Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. Was that Mark Loizeaux by any chance? He said the same thing that day and tried to warn the authorities but unfortunately, his warnings went unheeded in all the panic etc. going on. Let's face it though, no amount of evidence can ever change the stagnant, polluted mind of a truther 🤷🏽‍♂️
    1
  2. So you're saying Rumsfeld knew this was going to happen and actually allowed it to happen?
    1
  3. Typical twoofer buIIshit. That myth has been utterly refuted a long time ago and the engine part you're talking about has been PROVEN to have come from a 757 engine. The hole was (if i remember rightly) over 75ft across, NOT 16ft. You're confusing the impact hole with the exit hole (which begs the question, how would a tomahawk missile create an exit hole??? 🤣) which was 14ft in diameter, not 16ft. A Tomahawk missile is 21ft in length with a wingspan of around 9ft. Please tell me how a missile of these dimensions could possibly take out lampposts either side of a street and cause damage to surrounding structures much firther apart than 9ft? Please tell me how ALL 136 direct eye-witnesses ALL confirm they saw a large plane, including pilots who confirmed it to be a 757? Are you telling me experienced pilots who fly 757's couldn't tell the difference between a 21ft missile with a 9ft wingspan and a 155ft 757 with a 125ft wingspan?? 😂 You're insane.
    1
  4.  @francescoallevato6507  And this relates to 9/11 how?
    1
  5.  @mindsigh4  haha oh god, please stop before you start the crazies off again 🙈 lol
    1
  6.  @carproauto4379  He's a sell-out?? Or maybe he's just better informed than you and sees the lunacy of the nonsense you subscribe to 🤔
    1
  7.  @GhostSal  Why not ask me yourself? No i don't think Joe was "talked to", don't be so fkn paranoid lol. As for me believing everything I'm told, please don't tar me with the brush as you, who blindly believes he sees on the internet. Unlike you, i have the power of critical thought and know how to conduct proper research. I don't need to believe the goverment because the evidence is available to all. The fact is, your ridiculous conspiracy theories fail under scrutiny.
    1
  8.  WorcestershireSauce  Sheer lunacy, what are talking about? 🙈
    1
  9. It's called insulation you dense fool. Thermite?? 🤣 Sorry kook but those desperate, unfounded claims have ZERO evidence to back them up and have been utterly refuted. The plumes of smoke and explosions observed that you speak of, as everyone with a brain knows is just the result of air being violently expelled as entire floor slabs are slamming down on to one another. Drop a heavy book on a dusty table and you'll see the effect. Where exactly do you think the air is going to go when those towers began pancaking internally?? Nobody can be this dumb 🙈 For the record, we observe the EXACT same thing during a verinage demolition of which don't use any explosives. Watch a verinage demolition and see for yourself. Also, thermite is NOT an explosive and is extremely unreliable and inefficient means of cutting steel in demolition. Can you explain to me how such devices managed to survive the plane impacts and ensuing fires given how sensitive to heat they'd be? You are aware both towers collapsed precisely at the impact zones right?
    1
  10.  @FrenchFryKayak  He is most definitely a scientist, what are you talking about? lol
    1
  11.  @markasmith194  Ok first off, search 'Phantom F4 sled test' here in youtube and watch what happens to a smaller, lighter aircraft with less mass slams into a wall at 500mph and then come back and tell me you seriously expected ANY wing debris to survive or that we should have been able to piece the plane back together 🤣🤣🤣 The fact we have so much debris was due only to the size of a 757. Secondly, a cruise missile is 22ft long with a wingspan of 9ft. A Boeing 757 is 155ft long with a wingspan of 125ft. So what you're saying is, 136 direct eye-witnesses (some of whom were pilots who flew those model aircraft), on their morning commute to work, couldn't tell the difference between those 2 things? You're insane lol. Next, please explain how a 9ft wide missile takes out lamppost on either side of a street, slice tops off trees, hit an electrical generator and clipped a wall without detonating, before detonating on impact and then again after it had entered the building to create an exit hole? Please explain where all the 757 debris came from (including the black box), the personal belongings of the passengers as well as their physical remains? Were the ATC staff all in on this alleged conspiracy too? There's many more hugely fundamental flaws in your logic but i think I've made my point. Now let's see how much you genuinely seek truth......
