Comments by "Dirk Diggler" (@dirkdiggler8260) on "JRE Clips" channel.

@tek3311 Yeah because nobody knew that hey? 🙄 Talk about stating tbe obvious. They do not however lie anywhere near as much as truthers and regardless, the US government were not behind the 911 attacks 🤷🏽‍♂️
1
@tek3311 Just noticed another comment i didn't see yesterday beginning with "Believe what you will". In answer to that, i don't believe you. If you are just a troll, that makes you a bigger w@nker than i initially perceived. And if you do actually believe what you're saying, that isn't trolling 🙄 Again, it is not relevant for reasons I've already stated ie. there was a revolt and the hijackers dirched the plane rather than risking them being killed by the passengers and them landing the plane safely. IF this was all just a goverment ploy to trick the public, why the fk would they say they don't believe they did breach the cockpit??? That literally makes zero sense whatsoever! 🤣 They've been quite clear and honest by saying they do not know for sure and it remains a mystery, one we'll never know the answer to. You're clearly a very paranoid individual, probably believing the 'illuminate' are spraying us with chemtrails and lying about the shape of the earth because lets face it, conspiracy crackpots never, ever just buy into the one conspiracy; you likely believe them all 🤪👈🏽
1
@tek3311 What absolute nonsense 🤣 EVERY SINGLE truther is a liar by definition. Considering you're not one, you're certainly very much a truther apologetic, which i find utterly bizarre. But then again, who knows what to believe when it comes out of your mouth.
1
@leonkennedy8850 Are you seriously comparing a plane hitting a hollow steel-framed structure to one hitting a heavily reinforced, kevlar lined, concrete wall of the Pentagon?? 🙈 Jesus christ, what kind of morons am i dealing with here? There was plenty of wreckage, all from a 757 including the black box. The physical remains of all onboard retrieved at the crash site in what was THE biggest forensic investigation in history. 136 direct eye-witnesses ALL confirming a plane, not a single report from anyone if anything other than a plane. First responder accounts of the scorched remains of passengers still strapped into their seats, images of which stood as evidence in a court of law during the Moussaoui trial. Damage to surrounding structures perfectly lining up with the wingspan and engine separation of a 757. The list goes on. What the hell do you think crashed there if not a plane?? You're clearly not aware of the volume of available evidence otherwise you'd realise how erroneous your argument is. As for explosives in the twin towers, would they be those magic explosives that are somehow immune to aircraft impacts and can withstand fire for between 60 and 90 minutes? 🤔 Seriously, get the fk out of here 🤣 You must believe you know more about demolition that the ENTIRE demolitions community given how there isn't seemingly single demo expert who agrees with you. Typical, delusional truther who hides from any opposing evidence.
1
@andyscoming4919 Thank you Andy, sadly they will. I guess it's just easier to watch and believe conspiracy videos than do proper research 🤷🏽‍♂️
1
You clearly know nothing. They had no idea they would be attacked hy internal flights and always posited such an attack would come from international flights. They got caught with their pants down, end of. Your silly conspiracy kookery simply doesn't stand uo to scrutiny sorry Brad.
1
@bradd188 So your argument is one of incredulity, and that's why nobody takes you clowns seriously. Regardless of your unsurpassed intuitive reasoning, they most definitely did NOT foresee such an attack coming from an internal flight. I don't care if you believe that or not, facts remain facts irrespective of your unlearned, baseless opinion. As for why the towers collapsed, the fact you're unaware exposes your lazy, inept research skills. Try reading the actual, unrefuted studies you're so desperate to dismiss and you might actual learn something and save yourself further embarrassment. Can you name ONE single demolitions expert who agrees with you that the twin towers were demoed? Or do you believe you know better than the ENTIRE demolitions community? Please explain how a controlled demolition would bring both towers down precisely at the impact zones because the world's leading authority on demolition say that would have been, and i quote, "impossible". In reality, the collapses looked NOTHING like controlled demolitions as controlled demolitions go from the bottom up. And yes, they were designed to withstand plane strikes, but what you fail to recognise is the strikes they were designed to withstand were the scenario of a smaller, lighter aircraft (a 707) getting lost in fog as it was coming into land and therefore travelling around 150mph, with all its fuel spent. They were NOT designed to withstand stand strikes from larger aircraft travelling 3 times that speed, fully laden with fuel. Those are incomparable circumstances and vastly different forces at play. For the record, both towers withstood the strikes exceptionally well in case you hadn't noticed. They collapsed long after due to the fires. Please stop talking about things you are clearly so utterly ignorant of and spreading demonstrably false lies.
1