Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "VICE TV" channel.

  1.  @federalreservebrown2507  Are you for real? 🙈 I'm looking for serious discussion sorry.
    1
  2.  @someonecalleddarthjack  How do you mean? The pilot was a terrorist intent on killing himself & everyone on board, that was the plan.
    1
  3. This video is about the collapse of the twin towers, not WTC7 so why would he mention it? Saying it wasn't hit by anything exposes breathtaking ignorance of the facts as it literally had thousands of tons of debris drop onto it from the collapsing North tower. This ignited fires across many floors that the fire department decided to leave freeburn, create a safe collapse zone & then allow it to collapse naturally. It was no shock, surprise or mystery that it fell & it's demise was predicted hours before by the fire fighters who's job it was to assess the structure. It is an absolute myth that "4000 Jews" didn't show up for work & stems from a joke made by a Jewish comedian if I remember right. There is ZERO truth to that whatsoever & many Jewish people died that day. No Israelis were dancing, they were simply acting inappropriately as per what the one, single witness who saw them said. They were held by the FBI for 2.5 months for questioning! They were released without charge because they had nothing to do with it. They didn't even capture the first plane impact so CLEARLY didn't have any foreknowledge of the event. Jews who made money on the stock market?? More anti-Semitic BS.
    1
  4. 23yrs of crying conspiracy & STILL no evidence to support your claims more like 🤨
    1
  5.  @grandcanyon-d4d  If that's your evidence for believing the government was behind the 9/11 attacks, then all I can say is that my standards of proof are thankfully somewhat higher.
    1
  6. Oh please, stop with the disrespectful lunacy about debunked, government conspiracies.
    1
  7. What does that mean??
    1
  8. Imagine still believing 911 was an 'inside job' lol
    1
  9. Why would they admit to something they didn't do? The wreckage would easily have proven it if they had shot it down & they even admitted they gave the order. What's wrong with you people? 🤦🏽‍♂️
    1
  10. ​ @Larry26-f1w Always wanted my own stalker, I'm flattered 😋 Always a good sign I'm doing something right when troofers follow me around from video to video debunking their crazy, utterly refuted bullsh!t, you clearly see me as a threat to your failed narrative 😂👍🏽
    1
  11. But that's not what happened, as I detailed in my previous response to an almost identical comment you posted here. Passports/paper often survive plane crashes/explosions & there would be zero benefit of planting the passport of a guy who was on the flight manifest.
    1
  12. Indeed, hence every conspiracy movie or video out there. The official stance stands up whereas the silly conspiracy theories don't. What are you claiming hasn't been thoroughly researched in this video?
    1
  13.  @grandcanyon-d4d  When did I mention Bush? 9/11 had nothing to do with him.
    1
  14. Bush acted with professionalism and many admire his reaction rather than getting all hysterical and running out, but you'll grasp any straws you can to try and make your ridiculous, failed conspiracy theory stand up. All demolitions you say? Name ONE demolitions expert who agrees those towers came down via a controlled demo. In reality it would be impossible to have brought them down at the impact zones like that, impossible.
    1
  15.  @Zukalski  He was a structural engineer you beIIend and did NOT believe the towers were demoed 🙈 🤣🤣
    1
  16. Of which your ONLY evidence to try & support that ridiculous claim is the so-called 'dancing Israelis' that were found to be totally innocent. You're a crackpot mate.
    1
  17. We can thank Diaper Don the Con for that unfortunately. The sooner they lock that insincere, sex-offending, anti-democratic traitor, the better. Maybe then we can try & have some normality restored.
    1
  18.  @anonymousAJ  We were locked down because of a virus that killed millions & at the time, we believed had potential to kill millions more. It was an extreme measure in extreme circumstances. If we hadn't been locked down & half the population had died, you'd be complaining that they hadn't done anything to protect us. I fail to see what choice they had. They HAD to err on the side of caution. Gathering in buildings to engage in wish-thinking to an imaginary being was a needless risk. Pray at home, simple. In what respect were we censored? If you're referring to spreading potentially life-threatening lies about Covid conspiracies & the like, then good on them. People seem to trust Facebook posts now rather than actual scientific studies which is so dangerous & messed up. How were rights to bear arms threatened?? Do you not think people should be prosecuted for trying to overturn a free & fair election & overthrow the government? Are you one of these trying to claim it wasn't an insurrection? And why can we not unite around our country's flags AND a flag that represents unity against the persecution of people because of their sexuality, or is it that you're just homophobic?
