Comments by "TheFlat EarthTruth" (@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth) on "Curious Droid" channel.

  1. Hi m, hope that you are well. You are conflating heat and temperature, they are not the same thing. The Van Allen Belts may have particles that have a very high velocity, therefore a very high temperature but as there are relatively few of them the overall heat that they contain is small and they can not transfer heat energy to a spacecraft in any significant amounts. Take care.
    8
  2. Hi M, hope that you are well. Just to let you know, Physics still works in a vacuum. Take care.
    5
  3. So simple question. Between the end of the Apollo Program when US Congress cut the Apollo funding and the current Artemis Program who exactly was building a heavy lift rocket comparable to the Saturn V that would go beyond LEO? Take care.
    5
  4. The particles of a gas are constantly moving and the temperature of a gas is a measure of the average kinetic energy of its particles. The particles that make up the Van Allen Belts have a very high velocity so by definition have a very high temperature. However the particles in the VAB's are very spread out so density of particles in the VAB's is very, very low (millions of times lower than air at sea level) so the overall heat energy that they contain is very small. So for a spacecraft travelling through this region of space there will be relative few particles colliding with it and these few particles will be too few to transfer any great amount of energy to the craft. In short the VAB's are a region of space with a very high temperature but a very low amount of heat energy. Take care.
    5
  5. Do you mean the Apollo astronaut who was asked several decades later by a known liar, fraud and conspiracy theorists about his time in Skylab who then edited it to make it appear that he had been asked about Apollo? Seriously, do better.
    4
  6. Do you want to try again? This time with the truth.
    4
  7. Hi michael, hope that you are well. I have good news for you. Physics works perfectly well in a vacuum. Take care.
    4
  8. Hi jim, hope that you are well. You really do not seem to have understood (or possibly not watched) this video at all. Just because you can see the surface of a planet does not mean that you should be able to resolve small objects on the surface. You can see a field from an airplane but you can not resolve the individual blades of grass. Think about this. Take care.
    4
  9. Nope....incorrect. Take care.
    4
  10. I have found that it is pretty much guaranteed that anyone who mentions the Van Allen Belts as an insurmountable obstacle to space travel really knows next to nothing about radiation or these belts. The Van Allen Belts are called after James Van Allen, who worked for NASA and is credited with their discovery. While travel through this region of space requires careful planning, it is not the insurmountable obstacle that many reality deniers, in their ignorance, imagine it to be. The Van Allen Belts is a region of charged particles originating mainly from the solar wind that are contained by the Earth's magnetic field. The capsule walls and equipment shielded the astronauts from the vast majority of the particle radiation. The radiation dosage received by an astronaut while passing through the Van Allen Belts will depend on factors such as speed, shielding, trajectory, time spend in the region etc. The aim of the Apollo missions was to minimise the time spent in this region of space and thus reduce the exposure to a minimum. Here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights". Take care.
    4
  11. Did you not watch the video before commenting??
    4
  12. NASA have never said any such thing. Do you want to try again and this time speak the truth? Take care.
    4
  13.  @mikereed8181  " i want to know why their was a film crew already on the moon filming the decent".........The only footage of any of the actual landings on the lunar surface was taken with a 16mm camera point out the LM window. On the Apollo 11 mission this camera was operated by Buzz Aldrin. Can you please explain why you wrote such a ridiculous statement? Take care.
    4
  14.  @drmantistoboggan2870  Looks like that he can't handle the English language either.
    4
  15.  @anselmo4952  Produce the evidence...
    3
  16.  @anselmo4952  "facked".....?!? The floor is yours, produce the evidence. Take care.
    3
  17. You must have lots of evidence to back up your claim. Please share it with us and please do not run away. Take care.
    3
  18. I am sure that you have lots of credible and reliable evidence to back up your claim and that you will share it with us and not just "post & ghost". Take care.
    3
  19. Heat and Temperature are not the same thing. The VAB's are a region of space where there are very few particles. These few particles are moving at high speed so by definition they have a high temperature but because there are so few particles per unit volume, the VAB's contain very little heat energy. Take care.
    3
  20. The Apollo Program is over and the Apollo technology is no longer being funded or built. How exactly does that cause an issue for you? Also can you explain using basic engineering and scientific principles what exactly is the problem with any of the Apollo spacecraft? Take care.
    3
  21.  @fiat2496  So you make claims but can not back them up with evidence or you can not even begin to discuss in specifics anything about any of the Apollo spacecraft. Can you explain using basic engineering and scientific principles what exactly is the problem with any of the Apollo spacecraft? Take care.
    3
  22.  @fiat2496  You made that claim that the spacecraft was "ridiculous looking" and "absurd". Now you can not back these claims up with reasoned points or any actual evidence. Take care.
    3
  23.  @fiat2496  It is a claim that you made and now are unable to back up with evidence so instead you deflect. Take care.
    3
  24. NASA's current challenge in relation to the Van Allen Belts and the Atriums Program is that modern electronics are far more susceptible to radiation damage than the electronics used in the Apollo era. NASA have to test thoroughly the guidance and navigation systems in the Orion spacecraft before attempting a crewed mission. Take care.
    3
  25. Temperature and Heat Energy are not the same thing. Do some study on the meaning of these terms and also on the number of particles per unit volume in the Van Allen Belts and you will have learnt something. Take care.
    3
  26.  @TSGWPG  Thank you for your reply. " I am not going to teach you a science class"...That is very fortunate as you clearly do not have the slightest knowledge or understanding of radiation in general or the radiation contained in the Van Allen Belts in particular. Hint: "simple Xrays" are not involved. Take care.
