Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
1
-
@Apiaman1 Mel, you clearly live on a fantasy world and have no issues lying to try and validate your pathetic, failed, kooky conspiracy theories. He lost millions which is easily verified. His payout didn't even cover the cost of the rebuild whilst losing millions in rent, whilst still having to fork out milliona for his lease contract. So Mel, please explain to everyone here how you've concluded he made money from this or admit you're just a lying whackjob.
Again, 'pull' is NOT a demolition term that refers to an explosive demolition, EVER. How dull your life must be to need such conspiracies in it irrespective of the evidence. Changed his tune?? Lol, he changed nothing. If it was as you say, why the hell would he have allowed that interview to be broadcast?? It wasn't live, he could easily have stopped the interview, made his excuses and asked to go again but no, dumb fks like you actually believe an extremely intelligent, savvy individual outed himself in such a way 🤣 Here's the reality Mel, straight from the horse's mouth:
"The biggest decision we had to make on the first day was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged WTC 7 a 47-story building heavily involved in fire. A number of fire officers and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt. I issued the orders to pull back the firefighters and define the collapse zone. It was a critical decision." - Dan Nigro
Chief of Department FDNY
I suppose you'll now claim the fire fighters tending to the strucure were all in on this alleged conspiracy too right? 🤪👈🏽 lol
How fo you explain the lack if audible explosions at the moment of collapse? You've clearly never witnessed a controlled demolition because if you had, you'd know just how deafeningly loud they are, yet no such bangs in any of the audios, nor corroborating seismic signature from seismometers located around that area. In fact, it was calculated that the smallest blast capable of failing the building's critical column would have resulted in a sound level of 130 to 140 dB at a distance of at least half a mile, so where was it? I guarantee you won't address any of the fundamental facts put to you because as we both know, there is no rational justification to explain away the above. Just do the inevitable and run away now, just like every other dumb twoofer does when faced with uncomfortable facts they can't reconcile with their feeble-minded delusions. I'd love to have a proper debate with one of you guys but you're all spineless, fact-dodging cowards which is partly why you guys will never be taken seriously. That and the fact you literally have ZERO evidence whatsoever that stands up to scrutiny to support your tinfoil hat buIIsh!t. Now run along and save yourself further humiliation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hazelkagey6739 More lunacy spouted as fact when all your claims have been thoroughly, and utterly debunked long ago, even by your own fellow truthers eg. Dr Greg Jenkins. Judy Woods is a proven liar and conmerchant and i don't care if you claim to have been wandering around ground zero in the days that followed (obviously total buIIsh!t), we know full well why the heat remained and it doesn't take a genius to work it out. It's called 'insulation'. Heat was was of the main byproducts of the collapses which I'm sure i don't need to explain. Then all the debris covered it and insulated the area, thus keeping the heat trapped. There were also basement levels which would have served to supply oxygen to these areas and create almost like a furnace type scenario. No need to invent whacky theories about space lasers and magic thermite, of which there is ZERO evidence to support which if true, would be abundant. Vehicles damaged were due to falling, flaming debris, NOT Jewish space lasers 🙈 You're clearly bot wired right Hazel if you truly believe the lunacy you're spouting. Your theory is even more crazy than Judy Woods which is the pseudoscientific theory you seem to be building upon.
Planned demolition you say? Strange how there isn't a single demolitions expert on earth who seems to agree with you, but yes, im the one claiming to be an expert right? 🙄
The fact you actually believe people are getting paid to come on to youtube to counter the insane claims of the tinfoil hat wearing members of the lunatic fringe speaks volumes about the state of your mental health. Seriously, you actually believe that happens?? 🙈 Can you imagine how morally bankrupt somebody would need to be to help cover up the mass murder of thousands of their fellow citizens? Yet not a single whistle-blower 🤔 Sounds likely lol. Get a grip Hazel, is it really that difficult to comprehend that most people simply don't believe the easily debunked madness you do?
What your point about birds hitting and damaging the nose cones of planes is i have no idea. How is that relevant? Do you think the official stance is the planes survived?? No, they were shredded on impact but that doesn't mean they didn't cause immense damage when they hit! Did you skip you high school physics classes? Your painfully poor understanding of basic physics isn't an excuse sorry. Again, not a single physicist on the planet making this argument ...... but you know best, right Hazel? 🤪👈🏽
Regarding the "explosions" in the floors below as the towers are collapsing, as everyone with a shred of knowledge of this event knows, all we're observing is air being violently expelled as floor slabs slam down on to one another. Drop a heavy book on to a dusty table and you'll see what i mean. That air has to go somewhere, how can you not understand something so simple? We observe the EXACT same thing during a verinage demolition which don't use ANY explosives. Please explain to me how both towers managed to collapse precisely at the impact zones?
Ps. You say the public aren't dumb and i agree. That doesn't however make them experts in high-rise construction, structural engineering, controlled demolition, metallurgy, aviation, aeronautical engineering and all the other fields related to this event. In terms of what the experts do think, the overwhelming consensus of experts in every related field stand firmly behind me.
Pps. Just look how yoh congratulate somebody for spreading lies which are easily verified as utter garbage. You have zere concern for truth and are only interested in finding an echo chamber, even though the guy your congratulating on his lies almost certainly thinks your theory is absolute hogwash. I don't think you quite realise how you really are the fringe of the fringe and if you're here looking for confirmation bias, good luck with that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidmusial1611 As for "no science, no logic, just say what someone else said", you mean exactly what you're doing, or did you come up with your fantasy insurance scam reasoning all by yourself? That couldn't possibly be a better example of no science, no logic, just saying what someone else said .......and looking pretty fkng stupid by doing so.
