Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1.  @user-xm7sx8it9e  Yes,136 direct eyewitnesses, every one said it was a plane.
    1
  2.  @BeefTallowBoy  Silverstein had taken countless days off for meetings, appointments & holidays. He had an appointment that day, wow lol. He also doesn't have duel citizenship 😂 You are so full of sh!t lol.
    1
  3.  @jayh9529  Help lose brain cells maybe, which i have no desire to do thanks. How the hell can anybody in today's age possibly believe the earth is flat?? 🤣 It's insane! Imagine being more ignorant of the universe than people who lived thousands of years ago? 😂
    1
  4.  @mrdr1ggy  Ah ok, who needs the world's intellectual elite who create things like the large hadron collider and the like when we've got some drug addled/religious freak who calls people 'bro' and who's less informed about the world he lives in than people who lived a thousand years ago? 🤔 lol gtfo you clown. No way to detect earth's spin you say? You might want to tell Bob Knodel and Jeranism who, as I'm sure you know, spent 20k on a laser gyroscope to prove the earth wasn't spinning......except he proved it was by detecting a 15° per hour drift! 🤣 Couldn't have been a bigger own goal if he tried lol. As for no curvature detected, except for the countless images taken from space, the countless experiments we can all do which prove it; the technology we all use which relies on the earth being a globe, or the fact we can literally observe the curvature with our own fkn eyes!!! Go to the Lake Ponchartrain Causeway and tell me we can't observe the curve you benighted beIIend. Am i right in saying you reject the incontrovertible fact of evolution also? 🤔 You're a crackpot mate. A misfit loner who's failed at life in spectacular fashion. Get a grip, it's not too late to turn your life around and become a functioning member of society.
    1
  5.  @moneer7139  Yeah, screaming buIIshit 🤣 Atheists are generally pretty skeptical by nature so to believe somebody on a YouTube comment talking about premonitions and 'the gods', i doubt very much any atheist would buy that for one second. I know i certainly don't lol.
    1
  6. Yet they still tracked the money so nice try lol. They also announced it LONG before 9/11 back in 1999 and several times after.
    1
  7. Except this is just more conspiracy BS that holds little truth. Yes there was 2.3 trillion 'missing' but not missing in the way conspiracy crackpots make out and it was not declared publicly the day before as claimed; it was made public in a number of occasions dating back to 1999. It wasn't like the money was stolen, never to be seen again. It was merely the fact that they found it extremely difficult to track due to having incompatible, outmoded software systems between departments. That's it, nothing more. As far as I'm aware, the money was later tracked and accounted for. People are just too desperate to believe the US government were behind the attacks which is ludicrous. If this money was used to fund this attack, why announce it at all?? It makes no sense. But then conspiracy nuts don't really care about reality and get very defensive when the reality is explained, thus exposing the emotional investment the tinfoil hat wearing members of the lunatic fringe are on this topic.
    1
  8.  @PrivateSi  As unbelievable as space aliens?? Only if you're oblivious to the available evidence. I'm fairly clued up with the evidence myself and see no issue with the official stance, as the vast majority of experts in every related field seem to agree with. I have yet to be given any credible evidence of an inside job that stands up to scrutiny and rarely encounter a truther who's even attempted to read the official studies. That speaks for itself. Those "low skilled terror squad" held commercial pilot licences and those aircraft were very easy to fly. The only difficult parts of flying is taking off and landing, neither of which those guys had to concern themselves with. Those pilots had more than enough skill and competency to pull off what they did that day and the claims of not being able to fly a Cesna properly were taken from comments made long before they continued their training and gained the commercial licences. Truther quote this either out of ignorance or out of dishonesty to try and validate their conspiracy beliefs. It's utter garbage that more experienced pilots couldn't pull it off, that claim has been well and truly debunked. They weren't great pilots nor did they need to be. All they were were reckless and suicidal and therefore had no concern for safety. What was convenient about the passport? What purpose and benefit would it have served to plant it? Absolutely none whatsoever given the guy was on the flight manifest ie. we know full well he was in board from that fact alone. That would make planting it a pointless, needless risk. Passports often survive aircraft crashes so nothing convenient or unusual about it. The claim the hijackers are still alive was debunked, explained and put to rest 20yrs ago within 2 week of the actual event so it truly does baffle me when people still say this. I assure you, ALL hijackers from that day are well and truly dead.