    1
  19.  @dansaw1426  I guess he's forgotten....🙄
    1
  20. Any evidence to support that ridiculous claim yet? Didn't think so 🥱
    1
  21.  Josh  You think, we think Saddam Hussein was behind the attacks and you say i'm the clueless one?? 🤣 It wasn't until 2 weeks after the attacks it was confirmed with certainly Al Qaeda were behind them, although due to intercepted communications by the NSA, German and UK intelligence agencies on that day, guilt strongly pointed to Bin Laden. I have several close friends who served in the military and none of them to my knowledge believe they were killing innocent people. One of my friends was in hit by an I.E.D. so go and try telling him they were fighting innocent people. Idiot. Accept it, your ridiculous conspiracy theory has well and truly been debunked, hence why you're resigned to looking for an echo chamber here on the YouTube comments. Show me ANY evidence of a conspiracy and I guarantee it's been long refuted. I can back up my claims, can you?
    1
  22.  Josh  Why are you changing the subject and trying to steer me into another dumb conspiracy theory?? lol Let's just stick to 911 for now and then I will gladly hand you your ar5e on Covid when we're done. Address what I said or stop wasting my time you fact-dodging kook.
    1
  23.  Josh  Cuck?? You're the one who's just been made a little b!tch, not I 🖕🏽😏 I get it though, you've realised just how out of your depth you are, knowing full well you can't refute a single thing I've said. Best running away now and save yourself further humiliation 👋🏽😄
    1
  24.  Josh  🤗
    1
  25.  @LisaHack-hq3dv  Are you ok Lisa??
    1
  26.  @EpicCrust  It's hard to comprehend how dumb truthers truly are to make such absurd arguments. I insure my house yet they don't think Manhattan skyscrapers that have already been targeted by terrorists would need to be insured 🙈
    1
  27.  @tompilkington7379  🤣🤣 It's apparently that simple. Doesn't matter if you've spent your entire life murdering kids, as ling as you 'repent' on your deathbed, you get a free pass. Alternatively, you could live the most selfless life, helping and caring for others, but if you're incapable of believing in a magic man in the sky without a shred of evidence, you're burning........forever 😬👍🏼
    1
  28.  @bruceadam5632  No, not coincidence but standard practice. Every business in Manhahas insurance and it was part of his contractual obligations to the Port Authority of whom he leased the complex off. Silverstein hadn't even finalised the policies at the time of the attacks and lost a fortune in the event, only being paid HALF of his claim.
    1
  29.  @geoffcooper6963  Weeks before from the time Silverstein conglomerate took control of the lease, which is STANDARD PRACTICE you idiot.
    1
  30.  @tuck6464  Nope, Silverstein lost a fortune and collected only HALF of his claim which didn't even over the cost of the rebuild. You really are full of sh!t.
    1
  31.  @fredjones7705  Exactly, insurance isn't optional but a requirement of the lease contract. Hell, I insure my house so I'm sure as hell going to insurance a Manhattan based, commercial skyscraper that's already been the target of a previous terrorist attack! Lol, these crackpot's are dumb as rocks and no clue about the real world. What do they know about commercial insurance when they spend their existence tick-tocking and playing computer games from mommies basement?
    1
  32.  @zAlaska  "Goldstein"? "Ensuring"? You clearly know your sh!t 🤣 Back to reality for a moment; Silverstein got paid HALF OF HIS CLAIM which didn't even cover the costs of rebuilding the complex you absolute beIIend. No need to take my word, this is all documented in the public domain. There were legal battles that we're all privy to, should you bother your lame, unlearned ass to check, instead of lazily believing everything you read on notoriously unreliable conspiracy websites.
