Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@swilsonmc2 Well to most people that isn't how it sounds at all, and again, to think this very intelligent individual would out himself like this in a pre-recorded interview is insane. Get real. Even if he did slip up, it was pre-recorded and not live and would have INSTANTLY realised and cut the interview to start again. His words make sense to most and fits perfectly with what the fire department have stated, so again, are you suggesting the fire fighters were in on this alleged conspiracy? And how has he backpedaled? Not to my knowledge he hasn't so can you clarify what you mean by that? Do you believe the fire fighters were in on this alleged conspiracy??
Quit lying about Jowenko, he made his feeling quite clear on this so why you're lying so shamelessly on this I don't know. You're either very confused or very dishonest. He detailed how any demolition devices would have burned up way before the collapse and to have brought them down from where the planes hit would have been "IMPOSSIBLE".
How on earth do demolitions teams try to bring buildings down at impact zones??? By impact zone I'm referring to the location the planes struck. Demolitions happen from the bottom up, not two thirds of the way up. The world's leading authority on demolition (Mark Louizou of CDI Inc.) publicly stated it would be "IMPOSSIBLE" to achieve this via a controlled demolition, hence why there isn't seemingly a single demolitions expert on earth who believes the twin towers were demoed. But hey, you know better right? 🙄 So that's 2 demo experts who literally used the word impossible, and not a single one claiming the towers were demoed.
You don't see much evidence for it collapsing?? Who cares what you see, you're no expert in anything related and are clearly very conspiratorial minded and therefore have no concern for truth. It looks very much like a collapse to the experts and sorry, but it's their opinions that count on such matters, not yours. The way the penthouse drops shows how the structure is COLLAPSING internally and being as you're obvious unaware, demolitions are EXTREMELY loud. Yet this was silent 🤔 No evidence whatsoever of any demolition yet we do have a scientific study that's stood up to global scrutiny explaining the how and why, as well as assertions on the day from the fire fighters that the building was "DEFINITELY" going to collapse. How desperate are you to believe this conspiracy? Bizarre.
And no, the twin towers did in no way, shape or form turn to dust, that's a ridiculous claim and one that hold zero weight whatsoever. The amount of debris removed from that site tallied up just fine. I take it you're a Judy Woods fan? THE kookiest of all the crackpot conspiracy theorists out there pushing this lunacy. She's a liar, fraud and con-merchant.
What do you mean you don't see much evidence they collapsed from office fires??? What exactly would you expect to see in your expert opinion?? We literally have footage from the choppers of entire floor slabs sagging and beams and columns buckling from the heat at the impact zones, prior to collapse!! I'd say that's pretty strong evidence for most personally. Steel weakens when heated, that's why we use fire-proofing. When the planes hit, they stripped that fire-proofing (which prior photos show was poorly applied in the first place) so it was nothing short of a miracle they remained standing as long as they did.
At 550 degrees, steel has lost HALF of its initial strength. Those temperatures are easily reached in standard office/hydrocarbon fires so, no mystery whatsoever.
As for how the top sections took the larger bottom sections out, if you bothered to actually read the studies then you'd understand perfectly. It's quite simple. The planes hit and smashed through a number of steel columns. Those columns were load bearing therefore the load was transferred to the remaining columns. Obviously there were huge fires located at the impact zones due to all the ignited fuel that spewed from the planes, and those fires weakened the remaining steel columns that were now under way more load than they were designed to withstand. Once they were sufficiently weakened, they buckled and the top sections came toppling down on to the floor immediately below. Each floor had a static load limit of which, the dynamic load of those top sections HUGELY exceeded when it came slamming down on to them. With every floor it smashed through, it picked up mass and therefore became an even greater dynamic load with every floor it picked up, hence the acceleration. Truthers tend to see the lower structure as one solid mass rather than individual floors with expanses of space between them. The towers were 95% air as opposed to being solid Jenga towers that truthers try to apply the physics to. The dynamic load exceeded the static load limits by so much, although there was measurable resistance, it was negligible.
The towers did NOT collapse at freefall so why you're saying this I don't know. We can clearly see debris falling alongside the collapsing towers which are falling at a faster rate. Where are you getting your information from?? Try reading the actual studies instead of using your own unlearned reasoning on matter you have zero understanding of.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bigbobno11 Nope, utterly false myth being propagated by lunatic truthers with no clue. Countless pilots have come forward and said otherwise, test pilots take them beyond their V-limits all the time; we have footage of such aircraft reaching such speeds at extremely low altitude fly-bys and Boeing themself have no issue with ANYTHING those planes did that day. To believe a plane just falls apart the second it creeps beyond it's V-limits only serves to show how your 20yrs of alleged study have been limited entirely to conspiracy websites amd the reason why nobody takes anything you people say seriously.
No wreckage??? 95% of Flight 93 was recovered and there was plenty of wreckage found at all crash sites. ALL plane parts most definitely came from the planes claimed so what the hell you're talking about there i do not know. Must more truther lies.
All footage that captured anything at the Pentagon was released. The purpose of CCTV cameras however are to monitor the perimeter, as in people coming in and out and protecting fire exits, windows and other potentail entry points. They do NOT install them facing away from a structure, pointing down the street. Why would they?? That isn't their purpose. They were also set at 1 frame per second and im sure even you can work out the distance coveres by an object travelling at 500mph each second. There's no way a CCTV camera set at such low fps would capture an object travelling those speeds, you're being ridiculous once again.
The "whole" in the Pentagon facade was plenty big enough (between 80 and 90ft wide if I remember rightly) but if you expected a cartoom silhouette, road runner style then you're gravely mistaken. Of course that wouldn't be the case, impossible! The wings would have naturally flowed into the structure given the forces at play but they did impact the builidng and we have images showing the damage they caused. You'd think after 20yrs studying this you'd have known this, but then this is what happens when you don't know how to conduct proper research and rely on notoriously unreliable conspiracy websites compiled by people as equally ignorant as yourself.
Back to Flighr 93, like i said, 95% of the plane was recovered including the black box, and the physical remains of those on board were recovered throughout the crash site and retrieved by HUNDREDS of volunteers who searched, often on hands and knees the entire locality. All planted though right? 🤣 Get real. You clearly have no concern for truth and are only interested in conspiracy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1