    3
  27.  @TSGWPG  You wrote; "People have never been able to get through them," The Van Allen Belt's are only a problem if you stay within the denser regions for an extended period of time. Here are the words of Dr. James Van Allen himself, the man after whom the belts are named and the man who advised NASA during the Apollo Program: "The outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." Dr. James A. Van Allen.
    3
  28. Any your evidence is?
    3
  29. "it was impossible for the crew of the ascensing craft to remotely control the ......camera left on the moon"...No one has ever claimed that they did so why are you saying this? Take care.
    3
  30. Nope. I think that what you actually mean is that one particular astronaut was asked about the Van Allen Belts several decades after the Apollo Missions by a known liar, fraud and reality denier who then highly edited the footage. Take care.
    3
  31. Here are the words of Dr. James Van Allen himself: "The outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." Dr. James A. Van Allen.
    3
  32. First you need to understand that Temperature and Heat Energy are not the same thing. The VAB's do contain some particles with a very high velocity and therefore by definition a very high temperature. However there are very few of these particles per unit volume so the overall amount of heat energy that is contained is very little and there are fare too few particles to transfer any meaningful amount of heat energy to any passing spacecraft. Take care.
    2
  33.  @ann_onn  Just for the record, the temperatures mentioned are broadly correct however you can be sure that no conspiracy video would have mentioned that there are very, very few particles in the Van Allen Belts with these temperatures and also that Heat and Temperature are not the same thing. Take care.
    2
  34. ​ @Jesse-u2h  The difference between Heat (which is a form of Energy) and Temperature (which is a measure of hotness and is proportional to the energies of the particles) is a very basic concept in Physics and is taught and understood by school children in most countries. The VAB's do contain some particles with a very high velocity and therefore by definition a very high temperature. However there are very few of these particles per unit volume so the overall amount of heat energy that is contained is very little and there are far too few particles to transfer any meaningful amount of heat energy to any passing spacecraft. Take care.
    2
  35. Did you actually watch the video before commenting?
    2
  36. How much thrust does a modern computer generate?
    2
  37. "Evidence of faked moon landings is overwhelming"......Yet you are not able to produce any. "Van Allen Belt conundrum".......There isn't any conundrum. They passed through this region of space at high velocity and in a short time. Take care.
    2
  38. Yes, that is totally correct. The effect of radiation on the human body depends on a number of factors and one of the main ones is duration of exposure. Take care.
    2
  39.  @jaymonkey699  I am sure that you have lots of credible and reliable evidence to back up your claim and that you will share it with us. Take care.
    2
  40.  @jaymonkey699  "good old facts would tell you we haven't walked on the moon".......Such as???
    2
  41. I have found that it is pretty much guaranteed that anyone who mentions the Van Allen Belts as an insurmountable obstacle to space travel really knows next to nothing about radiation or these belts. The Van Allen Belts are called after James Van Allen, who worked for NASA and is credited with their discovery. While travel through this region of space requires careful planning, it is not the insurmountable obstacle that many reality deniers, in their ignorance, imagine it to be. The Van Allen Belts is a region of charged particles originating mainly from the solar wind that are contained by the Earth's magnetic field. The capsule walls and equipment shielded the astronauts from the vast majority of the particle radiation. The radiation dosage received by an astronaut while passing through the Van Allen Belts will depend on factors such as speed, shielding, trajectory, time spend in the region etc. The aim of the Apollo missions was to minimise the time spent in this region of space and thus reduce the exposure to a minimum. Here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights". Take care.
    2
  42. So what exactly does dust do in a vacuum, does it swirl, form clouds and cover things or does it move away following parabolic trajectories because there is nothing to stop it? Take care.
    2
  43. The Space Shuttles were not capable of going to the moon The Apollo Program when to the moon 9 times and the belts are called the Van Allen. Your basic knowledge is on a par with your ability to locate the Caps Lock button on your keyboard. Take care.
    2
  44. You mentioned that you have difficulties with the size of the Earth in lunar photographs. You need to take factors such as the field of view of the camera, the focal length of the camera lens, size of camera senser, etc, into account. In an attempt to understand this situation I direct you to the YT video "Is Earth the wrong size?" on the YouTube channel of professional photographer Dave McKeegan. Take care.
    2
  45.  @fiat2496  Dictionary: Opinion: a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.............. You know, you may be right. You have given no facts and you certainly have not shown any knowledge. Take care.
    2
  46.  @eventcone  "No spacecraft was ever subjected to those temperatures"....Just for the record, yes they were but there are so few particles in the Van Allen Belts at these temperatures that there was no meaningful transfer of Heat Energy to any passing spacecraft. I calculate that the total mass of the Van Allen Belts is a few grams at most. They are regions of high temperature but very little overall energy. Take care.
    2
  47. @ "A negligible amount of mass = a negligible amount of heat"...absolutely correct and only a very small fraction of this mass would be interacting with a passing spacecraft at any one time anyway.
    2
  48. You mentioned the Van Allen Radiation Belts. The Van Allen Belts are called after James Van Allen, who is credited with their discovery and also advised NASA on the Apollo Program and was known about and studied well before the first moon landing. While travel through this region of space requires careful planning, it is not the insurmountable obstacle that many reality deniers, in their ignorance, imagine it to be. The Van Allen Belts is a region of charged particles originating mainly from the solar wind that are contained by the Earth's magnetic field. The capsule walls and equipment shielded the astronauts from the vast majority of the particle radiation. The radiation dosage received by an astronaut while passing through the Van Allen Belts will depend on factors such as speed, shielding, trajectory, time spend in the region etc. The aim of the Apollo missions was to minimise the time spent in this region of space and thus reduce the exposure to a minimum. Here is quote from James Van Allen himself in 2004. "the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage – a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights". Take care.
    2
  49. What specifically is not factual?
    2
  50. The Van Allen Belts contain very little heat energy (per unit volume). Take care.
    2