    1
  12.  @cmdrw9855  Literally EVERY claim you make is utterly false. There was damage from the engines, there was debris from the engines recovered, there was NOT "150 cameras that saw it", there were only 85 in the entire vicinity and this WAS the only one that captured it. There are WAY more than 2 frames in the video and we can even pause the footage, zoom right in and see what is quite blatantly a large aircraft with the American Airlines livery emblazoned across it. There are NO "anti air turrets' on the lawn or anywhere else. Seriously, where the hell are you getting your information from??? You are literally THE worst truther I've ever encountered 🤣
    1
  13.  @jdinkaledgemorgoon2085  As for WTC7 collapsing demo style, i take it you've never actually witnessed a controlled demolition before, this much is clear. Checknout some videos and make sure you have the volume on. I'll ask you what i ask every other truther which no doubt you will fail to answer, just as every other truther fails to answer; if it was such a shock that WTC7 collapsed, how do you explain the fire fighters who were tending to and assessing the structure, publicly asserting it would definitely collapse several hours before coming down? 🤔 Do you believe they were in on it too?
    1
  14.  @marklewen4401  Oh good god, we have numerology nut in our midst 🙈 The earth's flat too hey buddy? 🤪👈🏽
    1
  15.  @lancemilliken9078  No, air traffic control told us it was a plane, 136 direct eye-witnesses mostly sat in traffic on their morning commute say it was a plane; ALL debris says it was a plane as does the remains of everyone on board recovered from the crash site in what was THE biggest forensic investigation in human history; the dimensions of the damage to the building and surround structures hut on approach say it was a plane, as does the footage from the security gate; You get the picture 🤨
    1
  16.  @crangonvulgaris9820  Oh here he is, the champion of truthers who runs away from the facts like every honest individual with a genuine concern for truth naturally would 🙄 Check out aeronautical data regarding commercial jet flight speeds?? Quit parroting your plagiarised buIIshit and ask yourself why Boeing themselves have no issue with what any of those planes did that day? Forget the fact also that many, many people literally witnessed them doing it and all the recovered wreckage and remains of those on board etc. 😂 In reality, those planes can EASILY reach those speeds at such altitude in a dive. Contrary to dullards such as yourself, planes don't instantly break up the second they exceed their v-speed limits. In fact those limits are simply the limits set by Boeing as to what they are willing to guarantee the structural integrity of the aircraft. Test pilots take them beyond those limits to create a safety margin. That plane only reached those speeds after a dive and reached them momentarily before crashing. Had the aircraft continued in such a trajectory for a sustained period of time at that speed, maybe the plane would have eventually have suffered some structural damage. In case you hadn't realised though, Hani Hanjour didn't really have safety in mind and was somewhat suicidal 🤨 "PLANES WITH A HOLOGRAPHIC OVERLAY"???? "EMF remote force generators"??? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Jesus christ, now i know why you don't want to go toe to toe with me on this lol. Just keep running. Ps. The 'cartoon wing impact damage' we saw on the twin towers is exactly as any sane individual with a shred of common sense would expect. Did you not think a 200 ton mass travelling around 500mph would strike with enough force to cut through aluminium sheets? 🙈 Where's your squirty flower you clown? 🤣
    1
  17.  @cmdrw9855  Again, literally EVERYTHING you say is false and/or has been utterly debunked and the fact you believe such garbage speaks volumes about your ability to conduct proper research, or rather inability. I'm not repeating myself again, what's the point? Burden of proof lies with you. Show me for instance the evidence you take it that their is ANY kind of ballistic air defence situated on the lawns of the Pentagon. Sorry for standing up for truth and calling conspiracy crackpots out on their inane, easily refuted lunacy 🤷🏽‍♂️ Maybe if you actually cared about truth, you'd take your research a little more seriously. Ps. I'd love to hear how you reconcile all the facts I've stated regarding Flight 77 with a missile strike lol.