    1
  9.  @PrivateSi  I've just realised my previous response hasn't posted for some reason. Try again 🙄 The reason there was little footage was due to the fact there weren't any cameras pointing at the direction of approach; why would there be? The CCTV security cameras are there to monitor people coming in and out of the building and the immediate perimeter. There would be no reason to have the pointed away and down the road. It's also very unlikely a CCTV camera would pick up much of an object travelling up to 600mph given that CCTV back then was generally set between 1 and 5fps. That said, we do have some footage from the security gate which, when paused and zoomed in, shows a still of what is quite obviously a large airliner with the American Airlines livery emblazoned across it. The same as what most eye-witnesses accounts agree on as well as the dimensions taken from the damage to surrounding structures on approach and the building itself. The manoeuvre made were nothing special regardless of what a couple of pilots claim. There are plenty who say otherwise. What Hanjour did that day was a standard manoeuvre used by pilots to lose altitude when coming into land and it's treatment to how poor a pilot he was, showing that he'd come in way too fast and too high. The Pentagon is the biggest office building on earth and crashing a plane really isn't difficult. That guy held a commercial pilot's licence don't forget and again, zero concern for safety. Google the words right blogger bastard Pentagon and take a look at the available evidence which has been collated on to that site. Take the time to look through it and I'm pretty sure you'll find it hard to dispute American Airlines Flight 77 crashed there that day.
    1
  10.  @PrivateSi  But it isn't a mystery, we know pretty much every detail of the event, hence the overwhelming consensus of agreement amongst experts in every related field. Who's arguing? I'm simply asking for sufficient, credible evidence of any conspiracy. Did you look up the website i directed to you?
    1
  11.  @PrivateSi  That's great, except all you've done so far is offer a highly irrational opinion and made several demonstrably false claims without providing a shred of credible evidence to back it up, whilst also failing to even acknowledge (let alone refute) any rebuttals made. And you're accusing me of being gullible? You're the one blindly believing everything you read on the internet whereas i not only know how to conduct proper research, but also have the vast consensus of experts stood firmly behind me. Unlike you, i can back up my arguments and easily debunk yours. Hell, you even claimed the hijackers were still alive which was totally debunked 20yrs ago! Your misplaced bravado doesn't quite cut it in the real world sorry champ. I've asked you for evidence and you've failed. You've made several claims I've debunked and you refuse to address them. I even pointed you towards a source that provides a mountain of evidence that shows AA Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon to be an incontrovertible fact and you haven't even bothered to look. These aren't the actions of somebody with a genuine desire for truth and if anybody is getting suckered into buying a bridge, it is you. One thing i am not is gullible, far from it. Unlike you, I've read the actual studies and don't run away or bury my head to facts simply because they don't support my agenda. I embrace the full body of evidence, you should try it. I don't "believe" 9 Saudi's with fake passports" pulled this attack off; i simply accept the overwhelming evidence which proves beyond all reasonable doubt that 15 Saudi nationalists (plus 2 from the UAE, 1 from Egypt and another from Lebanon) carried out the attacks. You don't even know how many hijackers there were or where they were from 🙈 Why talk so arrogantly about something you clearly know very little about? Why pretend it's a mystery when we have all the facts and evidence to back it up? If you (or anybody else) were to furnish me with sufficient, credible evidence of an 'inside job', i would happily change my opinion in a heartbeat. You can not say the same which speaks for itself.
    1
  12.  @zuckfacegobbels4527  Sounds like you are a conspiracy theorist if you believe a temporarily missing 2.3 trillion dollars had any bearing on anything here, or that 911 was an inside jurb. If the [tinfoil] hat fits 🤷🏽‍♂️
    1
  13.  @PrivateSi  Did you look at that website?
