Comments by "yapdog" (@yapdog) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1. Studies or not, all I can say for sure is that I'm a LOT happier since dumping social media, especially since this last U.S. presidential election. I wake up with more energy, and I get more stuff done.
    2
  2.  @stevenhenry5267  Truth!
    1
  3. Talk about causal relationship, look at the time on @johnwollenbecker1500s comment (1 day ago). Then look at the time of the video (1 hour ago). ...... W. T. F????
    1
  4. I'm no longer just chopped liver... now I'm also leftover cold turkey... apparently.... 😞
    1
  5. 0:15 Actually, (pushes glasses up nose) those emojis depict shitbulls
    1
  6.  @matatron.  IDK, if it harm the climate, stop doing it? We'll survive without all the bs that we've been made to believe is important by the people who siphon off our wealth to assert they are our gods
    1
  7. This was all very predictable. I did. I even wrote a novel years ago that touched on this and the potential solution that could pose real dangers to us all. But, as I've said previously in the comments, no one listen to Xathras....... 😞 If you're interested in my take on this as someone whose been doing research on AI since ~2006 (and who's been developing a model for sentience for years,) "Loophole of the Gods" <--use the quotes. It's a long novel but it gets to these particular points in Part II: The War. I can't post any further info or YouTube will delete it.
    1
  8.  @pandakicker1  Nnnnnope! I will release not a single bit of information as to how to actually achieve sentience. What I cover in the novel is how companies will likely try to mimic creativity and "ah-ha!" moments. They won't actually succeed in the real world because they have the wholly faulty notion that a huge collection of data can become sentient. (spoiler alert: it cannot)
    1
  9. So, I'm supposed to be afraid of your German accent??? If you ask me, that British dude just needs to do is check out your videos and he'll..... "grow."😳😅
    1
  10. 0:21 wait... your "inner" nerd? 🤨 I'd say your innie is pretty much an outie. That's why we're all he-- ooh .... Never mind😅
    1
  11. Buh-BLAAAM!!!
    1
  12. Being a contrarian can be a lonely, lonely space, Sabine. I go through the same thing with software development. Hell, in fact, I just went through this with some of your subs!
    1
  13. 0:50 😳Damn... Sabine puttin' the dude on blast🤣 Remind me to never publish my theory on AI quantum wormholes........
    1
  14. I'm just here for the new shirt
    1
  15.  @arctic_haze  Conspiracy theory?🤨It was simply a meta comment. The reality is that the misaligned dates are bad code, even if it's intentional.
    1
  16.  @arctic_haze  It most certainly is bad code. There are any number of ways to present this info so as not to be confusing. It's a very simple thing to fix. However, it's a choice to present things this way; no one notices, so it's not a big deal. I'd never have mentioned it (since I've been coding systems in C for 3 decades and am aware of the complexities), except for the meta nature of the comment. So, let's you and me agree to move on. No big. No bad.
    1
  17.  @Llortnerof  Bad design defines bad code. I'll just leave it at that.
    1
  18.  @BishopStars  And that, young padowan, is why you fail
    1
  19.  @nagualdesign  True, this is. But earned, it is, as well.
    1
  20.  @rosskrt  Thanx for the confirmation
    1
  21. "That's anti-MATTER, not anti-META...." 🤣!
    1
  22. We're just training liebots
    1
  23. Is "motivated reasoning" the new "confirmation bias?"
    1
  24. Hooray! There's finally an actual use case for (re)generative AI that doesn't involve eliminating jobs.😐
    1
  25. That slam against Biden while completely ignoring Trump makes one wonder how he defines intelligence
    1
  26. Let's be clear: you're referring to white Americans.
    1
  27. Could dark energy be the determinant, whereas the further out your get from a large mass, empty space exerts a "pressure" pushing the matter toward the center? So, the larger the galaxy, the less dense the perimeter, the more "pressure", thus accelerating the extents. Further, this could explain the behavior of clusters which, presumably, would reduce the pressure toward the center of the cluster mass.
    1
  28. Sabine checked her pocked, found no f#cks.
    1
  29. Toldja! (those who debated me about (re)generative AI)
    1
  30. So... quantum entanglement is not really a thing?
    1
  31. Did you say "naked"?! Where?? Where?!? 😳
    1
  32. Mom had often said I must have a hole in my head. Who knew she was a physicist?
    1
  33. I don't get the gravity of this "science"
    1
  34. I've been saying that LLMs are not AI for quite a long time, especially on this channel. And every time I do, I get attacked. So, 😜 I've been studying this for year, even developing my own model, so I know what the f#ck I'm talking about.
    1
  35.  @mikicerise6250  Define "novel problems," "complex systems," and the rules for the measure of "speed." To the point, we define what's intelligent based on what interested groups value.
    1
  36.  @mikicerise6250  Novel problems are indeed defined as problems that have not been previously encountered. However, it still requires that someone define/identify the problem (i.e. the bias of the observer defines what is novel). On complex systems, you're basically being meta. Speed, see above. I'm not being snarky. You're just missing the point entirely since you're the actual subject.
    1
  37. 5:27 "Damn! It is hard!" That's what she said😅 . . . . . . wut?🤨 She really did say that!
    1
  38. One could argue that the most intelligent of us (e.g. scientists, teachers, researches, etc.) are always controlled by the least intelligent of us... i.e., politicians. So, I think we'll be alright...... 😅
    1
  39. Holcomb may be hokum, but it'd be fantastic if it works
    1
  40. If we want to save the world, we should leave it.
    1
  41.  @operationlegend9746  Yeah, that's not what you think it is. We're now moving into an era when the hopeful mistake the results of complex filtering with true intelligence and consciousness. It's like a form of religion. It is what it is, I guess.
    1
  42. The universe thinks. It just thinks cosmically big and extensive, far larger than we can comprehend. It's like an atom wondering if we think because we're too big
    1
  43.  @refsOnReality  I'm avoiding the web and web tech altogether with new new portal and OS for Creators. Web crawl that, mofos!
    1