Comments by "" (@gcart7675) on "Forgotten Weapons" channel.

  1.  @samuellubell4557  🤦🏻‍♂️😑😒
    1
  2.  @samuellubell4557  no they don't
    1
  3.  @The_Lucent_Archangel  they know why they say it it's just to scare their stupid followers into wanting to "ban" all weapons it's like why they call "hunting" bolt action rifles with scopes "sniper rifles" and stuff like that and semiautos fully semiautos cause they know their stupid followers will go by it without questioning it
    1
  4.  @Bourikii2992  the people are the militia not the government also it doesn't matter what you tell them they won't get it and will still say it can be limited or only if states allow you or the federal government or whatever that's the whole point of the second amendment is to fight back against tyranny physically cause tyrants dont care unless made to by force not by voting or talking to them etc like that so if we dont use the second amendment it's useless to say we have it or any other rights for that matter
    1
  5.  @Bourikii2992  actually none are cause you can use pretty much anything to assault people with so it just makes it a stupid made up redundant word to scare their stupid followers into wanting to "ban" all weapons i don't remember where it was but i think they even "banned" butter knives like you can't walk around with a butterknife on you for self defense or some other nonsense like that
    1
  6.  @charlessmith6412  welcome if you're not being sarcastic or whatever
    1
  7. Zain Asif oh no the bad guys will regaurdles only the idiot people who go by that nonsense will do what you said
    1
  8. they kinda do make a modern version of this id like if they made muzzle loaders period that would take smokeless powder instead of black powder thatd be pretty cool cause then you get more power out of it
    1
  9. Jack Vernian not really
    1
  10. Gabbertjee they also said it was supposed to be an accurate to real life game though too ta know 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  11. @YoYo NoNo but they werent all used in the war so no its not real world accurate they said they wanted it as real as possible and thats not realistic at all to have and use guns that werent ever used in the war
    1
  12.  La Nausée  k whatever you say bud
    1
  13. Jackie Fife r/youreanidiot
    1
  14. geo_K_gaming r/youreanidiot
    1
  15. probly it adds more complexness to a system when if you make a mag fed gun right it will function alot better simpler is usually the way to go when making guns that work better just look at open bolt smgs theres pretty much nothing to go wrong with those and thats why they work so well
    1
  16. EB video wow no one cares grammar nazi 😂
    1
  17. H7 pubgm grammar nazi owned more like it the one saying all he overthrew was grammar no one cares at all about if someone doesnt spell perfect
    1
  18. Boris Buliak nah they wont ban cars cause "they werent designed solely to kill" like guns and knives etc (being totally serious cause theyre really that stupid)
    1
  19. Dan Cotton not the usa idiot the government that we have now thats tyrannical and so unconstitutional its unbelievable unconstitional "laws" are unlawful thats the whole point of the constitution but if we dont fight for it then we might as well not have it
    1
  20. Fin it is a totalitarian government or some other kind thats bad whatwver you want to call it it isnt a constitutional one thats for sure and unconstitutional "laws" arent lawful or real laws but we wont use our second amendment rights to keep them in check so its pointless if we dont use it to have it but people dont see it that way and are too scared of jailtime or death to come together and fight for it
    1
  21. Jonathan Tricoli wow just wow -_-
    1
  22. Ethan Lamoureux people that want to do all the evil stuff dont even go by the numbers they just make up bullcrap for gullible enough people to believe and go with without question cause they dont know any better
    1
  23. Ethan Lamoureux yeah and people driving cars can hurt and kill people too but you dont hear anyone trying to ban cars for that reason "because thats not what they were designed for" give me a break things can be used for more than the purpose they were intended for and are used for different purposes the person using them gives them thwir purpose not "what they were intended to do"
    1
  24. Damian thats not even the point they dont care what can and cant be done with them they just want control over wveryone in every way and they cant do that as long as youre armed
    1
  25. ShoesAndStuff what does the population have to do with anything? nothing thats what
    1
  26. ShoesAndStuff or alot of other stuff they dont think they should ban "because they arent solely made to kill" yeah they really think that way it doesnt mattee what it was intended for it depends on what the person who uses it uses it for
    1
  27. Ethan Lamoureux and all kinds of other crap that "wasnt intended for killing/violence like cars or acid etc
    1
  28. Ethan Lamoureux also criminals dont follow "laws" so you know theyre no less likely to be shot than anyone else just cause they have "laws" that say theyre not allowed to do something also they got way worse things than just shootings they got bombings, acid attacks, and running over people etc
