Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "ABC News" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18.  @jlsperling1  This isn't about me, jackass; it's about the rule of law, based on the Constitution you PISS on while LYING when you invoke it. This is in the "Declaration of independence" as a grievance against King George III: "He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power." There is no "right" to establish private anti-gov't military organizations. There is no "right" to "take up arms" against the gov't/RULE OF LAW. The ENTIRE Constitution is in effect at the same time, which includes these two Militia Clauses: "Art. I., s. 8., C. 15. The CONGRESS shall have Power To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute [ENFORCE] the Laws of the Union, SUPPRESS INSURRECTIONS, and repel Invasions." "Taking up arms" against the gov't -- based on pseudo-law gibberish and lies -- is INSURRECTION. "Art. I., S. 8., C. 16. The CONGRESS shall have Power To provide for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining the Militia . . . reserving to the States [GOV'TS] the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed BY CONGRESS." Constitutional provisions are implemented by means of STATUTES, in this context MILITA ACTS. The purpose of the Second Amendment, per the Debates of those who WROTE it, was to establish a NATIONAL DEFENSE relying on the well-regulated Militia -- ALWAYS UNDER the control of BOTH US and state constitutions and laws. This is underscored by the Militia Act enacted on May 8, 1792: "An act more effectually to provide for a NATIONAL DEFENCE by establishing an uniform MILITIA throughout the United States." You are not only spewing anti-Americanism; you are your own worst enemy: the rule of law, which you REJECT, secures the very rights you claim to be about defending. You can't BOTH reject the rule of law AND claim its protections. Your cheering on of the fascist right wing has just ELIMINATED the right of privacy. THAT affects YOU.
    1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. The "institution" is the GOV'T, dunce. "We the people" are the gov't -- and WE PAY OUR OWN WAY for the EXPENSES of gov't and therefore the security of rule of law. Don't pay your way, deadbeat, and the gov't will properly, in behalf of all those who DO pay their own way, seize assets you have commensurate with the amount in delinquency. For how it works see the judgment against Trump in the New York fraud case. He ripped off the people of New York -- they were in effect paying HIS taxes FOR him without being apprised of that fact. And it is longstanding LAW in New York state that in order to appeal such judgments -- which cannot be discharged in bankruptcy -- one must post a bond that is equal to the judgment + 20 PER CENT. Trump nonetheless attempted to appeal the decision without posting the bond -- he finally admitted that he doesn't have the "billions" he has for years LIED he has -- and the appellate court denied his appeal, then in effect told him -- Why not ask the banks you defrauded for loans to pay the bond? This is how the BANKS were defrauded: IN ADDITION to it being ILLEGAL to file FRAUDULENT financial applications for loans -- Trump's falsely inflated valuations of his properties on such applications got him FAVORABLE interest rates -- which means the banks were DEFRAUDED out of GREATER profits from the interest than were realized by the FAVORABLE interest rates. Wake up: nothing Trump says is true; therefore nothing he says is to be believed. Period. Full stop. End of story.
    1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42.  @JayTX.  You aren't the only person affected by the services, and therefore not the only person affected by your refusal to accept and act in accordance with the RESPONSIBILITIES of citizenship. Your bogus "argument" has been litigated to death and as ALWAYS LOST. So you don't want the potholes in the streets repaired; everyone else does, and they pay their taxes. And you get the repaired potholes FOR FREE. Or you don't want to pay taxes in support of, as example, the local fire department. So when your house catches fire the fire department doesn't show up and save it. So you lose that asset because you're a freeloading deadbeat. But let's ignore all that in favor of your whining against gov't because you're too stupid to have even the most basic understanding of "community" and "society" and how gov't is structured and functions, and that the first obligation of gov't is to meet the needs of "We the people," which costs MONEY therefore "We the people" PAY OUR OWN WAY through TAXATION, and to protect public health and safety. Gov't is by definition rule of law. When you bash gov't you bash the rule of law. That very rule of law secures and protects the RIGHTS you claim; but every right is inextricably entwined with RESPONSIBILITY. Here's how the Founders put it in the 1784 New Hampshire constitution: "Part I--The Bill of Rights "Article I. . . . . "III. When men enter into a state of society, they surrender up some of their natural rights to that society, in order to insure the protection of others [AND OF THEMSELVES]". There is no "right" to commit crimes -- including non-payment of taxes.
    1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1