You don't seem to be aware of the scientific studies conducted that detail this event. WE are the ones with the science behind up, that's tha fundamental problem truthers have, zero science to support their lunacy. Try reading those studies, how anout that for a novel idea. You'd probably be the first truther to do so if you did. Tell me David, how would a controlled demolition bring both towers down at the precise locations the towers collapsed? Why aren't there any demolition experts who agree with you the twin towers came down via a controlled demo? 🤔 I'll await your excuses not to answer these fundamental questions. You're all way too predictable 😏
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jpmonin7429 Jesus, every 9/11 cliché going; all of which long refuted meaning, you don't know how to conduct proper research. Let me help you out a little.
Eye witness accounts of "hearing explosions in the basement", so what? Explosions/loud bangs arr common place and expected in building fires, especially in ones of this magnitude. There are many, many reasons for hearing such things, In the basement what happened was ignited jetfuel flowed down elevator and service shafts. We KNOW this happened so deny it if you like, it won't change the reality. Just ask yourself, why on earth would anybody plant explosives in the basement?? It makes zero sense. In case you hadn't noticed, both towers collapsed at the impact zones. That fact alone refutes any claims of controlled demolition hence why you can't name a single demolitions expert who believes the twin towers were demoed, but hey, if you want to delude yourself that you know better than the entire demolitions community, that's up to you. Just don't expect anybody to take anything you say seriously.
Regarding claims of molten steel, all conjecture sorry. It was assumed it was steel but in reality it was molten aluminum contaminated with a few other metals with lower melting points. There were thousands of tons of aluminium present and we KNOW temperatures were high enough to melt it. If you have any non-conjectural evidence of molten steel (eg. a chemical analysis of the molten metal found) lets hear it. If not it's a moot point.
Regarding WTC7, the studies showed they were not diesel fires so well done for not even bothering to read the actual studies, you clearly have a genuine concern for truth and take the matter very seriously 🙄 Tell me, if it was such a shock and unexpected to collapse, why were the fire fighters publicly asserting a collapse was inevitable several hours before it fell? Why did they pull everyone out and away from the building and create a collapse zone if it wasn't expected to fall? Again, the reality is they know full well that ANY non-concrete reinforced, steel-framed structure left to freeburn will inevitably collapse 100% of the time. There can be no other outcome and WTC7 was especially prone to fire due to the implementation of longspan beams to create an open atrium.
What is your issue with Flight 77 all but disintegrating after slamming into a heavily reinforced concrete structure at 500mph?? You can see footage of a plane much smaller and lighter than a 767 vapourising on impact when hitting a similar wall at the same speed. It's physics and easily verified. That said, plebty of identifiable wreckage of Flight 77 remained, including the black box.
Flight 93 nose-dived into the ground at high speed with its engines throttled up, and you expected that to remain intact?? 🙈 That's absurd. Again though 95% of that plane was recovered (including the black box) by hundreds of volunteers who scoured the area picking it uo, scattered far and wide. All in on the conspiracy along with the fire fighters yeah? Lol, get a grip.
It's also quite common for passports to survive plane crashes and the passport in question was found along with literally thousands of pieces of paper that was also ejected as the planes hit. It's due to paper having a large surface to mass ratio meaning it is far more likely to survive a blast and be ejected. You're obviously suggesting it was planted which is again, ludicrous and would be a needless risk given the guy was on the flight manifest so we know he was on board. What would be the point in planting it? It'd be pointless.
I cannot believe you're still claiming the hijackers are still alive when that was debunked and put to bed within 2 weeks of the event! lol. No serious truther uses that one any more and haven't done for 20yrs. You seriously need to start checking your sources.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidmcdonald7298 Ok stupid, clearly reality is an issue for you because neither of the twin towers looked ANYTHING like a controlles demolition which is why there isn't a demolitions expert on earth who seemingly believes otherwise. In fact Mark Loizeaux who heads up CDI Inc. (the world's leading authority on controlled demolition) has stated publicly that it would be impossible to have brought those towers down in that manner via a controlled demolition for several reasons. The fact both towers dropped at the impact zone alone PROVES they were not demoed because what you're failing to understand is that demolition devices are EXTREMELY sensitive to things like heat and geometry, yet you're here telling me that they somehow managed to survive the plane impacts and ensuing fires for 60 and 90 minutes??? Gtfo of here you clown. You blindly believe the utter lunacy spouted by other members of the tinfoil hat wearing lunatic fringe, and you have the audacity to call others sheep?? Hypocrisy, much? 🤔 For the record, all 3 buildings collapsed from fire, not the plane impacts.
Regarding builidng 7, the collapse was anything but perfect and was highly asymmetrical. It was predicted to collapse HOURS before it fell by the fire fighters who were tending it and who assessed it. It burned for 2hrs beyond what its fire-proofing was rated at and as anybody who knows anything about such things would tell you, ANY steel structure (non-concrete reinforced) WILL eventually collapse if left to burn, 100% of the time. The audio tapes and seismic signature prove it wasn't demoed. You're just another deluded, crackpot twoofer who believes everything he hears on the internet whilst refusing to acknowledge any of the fundamental problems like the ones I've just highlighted, desperately tryinfnto cling on to your beliefs because it makes you feel special, figuring out something the rest of us are apparently oblivious to. I'll just stick with the facts and side with the experts thanks 🤪👍🏼
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1