Comments by "" (@gcart7675) on "Fleccas Talks" channel.

  1. thats not just an opinion thats the truth and it only works if we actually use it as intended to fight their tyrannical "laws" physically
    26
  2.  @mrwolf9957  but it does no good if we dont use them because tyrants dont care unless made to by force
    5
  3.  @chesterwilberforce9832  you are such an idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    2
  4.  @HammerJam007  but there will be guns and armed intruders cause they dont follow the "laws" that say that you cant have them they make them or steal them or buy them from someone who doesnt care whether theyre a bad guy or not or whether they can pass a background check or not or any other "laws" that they "pass" against the second amendment
    2
  5.  @dxmanforlife  they have way worse stuff than shootings they have bombings and acid attacks and masses of people being run over by cars because of terrorists i wouldnt believe a word of what they say about being safer than america cause they dont all carry guns to protect themselves with
    2
  6.  @twosik2315  they dont understand what bad guys are
    2
  7.  @senderoverland  id rather have a sign that says beware of owner cause theyre well armed and willing to use those arms if needed that would do alot more than a cat or dog sign especially if its true cause bad guys more often than not will stop whatever theyre doing if they see a gun come out alot of the time you dont even have to shoot them just the sight of the gun usually scares them off unless theyre just that determined or are on drugs or something like that at the time
    2
  8. @North Woods Hiawatha and mass bombings and people runnig over people in large groups etc cause they dont allow people to defend themselves there and its become that way here even in america because no one will stand up to the corruption and fight physically like the second amendment intends
    2
  9.  @skullbones7452  shoulda used your weapons while you had em instead of turning em in
    2
  10.  @deviledegg8266  yeah and we havent been doing that for a long time bow and we're almost down to nothing since we keep caving and going by the more and more so called "laws" they "pass" instead of actually physically fighting to keep our rights which is the only way that will actually work cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force (the whole point of the second amendment in the first place is to be armed as well as they are and willing to stand up to them physically if need be and it definately is cause like i said tyranta dont care unless made to by force)
    2
  11.  @jhanks2012  it is a law its a law that makes other laws not possible to be passed but it only works if we actually use it to physically fight back with like it was intended for in the first place cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force about us or their limits of power etc they do what they want when they want when theres no backlash and no real consequences to their actions its plain and simple
    2
  12.  @Gr3nadgr3gory  you should be able to own alot more than that according to the second amendment that says "arms" (which means weapons and not just certain ones)
    2
  13.  @Timenaught  it sure is but theyve been doing that slowly over about a century if not more now because we havent been using it as intended to fight back physically like we should be and shouldve been when they even first suggested putting the "laws" in in the first place
    2
  14.  @johnycakes6613  actually the first amendment would make that thing about "yelling fire in a theater" part not actually a thing that they could make illegal too its just like the second how they cant make any weapon illegal in any way cause the first amendment says "freedom of speech" not just in certain places or only free to say certain things yeah it might be stupid to do but you should still be able to say whatever you please cause of the first amendment that doesnt say a limited amount of speech just like the second amendment doesnt say a limited amount of arms
    2
  15.  @johnycakes6613  its not the best thing we have by far what would be is if we went by the original constitution how its written and the people regulate the power of the government through any means neccesary to where they cant or wont take any of our rights in any way thats the only way itll be civilised and bad guys will either think twice or wish they had a few years in jail then being released doesnt phase them but knowing people are armed and willing to use those arms if needed will it all takes the people doing whats neccesary though which is like i said regulating the governments power through any means neccesary
    2
  16.  @peterfitswell535  i really doubt it is and even if it is that doesnt meab you should "ban" them from everyone cause that would include good people too that could stop them with that same gun/weapon if they had them and itd make bad guys think twice or wish they had abd get shot either way is way better than just letting the bad guys so whatever they please cause theyll do what they want regaurdless of any so called "laws" they "pass" they know exactly what theyre doing they wont budge on their position to "ban" all guns/weapons its not about the guns or the violence you can do with them to the government its about their control over you and they cant do that if youre armed and willing to use them to against them so they "pass" more and more "laws" slowly as they get people on board with them and get people to enforce them until we have nothing left (if we go by their "laws" that is i mean)
    2
  17.  @kiwi7872  if you defund them then you dont have them cause then they have no equipment no cars no nothing so they actually are kinda the same thing to be honest
    1
  18.  @geronimo67  yeah no police
    1
  19.  @tenzintsenpey5274  that wouldnt be that bad of a thing considering most if not all are corrupt and are paid to and do enforce "laws" that take away our rights
    1
  20.  @mikebarat2884  reforming wont work we dont pay their paychecks the government does so they tell them what to do or not not us
    1
  21.  @mikebarat2884  you dont have common sense if youre a lefty dont talk about common sense unless you actually know what youre talking about and just seeing that youre left i know you dont
    1
  22.  @tenzintsenpey5274  police kill alot of innocent people they are dangerous most if not all are corrupt and do whatever the government says cause theyre paid to do it not cause its actually good or actually protecting us or our rights like their actual job is
    1
  23.  @911ragdoll  the actual stupid ones are but the ones "in charge" that lead them know exactly what theyre doing or we'd all have machineguns that we made ourselves and bombs etc without worrying about going to jail for it or dying because of it theyve "banned" so much stuff to where we dont have a single weapon thats useful to take them on if we go by their so called "laws" that they "pass"
    1
  24.  @silverletter4551  even the ones who say theyre "republicans" have "banned" things that are unconstitional to ban you know that right? libertarians dont allow that kind of crap or support that and if they do those things they arent real republicans/libertarians etc or right theyre leftist posing as the right or republicans
    1
