prófessor Murphy another like, to round it up to 300! 🙂👍
    1
  10.  @commonwunder  Sod the USA! About the only good thing they have is a written Constitution!
    1
  11. No!
    1
  12.  @margaretfarrell5137  No indeed!
    1
  13. @briankerrison8504  You're saying that people SHOULDN'T have access, to prescribed medicines? We need totally free prescriptions for all, like in Scotland and Wales.
    1
  14.  @briankerrison8504  I did!
    1
  15.  @briankerrison8504  🥱
    1
  16.  @swojnowski8214  💯
    1
  17.  @PGHEngineer  You mean, as private companies.. 😏
    1
  18.  @PGHEngineer  What do you mean by "the actual rate"?
    1
  19. Seems to be!
    1
  20. @swaggery  Google AI: "According to data from the Pew Research Center, China's middle class consists of roughly 707 million people, representing around 50.8% of the population, marking a significant growth from only 3.1% in 2000, making it one of the fastest growing middle classes globally." Pew Research Center. Think that's some kind of Chinese propaganda institution, do you? 😏 (And does the US still have a middle class consisting of over 50% of the population?)
    1
  21.  @swaggery  Hmm. What has YouTube done with my quote from Google AI? They own Google: at least it's all the same company..
    1
  22. @maplin007  You need to live in China? Try Google. Particularly anything on it by the Pew Research Center.
    1
  23.  @jeremykille4689  So who will you vote for?
    1
  24.  @garyb455  Such as?
    1
  25. True!
    1
  26. Me too! 💚
    1
  27.  @abody499  Probably!
    1
  28. ​ @rjw4762 Interesting!
    1
  29. @robmaslen6446  It would have!
    1
  30.  @bernardfox9078  🙄 And already got plenty of votes of no confidence!
    1
  31. Yes indeed! 👍 And maybe one of those softwares they advertise on YouTube (you will certain see them if you watch business/make money from home/start your own channel websites) which are s bit like "automated whiteboards": they kinda auto-draw cartoons and comics-style lettering: making your desired text magically appear on screen in this writing font, as if it is magically being written by Superman or the hand of s genie or something! 😁 It is excellent for explainer videos. You could combine that with shots of your face, your "talking head", or even."talking body", if you elect to move around the screen waving your arms, like some documentary pundits do! Or just do a few of the cartoon-style explainer videos! 🙂👍
    1
  32. ​ @adenwellsmith6908 How so?😊
    1
  33. ​ @Borderman47 😂
    1
  34. ​@garyb455 No they wouldn't! Governments are only pro the rich.
    1
  35. ​ @adenwellsmith6908 Well if the vouchers were redeemable, at, say, Tesco, Amazon etc, they would indeed be redeemable. But this would still be a form of "company scrip", and so the workers wouldn't like it. Your analogy is therefore bollocks!
    1
  36. ​ @keithparker1346 Which they should be!
    1
  37. ​ @marknaisby7384 Keynsian economics presided over the biggest rise in wealth and living standards for the masses of people, on both sides of the Atlantic, ever. Ergo: Keynesianism = ❤ Monetarism = 💩
    1
  38. ​ @Ludus57 💯
    1
  39. ​ @adenwellsmith6908 Bah. The workers benefit from "the socialist workers' state ". Indeed, half of them now depend on it because of low wages and not getting enough hours.
    1
  40. ​ @adenwellsmith6908 If the government said they had to (and redeemed them for real money, mo doubt.)
    1
  41.  @keithdonnelly8636  Why do you think I am talking about Labour?
    1
  42. ​ @inguzwulf 💯
    1
  43. ​ @inguzwulf 💯
    1
  44. ​ @charleswillcock3235 💯
    1
  45. 😂👍
    1
  46.  @garycroft8213  Why not have both? (You could recruit more people for HMRC.)
    1
  47. @garycroft8213  As I said: why not have both??
    1
  48.  @andyinsuffolk  But most people on the left on YouTube think that billionaires are bad for society.
    1
  49.  @PEdulis  Good points! 👍 (But Chat GPT is actually quite good. And it's pleasant to talk to, unlike some grumpy people... 🙂)
    1
  50. Why don't you Google it, 🤡?
    1