Comments by "Peter" (@peter65zzfdfh) on "Ryan McBeth"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bicker31 Most other countries can hold an entire election in less time than the US's shutdowns can be. Also supply bills are just funding things that don't have spending locked in, that is, the majority of things are funded by other legislation. If you can't pass something to rescind that spending, or the legislation didn't have an end date for the program, the spending keeps happening. You don't need the 'monarchy head-of-state', most countries which technically have one don't actually have any input from the monarchy, and the role of their local representative is basically ceremonial, and for the most part it's the mere threat of dismissal that does the heavy lifting. The other countries also put the paying for things in the bill that passes, so unless there's an end date to the program, or it's not had supporting legislation passed, funding continues. That means for most things (police, army, public service), funding will go on indefinitely, it's only new programs that don't yet have legislation or legislation that has a fixed expiry that needs supply passed. Other countries also only need 50.01% (in both houses) to pass legislation though, so cancelling programs is easier, but 4 people can't hold a country to ransom without risking their jobs for it.
1
-
@Dogmeat1950 Other countries the budget is set by the bill that passes the program, so if the program is set to last 2 years, without a replacement bill the budget ends then. But lots of things are ongoing, eg, funding police, parks, the armed services etc. Also, most other countries can hold an entire election in less time than the US's shutdowns can be. It's dysfunctional to agree to the spending but then to withhold approval to pay for it, that means everyone will add a $$$ to the amount they're planning to contract to deal with the contingency they don't get paid, on time or ever. If people want to cut spending they should pass a bill to cut the spending, not just continually ransom the entire government because of one issue only a handful of people care about.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1