    1
  14.  @PinchMyBalls  What have they lied about?
    1
  15.  @luisgarcia-vd9ei  Sorry what, the 'firmament'??? So you're telling me you actually believe the world is flat and has a dome over it??? 🤣 You can't be serious surely? It's exploding space shuttles??? 🙈 No, we KNOW why the space shuttle Challenger blew up (Discovery blew up on re-entry due to compromised heat tiles after a piece of the foam lagging hit it on take-off) and it had nothing to do with a dome over the earth, that's insane! It exploded due to a failure of the O ring on one of the solid fuel rocket boosters. If it hit this dome you believe in, how was it some of the rocket carried on vertically after the explosion rather than bouncing off? How can anybody in today's age possibly believe such easily refuted, primitive hogwash is beyond me, you're clearly religiously indoctrinated beyond reason and incapable of thinking critically. Thousands of videos proving this fictional, physically impossible dome?? I guarantee you there isn't. Not a single one. You seriously need to raise your bar in terms of your standards of proof. Tell me, what is this dome make of and why hasn't anybody travelled to it? Why haven't you gone there, taken photos and rightly claimed your place in history for making THE biggest discovery in human history?? And no, of course i don't believe what's written in the bible as it's nothing more than the ramblings of primitive minded, highly superstitious, tent-dwelling goat herders who were completely ignorant of the natural world beyond their region. I have science so have no need to believe such superannuated literature that's been shown to be wrong on so many things from beginning to end. Are you going to tell me the universe is 6000yrs old and man didn't evolve from apes too?? 🙈 People like you blow my mind. I'm assuming you're American right? We rarely encounter your sort in my country thankfully. As for radiation, please don't pretend to know about things you're blatantly utterly ignorant of. And no, we never 'lost the tech' and it's so dishonest of you guys who make this claim. You just purposely take things out of context to force things to fit with your presupposed agenda. Thank you but intellectual suicide isn't on my agenda and i think I'm going to stick with reality 👍🏼
    1
  16.  @luisgarcia-vd9ei  Great, so you COMPLETELY ignored everything i said and asked, and you expect anybody to take anything you say seriously?? You're clearly a very dishonest and equally confused individual who was seemingly starved of oxygen at birth. First off, we do NOT take the shape of the earth or space travel on the word of the government 🤣 That's almost as ridiculous as your claims of the earth being flat. People worked out the shape of the earth thousands of years ago which makes you more ignorant than those living back then, which is truly shocking and shameful. In reality, we don't have to take ANYBODY'S word for it as we can all conduct simple experiments to easily prove it either way. We can also observe the curvature with our own eyes, look at Lake Ponchartrain Causeway for one obvious example. I was lucky enough to fly on Concorde and observed the curvature with my own eyes on that also. There are many experiments we can do, EVERY one confirming the earth is a ball. As for the earth spinning on its axis, your own brethren scored THE biggest only goal when Bob Knodel and Jeranism spent 20k on a laser gyroscope to prove the earth wasn't spinning, but instead confirmed a 15° per hour drift 🤣👍🏼 You can buty your head to that one too of you like, because all you are is an uneducated, wilfully ignorant, religous nutjob who couldn't possibly be failing harder in life. Only your sorts care so strongly about the shape of the earth, desperately denying incontrovertible evidence in a futile attempt to prop up your feeble, presupposed, faith-based beliefs. If the earth was shown to be flat, it would have no major impact on me. You guys on the other hand, if you accepted the evidence PROVING it's a spinning globe, your faith would be in tatters and your entire world would fall apart. That is the reason you insist on maintaining such a breathtaking level of wilful ignorance. You're too emotionally invested in this, you have too much to lose if you're wrong. I personally couldn't give a damn either way and simply folllow the evidence.
    1
  17. Really? How about you name ONE SINGLE demolitions expert who believes that? Guarantee you can't because there aren't any. The irony of you guys being called 'truthers' given the level of lies you all tell is mind-blowing.