    1
  18. Why would the Soviets lie to help the US? Many people pointed directional antennae towards the moon and picked up the live transmissions of the astronauts up there. We went there is 1969, there is no question about it, the equipment is still up there and has been imaged independently. We've also been bouncing lasers off the lunar ranging equipment set up there on that first mission. Many also witnessed the trans-lunar injection. To think they faked that is insane.
    1
  19. What, you mean straight down theoughthe path of least resistance as a collapse of this nature would HAVE to do given the physical laws that govern our world? It would have been IMPOSSIBLE for a controlled demolition to have brought those towers down in the way we saw, literally impossible, hence why no demolition experts believe they were demoed. But hey, you guys know best 😉👍🏼
    1
  20.  @jaymeese7714  They had very good reason to believe Saddam had WMD's. He was known for it and had even used them in his own people. We did also find his plans for nuclear armament so we got him just in the nick of time if you ask me. If this was all just a government ploy to invade Iraq, why blame 911 on Saudi's?
    1
  21.  @tedmusson5179  The only naive ones are those who blindly believes the lunacy spread by the notoriously unreliable conspiracy websites you use for 'research'. Learn how to conduct proper research and you'll likely have a change of heart when you realise just how insanely ludicrous your current beliefs truly are. The vast, overwhelming majority of experts in every related field have no issue with the official stance, which speaks for itself. Watching highly suspect conspiracy videos isn't research sorry.
    1
  22.  @stanhunt8543  It's simply down to youtube algorithms picking up on certain words. Nothing suspicious about it whatsoever, there are no government spooks reviewing youtube comments and people from all sides have comments deleted/hidden which alone punches a big hole in any claims of biased censorship. Israel had NOTHING whatsoever to do with 9/11 and if you're going to spread such malicious lies, you'd better have some pretty strong evidence to back it up.
    1
  23.  @stanhunt8543  Lol oh go, do tell us why. Is it because youtube are part of the Illuminate and they pay people to immediately delete any evidence that exposes their involvement with 911? 🤔🤣🤣 You're a crackpot mate. Already explained why some messages dont publish but no, you have to turn it into another conspiracy 🙈 Must suck being so paranoid. If you had a shred of intellect then you'd have worked out ways to avoid the algorithm picking up the things they don't like, but no, you just stick to your paranoid delusions that the men in black are watching your every move and deleting your youtube comments 🤪👈🏽 Ps. Don't worry about sending links just TELL me what evidence you have and I'll check it out for myself. As a wise man once said though, 'extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence'. Make it good.
    1
  24.  @BeefTallowBoy  I'm British but would rather have a tiny hat than your tiny mind any day of the week, you deranged window-licker 👉🏽🤪 I take personal attacks as a sign of defeat as you clearly aren't able to counter anything I've said. Bitter little loser 👋🏽😂
    1
  25. Yes, because no matter how compelling the conspiracy theories may appear on the outset, the reality shows something very different. Your precious conspiracy theories simply don't stand up to scrutiny sorry, which is why the overwhelming consensus of experts have no issue with the official stance. But you guys know best, who needs to go to college when we've got youtube right? 🤪👍🏼
    1
  26. 🤣🤣🤣 Are you serious???
    1
  27. Mini nukes???? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 What a kook lol
    1
  28. How would you expect to see a plane hitting the Pentagon??? If you were there, you'd have seen it just like everyone there did, confirming it was a 757.
