Comments by "Grey Matters" (@o0GrayMatters0o) on "VICE News"
channel.
-
33
-
12
-
11
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
It's a vicious cycle that reinforces itself with society's acquiescence and approval. On one hand, women have liked to artificially embellish their facial features and adorn themselves with accessories and dress up in all sorts of extravagant wardrobes since the great civilizations of antiquity. On the other hand, it has been accepted as not only a normal practice, but has turned into a competition for women for mens attention. Men are naturally attracted to signs of youth (smooth and tight skin, lush hair, smaller frame). What started as women trying to look younger and more sexually desirable (generous red lips and blushy red cheeks as if natural excitatory processes were taking place within them), has turned into not only adult women trying to appear youthful and sexy, but now young girls trying to garner the same attention by looking older and sexy- a slippery slope from detached superficiality and lowered self-esteem, to all out trauma.
You see, society itself has an innate way of forcing these things on our females. Mainstream media and popular culture teaches our female youth that you need to be skinny and pretty- and I'd even go so far as to say slutty (they call it "hot"). Think about where they get their view of reality and what it means to be successful. From a young age they watch scantily clad sultry pop stars dancing around provocatively and are bombarded with subliminal programming in T.V. and movies telling them to be helpless princesses in need of a prince to come buy them all the shiny new things they need to compete with other girls. Don't believe me? Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5O2CKKtvwUE . By the time a little girl reaches puberty, depending on her rearing, they are already weight and appearance conscious. These practices are taught and learned behavior that is adhered to for- what are essentially- the demands of survival as placed upon our female gender by a very misguided society that has accidentally wandered a little too far off into the absurd. (Sidenote: The sad part is that it in some circles of research (especially pertaining to the sexualization of our youth) it is considered to be a very real conspiracy with which a small financially dominant class will be better able to control the masses in the future- which is always now from the perspective of a generation ago). Hopefully that answered your question.
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
"Everyone should be able to grow cannabis." We all have the 'ability' to take a seed, and put it in a small cup of water until is germinates, then we are all more than capable of placing that sprouted seed 1 inch below the surface of a pot full of dirt, whereby we can all handle the duty of placing that plant in sunlight for long summer days, and yes, are even then able to pour a little water on it until it chooses to flower- if that is what one feels inclined/chooses to do. As for me, I don't partake in the plant, but if you choose to, you are more than enabled. Once again, for you, if you're too slow. Seed+sun+water=cannabis. Are you able?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Mocha TechÂ
It seems we agree then, on everything but your stance on militia's. Let's get back to militia's, and let me quote & recap a GREAT point of yours:
"we have to stop this insidious system in which businesses’ success is based on a close relationship with government"
That goes both ways sadly. Even the modern day 's'elections are merely just a farce in which all that really takes place is a lot of changing hands of money- not guards, not policy, not even long term plan or agenda, just a whole lot of "campaigning" on the backs of lies in order to get money. Regardless of who "wins" things will carry on as the dealers intend. The game is rigged, the decks are stacked, and most people are fooled.
But if a Republican wins then...
But if a Democrat wins then...
No, no, all we need is a Third party candidate to win, then things will change...
Nope.
And that's why I don't completely understand your distaste for:
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
forget about the guns for a second and just really read that first half of the sentence to let it sink in.
Okay, I get that rabble rousers might exist on both sides to get things a little chaotic for whatever reason, but the underlying purpose of a real (not phony or staged, casted, scripted, or otherwise faked) militia is for a real scenario, which most likely won't be thick with back stories and muddy waters that make understanding the situation a bit more difficult. Let me simplify my stance on this, then you can reply: One day, I believe, there will be a potential for a percentage of misguided power hungry politicians and puppet masters to attempt to infringe upon our freedoms if even just a little bit more, whereby an authentic and benevolent resistance to their impositions will be the only panacea. I know that there can be fake militia's too, which there will be, just like shills online, to discredit the 3%'s, but there are real one's too, that will unite if fascism comes calling any louder. How can anti-militia people not see that?Â
/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2