    1
  18.  @lmiked84  Is that so? Show me a controlled demolition that starts 2/3rds of the way up a building. In reality, to anybody who knows anything about demolition, the twin towers looked NOTHING whatsoever likena controlled demolition. As for your 'plausible' theory in WTC7, that may sound plausible to you but to any fair-minded individual, it sounds as bat-sh!t crazy as the rest of what you crackpots believe. If it was such a shock and unexpected, please explain how the fire fighters knew several hours before that a collapse was inevitable? 🤔 I guess you must believe the fire fighters were in on this alleged conspiracy too 🙈
    1
  19.  @richardj9016  Except there are plenty more that have collapsed SOLELY from fire (without airliners laden with fuel slamming into them at 500mph, nor having thousands of tons of debris drop on to them) before and since 9/11. You morons just continue to spread lies even after being corrected. And that's why you all gather here to blow smoke up each other's backsides, because nobody in the real world takes any notice of you, and rightly so.
    1
  20.  @crangonvulgaris9820  Love how after telling you that you'd run away rather than address the evidence, you literally did exactly as predicted 🏃‍♂️💨 👋🏽😂
    1
  21.  @crangonvulgaris9820  As usual, it all sounds very compelling.......but then we look at the reality and see it isn't compelling at all. Just a typical truther smokescreen. You're talking about ae911truth who are a bogus organisation comprised mostly of crackpots and misfits, around 80% of which have ZERO knowledge, experience or understanding of controlled demolition, structural engineering or high-rise construction. Who cares what say, a software engineer or an electrical engineer thinks about such matters?? It's taken them all these years to collect less than 3500 signatures which make up less than 0.01% of their respective communities. It's a pathetic, puny attempt of an argument from authority. They have been shown to be exceptional dishonest, untrustworthy and corrupt to the core. The AIA actually took a vote as to whether their members believed there should be another investigation and 97% overwhelmingly voted against. So you see, it's YOU who believes he's more knowledgeable and has found something out that the vast consensus of experts have somehow missed, not i..... punk. You guys keep claiming demolition experts agree the twin towers were demoed yet not one of you can name a single one! Either name one or admit you're lying. No excuses, it should be a simple task but I guarantee you won't. You people don't give a damn about truth.
    1
  22.  @crangonvulgaris9820  So exactly as predicted, not one name. Ypure a liar, just like every other so-called truther I've ever encountered. And here you now are, shouting conspiracy and then asking ME for evidence! 🙈😂 You might want to try and familiarise yourself with the concept of burden of proof. Try again.
    1
  23.  @crangonvulgaris9820  Gone so soon? 🙄 🏃‍♂️💨 👋🏽😂
    1
  24.  @crangonvulgaris9820  My sentiments exactly, however you do serve as a warning to other, less broken sorts who may still be on the fence and have a genuine concern for truth, of just how mentally debilitating buying into the kind of lunacy you subscribe to. You've served your purpose, run along now, don't let the door hit your ass on the way out 👋🏽
    1
  25.  @crangonvulgaris9820  And you may be....sorry, ARE an unhinged, cowardly, tinfoil-hat wearing whackjob on an intellectual par with with mildew. So dumb you don't even understand burden of proof 🙈 Why are you even still responding when you literally have nothing to say other than superfluous nonsense in order to deflect from the fact you lack the confidence, knowledge and ability to stand by and defend your ludicrous, truly insane position. Again, keep running Mongo 👋🏽🤪
    1