  25.  @tonybtrucks3029  itd work way better cause the people are already there when the crime could possibly happen to immediately respond and shoot the would be criminal/bad guy thatd make them think twice or wish they had alot more than a phone and saying "wait a minute bad guy let me get my phone out and call the police and wait til they get here so they can arrest you"
    1
  26.  @rpscorp9457  wow 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  27.  @mikebaird6788  no pretty sure it would be a great idea the police more than not are corrupt and just do what theyre told cause theyre paid to not cause its their actual job and if people had to fend for themselves they could do it alot better than the cops which take way too much time to respond when the person thats already there in the situation can respond immediately and defend themselves which is way more effective than a phone and saying "wait a minute bad guy let me get my phone out so i can call the police and wait for them to come arrest you"
    1
  28.  @dubsmith1969  it actually does cause anymore most of not all the cops are corrupt anymore and kill innocent people and most if not all get away with it more than not
    1
  29.  @Starman062  wow youre an idiot 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  30.  @maadhujovi9528  no 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  31.  @tomeverett2212  dont take them from anyone fight physically to keep what you have cause thats the only way theyll care is if made to by force and its the whole point of the second amendment in the first place is to fight back physically against their so called "laws" they "pass"
    1
  32.  @tomeverett2212  but theyre not going to be limited in it cause we dont make them be by using the second amendment as intended to take them out for trying to take our rights like we should be
    1
  33.  @MFper4mance  yeah right and even if they do have less shootings or robbings or whatever they make up for it in a way worse way with mass killings with terrorists bombings and people getting run over in crowds by cars and acid attacks etc like that so dont say that stupid stuff like theyre more civilised or safer there than here cause they dont walk around with guns idiot
    1
  34.  @asanmartinjr07  probly both cause that one dude with the hitler sign had to be on something cause theres no way anyone can be that stupid
    1
  35.  @gone547  they wont
    1
  36.  @catherinesyme901  wow youre an idiot
    1
  37.  @sweetpea221000  wow youre an idiot
    1
  38.  @geoalmike8498  i wouldnt give any weapons to the pigs in blue fight to keep what you have physically like the second amendment intends
    1
  39.  @catherinesyme901  ok idiot whatever you say 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  40.  @MFper4mance  ok bud whatever you say
    1
  41.  @catherinesyme901  because youre a liberal idiot and theres a thing called bad guys that we'd want to prptect ourselves from and a tyrannical government
    1
  42.  @joserobles4875  they didnt "get rid of them" they just made it to where ""law" abiding" people dont have them
    1
  43.  @joserobles4875  they wouldnt be if the people stood up for their rights and fought back physiclly instead of going by what the government says
    1
  44.  @joserobles4875  the smart people already know that but i wouldnt say "criminals" cause i dont care where you are they shouldnt be able to take any weapons at all in any way or for any reason etc like that and it should be fought against physically if they do try and like they already have done
    1
  45.  @A1TheBest  it actually is legal but they enforce it as if it were a real law and put innocent people in jail just like they do here with certain weapons and itll soon be all weapons if we keep allowing them to take them slowly but surely instead of fighting physically against it like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
    1
  46. @wild western man bo there are others that do just very few cause of how bad the "laws" are there they make it so bad to try getting one that most people dont want to try to get them and its so restrictive and they "pass" more and more "laws" that make it so hard to know what they consider "legal" and because stupid people go by their stupid "laws" they just keep having less and less and actually all of america has less and less cause we dont fight back physically against their so called "laws" that they "pass" like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
    1
  47.  @joserobles4875  so is the american one if you havent noticed how much theyve taken of our weapons because we've not been fighting it physically like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
    1
  48. anything is a "weapon of war" if used in a war they used to use slings with rocks in them in war back in the day so slingshots would be considered "weapons of war" by that definition or just rocks in themselves so yeah that definition definately cant be used as what we define what we can and cant have weaponwise and the fact that its written that they arent allowed to regulate or limit our weapons in any way or after any amount of time etc with the second amendment but it only worrks if we actually use it as intended to fight back physically against the so called "laws" they "pass" against it cause tyeants dont care unless made to by force
    1
  49.  @justinsydnes3346  the thing about that is they actually did have more than what they say they had back then they literally had machineguns back in the day though for the second amendment part and for the first amendment it says "freedom of press" that covers all types of mediums including the internet they were definately smarter than the idiots that say its outdated they worded it that way hecause they knew technology would advance like it has been since before they were around and same way for the second amendment in how they wrote it to say "arms" (which just means weapons or not just firearms and it isnt short for firearms and not just certain ones and not just the weapons they had back then or not just what the government says youre allowed to have or in the way they say you can have them etc like that) and shall not be infringed. period. no ifs ands or buts to make it changeable in any way or after any amount of time or after any certain person in the government says it can be changed or any of the bullcrap they say or even any reason they dont say you get my point it pre empts change in the future the way its worded but it only works if we fight physically against the so called "laws" they "pass" against it and the other "laws" they "pass" against the rights we should have constitutionally its supposed to be so we can effectively fight the government with all the weapons they have without having to have anything they say you ""need" for it to be "legal"" like licenses or taxes etc like that or how they say you can only own certain guns or only certain ones that fire certain ammo or only certain ones that only have certain attachments or certain ones that can only fire so fast etc like that
    1
  50.  @TheNajSD  theyre pretty much the same gun as the one the military uses with the exception of the functions ill give them that but youre semi right they dont usually use just regular semiauto ones other than like in a snipers or dmr type rifle or whatever like that and those are ar-10s or sr-25s or m110s or whatever other designations they give them dont get me wrong the libbies are stupid as crap but they do use that pattern of rifle not the exact one like i said but the fire modes and calibers like for the ar-10s and sr-25s etc are really the only things that set them apart from regular ar-15s
    1