Comments by "May L" (@MeiinUK) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23.  @zhaoraymond8656  : Are you talking about the Huawei's CFO? Of course she is right to be arrested. First of all: 1) Huawei's products.. regardless of whether it is, or it is not the militaries... This is classified as the militaries in the United States. Even the average citizen does not know it. Just because you do not consider it as part of military materials and equipments... outside the PRC.. It IS the military's equipments ! 2) As a CFO... why does she have so many passports? It does not mean that she is entitled to travel around so many areas... Only diplomats can allow a passport. Don't tell me that inside the PRC... ALL certain types of elites... are issued with ALL passports.. without the authorisation, OR knowledge... of those respective governments? Don't tell me that you guys have those machines... and just print them.. but without liasing with other countries. If so.. then that is quite rude. 3) Why should the CFO not be prosecuted ? Isn't PRC on the Security Council as well? They are, aren't they ? So why would somebody like that, conflict or tries to undermine the other dept within the government ? By going "private" or consider the company as private and not a local government entity... are you not misleading others here? Globally ??? You sure do not have an issue with the governmental structures? How can a mere provincial level.. be classified as the top central government in its doing and in its actions ??? She should be prosecuted ! Based on what she has authorised... she can be killed. By law. It makes her an actual terrorist ? Cos she authorised and sold those items ? She signed them off ? She is the CFO....And why would a CFO not have an actual CFO qualification behind her as well? Who would promote THAT !?!?!?!!..... Yeh.. she acts like this is an imperial issue.. but this is much bigger than that ! She has no sense of humiliation ??? What she is selling... others can use to kill countries, citizens... And she has no shame? It is like selling knives.. to a mad man.. and he uses it to kill a classroom full of children. She would go and do that? She let them be used to kill. Do you think that is morally right? I don't !
    1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28.  esphaeraspraestans4212  : "In the west, democracies, with all its flaws tries it best to maintain an idea that everyone is represented, even minorities." In the West, you would allow the actual individual be locked under a mental health hospital, while their child is looked after by social services, and be fed cat food. That is what you would do. And you would make him angry, cos you just caused a situation whereby he wants to knock your block off. So yeh... the child eats the food... and the dad is locked up. In the West... you would take the land of the father.. and be given to the criminal.... That is what you would do. The guy ends up being a tyrant... and killed for a living.. but that is fine, cos you would give him a second chance. (And also his relatives as well.... which then kicks off and kill more of this man's relatives abroad....).... and he would kill the same people in the UK as well... What happens ? He would take his inlaws' hard earned money... married for her money.. and then dump her and her parents. Supposedly use that bit of money for his son. While he has an actual mistress in the end. And dumped and divorced her. And then what.. has another child abroad in Malaysia.... invite all their relatives to marginalise that young boy ??? (Despite so many helped raise his family.. while he was living in prison.) Of course... invite the daughter of some PLA general as well.. why not... and it is funny how she talked about the 14K people.... whilst working for somebody that has ties to that. Under her very nose, and unknown about this at all. Of course... this man and his relative ends up killing the relative of another man as well... for their wealth.... to feed his own people.... his pensions, his savings.. his everything.... And they cut off his tongue in the process as well. Isn't this why some people ends up in the NHS for ?? To take revenge ?? To get rid of the money ??? Out of the entire globe.. the same families can be targetted around 4 to 8 times ? How is this possible when the world is around 8 billion people ?????? Such a coincident, right ??? If there is a God... euthanasia. Give mercy.
    1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37.  @josephho6315  : That is because China REFUSED to do circular monetary policies. It is like...in the past, the ship trading routes raised the profit level of the country. The Treasury has a lot of money. But instead of reforming asap to catch this situation. The government, and the political structure DELIBERATELY refused to do this. Even when there is like a mega big office of the World Bank INSIDE the country, it STILL CANNOT resolve its own issues ! Why ?! Why ?! So now.. we see... the provincial level state level.. can hold foreign currencies (which is scary in itself)... and then they lend it to the likes of Sri Lanka... HOW THE HECK COULD THIS HAVE HAPPENED ! .... So now, a mere "city" within China, their banks, can own an entire "country" outside of PRC. And so they shoved this issue.. into the UN level.. is this or is this not trying to provoke international feelings and cause chaos here??? Even when Britain HAD the Royal Family.. and that they ruled... what the UK did was quickly to create a structure that was fair and it was public... So where is China' responsible reformed exercise then ? When the banking crisis happened in Thailand, in HK, in Japan... surely PRC knows what could possibly happen to their own banks ? So why spend so much money, in building random and loss profit exercises like the trains? And the road system ? I have read now that, the dept of police, or whoever governs the roads, now uses AI to "catch" drivers that is like driving out of line. They automated this fine process. WTF. So this is how they are trying to recooperate their costs... cos they spent.. and now, the standard of living is going to be high for these people... Many Western countries could do this, cos their population is small. So this is why they would have excess money to go round, but however, they structure and restructure the processes, in order to keep the circle of money in going round. i.e. Add local taxes, add local education fees. Create means-tested taxation. Tiered, and structured. etc etc etc. This is what people analyse in the UK at the very least. But what about China ? How come they don't have their act together ?! This situation shouldn't even have happened.. and there is often this "top down" situation as well... and so.. therefore.. people keep doing these half-hearted projects, without thoughts. A life in China is like a life in the circus it seems. Always running around, always on the mobile.. always having to be lectured, or told what to do, depending on which province you happen to live in and what is their goals etc. Chaos often, and always.
    1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48.  @JohnSmith-i3i  : I had NEVER heard of that before.... so.... and many people, used to set up orphanages, for post-war time. So that the children are not actually starved. But if wars did not happen. Then there is no need for that at all ? All or most of the religious organisation had taken the children in. The remaining children that were born out of wedlocks are also often taken into the local temples. Or those unwanted women.. i.e. mistresses, and are not allowed into people's homes. The entire "kick out of the concubine " thing.. and ended up as... "no excess children" had to happen over time. Just because the provision for taking care of children is there. Does NOT mean that you SHOULD abuse the system? And the whole idea of the "one child" policy as well.. well... what about inter-marrying? Cos in chinese policies and governance, you are locked down to your own hometown as registration. Post Mao's era, you are not supposed to run off away from your own town or villages, without reason... or permits. Cos people own their own land. So if you walk into somebody else's then isn't that trespassing any way ? It is trespassing.. actually. So... Most people travel to visit outwardly married families. Had always been as such and known as such. So... why now, this way? Which creates a form of family division ?... You do not want inbreeding, but at the same time... you do want a child... but... when somebody in your family tree married somebody else, then your position in the tree changes... so... people see the situation inside china, as too simplistic?... Maybe china needs to create a law to be explicit to say "no inbreeding under 3 generation" or whatever.... Just so that, ENGLISH readers KNOW and GETS the point !!!!!!!!
    1
  49. 1
  50. 1