  26.  @Apiaman1  Oh Mel 🙈 You really aught to check your sources because wherever you're getting your information from has to be one ridiculously unreliable source. I swear you've made most of your claims up yourself because I've never heard such nonsense before and I've been calling you kooks out on and off for quite some time. First off, who is this professor you allege Bush had struck off, have you got a name or do we have to just take your word for this? I can't find any mention of such a person anywhere so I'm sorry, without a name or source to check, i call buIIshit. Next, you say the pancake theory is buIIshit which, is true in the way that they ruled this out as the reason for collpase although, the floors DID pancake, obviously. They had to, there could be no other outcome as those floors DID pancake as the towers collapsed. You're simply confused because you've never took the time to read the studies you're clearly so desperate to dismiss. Always a sign of somebody with a genuine concern for truth 🙄 So who owns Popular Mechanics Finally you make out as though a team of demolition workers (that's what you're implying right? Correct me if I'm wrong) entered the towers every night for a week to wire them up for demolition. This is also completely untrue and once again, if you think anybody should just take your word for such ridiculous claims, you're crazy. Burden of proof is on you and before you tell everyone to do some research, i have; plenty. FAR more than you ever will in fact which is why i can say with confidence, you're full of sh!t and will literally believe anything you read on the internet without ever checking its validity. That's the problem with most truthers and one of the key factors in why nobody of worth takes anything you people say, or ever will. For the record, one of those towers would take months to wire for demolition, and then there's the bomb detection dogs that were present in the towers, of do you believe they were in on it too? And then possibly your biggest problem of explaining how the hell both towers managed to collapse at the impact zones which would be IMPOSSIBLE to do in a controlled demolition. That sole fact utterly destroys any claims of controlles demolition, there's simply no getting around that. Any devices located anywhere near those zones would have been instantly destroyed by the plane impacts and ensuing fires. Can you name ONE demolition expert who agrees with you that the twin towers were demoed. Just one will do and when you fail to do so, ask yourself why that is and then ask if you genuinely believe you have a greater knowledge of demolition than the entire demolitions community 🤔
    1
  27.  @Holymakinaw  Whoa, you cant ask a twoofer for evidence, are you mad? 🙄 lol
    1
  28.  @hobbes8737  LIAR!!!! Name ONE demolitions expert who believes the twin towers were demoed. Just one name or you've been exposed publicly as the liar you are. As for "countless architects", i think you'll find it's more like a tiny, futile, insignificant number if fringe kooks, 80% of which have no experience, knowledge or understanding of high-rise construction, structural engineering or controlled demolitions. They make up less than 0.01% of their respective communities and it gets worse when you realise it took well over a decade to gather that feeble number of signatories! 🤣 The AIA even publicly asserted they do NOT share the views of those crackpots/crooks over at ae911twoof. In reality, anybody with a shred of intellect or common sense would know it'd be all but impossible to drop those towers at the impact zones. You make such ridiculous, erroneous claims and have the audacity to say i haven't done any research?? I'm yet to meet a twoofer who's even bothered to read the studies they so desperately dismiss and you expect anybody to take you seriously? Calling you delusional doesn't come close.
    1
  29.  @Apiaman1  Cool story Mel. Now explain to everyone how ajy explosive devices located anywhere near those impact zones managed to survive the impacts and ensuing fires that raged for long after the strikes? Such devices are extremely sensitive to things like heat and geometry and would have been destroyed INSTANTLY. Yet here you are trying to tell us that you know better than the ENTIRE demolitions community? 🤔 Gtfo of here.
    1
  30.  @wildcardartsent  What does that have to do with anything? I doubt anybody trusts any government but that doesn't mean they're behind every bad thing that happens. The fact is, the conspiracy claims made about government involvement with 9/11 don't stand up to scrutiny whereas the official stance does. It's that simple.
    1
  31.  @wildcardartsent  Cool story bro. The fact is, what you believe to be suspicious isn't and you only believe that because you've been mislead by the exceptionally dishonest and ironically named 'truth community'. Give me an example of what you believe to be suspicious and let's see. If it is then I'll admit it but so far, I've not seen anything that stands up to scrutiny and hasn't already been long debunked. The problem with most truthers is, they have no real concern for truth and only care about conspiracy.