    1
  29.  Snakejüce  You mean unless they're of sound mind and capable of conducting proper research, as opposed to being a tinfoil hat wearing member of the lunatic fringe who blindly believes everything he reads on the internet. When you say everyone knows it was an inside job, you exclude the overwhelming consensus of experts in every related field who i assure you, very much reject the lunacy of your ridiculous conspiracy theories. Instead of believing what you hear on the internet, try reading the actual studies you're all so desperate to dismiss. When you can refute them with sufficient, credible evidence or show specifically how they're wrong, maybe people of worth will think about taking you guys seriously.
    1
  30.  @downsouth5971  Take 50.....
    1
  31.  @downsouth5971  🙋🏽‍♂️
    1
  32.  @onebodyinyahuahlosangeles1206  There's always some religious crackpot who uses any opportunity to preach their primitive hogwash. It's because of religion we have sh!t like this happening!! When will people learn? 🙈
    1
  33.  @jayh9529  One of THE worst channels on Youtube, are you mad? 😂
    1
  34.  @432b86ed  Aw, do you have an imaginary friend too? 🥺
    1
  35.  @jayh9529  So you're a flat earther? 🙈 Sweet Jebus lol
    1
  36.  @432b86ed  All? 🤔 Are you referring to the voices in your head? Weirdo 🤪👈🏽 No, we don't all have imaginary friends by any stretch of the imagination. I grew out of mine many years ago, and your primitive death-cult is swiftly dying out and will soon by cast alongside the thousands of other failed religion. Seriously, get a grip and get some help.
    1
  37.  @jayh9529  Did my response not publish?? Try again....🙄 The word theory has a very different definition in theory than the standard definition of the term, and in science something can be theory AND fact at the same time. You are aware of that aren't you? Just like 'level' doesn't equate to flat. If you want proof, go and check out Lake Ponchartrain Causeway and you'll CLEARLY see the sea following the curvature of the earth. How you people make it through each day without causing serious harm to yourself and others baffles me. There is no global conspiracy involving the entire scientific theory, spanning many generations, trying to trick us about the shape of the earth to try and take us away from Jesus 🤣
    1
  38.  @jayh9529  How does address a single thing i said??? Hebrew cosmology indeed 🤣 Primitive woo, nothing more. Now address what i wrote you fact-dodging fool.
    1
  39.  @jayh9529  Are you drunk?? Can you just address what i wrote and stop deflecting! For the record, the Gleesom map is NOT evidence of a flat earth you utterly delusional clown.
    1
  40.  @ibtissempharm8800  Saddam Hussein pursued the most extensive chemical program during the Iran–Iraq War, when he waged chemical warfare against his foe. He also used chemicals in 1988 in the Al-Anfal Campaign against his civilian Kurdish population and during a popular uprising in the south in 1991. Are you seriously denying these well documented facts? You sound like his number one fan. And if the war was all about invading Iraq for oil, how come less oil was exported from the region since the war and why blame 9/11 on Saudi's?
    1
  41.  @karebushmarebu233  I'm talking about the conspiracy theories most around here believe in that they think the US government were behind the attacks, ot Bin Laden. I know full well Bush had a boner for Saddam but never did they claim Bin Laden was in Iraq. They misled the public by claiming they had something to do with the planning which of course was bogus. They never allowed Bin Laden to escape & actively hunted him from the outset. Bush used the attacks as an excuse to invade Iraq, but it wasn't about oil. If that were the case then why was less oil exported from the region than prior to the attack? I know it's naturally the obvious conclusion to jump to buy it's just not true.
    1
  42.  @BeefTallowBoy  Oh wow, a Jew hater on the internet, how unusual lol. I take it you can't manage a rational argument or refute a single thing I've said right? So straight to the anti-Semitism because that makes lots of sense in terms of this subject 🤪👍🏽 lol
    1
  43.  @BeefTallowBoy  Yes, because me being M0ssad would make so much sense 🤣You deranged m0ron 👉🏽🤪
    1
  44.  @hornox4life  So how would it be any different if it happened as it is claimed by official sources? All you have is a highly subjective, baseless interpretation of a reaction to an incomparable event. I see no issue whatsoever personally, as do the majority or fair minded individuals. You are seeing what you want to fit with your conspiracy agenda. Unfortunately for you, your conspiracy beliefs don't purport to reality whereas the official story does regardless of whether you accept it or not.