    1
  29. Nagow_ nah you arent safer you got way worse stuff and just having "laws" that say people cant do certain things doesnt mean it wont happen
    1
  30. Frank McGovern no "laws" dont guarantee that it wont happen cause CRIMINALS DONT FOLLOW "LAWS"
    1
  31. Stale Bagelz yeah cause takimg away their defenses against all the threats we face isnt the worst of it all if you take that away they can do all those worse things you mentioned if not they cant cause the people would have military grade weapons to fight back against them so no we arent "just ignoring all the other stuff"
    1
  32. Wolfang cutthroat youre an idiot if we actually went by the second amendment we wouldnt "only have rifles" like you say wed have the same tech as they do and tech isnt the only factor or doesnt always gaurantee victory or superiority
    1
  33. John Smith yeah i think you got your parties mixed up bud conservatives dont want all this stupid crap that does no good but for criminals who DONT FOLLOW THE "LAWS"
    1
  34. Frank McGovern wow youre a complete idiot
    1
  35. Colin Cleveland still yall we still got way more guns than youll ever have again unarmed nations are the ones who have mass genocides cause they have nothing to fight back with learn from history bud look at all the countries that had their weapons taken from them then got slaughtered by their own "government"
    1
  36. James Ricker youre an idiot read and understand what the second amendment says and means then cone back to this conversation we should have everything the military has for that very purpose and even if we dont the tech and weapons doesnt gaurantee a victory for them
    1
  37. MrYfrank14 its not before democrats its before we let them take over with their unconstitutional bullcrap "laws" we shouldve just shot them on the spot even talking about banning inanimate objects but all the people on the government were the same way thats why they got passed anyone who actually believes in the second amendment doesnt want any regulation of any kind except you know people who do bad things with them go to jail or die because the good people would defend themselves against them
    1
  38. thesweatleaf it doesnt even matter what side did what to be honest trump claimed to be republican and pro second amendment his whole campaign and when he got in signed anti gun bill through exectutive order no less to make it even worse yet people think hes still on our side the first and second amendments are our best defense against tyranny and if hes trying to take either or both of those away in any increment then hes a big threat not a good guy at all
    1
  39. Mrjohnnymoo1 freedom keeps the peace not makes it more afngerous but i get what youre saying people should be armed
    1
  40. considered by the atf people who actually know what theyre talking about call them stocked pistols
    1
  41. USSEnterpriseA1701 the atf of run by decieving people or legitamately dont know or care about what firearms actually are or how they operate their definition of a machine gun is any gun that can fire more than one bullet at a time per trigger pull in their definition that could be a double barrel shotgun its all deceptive so they can ban all guns by getting people on their side about banning them because the people theyre trying to convince are scared of them already or dont know anything about guns either
    1
  42. bindingcurve more accurate maybe because you can stablise it but no more deadly it still fires the same round and anything can literally be deadly even air if used a certain way so what should we do? ban air? lol no inanimate object should be banned the people who do bad things should be put in jail instead of punishing everyone for what the few stupid people do by banning owning an in animate object that cant do anything by itself
    1
  43. TheFanatical1 your comments good but i have one tweak its that they consider it to be more concealable if its shorter but like you said its not going to be
    1
  44. Woistdeingott yeah and youll also notice it was people in a large group of people in close proximity of each other so having a pistol or unstocked weapon makes no difference whatsoever whether theyre more accurate or not cause theyre so close and so many even if the sprayed randomly in the direction of the crowd theyd still hit a ton of them and a stock or not doesnt make any dofference of the ballistics of the round
    1
  45. bindingcurve mass shooting happen where there are a lot of people in close proximity to each other like concerts youd actually wanna be less accurate and youd hit more people shooting in their general direction and killing more or hitting more
    1
  46.  @Predalien195  i see but they dont say mama they say ma so just say ma it doesnt sound right saying mama deuce
    1
  47.  @Predalien195  ah...
    1
  48. Yourflyisundone this is basically the original version of that minus that in the chassis of the fmg is a glock long barrel full auto and the hotchkiss still looks like a gun thats just been folded and the fmg looks like a radio or something incospicous
    1
  49. Maryus Knight thats basically what an fmg 9 is a folding long barrel glock with a chassis that makes it look inconspicous
    1
  50. this isnt semiauto though and its bullpup
    1