Comments by "TheFlat EarthTruth" (@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. Just for your information, there is no Earth based telescope that has the resolving power to detect the Apollo equipment on the lunar surface. However satellites in lunar orbit from 4 different countries have detected the various Apollo landing sites exactly where they are supposed to be. Take care.
    1
  2.  @JbayOplentay  Considering that the vast majority of telescopes are Earth based and that you did mention about "China or Russia....(pointing) telescopes at the lunar surface" it was far from a wild guess. Just for your information, satellites in lunar orbit from 4 different countries have detected various Apollo landing sites exactly where they are supposed to be. Take care.
    1
  3.  @JbayOplentay  Thank you for your reply. The location of such a telescope, however, is crucial. No Earth based instrument has the resolving power to do so. The only instruments so capable are the ones in the satellites in lunar orbit, which of course have detected the Apollo equipment. Take care.
    1
  4. In that case you must not have actually ever watched the film because in Fly me to the Moon the Apollo 11 mission actually happens. Take care.
    1
  5. Do you mean the Van Allen radiation belts, plural, as there is more than one of them? Can you please cite the evidence to back up your claim as I know of no evidence that even suggests what you claim. Take care.
    1
  6. Unfortunately (for you), the misunderstanding of religious texts does not trump over observable reality. Take care.
    1
  7. But siberel shows no evidence of any kind. He just makes unevidenced claims which are totally debunked by the very footage that he puts forward. Do not be so gullible. Take care.
    1
  8. "the lunar Rover"....Which one??
    1
  9. " the 8-year old asking Buz Aldren"...Perhaps someone who can not even get the mans name correct is not in the best position to make claims on these matters. Also please watch the full interview where he makes it very clear that he is answering her question and referring to a return to the moon. Take care.
    1
  10. The effects of radiation on the human body depends on a range of factors such as nature & type of the radiation, duration of exposure, any shielding materials etc. Take care.
    1
  11. What exactly did you expect the flags to do when the astronauts were moving them? Stay still??
    1
  12. " why no shots of the stars"......Please get you basic facts correct. They took dozens of photographs of stars from the lunar surface while using the appropriate equipment and settings. Take care.
    1
  13. " lunar daytime with surface temperature of 265 F" Please get your basic facts correct. The temperature that you quote is the maximum lunar surface temperature over the course of a lunar day/night cycle not the lunar surface temperature during any of the Apollo landings. Take care.
    1
  14. Serious question, why do you talk the stupid? Take care.
    1
  15.  @bitchutecomnomsmbs  You no answer question. Why stupid you talk? Take care.
    1
  16. Any actual evidence to go with that claim?
    1
  17. "proofs"......Are you having a laugh?
    1
  18. What do you mean by "minus 250"...C or F????? Either are below the minimum lunar surface temperature during lunar night and nowhere near the lunar surface temperatures encountered during any of the Apollo landings. Take care.
    1
  19. "touch the moon and immediately leave".................They went to the moon 9 times with 6 successful landings. "no exploration or anything".........Some 382kg of lunar rock and soil samples were returned to Earth, thousands of photographs were taken and hundreds of hours of film obtained. Numerous scientific experiments were deployed such as EASEP, ALSEP, both active and passive seismic experiments, temperature probes, several magnetometers, a Cold Cathode Ion Gauge was deployed to measure the density of neutral particles in order to determine the amount of gas present at the lunar surface, a mass spectrometer, solar wind, & cosmic ray detecting experiments, etc. "Makes zero sense"......Yes, if you don't know a single thing about what you are talking about then everything will make "zero sense". Take care.
    1
  20. Any actual evidence to go with your rant?
    1
  21. The sky on Earth is blue because of Rayleigh Scattering in the atmosphere so what you actually see is the blue sky in front of the night side of the moon. There are tens of thousands of professional astronomers and there have been literally millions of amateurs over the centuries. None have ever observed stars through the moon. Learn basic Physics. Take care.
    1
  22. So what would you expect the flags to do when the astronauts were moving them during assembly? Stay still? Especially in a vacuum where there is no atmospheric resistance to remove energy so a flag will oscillate very easily. Take care.
    1
  23. Do you have some actual evidence to back up your personal incredulity in relation to the Apollo Program? Take care.
    1
  24. Incorrect. The astronauts muscles still exert full force on the moon but the downward force is less than 17% of what it would be on Earth. This means getting up from the lunar surface is incredibly easy and requires much less effort than on Earth. Take care.
