Comments by "sandgrownun66" (@sandgrownun66) on "BBC Archive" channel.

  1.  @davidcarrol110  That's more like it.
    2
  2. And so civilised too.
    2
  3.  @ltipst2962  Triumph have a factory in Thailand too. There are a few videos on YT featuring it.
    2
  4.  @Wildrover82  Don't worry, you're being culturally enriched thanks to your politicians. That's going to liven things up a bit.
    2
  5. The same way as a German would call an American an Amerikaner.
    2
  6. That's the way he was normally. No sherry needed.
    2
  7.  @Fatfrogsrock  Don't worry. It's the only word Bernie knows.
    2
  8.  @jackiechan8840  Interesting. I noticed that as well. I'm not sure the reason for the two voices. It does sound a lot like Tim Sebastian at the start. His biography states that Sebastian began his journalism career at Reuters in 1974, moving to the BBC as foreign correspondent in Warsaw in 1979.
    2
  9.  @jamesoneill2933  So the Japanese should have been left unchallenged in Burma then? I'm sure the Burmese people would have loved that.
    2
  10. Who did they replace it with. Saint Bono from U2?
    2
  11. I don't think either names could sell a bean can. They were in it for themselves, rather than the UK sell more arms.
    2
  12. Got any other slurs? They're getting boring.
    2
  13.  freebeerfordworkers  Didn't they have one already?
    1
  14.  @martingrefen7792  You're
    1
  15.  @jamieoshea1681  What are you talking about?
    1
  16.  @jamieoshea1681  No. I write them, and you read them. That's the way it works.
    1
  17.  @Norvik_-ug3ge  What did I say that was against any statue. Just find a new home. Anything else is cultural vandalism.
    1
  18. "I've seen Japanese looking Triumph and Norton bikes. "Where do you get that statement from? The Japanese took a lot of British technology, and improved it. Anyone would be a fool not to incorporate any advances in their products. Today, there is a lot more homogeneity in products such as cars and motorbikes. It's a good way to cut costs, but it does lead to things all looking the same.
    1
  19. @Null How is making a direct observation r@ysist?
    1
  20.  @daniellamcgee4251  Well, there you are. Join the club. You'd better be careful what you write. Although, that's something you'd probably appreciate.
    1
  21.  @svmwasthesheet1971  Who are you referring to?
    1
  22.  @FatNorthernBigot  Are some quotes from some film with a Canadian in it, all you know about late 60's Britain?
    1
  23.  @croonyerzoonyer  Nope. Just an cr@p humour detector.
    1
  24. It's the right to light. How much is another question.
    1
  25.  @tiswhatitis137  Apparently, his solicitor at the time, had no knowledge of the law relating to this dispute. So that disproves your theory about everyone being smarter then. The internet gives us the power to answer many questions from the comfort of our chair, that was inconceivable just a few short decades ago.
    1
  26.  @jamieoshea1681  And you're educated, I suppose?
    1
  27. 🏚Knowing that John Noakes did some high level feats. I wonder if they asked Peter, when he took over, if he was OK with heights too?🕰
    1
  28.  @harryshuman9637  The official name is "New P@k!stan".
    1
  29.  @Tismeok  The politicians obviously.
    1
  30.  @Nick-io9uk  It's so obvious, it's distracting. Almost on a par with Robert Robinson, and Arthur Scargill, or Rab C Nesbitt in the photo both. You weren't fooling anybody guys about being bald. Also, imagine all the effort of keeping those strands in place on a windy day. At least people like Joe Rogan and Dana White admit it, and go for the shaven look.
    1
  31. The sea view is blocked by a Chinese takeaway anyway.
    1
  32. Wasn't the ability to "finger" it, with no issues. One of the selling points?
    1
  33.  @steb430  What?
    1
  34. "smoking in bed"?
    1
  35.  @nuntius1933  Noticed what? Everything was perfectly normal. Also, there was no Nora Batty.
    1
  36. @ Or even a Sean Connery,Tone.
    1
  37.  @spo-h4u  Only in your opinion.
    1
  38. @ Only in your opinion.
    1
  39. Was that an attempt at humour?
    1
  40.  @Ian-gw2vx  Yep what?
    1
  41.  @jadams1791  Or is that bored of looking at boards? Or It's plain to see those planes flying above the boards without getting bored. Context is everything.
    1
  42.  @civlyzed  Yes, we all saw that. However, did it make any difference to the boards being there?
    1
  43. If you can fly a spitfire driving a tanks should be a doddle.
    1
  44.  @fidelcatsro6948  He more than played with them. He made a successful business making and selling them. Do you comment on History Debunked by any chance?
    1
  45. @ Nobody cares.
    1
  46.  @jumblestiltskin1365  "the support for the IRA in Ireland is not as clear cut or anything near it as you'd imply here." I was just stating facts, as I always do. There was somebody doing a lot of research to reach the conclusions they did. I'll go with them. Their knowledge is infinitely greater than mine.
    1
  47.  @anonUK  No they didn't. They just wanted to destroy it. Although, it them took two attempts to do so.
    1
  48.  @jackkraken3888  The watch looked like something Blue Peter used to show it's viewers how to make from cereal packets and sticky back plastic.
    1
  49. Of course, they didn't ask the obvious question. That's how they got them in the house? Maybe, they built the house around them. LOL.
    1
  50.  @davidcarrol110  And how many are surviving? Also, do you know the amount of work that would take? Especially, if it was only uploaded to this site.
    1