    1
  32.  @geetee2694  Agreed 👍🏼
    1
  33.  @wildcardartsent  I've read all of your replies to me and addressed them so why you say this i have no idea. As for me not reading much, far more than you it seems as you've clearly not even bothered to read the studies detailing the event. And yes, by definition you are a truther. I'm not classing you as the same kind of truther as many others (who give zero fks about truth and run away as soon as they have any conspiracy busting facts posed upon them) I've spoken with as we've not spoken long enough for that to be established. I reserve judgement on that one for now and sincerely hope you're not one of those. To address the questions you've asked me, explosions are common place and completely expected in building fires and even more so in one of this magnitude. There are many, many reasons for this such as electrical transformers going pop, oil filled generators, gas lines, diesal tanks, LNG, huge studs and bolts shearing, elevators freefalling into the ground, debris hitting the ground from a thousand foot up, entire floor slabs slamming down on to one another etc. etc. etc. There were no explosions prior to the plane impacts, that's just conjecture and isn't corroborated by anbody else, nor does the seismic data show anything of the sort. Besides, why on earth would there be bombs in the basement levels when the towers collapsed an hour to ninety minutes (depending which tower we're talking about) after the impacts and both towers collapsed at the impact zones, NOT from the bottom up? That makes no sense whatsoever and how on earth would they have evaded the bomb detection dogs present prior to the attacks? The guy you speak of who was burned and the explosions in the basement were from the ignited jet-fuel that spewed down the elevator and service shafts. All of this has been explained in rational terms using factors we know happened. This makes infinitely more sense than the alternative the conspiracy theorists propose. In respect to the allegations of insider trading, if you google the words 911myths Put Option then you will find a break down of this and see the reality for yourself. Not quite as the diehard truthers would have you believe. These people are dishonest and twist the facts to suit their agenda. Try finding a demolitions expert who believes the twin towers were demoed and then ask yourself why there aren't any. The very fact both towers collapsed at the impact zones alone utterly refutes any notion of controlled demolition.
    1
  34.  @leeohh427  Building 9?? And im sorry, at 10yrs old you have no clue whatsoever about anything remotely related to any of this and certainly no knowledge of structural engineering or controlled demolitions.
    1
  35.  @kurtwollermann2210  You're not making any sense again Kurt 🙄
    1
  36.  @fouadmas5413  You've taken his words out of context, as does every truther. He was NOT talking about a demolition, he was referring to THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS DECISION to 'pull' the operation to try and save the building as it was too heavily involved in fire and had sustained a huge amount of structural damage. The term 'pull' in demolition refers solely to a structure being rigged up with cables attached to excavators which pull the structure down. It does NOT refer to a controlled and the audios alone prove categorically that WTC7 was NOT an explosive demolition. Those things are pretty damn loud you know lol.
    1
  37.  @stonehaven2289  Sheep? Says the guy who blindly believes what he reads on notoriously unreliable conspiracy websites 😂 Truthers epitomise sheeplike behaviour whilst we choose science which is about as far removed from sheeplike behaviour as you can get. Do you guys ever say things that don't make you sound dumb as fk?
    1
  38.  @fouadmas5413  I have and i know full well what he meant and therefore, you HAVE taken it out of context. He clearly says "THEY decided to pull", meaning the fire department. Why on earth would he out himself on a pre-recorded interview and why would anybody take such orders off a property mogul?? No, it was the decision of Chief of Department Dan Nigro, and only hos decision. He has publicly confirmed this so there is no debate here. Again, the audios alone PROVE this was not an explosive demolition. I can find you the quotes from the fire fighters there that day, including Chief Nigro's statements on the matter if you like? Like i said, never in demolition circles does 'pull' refer to an explosive demolition.
    1
  39.  @jackno7danls  Eye witness accounts are the most unreliable form of evidence. We have footage, wreckage, radar tracks, the remains of passengers who were on board, there really is no question about it that those planes hit that day and anybody who disputes this is quite frankly fkn mental 🤪👈🏽
    1
  40.  @benperkins9237  Nope, impossible. There were bomb detection dogs present the whole time and the work required to rig such a building with explosives would take several months and would be blatantly obvious. There would be so much evidence in the rubble also yet there was none. The fact both towers collapsed at the impact zones alone utterly destroys all claims of controlled demolition, hence why there isn't a demolitions expert on earth claiming otherwise. But hey, if you want to pretend you know better than the entire demolitions community, so be it. Just don't expect anybody of fair mind to take anything you say seriously. Operation Northwoods was immediately rejected and never happened so try to crowbar that into this discussion all you like, it has literally no relevance whatsoever to this topic.
