Comments by "TheFlat EarthTruth" (@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. Only idiots make claims and can not back them up with evidence. So do you have any actual evidence to back up your claim or not? Take care.
    1
  2. "If they went to moon, why didn't they go second time".....Has to be a low grade troll, nobody could really be that clueless.
    1
  3. You never gave any evidence to back up your claim.
    1
  4. And your evidence is?
    1
  5. You didn't provide any evidence for your claim and those who make claims such as yours never do. Take care.
    1
  6. Stanley Kubrick never said any such thing but the actor Tom Mayk sure said that in the 2015 mockumentary film Shooting Stanley Kubrick. Have we another who hasn't done their research?
    1
  7. Various Apollo landing sites have been imaged, photographed and identified by several lunar probes and satellites in lunar orbit. For example the Japanese SELENE lunar probe obtained several photographs showing evidence of Moon landings and matched the terrain to Apollo footage and the ISRO (India) Chandrayaan-2 orbiter captured an image of the Apollo 11 Lunar Module Eagle descent stage. The orbiter's image of the Apollo landing site was released to the public in a presentation on September 3, 2021. China's second lunar probe, Chang'e 2, also spotted traces of Apollo landing sites. In addition NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has also captured sharp clear images of the Apollo 12, 14 and 17 landing sites. Take care.
    1
  8.  @BN-cp6fw  The measured lunar surface temperature range during the Apollo 11 time on surface was -23C to 7C. All the Apollo landings took place early in the lunar day when the temperatures were mid range. Take care.
    1
  9. And what evidence is that? Take care.
    1
  10. Stanley Kubrick had zero involvement in the Apollo Program and never claimed to have any. Buzz Aldrin is still alive. Take care.
    1
  11. So produce the credible and reliable evidence to back up your claim.
    1
  12. Research the term "chemical oxidiser" and you will have learnt something. Take care.
    1
  13. There is lower gravity on the moon, not zero gravity. Take care.
    1
  14. Please get your facts correct and speak the truth. Buzz Aldrin never said any such thing. Take care.
    1
  15.  @joseandrescazares6024  I was saying that what you said is non-factual and quite absurd. Do try to put a little basic research into your comments before falling for conspiracy nonsense. Take care.
    1
  16.  @chicas7569  No Apollo astronaut, Dr. Aldrin included, has ever even hinted at the Apollo Program being fake in any way. Please stay with the facts. Take care.
    1
  17.  @chicas7569  Again, your comment makes zero sense. What question, what interview, what answer, who gave this answer. Full details please. Take care.
    1
  18.  @bupahs  Run Rabbit Run..........
    1
  19. In 1969...really???
    1
  20. "we have been to the moon once but only once"....Are you just trolling or do you really not know that there were 9 manned missions to the moon with 6 successful manned landings? Take care.
    1
  21. Correct. Satellites in lunar orbit from 5 different countries have identified the various Apollo landing sites. Take care.
    1
  22. The flags oscillated when the Astronauts were moving them during assembly and supplying them with energy. A flag will oscillate very easily in a vacuum as there is no atmospheric resistance to remove energy from it. The flags only oscillated when the astronauts moved them or interacted with them in some way, otherwise they remained motionless. Take care.
    1
  23. "signal need 11 minutes to get to the moon".........???????????????????????????????????????????????????
    1
  24.  @kovacevicboban  The basic Speed = Distance/ Time calculation has been worked out for you by a previous commentator. The speed of the Unified S-Band signal used by the Apollo MSFN is 2.9979 x 10>8 m/s (the speed of light). The distance to the moon is 3.84 x 10>8 m/s giving a one way communications delay of about 1.25 seconds or a total of 2.5 seconds there and back. Take care.
    1
  25.  @sewerbat4634  Thank you for your reply. Take care.
    1
  26. So produce the evidence to back up your claim, what is stopping you??????
    1
  27. It was not a guess. The LRV was placed in a specific pre-agreed position, the rate of assent of the Ascent Stage of the LM was known in advance and the maths were not that hard to work out. The communications time delay and the reaction time of the electric motors were also known. All Ed had to do was move a rheostat at a predetermined rate beginning at a specific time in a predetermined countdown. Take care,
    1
  28. You didn't provide and evidence for your claim and those who make claims such as yours never do. Take care.
    1
  29. Didn't "drop", he pushed it that way with his hand. Check out the full original video and you will observe that the globe moves in all different directions as the astronauts push it around an at times it floats in thin air. Somehow I doubt if your conspiracy guru of choice allowed you to see that! Take care.
    1
  30. You didn't provide and evidence for your claim and those who make claims such as yours never do. Take care.
    1
  31. Dr. James Van Allen said otherwise.
    1
  32.  @yassassin6425  A very clear, concise and accurate debunk. Well done.
    1
  33. No Apollo astronaut has ever "admitted he never went" to the moon. Have you been fed short cherry-picked comments by a peddler of conspiracy who hid the context from you? Take care.
    1
  34. "we're spinning 1000 mph"................NOTHING spins in mph as mph are units of linear velocity. Linear tangential velocity and angular velocity are not the same thing. The correct angular velocity of the Earth is 0.000073 radians/sec. Take care.