    1
  33.  @mathewhosier9739  What are you referring to exactly? It sounds like you're confusing me with a dumba55 twoofer, who blindly.believes everything they read on the internet, as long as it fits their agenda. Don't tar me with your brush buddy, I simply follow the evidence, free from any presuppositions.
    1
  34.  @redkessy  They didnt wait at all, where are you getting this nonsense from? Larry Silverstein took over the lease & as part of the contract he had to sign from the Port Authority who owned the complex. This is standard practice & I challenge you to find any commercial building in that vicinity that isn't insured. I insure my house so I'll be damned if two of the most iconic skyscrapers on earth aren't going to be insured, especially after they'd already been the target of a previous terrorist attack.
    1
  35.  @johnsanders9688  LIAR!!! There is NO truth to that whatsoever & never have I even heard that claim made before. I've heard the myth that all the Jews had been told not to come in which is of course utter horsesh!te, so not sure if you're getting confused with that lie or what, but what you claim is rubbish.
    1
  36. Sorry but your ridiculous conspiracy theories fail under scrutiny. This was an attack that was planned and carried out by Islamic radicals p!ssed at the west.
    1
  37.  @dontplay3088  Handy? Strange way to put it. What exactly do you mean?
    1
  38. @James Furey You believe people get paid to counter the arguments of 911 truthers, believing they're assisting the cover up of thr mass murder of thousands of innocent civilians ie. You're a kook. I'm sorry if I've spoiled your little fantasy but i don't care what you blindly believe, i just follow the evidence and call people out on their lies 🤷🏽‍♂️
    1
  39.  @lotharhamburg5343  Yes, namely all you crackpots who believe everything they read on the internet.
    1
  40.  @jamestee8852  Why would i compare Flight 93 to other crash sites when they're incompatible events? Flight 93 literally nose-dived into the ground, throttled up travelling over 500mph. And you've the audacity to tell me to wake up?? NINETY FIVE percent of that plane was recovered in Shanksville, yet here you're saying no wreckage was found 🙈 Go away you utter lunatic and try taking some time out from the internet in hope it'll help you get back in touch with the reality again.
    1
  41.  @jamestee8852  No, I just know a lot more about this topic than you. All you've done is watched a bunch of conspiracy videos and blindly believed everything they said. That epitomises sheeplike behaviour. I simply follow the evidence whereas you just handwave anything that opposes your presupposed conspiracy away without thought. Your claims are demonstrably wrong and easily refuted. No need to believe the government or mainstream media and the fact your think otherwise only serves to show how tragically poor your ability to conduct proper research is. No wonder you're part of the tinfoil hat wearing lunatic fringe.
    1
  42.  @jamestee8852  Three times now champ, NINETY FIVE PERCENT OF THE PLANE WAS RECOVERED FROM THE CRASH SITE. You are OBVIOUSLY wrong unless you believe it was all planted without anybody seeing, or that the hundreds of volunteers who scoured the area retrieving it all are all lying and complicit with your alleged conspiracy. Did somebody bury the engines and landing gear seceral meters underground too, as well as scattering the lighter, fragmented piece across an area several miles, and all the human remains around an acre sized area of thr impact site. Is that what you believe?
    1
  43.  @benwatkins6513  Except they absolutely can and did. The planes dived before crashing. What exactly do you think is going to stop them reaching those speeds in a dive? On fact only one of the plane's exceeded it's Vd limit, briefly......then crashed. Please explain where the impossibility lies here because Boeing have no issue here, neither do many pilots I know of. The only one embarrassing himself here is you Ben, by repeating lies and talking about things you literally have zero knowledge of.
    1
  44.  @benwatkins6513  Plane's melting through steel? Who told you that? Seriously, what are you taking about? The only plane that nosedived was Flight 93. Never have I said otherwise. The other 3 aircraft however did indeed dive (not nosedived, there is a difference) altiwards their targets, easily reached those speeds. I notice you failed to explain how and why this is impossible in your mind? What is stopping them? Explain yourself.