    1
  45. Not quite true but then hey, you're a 911 twoofer so why let reality get in the way of a good conspiracy right? 🙄
    1
  46.  @chiefreficul9774  Are you a shameless liar or do you actually believe what just wrote? You do realise collecting any available CCTV footage that could potentially capture something of interest at a crime scene is standard practice and there's NOTHING whatsoever unusual about that? The footage was handed in rather than seized as you drama queens like to insinuate. They did not say they would release all 85 videos, that's an outright lie. ALL footage that remotely showed anything was released and the security gatehouse footage was WAY more than a few frames lol. What you've done is watched an edited version on a conspiracy website/video and just blindly believed that to be the only footage. It isn't so please stop misleading people and spreading lies.
    1
  47.  @julieyoung3315  That means nothing. What are you suggesting exactly?
    1
  48.  @tek3311  Succeeded?? I'd hardly say everybody dying was succeeding personally. The terrorists intentionally brought the plane down rather than failing, the CVR proves this, unless you believe the CVR data to be fake which is ludicrous. Can you answer the questions i asked you previously as i have addressed all of your claims? What did Edward Felt say that brings the official story into question and what evidence do you take it on that the operator taking the call would suddenly decide to conjur uo such a lie?? Your version makes little sense. Nothing you've claimed shows evidence of a missile strike, nothing. Like i said, they openly admit they initially believed the plane was brought down via a missile strike so clearly, they had no problem with doing that. What benefit is there to lying??
    1
  49.  @tek3311  What do you mean it doesn't add up?? Of course it does. The last recording on the CVR qas 10:03. Again, what smoke amd explosions? If the plane was taken down by a missile, there would be no reports of smoke or missiles, the plane would have had a huge hole ripped through it and would have broken up midair, which we know it didn't. Claiming the government admitted the 'let's roll' remark was a lie is a total fabrication, cite your source because I'd love to know where you're getting this information from. I can only assume a notoriously unreliable conspiracy website. Of course it wasn't on the CVR, do you know what the CVR is?? How would a comment made in the fuselage be recorded on the cockpit voice recorder? Your argument makes no sense. The transcript is quite clear and the hijackers knew they had no chance against the revolt because they were outnumbered, so they made the decision to ditch the plane. They mpst certainly did breach the cockpit door by repeatedly smashing the heavy food trolley into it. No i dont speak Arabic an don't need to. Millions of people do and could easily translate it word for word. We're not talking ancient Hebrew here, this is momern dialect EASILY translated by any Arabic speaking individual. Oh p!ss off the coroner lied 🤣 You really are plucking this right out of your backside. Wallace Miller was a highly respected county coroner who you are accusing of helping cover up mass murder, that's disgusting. Show me ANY evidence of body parts found further afield. You won't because there isn't any. Only small, light pieces of the aircraft was found in the lake and the myths that form the basis of your ridiculous beliefs have been long debunked.
    1
  50.  @tek3311  No, I'm saying they believe they didn't breach the door but they admit they don't know for sure so who knows. I don't mind admitting i believed they did but never did that much research into that particular claim because i don't think it bears any relevance to what happened. After now looking a bit more into it, om happy to accept that maybe they didn't. Unlike truthers, I'm mot immune to becoming better inforned and will happily change my opinion in light of evidence i may not have known of. Again though, irrelevant to the discussion as to whether 93 was shot down or not. EVERYTHING else i said however still stands. So now after being pushed for evidence to back up your claims, you've backtracked. I'd have had more respect if you'd just have admitted you were wrong rather than pretending you were 'just trolling' because that i do not believe for a second sorry.
    1