    1
  25. Nope, what you wrote is non-factual. Would you like to try again? Take care.
    1
  26.  @emmjay4447  Thank you for your reply, which, to be fair, is factually correct. While the lunar surface temperatures can vairy from a max of about 120C to a min of around -130C over the course of a lunar day/night cycle, these are the max and min surface temperatures not the surface temperatures encountered by the Apollo astronauts. Hope that this helps your understanding. Take care.
    1
  27.  @emmjay4447  Thank you for your reply. Would you like to outline where these " extreme temperature changes" occur and how you think that they would be a problem for an Apollo spacecraft. Also, do you have an understanding of what the term "temperature" means? Take care.
    1
  28.  @emmjay4447  So what exactly was at that temperature? Take care.
    1
  29.  @emmjay4447  No such temperatures were measure during the Apollo 11 mission. Take care.
    1
  30.  @emmjay4447  Thank you for your reply. So do you consider that Neil Armstrong is a reliable and accurate source of information at all times. Yes or No? Take care.
    1
  31.  @emmjay4447  Thank you for your reply which again does not contain any evidence of what you claim. It is you who seem to want to have it both ways....Do you accept what Armstrong says about the Apollo 11 mission or not? Also now you have gone on to make further unevidenced claims. So can you provide any actual evidence to back up your claims or not? Take care.
    1
  32.  @emmjay4447  Thank you for your comment. Now you are claiming that Neil Armstrong was on the moon which seems to undermine your position somewhat. Also you continue to make claims without even attempting to provide even a shred of evidence or in most cases any details about them. Why is that? Take care.
    1
  33.  @emmjay4447  Thank you for your reply. Your personal incredulity in relation to the footage of the lift of of the LM on the Apollo 17 mission is not evidence of anything. When you mention "rainbow sparkles" it is unfortunate that you were not curious enough to do any actual research on this issue. Otherwise you would have found that this effect was caused by the way the colour filters in the camera captured the ignition of the explosive bolts used to sever connections between the DS and AS of the LM. Again, I can not help but notice that you still have not provided any actual evidence to back up your claims. Take care.
    1
  34.  @emmjay4447  Thank you for your comment. Again deflection. Again zero evidence to back up your claim. Take care.
    1
  35.  @emmjay4447  Thanks for your reply. Take care.
    1
  36. So produce the evidence to back up your claim. Take care.
    1
  37. (1) "When the moon lander left the moon who was running the camera"......The RSA TV camera was mounted on the LRV and its tilt was controlled remotely by Ed Fendell at Mission Control, Houston. (2) "how did they get the film from the camera". A TV camera does not use film. The signal was transmitted to Earth. (3) "The vanallan belt is 20× the radiation of what a microwave puts out"...Incorrect. The Van Allen Belts do not contain microwave radiation or electromagnetic radiation of any type. Take care.
    1
  38. The weren't on the dark side of the moon, they did not look terrified and why do you say "the" moon landing? Take care.
    1
  39. You never provided any evidence to back up your claim and you never will.
    1
  40. On the Apollo Program in total...closer to 400,000 in the US alone plus many thousands abroad in the tracking stations etc.
    1
  41. You correctly mention how dust kicked up on the lunar surface will behave differently compared to an equilivent situation on Earth. A perfect example of this is the "Rooster Tail" dust trails kicked up by Apollo 16's John Young during his "Grand Prix" in April 1972. This very situation has been analysed, studied and the published results are easily obtained online. "Ballistic motion of dust in the Lunar Roving Vehicle dust trails", Hsu, Hsiang-Wen, Horányi, Mihály, (University of Colorado), American Journal of Physics, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp. 452-456 (2012). They conclude that the lack of particles’ deceleration along the x-axis of their coordinate system, could only be the case if Apollo 16’s rover footage was filmed in a vacuum and low gravity environment. Enjoy reading, take care.
    1
  42. And do you have any actual evidence to back up your opinion? Take care.
    1
  43.  @IHOPROB  Thank you for your polite reply. Take care.
    1
  44. Funny, Dr. James Van Allen himself disagrees with that opinion. Take care.
    1
  45. So why do you not provide any evidence to back up your claim? What is stopping you??
    1
  46.  @JustinThorts  So your evidence really is lack of evidence. Interesting. Take care.
    1
  47.  @JustinThorts  Thank you for your reply. Those who make claims such as yours never seem to be able to produce any actual evidence to back them up. Take care.
    1
  48.  @JustinThorts  Again a reply. Again no evidence. Take care.
    1
  49.  @chicas7569  Thank you for your comment. Would you care to elaborate? Take care.
    1
  50. The various landing sites and Apollo equipment have been verified by satellites in lunar 0rbit from 5 different countries. Take care.
    1