    1
  41.  @darenbergstrom9565  More truther rubbish. Marvin Bush was a director from 1993 until 2000so where you've got your information from i dont know but clearly an unreliable source. Security couldn't have been tighter during the build-up to the attacks and there were bomb detection dogs present the whole time. To say this was the only day Silverstein hadn't attended the towers is just nonsense. He'd had plenty of days off for meetings, appointments, sickness, holidays etc. This was merely one of them due to him having a chiropodist appointment of which his wife insisted he attend. So yes, coincidence and nothing more. Some people will ALWAYS gain financially from war and such atrocities, but that in bo way, shape or form equated to guilt in any way. Such infantile logic and rationale. Do you have any actual evidence to support your whacky beliefs, or is that it? If that's it then i suggest you raise the bar a little because your standard of proof is pretty pathetic to say the least.
    1
  42.  @silverman5707  Did it blow many 911 twoofers spurious claims completely out of the water?
    1
  43.  @silverman5707  So just another buIIsh!t truther video repeating the same old, denunked nonsense 🙄 When are you lot going to learn to conduct proper research instead of believing everything you hear on notoriously unreliable sources?
    1
  44.  @zmqazi1099  What, that started 2 thirds of the way up the building at the precise location the plane's struck?? 🤣 Ok mate lol. Find me ONE demolitions expert who agrees with you.
    1
  45.  @zmqazi1099  Nice strawman! 🤣 No steel melted, sorry to burst your bubble. No name then? You clearly know better than the ENTIRE demolitions community 🤪👍🏼
    1
  46.  @jamesjennings4206  Oh sweet Jesus 🙈 Did you serious just cite Donald Trump? 🤣 Planes get taken down by geese?? And?????? 😂😂😂 Please, please explain the relevance of that lol. The fact you don't understand how a 200 ton mass travelling around 500mph and striking with the force equivalent to 1.35 tons of TNT then this is a nonestarter. You know we cut steel with water right? Hit perfectly you say? As opposed to what? They had miles and miles of clear skies in almost perfectly flying conditions to lone themselves up, a fkng monkey could have done it, even a low IQ twoofer! 50hrs in a Cessna? 🤔 I take it you're unaware they had gained commercial pilot licences and fail to understand how stupidly simple and easy it is to steer a plane? The difficult parts of flying is the take of and landing, neither of which those guys had to concern themselves about. You say "pilots came out of the woodworks and said they themselves couldn't get a plane to descend at thay rate and they would tear apart", to which i call you a fkn liar. Name one! Neither of those planes even exceeded their VD limit!!! 🤣🤣🤣 You clowns are so full of sh!t, it's no wonder why nobody of worth takes a blind bit of notoceof anything you say. You really are blinded by stupidity and ignorance.
    1
  47.  @zmqazi1099  Keep running 🏃‍♂️ 👋🏽😂
    1
  48.  @sevenmilewhite1407  Your response has no relevance to my reply to you 🤷🏽‍♂️ Nobody else has what?? Isolation tank? What are you talking about, did you forget your medication or something? Why have you just ignored everything i said and replied with some random, irrelevant nonsense? You claim controlled demolition yet there doesn't seem to be a demolitions expert alive who agrees with you, why is that? 🤔 Maybe it's just because they didn't watch the collapse in slow motion like you 🤣🤣🤣 Genius lol
    1
  49.  @abdullah04_m  There was no explosive devices and no demolition experts said anything of the sort. You need to understand that most truther are by definition, ironically liars.
    1
  50.  @abdullah04_m  No there wasn't. Some fire fighters naturally assumed there were bombs present because they knew it was a terrorist attack and the building had been bombed previously. The reality however says different. Both towers collapsed precisely at the impact zones so why the hell would there be bombs lower down? That makes zero sense whatsoever. Try finding a single demolitions expert who believes the towers were demoed. I guarantee you won't find any. How also would bombs have gone undetected by the bomb detection dogs present? I just don't get why some people are so desperate to believe this was a government conspiracy, it's just bizarre.
    1