    1
  45.  @jamestee8852  Yes, you were wrong. VERY wrong. In fact, that's one of the dumbest things I've heard from a truther, and I've hear some pretty dumb sh!t from you guys over the years to say the least. It wasn't a 50 ton plane, more like double that and it was mostly the heavier parts of the plane that buried itself (as expected) and the lightweight skin mostly confettied into small pieces which we then scattered far and wide in the blast. The vast majority of that plane was recovered and hundreds of volunteers scoured the area retrieving wreckage, remains of the passengers and their personal belongings. Are you suggesting all of this was planted without anybody seeing, or that the hundreds of volunteers, first response, emergency services, the clergyman, the county coroner and all the others who helped out were all just lying? It's beyond absurd and highly disrespectful to those who died that day. Your ridiculous conspiracy theory fail's under scrutiny many times over whether you accept that or not.
    1
  46.  @jamestee8852  Why are you comparing plane crashes where the pilots would have desperately been trying to keep the aircraft in the air to one where the hijackers purposely nosedived into the ground whilst throttled up?? They are incomparable for blatantly obvious reasons, or rather obvious to most. Find me a single first responder who doesn't fully believe AA Flight 93 crashed into that field that day, just one! You can't because none exist and no matter how much you quote-mine these people, it will never make you utterly absurd and easily debunked conspiracy buIIsh!t stand. Around 90% of that plane was recovered at the scene and ignoring what I wrote really doesn't do any favours for your already shot credibility. You must be the only crackpot claiming it was a missile as opposed to a plane. People literally saw the plane flying over head moments before crashing. I suppose the ATC staff were all in on this conspiracy too as well as the hundreds of volunteers who recovered the wreckage and everyone else involved in the clean up, forensic investigation etc. etc. You're a kook who's beyond reasoning with. Ps. Small pieces of debris like 2 engines from a Boeing 757??? 🙈 Idiot.
    1
  47.  @jamestee8852  LIAR!!!! Not one of those 136 people who were direct eyewitnesses reported seeing a fighter jet. No reports whatsoever of a fighter jet at the Pentagon but jet, when you have no evidence, just invent some right? It's not like anybody of relevance takes anything you lunatics say seriously, so go for your life, blame it on King Kong for all it's worth. To think all those people (some even pilots who flew Boeing 757's!!) couldn't tell the difference between an F15 and a commercial airliner just highlights the kind of mind we're dealing with here. And where's the wreckage from an F15?? Plenty of 757 wreckage including the black box of which the data shows the details of AA77's final 11 flights, yet no F15 wreckage. And what happened to the F15 pilot? Where are his family and friends? Where did all that 757 wreckage come from? How would an F15 take out lamposts over 100ft apart on either side of the street? What about the remains of all the passengers that were retrieved in THE largest forensic investigation in history, where did they come from? Explain the first responders who took images of the charred remains of passengers still strapped into their seats that stood as evidence in a court of law during the Moussaoui trials, all without any objections from the defence? The list goes on and on. No serious individual who's aware of the available evidence could possibly deny that plane crashed into the Pentagon that day. But then truthers don't actually care about truth, ironically. For you guys it's all about the conspiracy regardless of the facts, and that's why nobody takes you seriously or ever will.
    1
  48. @@pedropedroso697 Where do you think it went? If you're struggling, watch the video here showing a smaller, lighter Phantom F4 slamming into a reinforced wall at 500mph & you'll find your answer.
    1
  49.  @timtapsell  Yes, total boIIocks. So many falsehoods claimed, it really is a terrible movie. Compelling I agree, but as soon as you fact check the claims made, it soon becomes clear how unreliable it is. The conspiracy theories have all been debunked & hold no weight whatsoever.
    1
  50.  @timtapsell  I meant looking at each claim individually & seeing whether they stand up to scrutiny, which I've done & they don't. For the record though, fact checking websites provide you with sources for you to verify yourself, so no need to take anybody else's word for anything. If there's any evidence you've seen on Zeitgeist you believe to be compelling, let me know & I'll tell what I've learned in that particular topic for you to check for yourself.
    1