    1
  35. Can you list the ways in which the technology needed for a manned lunar mission has advanced since the end of Apollo? Take care.
    1
  36. The particle radiation in the VAB's does not significantly interfere with Unified S-Band frequencies. Take care.
    1
  37. Please list what "technology did Not exist".
    1
  38. Satellites in lunar orbit from 5 different countries have identified and verified the various Apollo landing sites. Take care.
    1
  39.  @Alex-hr2df  Thank you for your reply in which you show a poor understanding of basic Physics, the Apollo Program and ever seem unaware of your own previous comments. Again, all you have done is repeated some of your unevidenced claims, ignored others and added a few more without, as is your custom, providing any evidence to back them up. Your comments continue to underline your very poor knowledge and lack of research on the topic. (1) “I never said multiple lights. Spotlight is a single light”….Incorrect. What you wrote was “Shadows in images proving spot lights". (2) “free fall from 2m would smash the hell out of the equipments and landing pads”….Incorrect. The Lunar Module was designed to drop the last 5ft. This was done to prevent the LM descent module engine from reflecting thrust back up into the engine bell and possibly causing catastrophic damage. (3) “being carried up until 2m above the surface MUST create a crater”…..The LM had landing pods, what do you think that they were for? (4) “Did you see NASA the takeoff video also? Why doesn't it show any dust blown-away or any crater being formed? Please don't tell me the thruster started 2m above the surface”…….Here you display your total ignorance of the Apollo Program. The Ascent Stage of the Lunar Module was a separate spacecraft with its own rocket engine and propellent supply. It used the Descent Stage as its launch pad. The thrust produced by the Ascent Stage rocket engine never impacted on the surface so a crater and dust disturbed was impossible. (5) “You believe dust should be scattered. This is wrong. Moon has a gravity, and with little-to-no air the dust should settle quickly on the pads without to move at all”….Again totally incorrect. With the absence of atmospheric resistance the dust particles will continue to move away and outwards from the LM following the basic rules of Physics. The engine engine thrust pushed most of the dust away before landing and the descent engine was turned off before the LM touched the surface. (6) “but it's clearly hand-spread”. Again a made up claim with absolutely aero evidence. You seem to have totally ignored your other unevidenced claims such as “Ridiculous fuel capacity compared to distance”. Strange that none of the many thousands of highly qualified scientists and engineers involved in the Apollo Program and the many who have studied it over the decades see any difficulty here. Please provide your detailed calculations on this issue to include all your research, assumptions, published work etc. Do not pretend that you know anything about basic Physics or the Apollo Program. You clearly do not. Take care.
    1
  40.  @nicholasmanolache9428  Thank you for your reply. Perhaps you should consider doing further research into the Apollo Program rather than writing absolute nonsense. Take care.
    1
  41. You may be interested to know that totally separate to the tiny Goodwill moonrock samples given out by the Nixon administration, NASA release over 400 samples of lunar rock and soil to international researchers each year. To date thousands of samples have been released and examined by thousands of scientists of one type or another globally resulting in many thousands of research papers being published. The lunar origin of these rocks is not in question. Take care.
    1
  42. Nice rant, pity no evidence to back it up. Take care.
    1
  43. Data from the European Space Agency shows that an extremely tenuous portion of the Earth's atmosphere stretches out to the moon. This does not change the distance from Earth to moon which is measured to be about 384,400km. Take care.
    1
  44. While your overall point is correct I have to point out that 180/6 = 30. Take care.
    1
  45. "120 degrees Celsius under the sun and -120 degrees in the shade". Please get your facts correct. The figures that you have quoted are the maximum and minimum lunar surface temperatures over the course of a lunar day/night cycle. Neither does the lunar surface temperature instantly change temperature from Sun to shade, that is simply physically impossible. Also what exactly do you mean by "no Apollo took a single photo of the universe".....How exactly is it possible to get all the Universe into a single photograph! Are you having a laugh? Take care.
    1
  46.  @Punhenen  Thank you for your reply. The Apollo astronauts took well over a hundred photographs of stars from the lunar surface while using the appropriate equipment and settings, the Carruthers Camera. It seems that your basic knowledge of the Apollo Program is as poor as your knowledge of basic Physics. Take care.
    1
  47.  @Punhenen  Serious question: Do you really think that your total ignorance of the Apollo Program actually counts as evidence? Why do you repeatedly make claims then when confronted with the facts glibly move on to making other unevidenced claims? For a start why did you quote the maximum and minimum lunar surface temperatures over the course of a lunar day/night cycle rather than the early lunar morning temperatures when the Apollo astronauts were on the lunar surface? Take carer.
    1
  48. Nope.
    1
  49. What movie?
    1
  50. The temperature of what exactly? The moon is in a vacuum. A vacuum basically does not have a temperature as it does not contain atoms/molecules/particles. The temperatures that you mention are close to the maximum and minimum of the lunar surface A large mass of matter can not change temperature virtually instantly as you seem to think. Heat transfer does not work like that. Take care.
    1